|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On November 22 2016 04:28 Mohdoo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2016 04:23 ticklishmusic wrote: president is exempt from a lot of conflict of interest rules for public servants, though i would say a president should typically try and avoid impropriety/ the appearance thereof
i'm thinking the trump administration will be more scandal-ridden than a clinton one, lol. I expect a lot of "Well that's blatantly fucked up. Yet not illegal. -_-" He's a billionaire. I'm sure he is already adept at that game.
|
On November 22 2016 04:31 LegalLord wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2016 04:28 Mohdoo wrote:On November 22 2016 04:23 ticklishmusic wrote: president is exempt from a lot of conflict of interest rules for public servants, though i would say a president should typically try and avoid impropriety/ the appearance thereof
i'm thinking the trump administration will be more scandal-ridden than a clinton one, lol. I expect a lot of "Well that's blatantly fucked up. Yet not illegal. -_-" He's a billionaire. I'm sure he is already adept at that game. Just get a committee to put him under oath while talking about.... well anything really, he'd likely perjure himself pretty quickly.
|
On November 22 2016 04:23 ticklishmusic wrote: president is exempt from a lot of conflict of interest rules for public servants, though i would say a president should typically try and avoid impropriety/ the appearance thereof
i'm thinking the trump administration will be more scandal-ridden than a clinton one, lol. Was that ever a question????
I think Trump is going to end up impeached; it doesn't look like he even has a notion of what is ok and what is batshit nuts. The sad thing is that the guy next in line is probably even worse than him in the sense that contrarily to Trump, he is crazy enough to believe the shit he says.
|
Howard Dean is calling Steve Bannon a nazi.
Since President-elect Donald Trump announced that his former campaign CEO and Breitbart head Steve Bannon would be his chief strategist in the White House, Democrats, liberals and even some conservatives have expressed outrage over the selection.
Much of the criticism has been due to Bannon’s ties to the alt-right movement and his own comments that have been construed as anti-Semitic. In that vein, former DNC chairman Howard Dean spoke to a Texas news station about Bannon.
While speaking about Trump, Dean — who is running to be named chair of the DNC again — straight up called Bannon a “Nazi.”
“He appoints a reasonable person, who’s much more conservative than I am, but for somebody who can talk to, as chief of staff, and then his senior adviser is a Nazi,” Dean stated, bringing up Reince Priebus’s selection as Trump’s Chief of Staff.
KAUZ-TV: Newschannel 6 Now | Wichita Falls, TX
Calling Breitbart a “far-right, anti-Semitic publication,” Dean justified calling Bannon a Nazi by stating that “he’s anti-Semitic, he’s anti-black and he’s anti-women.”
When pressed by the reporter over using the “big word,” Dean repeated his criticism of Bannon.
“It’s a big word, and I don’t usually use it unless somebody’s really anti-Semitic, really misogynist and really anti-black,” Dean said.
This isn’t the first time Dean has said something controversial as it relates to Trump. During the campaign, he tweeted that Trump showed the signs of being a “coke user” and then defended those remarks during a TV interview. He would later issue a half-hearted apology.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/howard-dean-calls-steve-bannon-a-nazi/
|
On November 22 2016 04:28 Mohdoo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2016 04:23 ticklishmusic wrote: president is exempt from a lot of conflict of interest rules for public servants, though i would say a president should typically try and avoid impropriety/ the appearance thereof
i'm thinking the trump administration will be more scandal-ridden than a clinton one, lol. I expect a lot of "Well that's blatantly fucked up. Yet not illegal. -_-"
That sounds super familiar. Well, as long as it's legal, then it's just noise right?
|
In a way, it’s a shame that President-elect Donald Trump’s resort here is located in Doral, rather than Miami Beach. If his property were closer to the water, we might be able to say: Welcome to our world, Mr. Trump.
Mr. Trump said during the campaign that climate change is a hoax. But no amount of denial can shield those of us who live and work here, or visitors, from the visible impact of rising seas. Flooded streets are not a hoax. Just ask the folks in Miami Beach, who have to navigate underwater neighborhoods with increasing frequency.
But don’t feel too smug if your home or business (or golf course) is located safely on the mainland. The rising water is coming your way — to Doral and to every other part of Florida close to the ocean. Even in a post-truth world, as some have called the new era of make-believe “information,” only the most obtuse would deny that the long-feared effects of climate change have arrived in our peninsular paradise.
This is our today, our everyday reality, our future. The question is whether we fight it — and how — or whether we ignore it. For most of us, denial is not an option. Local governments are on board. How could they not be? At the state level, Gov. Rick Scott seems like a lost cause. He won’t even let state agencies employ the phrase “climate change.”
