I don't know why you link her lack of press conferences as a suspicious for her health, She still goes out and talks in public, she just hasn't done press conferences for whatever reason.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4793
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
I don't know why you link her lack of press conferences as a suspicious for her health, She still goes out and talks in public, she just hasn't done press conferences for whatever reason. | ||
IvanTheTerrible
5 Posts
It is especially relevant given that Huma Abedin said that Hillary has trouble concentrating and remembering issues so will she be able to do the job effectively? Hillary's handlers like Abedin and possibly even people like Kissinger might have more to do with government policy then she will. That then raises the question regarding who are these people and are they good? BTW her personal doctor says she's fine I don't trust that when she has a handler following her around with anti seizure meds and needs help just to walk up a staircase.. Its as believable as Trumps 'doctor' saying Trump is the healthiest man ever to run for president.. | ||
IvanTheTerrible
5 Posts
| ||
![]()
KwarK
United States41984 Posts
On August 22 2016 12:17 Slaughter wrote: To be fair didn't Trump have some physician basically put out some stupidly worded thing about his health? I don't know why you link her lack of press conferences as a suspicious for her health, She still goes out and talks in public, she just hasn't done press conferences for whatever reason. A bunch of psychiatrists tried to diagnose Trump and it got to the point that the APA had to send out a memo basically saying to shut the fuck up unless you've actually treated him. https://www.psychiatry.org/news-room/apa-blogs/apa-blog/2016/08/the-goldwater-rule | ||
hunts
United States2113 Posts
It appears donald trump is unfit to lead due to mental illness. Given how useful leaked emails and random non doctor celebrity's testimonies were in determining hilary is sick, I think this evidence is enough to force trump to drop out, right guys? | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On August 22 2016 12:16 LegalLord wrote: Trying to speculate about what "mental illness" someone has is almost always a stupid game of mudslinging anyways. Like I said, it's the same shit that happened before when people were armchair-psychoanalyzing Trump. It was stupid then, and it's stupid now. | ||
oBlade
United States5294 Posts
On August 22 2016 08:04 puerk wrote: Saying that: "I just think the country that brought East and West Germany together can do better." is still totally wrong.. So I see you disagree with Kastrup. On August 22 2016 08:04 puerk wrote: but you apparently can never concede, when you are wrong about stuff, you do not know very much about, then you get defensive and mock people with accents... as if that constitutes an argument and get even more defensive if you get called out for your contentless post... You posted "just to clarify about the reuninfication: gorbachov is not a country." and are presuming to take me to task for posting without content. ![]() On August 22 2016 08:04 puerk wrote: the country that brought germany together was germany not the us. and even gorbachov had a bigger role than any american politicians.... Erasing the US from the picture, Germany firstly would have been unified under communism, but anyway: -If divided, wouldn't have been reunified due to bilateral opposition -If reunified, wouldn't have been sovereign -If sovereign, would have been neutral/wouldn't have been in NATO due to Soviet opposition to the eastward creep You can't look after the fact and go oh, this thing happened, therefore it was historically inevitable, so this party doesn't get any credit for its success. There were many and rapid Two Plus Four negotiations by the State department. There were multiple presidential summits. That's Gorbachev and Bush. Not Gorbachev and himself. I brought this up in the context of US foreign policy successes, which I want to see more of. How is this controversial, because I trespassed on German national honor? I'm sure "Germany" in some sense had more to do with its own reunification than the US did. That's almost trivially true. | ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On August 22 2016 12:17 Slaughter wrote: To be fair didn't Trump have some physician basically put out some stupidly worded thing about his health? I don't know why you link her lack of press conferences as a suspicious for her health, She still goes out and talks in public, she just hasn't done press conferences for whatever reason. Yes, it was filled with typos starting from the header being “To Whom My Concern” https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/Health_Record.pdf Like, there's no way an actual doctor wrote that note - the lab results were "astonishingly excellent." wtf? | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States41984 Posts
