|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
United States7226 Posts
On July 08 2016 03:36 biology]major wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2016 03:32 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:30 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Could there please be an acknowledgment of the impossible standard HRC is being held to here? Maybe she spun too hard is saying her server set up was super above board (the IT guys all signed off on it at the time, no one complained). But compare that to even one sentence from Trump, or a few sentences from Gowdy or Chaffetz. Trump can't finish a sentence without a blatant falsehood that he should have known better. The best "Hillary lied' argument left is that there were 2-3 emails that had "C" in the boddy that she missed when she said "I didn't sent marked classified emails". Note that these may have been misclassified as indicated by the State department.
If you didn't hate Hillary, then you would see that as an honest mistake.
And if you insist on holding Hillary to the standard of not just honest effort in trying to say the truth to her best recollection (remember we talking about 4 year old server configurations and emails), but to absolute truth in all statement irrespective of error, then you must hold the Republicans to the same standard. This post is so ironic considering the standard the left holds Trump to. Irrelevant shit post but this thread is proof for the level of mental gymnastics people have to do to maintain their perspectives and avoid cognitive dissonance. It's amazing, I've learned argument with the purpose of changing someone's mind is utterly fruitless
How is it irrelevant the last 5 posts from him have been about how unfair Clinton is being treated and such a 'high standard' she's being held to.
|
Wait, now there's a second panel? lol
|
|
|
On July 08 2016 03:41 Mohdoo wrote:
Wait, now there's a second panel? lol
my benghazi over/under is starting to look like a real bet vs. a joke
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On July 08 2016 03:41 Mohdoo wrote:
Wait, now there's a second panel? lol
7 hours, 2 sessions
|
United States7226 Posts
On July 08 2016 03:37 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2016 03:32 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:30 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Could there please be an acknowledgment of the impossible standard HRC is being held to here? Maybe she spun too hard is saying her server set up was super above board (the IT guys all signed off on it at the time, no one complained). But compare that to even one sentence from Trump, or a few sentences from Gowdy or Chaffetz. Trump can't finish a sentence without a blatant falsehood that he should have known better. The best "Hillary lied' argument left is that there were 2-3 emails that had "C" in the boddy that she missed when she said "I didn't sent marked classified emails". Note that these may have been misclassified as indicated by the State department.
If you didn't hate Hillary, then you would see that as an honest mistake.
And if you insist on holding Hillary to the standard of not just honest effort in trying to say the truth to her best recollection (remember we talking about 4 year old server configurations and emails), but to absolute truth in all statement irrespective of error, then you must hold the Republicans to the same standard. This post is so ironic considering the standard the left holds Trump to. If he could stop following white supremacists on twitter and retweeting their shit over and over, it would be a good start. Well he did stop following two of them after a reporter wrote a story about it. But I get it, it’s a really common problem that no one really has.
I'd be interested in a source on this and if they're actually white supremacists or not.
So I can go look at what the accounts are tweeting
And what he retweeted.
|
On July 08 2016 03:36 biology]major wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2016 03:32 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:30 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Could there please be an acknowledgment of the impossible standard HRC is being held to here? Maybe she spun too hard is saying her server set up was super above board (the IT guys all signed off on it at the time, no one complained). But compare that to even one sentence from Trump, or a few sentences from Gowdy or Chaffetz. Trump can't finish a sentence without a blatant falsehood that he should have known better. The best "Hillary lied' argument left is that there were 2-3 emails that had "C" in the boddy that she missed when she said "I didn't sent marked classified emails". Note that these may have been misclassified as indicated by the State department.
If you didn't hate Hillary, then you would see that as an honest mistake.
And if you insist on holding Hillary to the standard of not just honest effort in trying to say the truth to her best recollection (remember we talking about 4 year old server configurations and emails), but to absolute truth in all statement irrespective of error, then you must hold the Republicans to the same standard. This post is so ironic considering the standard the left holds Trump to. Irrelevant shit post but this thread is proof for the level of mental gymnastics people have to do to maintain their perspectives and avoid cognitive dissonance. It's amazing, I've learned argument with the purpose of changing someone's mind is utterly fruitless
argument on the internet often doens't work certainly; often people aren't interested in changing or willing to listen. A few are, they're more liekly to lurk and post less. Of course, a lot of people also argue that someone else is wrong when they themselves are the one who is wrong, and are arguing from a false case that they wrongly believe to be sound.
|
The correct answer being "Is it reasonable she missed 3 paragraphs in 60k emails? yes it is reasonable to miss that".
|
On July 08 2016 03:44 GGTeMpLaR wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2016 03:37 Plansix wrote:On July 08 2016 03:32 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:30 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Could there please be an acknowledgment of the impossible standard HRC is being held to here? Maybe she spun too hard is saying her server set up was super above board (the IT guys all signed off on it at the time, no one complained). But compare that to even one sentence from Trump, or a few sentences from Gowdy or Chaffetz. Trump can't finish a sentence without a blatant falsehood that he should have known better. The best "Hillary lied' argument left is that there were 2-3 emails that had "C" in the boddy that she missed when she said "I didn't sent marked classified emails". Note that these may have been misclassified as indicated by the State department.