But the federal government is the most important force in shaping environmental policy and climate change strategy. That’s where broad national standards are created, where national policy is set and where policies can have the most widespread and lasting impact. It’s where the nation sets an example for the rest of the planet. And, yes, it’s where the money is.
As a candidate, Mr. Trump could afford a wink-and-nod approach to climate change. As president, he has to become a pragmatic realist. In the real world, actual facts matter. Like the fact that October 2016 was the second warmest October on record, according to data released Tuesday by NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, falling just behind October 2015 by 0.18 degrees Celsius. Like the fact that 2016 is likely to be the third consecutive record-warm year in a row for the globe, topping 2015 and 2014, which currently occupy the No. 1 and 2 spots, respectively.
And while that data was being released, world leaders meeting in Morocco doubled down on plans to implement the groundbreaking Paris Agreement that at long last committed the United States, China and other countries around the world to an action plan to fight climate change.
If Mr. Trump withdraws from it, as he has promised during his campaign, it won’t kill the agreement, but it will make the United States an outlier among the world’s leading countries. Even presidents can’t turn back the rising tide. But, acting in concert with the rest of the world, they can halt its ascent and find a long-term strategy to avoid its worst effects before it’s too late.
So come on down to our beaches, Mr. Trump — preferably during a full moon, at king tide. It might awaken you to the scary truth. You would see how beaches narrow, if not altogether vanish, when the tide comes in. How streets that used to stay safely dry are now chronically in danger of flooding. How the ocean is creeping in.
You might just discover that climate change isn’t a hoax, after all. In the process, you might go from climate change denier to climate change realist. From ignoring the peril to our planet to helping heal the planet.
Source
|
On November 22 2016 06:19 Biff The Understudy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2016 04:23 ticklishmusic wrote: president is exempt from a lot of conflict of interest rules for public servants, though i would say a president should typically try and avoid impropriety/ the appearance thereof
i'm thinking the trump administration will be more scandal-ridden than a clinton one, lol. Was that ever a question???? I think Trump is going to end up impeached; it doesn't look like he even has a notion of what is ok and what is batshit nuts. The sad thing is that the guy next in line is probably even worse than him in the sense that contrarily to Trump, he is crazy enough to believe the shit he says.
There's a 0% chance that a Republican Congress impeaches Trump unless he does something so terrible that there are riots in the streets.
Republicans are too cowardly and are too much of the "team player" type. They would see impeaching a Republican president as a huge blow to them politically and would never do it.
|
On November 22 2016 06:20 Nevuk wrote:Howard Dean is calling Steve Bannon a nazi. Show nested quote +Since President-elect Donald Trump announced that his former campaign CEO and Breitbart head Steve Bannon would be his chief strategist in the White House, Democrats, liberals and even some conservatives have expressed outrage over the selection.
Much of the criticism has been due to Bannon’s ties to the alt-right movement and his own comments that have been construed as anti-Semitic. In that vein, former DNC chairman Howard Dean spoke to a Texas news station about Bannon.
While speaking about Trump, Dean — who is running to be named chair of the DNC again — straight up called Bannon a “Nazi.”
“He appoints a reasonable person, who’s much more conservative than I am, but for somebody who can talk to, as chief of staff, and then his senior adviser is a Nazi,” Dean stated, bringing up Reince Priebus’s selection as Trump’s Chief of Staff.
KAUZ-TV: Newschannel 6 Now | Wichita Falls, TX
Calling Breitbart a “far-right, anti-Semitic publication,” Dean justified calling Bannon a Nazi by stating that “he’s anti-Semitic, he’s anti-black and he’s anti-women.”
When pressed by the reporter over using the “big word,” Dean repeated his criticism of Bannon.
“It’s a big word, and I don’t usually use it unless somebody’s really anti-Semitic, really misogynist and really anti-black,” Dean said.
This isn’t the first time Dean has said something controversial as it relates to Trump. During the campaign, he tweeted that Trump showed the signs of being a “coke user” and then defended those remarks during a TV interview. He would later issue a half-hearted apology.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/howard-dean-calls-steve-bannon-a-nazi/ Well, calling people nazis is always a bit dumb but Bannon and the alt-right really earned it. In fact it look like they kind of agree themselves :
But now his tone changed as he began to tell the audience of more than 200 people, mostly young men, what they had been waiting to hear. He railed against Jews and, with a smile, quoted Nazi propaganda in the original German. America, he said, belonged to white people, whom he called the “children of the sun,” a race of conquerors and creators who had been marginalized but now, in the era of President-elect Donald J. Trump, were “awakening to their own identity.”
