EPThttp://fivethirtyeight.com/features/live-election-night-video/
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6006
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/live-election-night-video/ | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: ROFL LOL | ||
|
acker
United States2958 Posts
That said, I doubt anything like Karl Rove's walk to the analysis room will happen this year. | ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: ROFL https://twitter.com/FBCSO/status/796151174202347520 I can't say I'm the least bit surprised. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
| ||
|
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:01 LegalLord wrote: Speaking of heart attacks, how is the stock market reacting to these initial results? It was up before market closed. | ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:02 Aquanim wrote: I have a hypothetical question: If Clinton wins the presidency, the Republicans keep control of the Senate, and they actually stonewall Supreme Court nominations for the next two years, will the Republicans get punished in the midterms? With DWS gone, maybe. Whether or not Brazile is equally incompetent remains to be seen | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:02 Aquanim wrote: I have a hypothetical question: If Clinton wins the presidency, the Republicans keep control of the Senate, and they actually stonewall Supreme Court nominations for the next two years, will the Republicans get punished in the midterms? Not only punished but also in 2020 as well. | ||
|
acker
United States2958 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:02 Aquanim wrote: I have a hypothetical question: If Clinton wins the presidency, the Republicans keep control of the Senate, and they actually stonewall Supreme Court nominations for the next two years, will the Republicans get punished in the midterms? I doubt it. The party that controls the Presidency generally loses the midterms. If Americans didn't care about the debt ceiling "negotiations", they're not going to care about a few justices. Republicans are set up to have control of the legislative and executive branches come 2020. | ||
|
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:02 Aquanim wrote: I have a hypothetical question: If Clinton wins the presidency, the Republicans keep control of the Senate, and they actually stonewall Supreme Court nominations for the next two years, will the Republicans get punished in the midterms? Unlikely. Democrats don't vote enough in the midterms and we as a country somehow just forgot about the SCOTUS somewhere between emails and pussy-grabbing. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Howie_Dewitt
United States1416 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:01 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: ROFL https://twitter.com/FBCSO/status/796151174202347520 INCREDIBLE I love this country also, Dowjones closed like 100 pts up today, whatever that means | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4329 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:01 LegalLord wrote: Speaking of heart attacks, how is the stock market reacting to these initial results? Watch the gold price and USD/PESO Gold down 10 in the past hour, good for Clinton. | ||
|
Clonester
Germany2808 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:02 Aquanim wrote: I have a hypothetical question: If Clinton wins the presidency, the Republicans keep control of the Senate, and they actually stonewall Supreme Court nominations for the next two years, will the Republicans get punished in the midterms? Depends on HRCs 2 years. As she is blocked by the reps, she will look like a lame duck and will have a hard time to turn this on the Reps. Obama couldnt do this 6 years long and he has much more personal appealing to the people. Maybe the Reps stop any supreme court nominations for years. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:03 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: https://twitter.com/AmericanAtheist/status/796156159187177473 Of all the twitter feeds in the world reporting on who won what, you picked this one. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Introvert
United States4748 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:03 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Not only punished but also in 2020 as well. Like in 2014? I don't think posters here realize how unwilling people are to hand the entirety of the federal government to Democrats. They might be pushing their luck, but I wouldn't be so certain. | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
(also, 538 video is up. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/live-election-night-video/) | ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On November 09 2016 10:02 Aquanim wrote: I have a hypothetical question: If Clinton wins the presidency, the Republicans keep control of the Senate, and they actually stonewall Supreme Court nominations for the next two years, will the Republicans get punished in the midterms? Will they stonewall the Supreme Court nominations? Depends on who Obama or Clinton nominates I suppose. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
| ||