If you didn't hate Hillary, then you would see that as an honest mistake.
And if you insist on holding Hillary to the standard of not just honest effort in trying to say the truth to her best recollection (remember we talking about 4 year old server configurations and emails), but to absolute truth in all statement irrespective of error, then you must hold the Republicans to the same standard. This post is so ironic considering the standard the left holds Trump to. If he could stop following white supremacists on twitter and retweeting their shit over and over, it would be a good start. Well he did stop following two of them after a reporter wrote a story about it. But I get it, it’s a really common problem that no one really has. I'd be interested in a source on this and if they're actually white supremacists or not.
Also just look at the line of reasoning op uses. If a white supremacist tweeted 2 plus 2 equals 4, and I retweet that, somehow I am now pro white supremacy. Once you throw a label on someone, discussion is over. It's just another form of censorship.
|
On July 08 2016 03:44 GGTeMpLaR wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2016 03:37 Plansix wrote:On July 08 2016 03:32 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:30 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Could there please be an acknowledgment of the impossible standard HRC is being held to here? Maybe she spun too hard is saying her server set up was super above board (the IT guys all signed off on it at the time, no one complained). But compare that to even one sentence from Trump, or a few sentences from Gowdy or Chaffetz. Trump can't finish a sentence without a blatant falsehood that he should have known better. The best "Hillary lied' argument left is that there were 2-3 emails that had "C" in the boddy that she missed when she said "I didn't sent marked classified emails". Note that these may have been misclassified as indicated by the State department.
If you didn't hate Hillary, then you would see that as an honest mistake.
And if you insist on holding Hillary to the standard of not just honest effort in trying to say the truth to her best recollection (remember we talking about 4 year old server configurations and emails), but to absolute truth in all statement irrespective of error, then you must hold the Republicans to the same standard. This post is so ironic considering the standard the left holds Trump to. If he could stop following white supremacists on twitter and retweeting their shit over and over, it would be a good start. Well he did stop following two of them after a reporter wrote a story about it. But I get it, it’s a really common problem that no one really has. I'd be interested in a source on this and if they're actually white supremacists or not.
The David star corrupt Hillary twitter picture originated from a neo-nazi board where it was posted hours before the tweet was send out.
Google can probably provide more evidence of that if you want it.
|
United States7226 Posts
'I think it's possible she didn't know what a C meant like that'
-facepalm-
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On July 08 2016 03:47 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2016 03:44 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:37 Plansix wrote:On July 08 2016 03:32 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:30 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Could there please be an acknowledgment of the impossible standard HRC is being held to here? Maybe she spun too hard is saying her server set up was super above board (the IT guys all signed off on it at the time, no one complained). But compare that to even one sentence from Trump, or a few sentences from Gowdy or Chaffetz. Trump can't finish a sentence without a blatant falsehood that he should have known better. The best "Hillary lied' argument left is that there were 2-3 emails that had "C" in the boddy that she missed when she said "I didn't sent marked classified emails". Note that these may have been misclassified as indicated by the State department.
If you didn't hate Hillary, then you would see that as an honest mistake.
And if you insist on holding Hillary to the standard of not just honest effort in trying to say the truth to her best recollection (remember we talking about 4 year old server configurations and emails), but to absolute truth in all statement irrespective of error, then you must hold the Republicans to the same standard. This post is so ironic considering the standard the left holds Trump to. If he could stop following white supremacists on twitter and retweeting their shit over and over, it would be a good start. Well he did stop following two of them after a reporter wrote a story about it. But I get it, it’s a really common problem that no one really has. I'd be interested in a source on this and if they're actually white supremacists or not. The David star corrupt Hillary twitter picture originated from a neo-nazi board where it was posted hours before the tweet was send out. Google can probably provide more evidence of that if you want it.
