EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 5467
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On October 10 2016 12:48 TheTenthDoc wrote: You're confusing polls with clickers. Yougov and CNN flash polls aren't clickers. okay I see what you are saying but they are still polls I get what you are saying though still don't care, though. like I said, I will wait and see. I hardly think this thread is infested by people skewing things for trump. maybe it's because this site is mostly men | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On October 10 2016 12:55 Plansix wrote: This will be the topic tomorrow. Have no doubt. | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On October 10 2016 12:56 GGTeMpLaR wrote: Oh I'm not skeptical about everything, but there are good reasons for being skeptical about the idea that these are truly undecided voters just because they clicked a few questions on a pew poll and got a positive response, which was likely the metric for deciding they were undecided Undecided voters don't enthusiastically cheer when one candidate burns another I'm willing to bet the majority of that audience knew who they were voting for before tonight I can't believe I'm saying this but I agree with Templar here. Not that there's anything more that could have been done about it, and it's better than nothing at all. | ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On October 10 2016 12:49 Plansix wrote: They are picked by Pew Research. But this is the internet and we can be skeptical about everything, not matter how well documented. They were picked by Gallup, who has fucked up pretty hard in the last election (they had Romney winning in '12) | ||
|
Logo
United States7542 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On October 10 2016 12:57 Aquanim wrote: One could equally create a robot to complain about the moderators whenever they make any interjection. Do not throw stones when you live in a glass house. I say we hire some Mexicans. I'm starting to see this as a job Americans are unwilling to do. Right. Anytime they make any interjection. I think you're trying to eclipse the Trump campaign in hyperbolic speech. Is this some side-bet I wasn't aware of? | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
Trump literally uttered the words that Clinton "would be in jail" as a result, which is a better representation of what Eichenwald said than the tweet you have quoted. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
That isn't what he said. He said he would order the AG to assign a special prosecutor to the Clinton case. The AG is supposed to make that decision independent of the President, based on the facts of the case. He said he is going to put her on trial regardless of the merits of the case and against the previous decisions of the people who invested her in the first place. And he also said she would end up in prison. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On October 10 2016 13:01 Aquanim wrote: Trump literally uttered the words that Clinton "would be in jail" as a result, which is a better representation of what Eichenwald said than the tweet you have quoted. | ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On October 10 2016 13:01 Danglars wrote: I say we hire some Mexicans. I'm starting to see this as a job Americans are unwilling to do. Right. Anytime they make any interjection. I think you're trying to eclipse the Trump campaign in hyperbolic speech. Is this some side-bet I wasn't aware of? So I take it you would not care to address the argument that complaining about the moderators in this thread is at least as ubiquitous as complaining about those complaints. | ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
That isn't' the job of the president. It isn't part of the job to decide who should be taken to trial. That is the AGs or FBIs job. Trump isn't even a lawyer, he shouldn't be never be making that call. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On October 10 2016 12:48 GGTeMpLaR wrote: Let's be real, with all the cheering going on from the audience, are you even the slightest bit skeptical about them being 'undecided voters'? Clinton and particularly Trump are hoping the decided voters are persuadable the other way for the good of the country. But when presented with such terrible choices, I don't know if undecided is even the right term for it. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On October 10 2016 13:04 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Romney strategist https://twitter.com/stuartpstevens/status/785316266017980416 It is going to be the only thing people talk about after the debate. And Trumps people are already saying he was joking. A you do not threaten to jail your opponent and then walk it back saying you will give them a fair trial first. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On October 10 2016 13:04 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Romney strategist https://twitter.com/stuartpstevens/status/785316266017980416 Yea because that's what he did When you run out of ideas you spin lies politics 101 | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On October 10 2016 13:06 Plansix wrote: It is going to be the only thing people talk about after the debate. And Trumps people are already saying he was joking. A you do not threaten to jail your opponent and then walk it back saying you will give them a fair trial first. Yes the guy who despises Trump is clearly a 'Trump people' It's already that time to spin bullshit lies and discredit anyone who disagrees with you as a 'trump person' isn't it | ||
|
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
On October 10 2016 12:58 travis wrote: okay I see what you are saying but they are still polls I get what you are saying though still don't care, though. like I said, I will wait and see. I hardly think this thread is infested by people skewing things for trump. maybe it's because this site is mostly men They aren't polls that matter in any way, shape, or form. All they are is who can make a bot to vote or who has more rabid no life followers who will actually spend their time spam voting in something completely meaningless. They're the exclusive reason things get named boaty mcboatface, why pitbull played a show in a walmart in Alaska, and the winner for a poll to name a Mountain Dew flavor was "Hitler did nothing wrong". They literally couldn't possibly matter less. | ||
|
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
| ||
