| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On November 09 2016 09:41 DickMcFanny wrote: What the shit, I just learned that Californians and New Yorksters get less valuable votes? The fuck? I mean, the electoral college numbers were made from Representatives + Senators. Reps are population proportional, Senators are guaranteed 2/state. This guarantees votes in more populous states will be worth proportionally less. | ||
|
ggrrg
Bulgaria2716 Posts
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=span-abc-region®ion=span-abc-region&WT.nav=span-abc-regio Why is NH already tinted in a color considering that according to the tracker only 61 votes are in? Why is W.Va. deep red despite it saying 0% reporting and a total of 0 votes counted? How come that for Florida it says "4% reporting" with about 4mio votes counted? This would result in about 100 mio votes in Florida, which is obviously not possible. I assumed the "votes" column means locked/counted votes, am I wrong? | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On November 09 2016 09:41 DickMcFanny wrote: What the shit, I just learned that Californians and New Yorksters get less valuable votes? The fuck? u should call hamilton and complain | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4329 Posts
On November 09 2016 09:43 ggrrg wrote: I am having some trouble understanding this: http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=span-abc-region®ion=span-abc-region&WT.nav=span-abc-regio Why is NH already tinted in a color considering that according to the tracker only 61 votes are in? Why is W.Va. deep red despite it saying 0% reporting and a total of 0 votes counted? Same happened with Vermont.Because W.V. and Vermont are so goddamn safe. | ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On November 09 2016 09:43 ggrrg wrote: I am having some trouble understanding this: http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=span-abc-region®ion=span-abc-region&WT.nav=span-abc-regio Why is NH already tinted in a color considering that according to the tracker only 61 votes are in? Why is W.Va. deep red despite it saying 0% reporting and a total of 0 votes counted? How come that for Florida it says "4% reporting" with about 4mio votes counted? This would result in about 100 mio votes in Florida, which is obviously not possible. I assumed the "votes" column means locked/counted votes, am I wrong? West Virginia was called based on exit polls. | ||
|
SoSexy
Italy3725 Posts
On November 09 2016 09:43 ggrrg wrote: I am having some trouble understanding this: http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=span-abc-region®ion=span-abc-region&WT.nav=span-abc-regio Why is NH already tinted in a color considering that according to the tracker only 61 votes are in? Why is W.Va. deep red despite it saying 0% reporting and a total of 0 votes counted? How come that for Florida it says "4% reporting" with about 4mio votes counted? This would result in about 100 mio votes in Florida, which is obviously not possible. I assumed the "votes" column means locked/counted votes, am I wrong? Watching the same thing and Florida is 11% reported to me | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
On November 09 2016 09:43 ggrrg wrote: I am having some trouble understanding this: http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=span-abc-region®ion=span-abc-region&WT.nav=span-abc-regio Why is NH already tinted in a color considering that according to the tracker only 61 votes are in? Why is W.Va. deep red despite it saying 0% reporting and a total of 0 votes counted? How come that for Florida it says "4% reporting" with about 4mio votes counted? This would result in about 100 mio votes in Florida, which is obviously not possible. I assumed the "votes" column means locked/counted votes, am I wrong? Beats me bro. They're reporting shit as fast as possible to make sure people use their site. I wouldn't put it above anyone to fuck up. | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
On November 09 2016 09:42 Howie_Dewitt wrote: plansix, does shaella ever visit this thread? I am having flashbacks. http://imgur.com/a/DK33M roflllll User was warned for this post | ||
|
DickMcFanny
Ireland1076 Posts
On November 09 2016 09:42 TheTenthDoc wrote: I mean, the electoral college numbers were made from Representatives + Senators. Reps are population proportional, Senators are guaranteed 2/state. This guarantees votes in more populous states will be worth proportionally less. What shit is that? Why don't they just count the popular votes, add them up state by state and make whoever has more people voting for them the POTUS? That's insane. | ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
| ||
|
Nebuchad
Switzerland12172 Posts
On November 09 2016 09:43 ggrrg wrote: I am having some trouble understanding this: http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=span-abc-region®ion=span-abc-region&WT.nav=span-abc-regio Why is NH already tinted in a color considering that according to the tracker only 61 votes are in? Why is W.Va. deep red despite it saying 0% reporting and a total of 0 votes counted? How come that for Florida it says "4% reporting" with about 4mio votes counted? This would result in about 100 mio votes in Florida, which is obviously not possible. I assumed the "votes" column means locked/counted votes, am I wrong? Colors are tinted based on who's in the lead no matter how few votes. West Virginia had enough votes for Trump that they could call it immediately. To be honest they could have called it 6 months ago. | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4329 Posts
On November 09 2016 09:45 SoSexy wrote: Watching the same thing and Florida is 11% reported to me Confirmed. 11% reporting Trump up by 80,000 or so. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On November 09 2016 09:42 Howie_Dewitt wrote: plansix, does shaella ever visit this thread? I am having flashbacks. http://imgur.com/a/DK33M Even if he(they? what pronoun do cacti prefer) did he's riding out a 30 day ban atm | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
nafta
Bulgaria18893 Posts
On November 09 2016 09:46 Plansix wrote: I am going to enjoy the collective confusion of our non-American viewers. Its fine folks, we have been doing this since September 17, 1787. Not confusing just straight up retarded tbh. | ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9858 Posts
| ||
|
plasmidghost
Belgium16168 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV European League
PiGosaur Monday
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|
|
EPT