As he finished, several audience members had their arms outstretched in a Nazi salute. When Mr. Spencer, or perhaps another person standing near him at the front of the room — it was not clear who — shouted, “Heil the people! Heil victory,” the room shouted it back. source
Reeling from that, I walked into the area where people were eating dinner just in time to see around 20 men – some wearing Make America Great Again hats – leap from their seats and give the Nazi salute to a speaker.
One of the men wearing a hat, called Mack, walked past and me and I asked what the salute was about.
“The whole thing is we have jokes that offend the outside and we laugh,” he said.
“It’s hilarious.”
While Mack and I were talking, MacDonald, the former professor, was giving his speech on America and Jewish consciousness. He’d started off his speech by saying: “Tonight I want to talk about Jews,” which had got a big laugh from the crowd.
I asked Mack, 30, if he believed in the Holocaust. A couple of people I’d spoken to earlier had expressed doubts.
“I’m not sure, I don’t know what to believe,” he said. “If it did happen, that’s a terrible thing. I don’t agree with genocide.
“But I mean, if it happened it’s a very practical, I mean an uber-practical, kind of thing to say: ‘If it is people among a people who, let’s say, are destroying Germany because of x, y, z, then let’s root them all out and destroy them as people completely.’
“That’s pretty practical. But it doesn’t mean that it’s a moral thing. It’s not admirable. I don’t think it’s a good thing.” source
Those people seem brighter and brighter every time I read about them. Gonna be loooong four years, and I wish good luck to America and its people. You guys are gonna need it.
|
I am not saying climate change is a total hoax but Europe never had summer all year and our spring and autumn were dsmn cold. So I really dont believe media telling me that we had a warm October. Harvest has been horrible this year.
|
On November 22 2016 06:25 Stratos_speAr wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2016 06:19 Biff The Understudy wrote:On November 22 2016 04:23 ticklishmusic wrote: president is exempt from a lot of conflict of interest rules for public servants, though i would say a president should typically try and avoid impropriety/ the appearance thereof
i'm thinking the trump administration will be more scandal-ridden than a clinton one, lol. Was that ever a question???? I think Trump is going to end up impeached; it doesn't look like he even has a notion of what is ok and what is batshit nuts. The sad thing is that the guy next in line is probably even worse than him in the sense that contrarily to Trump, he is crazy enough to believe the shit he says. There's a 0% chance that a Republican Congress impeaches Trump unless he does something so terrible that there are riots in the streets. Republicans are too cowardly and are too much of the "team player" type. They would see impeaching a Republican president as a huge blow to them politically and would never do it.
Well to be fair, no president has actually been fully impeached, Andrew Johnson got closer than anyone, but still not quite official.
Betting market/legal scholars seems to think Trump won't make it.
Bookmaker Ladbrokes has cut the odds on Donald Trump leaving office early due to impeachment or resignation amid mounting controversy about how he will manage his business interests after becoming America’s 45th President.
Ladbrokes opened the market at 3-1, cutting it to 5-2, and again to 9-4 in the wake of a flurry of bets on the back of a growing consensus among law professors that the controversial Republican is heading for trouble.
Source
So I'd guess that means 8 more years of Trump .
|
On November 22 2016 06:34 sharkie wrote: I am not saying climate change is a total hoax but Europe never had summer all year and our spring and autumn were dsmn cold. So I really dont believe media telling me that we had a warm October. Harvest has been horrible this year.
1. Scientists measure and report temperature, not media.
2. "We" = the world, not Austria.
|
On November 22 2016 06:34 sharkie wrote: I am not saying climate change is a total hoax but Europe never had summer all year and our spring and autumn were dsmn cold. So I really dont believe media telling me that we had a warm October. Harvest has been horrible this year.
You're conflating climate change with local weather. It doesn't matter if it gets colder somewhere some part of the world for a month. Climate change is about the trend around the world.
|
On November 22 2016 06:34 sharkie wrote: I am not saying climate change is a total hoax but Europe never had summer all year and our spring and autumn were dsmn cold. So I really dont believe media telling me that we had a warm October. Harvest has been horrible this year. Several problems here :
1- You can't judge the effect of a global phenomenon in one place during one month. That makes 0 sense. Saying that global warming doesn't exist because you had bad weather in Austria this october is just a gross misunderstanding of what global warming is about.
2- 2016 is going to be the warmest year ever recorded. And before that 2015 held that title and before that 2014. That's not theory, that's not interpretation, that's data. We are talking about just looking at the thermometer.
