EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 686
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On December 05 2013 16:00 xDaunt wrote: "Appalled" usually connotes and element of shock or surprise. I definitely was neither shocked nor appalled by your post. It was very typical of the baser elements on the left. I was merely expressing continued disappointment. It's enjoyable to retrospectively watch vanilla news media establishment types be provocative. The enjoyment is doubled when you know the shit storm that followed (pun intended). If you watch the actual segment you might find it quite tame. He clearly didn't mean it literally, and it's something that I can imagine a lot of people might say. Did he know what he was doing when he did it? Was it planned or improvised? | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
![[image loading]](http://media1.s-nbcnews.com/j/streams/2013/November/131108/8C9637008-Good_Tidings_and_Great_Joy_cover.blocks_desktop_vertical_tease.jpg) | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
Ugh, republicans kept sniping at the law so much. It's really quite irritating and stupid. It'd be better if they'd work on agreeable solutions; but I know everyone (on all sides) likes to blather when they're on camera in hearings. I wonder, how do we select for people who are good at doing their job instead of pandering to the camera. | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On December 05 2013 16:12 oneofthem wrote: conservatives are rather off base about their own self assessment, given all the shit they been doing and thinking lately I would think the doing shit part is a separate stage from the self assessment part. Your post is all kinds of confusing. Are you talking about self assessing or mixed goals? | ||
|
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
On December 05 2013 15:22 xDaunt wrote: What, do you guys really want to have a battle of the retards from both sides of the aisle? What does it say about a person who voted for a VP candidate he thinks is retarded knowing full well the old man could die anytime and this retarded person could become president? That sounds like a pretty retarded move to me. | ||
|
Roe
Canada6002 Posts
On December 05 2013 15:22 xDaunt wrote: What, do you guys really want to have a battle of the retards from both sides of the aisle? you call sarah palin a retard...sounds like you're the one who's lost his common decency. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On December 06 2013 00:24 Roe wrote: you call sarah palin a retard...sounds like you're the one who's lost his common decency. Really, now. We're going to equate calling someone a retard to advocating that someone should take a shit in someone else's mouth? That sounds pretty retarded to me. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On December 05 2013 21:57 heliusx wrote: What does it say about a person who voted for a VP candidate he thinks is retarded knowing full well the old man could die anytime and this retarded person could become president? That sounds like a pretty retarded move to me. Because I'd rather have a President Palin than a President Obama? | ||
|
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
On December 06 2013 02:36 xDaunt wrote: Because I'd rather have a President Palin than a President Obama? You would prefer someone you regard as retarded over Obama. And you see nothing wrong with that? You're a prime example of what's wrong with politics in America. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On December 06 2013 02:41 heliusx wrote: You would prefer someone you regard as retarded over Obama. And you see nothing wrong with that? You're a prime example of what's wrong with politics in America. It begs the question of what I actually think of Obama.... | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
what do you think of obama? | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On December 06 2013 02:46 PassiveAce wrote: il bite. :D what do you think of obama? I'm on record stating that I'd rather have a plywood board be president than Obama. | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
what do you think of obama? :D im looking more for the answer to what and why. fyi im not gonna jump on you over your answer, I think your the most reasonable voice of the right wing of american politics on this website and id really like to know what you dont like about him if your willing to take teh time to write it all out. | ||
|
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
On December 06 2013 02:50 PassiveAce wrote: nice doj what do you think of obama? :D im looking more for the answer to what and why. Clearly something horrific if he prefers a president with mental retardation. Much more likely though is he would prefer a GOP president over anything no matter who is actually better, as long as his guy wins. There's also the possibility of the whole black man becoming president stuff. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On December 06 2013 02:50 PassiveAce wrote: nice doj what do you think of obama? :D im looking more for the answer to what and why. fyi im not gonna jump on you over your answer, I think your the most reasonable voice of the right wing of american politics on this website and id really like to know what you dont like about him if your willing to take teh time to write it all out. I appreciate that, but I don't have the time to do it justice presently. Whatever I'd write right now would be somewhat half-assed and derail the thread so badly that it might break. | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18133 Posts
Do you believe Obama to be more corrupted than the norm in US politics? In other words, is it purely ideological? Or do you have something against the man himself? | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On December 06 2013 02:59 Acrofales wrote: Do you at the very least believe that Obama is an intelligent man? He's definitely intelligent enough to do the job, but I think his intelligence is overstated. Do you believe Obama to be more corrupted than the norm in US politics? Yes, I do. Without going into any specific scandals, the mere fact that he came out of the Chicago political machine says all that you need to know on this subject. In other words, is it purely ideological? Or do you have something against the man himself? It's mostly ideological, though I strongly question Obama's judgment. | ||
|
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
On December 06 2013 02:59 PassiveAce wrote: @heliusx I really dont get why xdaunt is so maligned here. I dont agree with him 90% of the time but hes articulate and always keeps a reasonable tone. I really just want to pry an answer out of him on this topic because I really don't get partisanship from either side. I definitely categorize TLs conservative posters wrong sometimes, it's hard to remember not all conservatives are like the ones I talk to in the south. | ||
| ||