On August 22 2016 12:53 Nevuk wrote: Yes, it was filled with typos starting from the header being “To Whom My Concern” https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/Health_Record.pdf Like, there's no way an actual doctor wrote that note - the lab results were "astonishingly excellent." wtf? Degree in Medicine from Trump University perhaps? | ||
GreenHorizons
United States22704 Posts
That said, I'm not convinced it's anything super serious that would prevent her from serving but please stop with pretending you all can just wave it away with "but her doctor said" and "but it's infowars an /r/thedonald" Reagan, and Cheney's doctors said they were in excellent health too. Fine if you think Hillary is the best option we have, but can we not pretend that she's in "excellent health" because her doctor said so? Think Michael Jackson proved you can get doctors to say or do just about anything (like anyone else for enough money). | ||
Thieving Magpie
United States6752 Posts
On August 22 2016 12:22 IvanTheTerrible wrote: As for the no press conference thing clearly Hillary doesn't want to face questions because many of them will be difficult to handle... Doing speeches is a different story she just reads it out and that's that so the message is completely controlled. I doubt Hillary would like to be asked questions about how she received bribes to sell Russian business American uranium reprocessing for example (lol).. Hillary doesn't want to do press conferences since her opponent is doing fine destroying his reputation as is. If you're opponent is hurting himself, the best course of action is to let him. She just needs to be visible enough so people know she's someone you vote for to beat Trump. If people liked Trump, then she would need to get out there and get ahead. But with her being 85% favored right now, putting herself out there does nothing but hurt her chances. Its not fear, its strategy. | ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
| ||
zeo
Serbia6267 Posts
On August 22 2016 11:09 Nyxisto wrote: Her Health records are public, she's had a concussion years ago but is otherwise healthy. Are you kidding? Oh please, like millionaires can't hide their health conditions. Just pay a doctor to come privately off the books. Are health records really public in the US? | ||
Ghostcom
Denmark4781 Posts
| ||
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
Health record has a lot of stuff in there that's no one's business. | ||
puerk
Germany855 Posts
On August 22 2016 12:35 oBlade wrote: So I see you disagree with Kastrup. You posted "just to clarify about the reuninfication: gorbachov is not a country." and are presuming to take me to task for posting without content. ![]() Erasing the US from the picture, Germany firstly would have been unified under communism, but anyway: -If divided, wouldn't have been reunified due to bilateral opposition -If reunified, wouldn't have been sovereign -If sovereign, would have been neutral/wouldn't have been in NATO due to Soviet opposition to the eastward creep You can't look after the fact and go oh, this thing happened, therefore it was historically inevitable, so this party doesn't get any credit for its success. There were many and rapid Two Plus Four negotiations by the State department. There were multiple presidential summits. That's Gorbachev and Bush. Not Gorbachev and himself. I brought this up in the context of US foreign policy successes, which I want to see more of. How is this controversial, because I trespassed on German national honor? I'm sure "Germany" in some sense had more to do with its own reunification than the US did. That's almost trivially true. You are still not getting it: yes the us played a role, they were the 3rd most important country to the reunification. Which is pretty important considering there were like 180 more countries down the list. But your statement that the US reunified Germany is still stupid, and your refusal to drop it speaks for itself. | ||
zeo
Serbia6267 Posts
On August 22 2016 19:50 ragz_gt wrote: I don't think she did, or why she would. Health record has a lot of stuff in there that's no one's business. If you want to be the president of the United States possibly having brain damage is something people should know about. No? I guess its only fair to make an issue about health records if your target is a Republican: | ||
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Drone
Norway28558 Posts
Releasing health records in the name of transparency, meh, I don't really object to that as a principle, with the caveat that only some health issues are relevant. An STD for example should not matter at all, but yeah, I'd like to know about strokes or heart attacks or cancer or diseases somewhat likely to kill or severely impair the candidate within the next 4 years. I do however think that from that angle, tax returns are just as important (and that is an actually established principle, unlike health records), and thus it becomes a bit silly for Trump supporters to be okay with him failing to release those but harping on wanting Clinton's health records. | ||
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + (skip to 4:20) | ||
| ||