3- There is no such thing as "the media". Saying you distrust "the media" means absolutely nothing. "The media" is the ensemble of all radio channels, TV channels, newspapers and even blog all around the globe. Among those are good, mediocre, bad and horrendous source of information. You are totally right not to trust Fox News, Breitbart, the Pravda or New Age alternative bloggers. Good papers, such as the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Guardian, the Economist and so on are excellent sources of informations and probably the most reliable you will get. They provide analysis that are opinion based (like every analysis) but they get their facts right.
|
On November 22 2016 06:34 sharkie wrote: I am not saying climate change is a total hoax but Europe never had summer all year and our spring and autumn were dsmn cold. So I really dont believe media telling me that we had a warm October. Harvest has been horrible this year.
As silly as it sounds, a net increase in the total thermal energy of our atmosphere can actually mean less thermal energy in certain areas at certain times, just by changing the dynamics between pockets and currents of energy transfer.
|
|
On November 22 2016 06:25 Stratos_speAr wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2016 06:19 Biff The Understudy wrote:On November 22 2016 04:23 ticklishmusic wrote: president is exempt from a lot of conflict of interest rules for public servants, though i would say a president should typically try and avoid impropriety/ the appearance thereof
i'm thinking the trump administration will be more scandal-ridden than a clinton one, lol. Was that ever a question???? I think Trump is going to end up impeached; it doesn't look like he even has a notion of what is ok and what is batshit nuts. The sad thing is that the guy next in line is probably even worse than him in the sense that contrarily to Trump, he is crazy enough to believe the shit he says. There's a 0% chance that a Republican Congress impeaches Trump unless he does something so terrible that there are riots in the streets. Republicans are too cowardly and are too much of the "team player" type. They would see impeaching a Republican president as a huge blow to them politically and would never do it.
I don't think conservatives have a lot of love for Bannon's economy plans... I could see a few scenarios where friction occurs. Still seems unlikely though, you're right
|
On November 22 2016 06:55 Biff The Understudy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2016 06:34 sharkie wrote: I am not saying climate change is a total hoax but Europe never had summer all year and our spring and autumn were dsmn cold. So I really dont believe media telling me that we had a warm October. Harvest has been horrible this year. Several problems here : 1- You can't judge the effect of a global phenomenon in one place during one month. That makes 0 sense. Saying that global warming doesn't exist because you had bad weather in Austria this october is just a gross misunderstanding of what global warming is about. 2- 2016 is going to be the warmest year ever recorded. And before that 2015 held that title and before that 2014. That's not theory, that's not interpretation, that's data. We are talking about just looking at the thermometer. 3- There is no such thing as "the media". Saying you distrust "the media" means absolutely nothing. "The media" is the ensemble of all radio channels, TV channels, newspapers and even blog all around the globe. Among those are good, mediocre, bad and horrendous source of information. You are totally right not to trust Fox News, Breitbart, the Pravda or New Age alternative bloggers. Good papers, such as the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Guardian, the Economist and so on are excellent sources of informations and probably the most reliable you will get. They provide analysis that are opinion based (like every analysis) but they get their facts right.
TLDR
Anecdotal evidence is not evidence.
|
On November 22 2016 06:34 sharkie wrote: I am not saying climate change is a total hoax but Europe never had summer all year and our spring and autumn were dsmn cold. So I really dont believe media telling me that we had a warm October. Harvest has been horrible this year. As a useful rule of the thumb, whenever you've spent all of 10 seconds pondering a subject and you think you've discovered something obvious that was missed by the thousands of people that dedicate their lives to studying said subject, googling it is an easy way of dispelling the significance of that observation.
|
On November 22 2016 07:18 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2016 06:34 sharkie wrote: I am not saying climate change is a total hoax but Europe never had summer all year and our spring and autumn were dsmn cold. So I really dont believe media telling me that we had a warm October. Harvest has been horrible this year. As a useful rule of the thumb, whenever you've spent all of 10 seconds pondering a subject and you think you've discovered something obvious that was missed by the thousands of people that dedicate their lives to studying said subject, googling it is an easy way of dispelling the significance of that observation.
Or you can bring a snowball into a government building.
|
On November 22 2016 06:34 sharkie wrote: I am not saying climate change is a total hoax but Europe never had summer all year and our spring and autumn were dsmn cold. So I really dont believe media telling me that we had a warm October. Harvest has been horrible this year. If we're going by certain climate change models Europe will actually be colder. Anyways, it's a global phenomenon, not centralized purely in middle Europe. And blaming the media is nice, but when those statistics come from NASA, maybe rethink it.
|
|
|
|