|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On September 27 2016 11:28 acker wrote: "China should go into North Korea." (Trump) (Obviously)
I can't believe this isn't the most controversial statement from this debate, but it's not even in the top five. I didn't notice that one; it's hard to keep track of every dumb thing trump says.
|
On September 27 2016 11:28 Monochromatic wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2016 11:28 BigFan wrote:On September 27 2016 11:27 KwarK wrote: She is smashing him so hard. He lost control completely. question is, will the public see that? He's talking the same way he's always been doing so far. Unless everyone is watching the NFL, they should be able to see that he lost this debate handily.
The best part is not only has he lost but there is so much more she can hit him with next time to compound the loss even further. He not only lost but has lost so badly she can spend all next debate hitting him with him stupidity from this one.
|
On September 27 2016 11:29 OuchyDathurts wrote: Why on earth do we need more bombers? Bombers are dinosaurs man. God he's clueless on everything I guess he's recalling back to when he was a child and before ICBMs existed.
|
On September 27 2016 11:28 BigFan wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2016 11:27 KwarK wrote: She is smashing him so hard. He lost control completely. question is, will the public see that? He's talking the same way he's always been doing so far.
Having watched the Republican debates this is a world of difference
|
On September 27 2016 11:27 On_Slaught wrote: There is zero percent chance Trump knows what the moderator means by Obama's first use policy.
He responded well but it just doesn't sound like he knows what the First Use Policy is.
|
South Korea and Japan would literally riot over China invading NK. Especially South Korea, China's been laying the groundwork to annex parts of NK for years.
|
On September 27 2016 11:24 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2016 11:23 Blisse wrote: Hillary's fact checking website is so shit
Like learn to make a fucking presentable website you dumb shits, it's literally the fate of the next 4 years in the USA and it's an incoherent mess It's not that bad, but it could easily be much better.
Was this intentional?
|
I really wish Clinton would mention the whole "Japan only has a self-defense force" it would really validate the learning I did from my anime
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On September 27 2016 11:27 On_Slaught wrote: There is zero percent chance Trump knows what the moderator means by Obama's first use policy. Not a lot of people do.
|
On September 27 2016 11:29 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2016 11:28 acker wrote: "China should go into North Korea." (Trump) (Obviously)
I can't believe this isn't the most controversial statement from this debate, but it's not even in the top five. I didn't notice that one; it's hard to keep track of every dumb thing trump says.
I don't think that is a stupid quote. North Korea is pure evil, and China is the only one supporting them. China should absolutely do more to stop the DPRK.
Also worst deal every negotiated? Iran deal or NAFTA?
|
Trump is getting truly mauled. Wow.
|
I really dislike Hillary Clinton and think she is full of it, but she is actually coming out better on NATO and our Pacific allies. Trump is coming across as a non-interventionist lunatic who doesn't understand how foreign policy works. Very disappointed in Trump.
|
|
On September 27 2016 11:29 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2016 11:27 Adreme wrote:On September 27 2016 11:26 The_Templar wrote:On September 27 2016 11:25 zlefin wrote:On September 27 2016 11:24 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: How the fuck did this guy get nominated for candidate republicans pls he's highly polarizing; people either love him or hate him. It was a field of 17 candidates; so a bland medium candidate that everyone could accept had no chance, since people could only vote for 1 person, they'd vote for the person they liked most. The real question is how is he close in the polls? She went down. He didnt really go up. It reminds me of that Obama slide after the 1st debate with Romney. Nobody really decided to vote for Romney it just gave them pause about voting for Obama but they were never going to vote for Romney so he just had to win them back which she is kinda doing right now. Clinton has the same poll % as she did one year ago. Trump has gone up very slightly. Both of them have gone up and down very rapidly during that time.
2 months ago after the conventions when people watched both of them speak she was up 10 points. Then 2 months of nothing happened and people only watched headlines and they became less sure but that support is still there for her and that will likely be the final numbers for the election.
|
On September 27 2016 11:30 acker wrote: South Korea and Japan would literally riot over China invading NK. Especially South Korea, China's been laying the groundwork to annex parts of NK for years. how so? for the most part china doens't want NK. that place is a mess. frankly, I think everyone would be happy with china invading NK, cuz it means we don't have to deal with NK.
|
Canada8988 Posts
On September 27 2016 11:29 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2016 11:28 acker wrote: "China should go into North Korea." (Trump) (Obviously)
I can't believe this isn't the most controversial statement from this debate, but it's not even in the top five. I didn't notice that one; it's hard to keep track of every dumb thing trump says.
I wanted to give him credit and meant "go" as in influence them, pressure them, not invade them.
|
Ok so Hillary slaughtered Trump tonight. How long until she pisses it away?
|
TLADT24920 Posts
To everyone who commented on my public question, I think you are vastly overestimating people lol. Even if he is more flustered, his rhetoric is still the same so I don't think this will bring him down that much tbh.
|
On September 27 2016 11:31 Monochromatic wrote: I don't think that is a stupid quote. North Korea is pure evil, and China is the only one supporting them. China should absolutely do more to stop the DPRK.
Also worst deal every negotiated? Iran deal or NAFTA? There's a difference between diplomacy and invasion. One leads to Seoul shelled before the Kims go, and the other doesn't.
|
On September 27 2016 11:31 Netscape9 wrote: I really dislike Hillary Clinton and think she is full of it, but she is actually coming out better on NATO and our Pacific allies. Trump is coming across as a non-interventionist lunatic who doesn't understand how foreign policy works. Very disappointed in Trump. that's because he's a lunatic who does'nt udnerstand foreign policy works; which he's been demonstrating for many many months now.
|
|
|
|