TIL im a neo-nazi
|
On July 08 2016 03:45 Gorsameth wrote:The correct answer being "Is it reasonable she missed 3 paragraphs in 60k emails? yes it is reasonable to miss that".
Followup, can you possibly make an indictment for a charge that requires KNOWING INTENT TO DISSEMINATE based on those 3 missed "C"s? The answer is no, not even close. Which is why the FBI investigators unanimously recommended against prosecution.
EDIT: Comey's initial remarks were a grand gift to the Republicans. The Republicans have looked that gift in the mouth and have dashed it all. Foolishness.
|
On July 08 2016 03:49 amazingxkcd wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2016 03:47 Gorsameth wrote:On July 08 2016 03:44 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:37 Plansix wrote:On July 08 2016 03:32 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:30 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Could there please be an acknowledgment of the impossible standard HRC is being held to here? Maybe she spun too hard is saying her server set up was super above board (the IT guys all signed off on it at the time, no one complained). But compare that to even one sentence from Trump, or a few sentences from Gowdy or Chaffetz. Trump can't finish a sentence without a blatant falsehood that he should have known better. The best "Hillary lied' argument left is that there were 2-3 emails that had "C" in the boddy that she missed when she said "I didn't sent marked classified emails". Note that these may have been misclassified as indicated by the State department.
If you didn't hate Hillary, then you would see that as an honest mistake.
And if you insist on holding Hillary to the standard of not just honest effort in trying to say the truth to her best recollection (remember we talking about 4 year old server configurations and emails), but to absolute truth in all statement irrespective of error, then you must hold the Republicans to the same standard. This post is so ironic considering the standard the left holds Trump to. If he could stop following white supremacists on twitter and retweeting their shit over and over, it would be a good start. Well he did stop following two of them after a reporter wrote a story about it. But I get it, it’s a really common problem that no one really has. I'd be interested in a source on this and if they're actually white supremacists or not. The David star corrupt Hillary twitter picture originated from a neo-nazi board where it was posted hours before the tweet was send out. Google can probably provide more evidence of that if you want it. TIL im a neo-nazi
totally that, there have been no links earlier in this thread to 'journalists' who found it.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On July 08 2016 03:44 GGTeMpLaR wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2016 03:37 Plansix wrote:On July 08 2016 03:32 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:30 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Could there please be an acknowledgment of the impossible standard HRC is being held to here? Maybe she spun too hard is saying her server set up was super above board (the IT guys all signed off on it at the time, no one complained). But compare that to even one sentence from Trump, or a few sentences from Gowdy or Chaffetz. Trump can't finish a sentence without a blatant falsehood that he should have known better. The best "Hillary lied' argument left is that there were 2-3 emails that had "C" in the boddy that she missed when she said "I didn't sent marked classified emails". Note that these may have been misclassified as indicated by the State department.
If you didn't hate Hillary, then you would see that as an honest mistake.
And if you insist on holding Hillary to the standard of not just honest effort in trying to say the truth to her best recollection (remember we talking about 4 year old server configurations and emails), but to absolute truth in all statement irrespective of error, then you must hold the Republicans to the same standard. This post is so ironic considering the standard the left holds Trump to. If he could stop following white supremacists on twitter and retweeting their shit over and over, it would be a good start. Well he did stop following two of them after a reporter wrote a story about it. But I get it, it’s a really common problem that no one really has. I'd be interested in a source on this and if they're actually white supremacists or not. So I can go look at what the accounts are tweeting And what he retweeted.
It was so prevalent that the Daily Show did an entire segment on it.
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On July 08 2016 03:52 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2016 03:49 amazingxkcd wrote:On July 08 2016 03:47 Gorsameth wrote:On July 08 2016 03:44 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:37 Plansix wrote:On July 08 2016 03:32 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:30 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Could there please be an acknowledgment of the impossible standard HRC is being held to here? Maybe she spun too hard is saying her server set up was super above board (the IT guys all signed off on it at the time, no one complained). But compare that to even one sentence from Trump, or a few sentences from Gowdy or Chaffetz. Trump can't finish a sentence without a blatant falsehood that he should have known better. The best "Hillary lied' argument left is that there were 2-3 emails that had "C" in the boddy that she missed when she said "I didn't sent marked classified emails". Note that these may have been misclassified as indicated by the State department.
If you didn't hate Hillary, then you would see that as an honest mistake.
And if you insist on holding Hillary to the standard of not just honest effort in trying to say the truth to her best recollection (remember we talking about 4 year old server configurations and emails), but to absolute truth in all statement irrespective of error, then you must hold the Republicans to the same standard. This post is so ironic considering the standard the left holds Trump to. If he could stop following white supremacists on twitter and retweeting their shit over and over, it would be a good start. Well he did stop following two of them after a reporter wrote a story about it. But I get it, it’s a really common problem that no one really has. I'd be interested in a source on this and if they're actually white supremacists or not. The David star corrupt Hillary twitter picture originated from a neo-nazi board where it was posted hours before the tweet was send out. Google can probably provide more evidence of that if you want it. TIL im a neo-nazi totally that, there have been no links earlier in this thread to 'journalists' who found it. + Show Spoiler +
i actually frequent that board. in fact, im on it right now
|
On July 08 2016 03:55 amazingxkcd wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2016 03:52 Gorsameth wrote:On July 08 2016 03:49 amazingxkcd wrote:On July 08 2016 03:47 Gorsameth wrote:On July 08 2016 03:44 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:37 Plansix wrote:On July 08 2016 03:32 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:30 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Could there please be an acknowledgment of the impossible standard HRC is being held to here? Maybe she spun too hard is saying her server set up was super above board (the IT guys all signed off on it at the time, no one complained). But compare that to even one sentence from Trump, or a few sentences from Gowdy or Chaffetz. Trump can't finish a sentence without a blatant falsehood that he should have known better. The best "Hillary lied' argument left is that there were 2-3 emails that had "C" in the boddy that she missed when she said "I didn't sent marked classified emails". Note that these may have been misclassified as indicated by the State department.
If you didn't hate Hillary, then you would see that as an honest mistake.
And if you insist on holding Hillary to the standard of not just honest effort in trying to say the truth to her best recollection (remember we talking about 4 year old server configurations and emails), but to absolute truth in all statement irrespective of error, then you must hold the Republicans to the same standard. This post is so ironic considering the standard the left holds Trump to. If he could stop following white supremacists on twitter and retweeting their shit over and over, it would be a good start. Well he did stop following two of them after a reporter wrote a story about it. But I get it, it’s a really common problem that no one really has. I'd be interested in a source on this and if they're actually white supremacists or not. The David star corrupt Hillary twitter picture originated from a neo-nazi board where it was posted hours before the tweet was send out. Google can probably provide more evidence of that if you want it. TIL im a neo-nazi totally that, there have been no links earlier in this thread to 'journalists' who found it. + Show Spoiler + i actually frequent that board. in fact, im on it right now
Are you also running for president?
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On July 08 2016 03:58 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2016 03:55 amazingxkcd wrote:On July 08 2016 03:52 Gorsameth wrote:On July 08 2016 03:49 amazingxkcd wrote:On July 08 2016 03:47 Gorsameth wrote:On July 08 2016 03:44 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:37 Plansix wrote:On July 08 2016 03:32 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On July 08 2016 03:30 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Could there please be an acknowledgment of the impossible standard HRC is being held to here? Maybe she spun too hard is saying her server set up was super above board (the IT guys all signed off on it at the time, no one complained). But compare that to even one sentence from Trump, or a few sentences from Gowdy or Chaffetz. Trump can't finish a sentence without a blatant falsehood that he should have known better. The best "Hillary lied' argument left is that there were 2-3 emails that had "C" in the boddy that she missed when she said "I didn't sent marked classified emails". Note that these may have been misclassified as indicated by the State department.
If you didn't hate Hillary, then you would see that as an honest mistake.
And if you insist on holding Hillary to the standard of not just honest effort in trying to say the truth to her best recollection (remember we talking about 4 year old server configurations and emails), but to absolute truth in all statement irrespective of error, then you must hold the Republicans to the same standard. This post is so ironic considering the standard the left holds Trump to. If he could stop following white supremacists on twitter and retweeting their shit over and over, it would be a good start. Well he did stop following two of them after a reporter wrote a story about it. But I get it, it’s a really common problem that no one really has. I'd be interested in a source on this and if they're actually white supremacists or not. The David star corrupt Hillary twitter picture originated from a neo-nazi board where it was posted hours before the tweet was send out. Google can probably provide more evidence of that if you want it. TIL im a neo-nazi totally that, there have been no links earlier in this thread to 'journalists' who found it. + Show Spoiler + i actually frequent that board. in fact, im on it right now Are you also running for president?
do i look like i got a small loan of a couple million dollars?
|
I'm running for president right now.
Its not going to well i'm not going to lie.
|
On July 08 2016 04:02 Sermokala wrote:
I'm running for president right now.
Its not going to well i'm not going to lie.
It's not going well because you're not lying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
