|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On February 24 2016 01:37 oneofthem wrote: he will run to the left of hillary on trade come general and get a bunch of low skill voters Yep. Trump is very well-positioned to steal some traditionally democratic voters.
|
On February 24 2016 01:02 Plansix wrote: Nothing is going to dissuade his current supporters, but a recent gallup poll put independents at nearly 40% of the population nationwide. He is only invincible during this primary process. I doubt it will carry over to the general election where people are far less committed to a single party.
There were people who thought he was a joke candidate from the start and that there was no way he'd be a serious contender.
You guys may want to stop underestimating him, lol.
|
|
On February 24 2016 01:41 killa_robot wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2016 01:02 Plansix wrote: Nothing is going to dissuade his current supporters, but a recent gallup poll put independents at nearly 40% of the population nationwide. He is only invincible during this primary process. I doubt it will carry over to the general election where people are far less committed to a single party. There were people who thought he was a joke candidate from the start and that there was no way he'd be a serious contender. You guys may want to stop underestimating him, lol. I thought he was a joke as well, but I’ve been proven wrong. If he makes it to the nomination and is the Republican candidate, Democrats will take him seriously. And I don’t believe he can beat them once that happens. I would put his odds right up there with what Sarah Palin and Romney had. Winning the nomination of the increasingly dysfunctional and fractured Republican party is not winning the general elections.
|
On February 24 2016 00:08 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2016 12:21 oBlade wrote:On February 23 2016 12:07 Plansix wrote:On February 23 2016 12:07 oBlade wrote: Excuse me, but you said "tens of millions of Americans." Would you mind clarifying this - you consider people who enter and live in the USA illegally to be Americans? Are you going somewhere with this amazing line of questioning? There are people who think that the illegal immigrants should have a path to citizenship as long as they are not horrible criminals. Which is better that the people who want to deport everyone because they like wasting money on useless shit. I am suggesting that, despite what the post at the top of the page would have us believe, Trump has no stated interest in exiling American citizens, or if the miscommunication is elsewhere, that illegal immigrants aren't Americans, which while it may be obvious to you, is a misconception someone is apparently laboring under. You may want them to stay here (perhaps because it's easier if nothing else), you may want a path to legalization, you might even want a path to citizenship - which to me is an insult to everyone who is observing patience and diligence and waiting to immigrate to the US legally - but they're not Americans. Trump wants to not let Muslim citizens back into the US if they leave and try to come back, such as any Muslims serving in the US army who might be stationed abroad. If you're Muslim you can't enter. He also wants to end birth citizenship and deport the children of illegal immigrants who are legal American citizens. He really does want to deport citizens. I know that sounds crazy but that doesn't mean it's not something he said, he just says crazy shit. to be fair: while he did include american citizens in the innitial statement, that's one of the few statements that he backpaddled on and changed it to US (military personell) Muslims "only" getting stasi'd if they want to come back into the country
|
Fudged prior polls notwithstanding, Kasich is not very popular in Ohio so that result ought not surprise anyone.
Kasich sucks
|
not as much as jindal tho
our republican governor is worse than yours
also good god i just realized he'd aged really badly. he may not have won the presidency, but looks like he went through 8 years of one.
|
Kasich needs to drop immediately. If those polls aren't the nail in the coffin, his recent sexist comment about his own supporters should be.
|
I saw that quote and thought it was a comment from when he was initially elected, not from 2016. It wouldn’t be totally fatal, expect that he signed a bill to defund PP as well. The one, two punch.
|
United States22883 Posts
On February 24 2016 01:53 ticklishmusic wrote: not as much as jindal tho
our republican governor is worse than yours
Snyder > Jindal > Kasich
Also, a choice quote from one of his previous senior advisors:
|
Haha, Kasich's comment is hilarious.
|
On February 24 2016 02:16 Jibba wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2016 01:53 ticklishmusic wrote: not as much as jindal tho
our republican governor is worse than yours
Snyder > Jindal > Kasich Also, a choice quote from one of his previous senior advisors:
I would argue that running a state or whatever like a business isn't a bad thing, it's just that these folks were basically shitty businessmen who didn't realize or know that financials =/= fundamentals. It's like share buybacks which are the dumbest thing ever, it creates no value and just artificially pumps up EPS with money that could be spent in actually growing the company.
|
On February 23 2016 19:54 Jibba wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2016 14:09 oBlade wrote:On February 23 2016 13:55 strongwind wrote:On February 23 2016 13:04 oBlade wrote:On February 23 2016 12:29 Plansix wrote:On February 23 2016 12:21 oBlade wrote:On February 23 2016 12:07 Plansix wrote:On February 23 2016 12:07 oBlade wrote: Excuse me, but you said "tens of millions of Americans." Would you mind clarifying this - you consider people who enter and live in the USA illegally to be Americans? Are you going somewhere with this amazing line of questioning? There are people who think that the illegal immigrants should have a path to citizenship as long as they are not horrible criminals. Which is better that the people who want to deport everyone because they like wasting money on useless shit. I am suggesting that, despite what the post at the top of the page would have us believe, Trump has no stated interest in exiling American citizens, or if the miscommunication is elsewhere, that illegal immigrants aren't Americans, which while it may be obvious to you, is a misconception someone is apparently laboring under. You may want them to stay here (perhaps because it's easier if nothing else), you may want a path to legalization, you might even want a path to citizenship - which to me is an insult to everyone who is observing patience and diligence and waiting to immigrate to the US legally - but they're not Americans. To be honest, I am not really concerned with their feelings and how insulted they are. They will immigrate somewhere else in the meantime, which is our loss, while the people just waltzing in without skills (without basically anything) continue to be a factor in who we actually let in. I will even grant that we should take people in from all classes. But the lowliest, most untrained, uneducated, unskilled guy, can't he also follow the law and come here legally? I understand what you're trying to do here, but I find it very disingenuous to infer that coming here legally is a simple and easy process. You need thousands of dollars in applications and lawyers fees and many years of waiting (sometimes more than a decade) depending on the country you're emigrating from, just as a start. These are things the lowliest might have some trouble with. I'm not implying that. I'm suggesting part of immigration reform, in addition to curbing illegal immigration, should be making it the process of coming here legally much less obnoxious for people in the future. But the fact that it's hard is not an excuse for people disobeying the law and disrespecting the country's border. I think you're too caught up on the idea of fairness (which is a common take I see from Asian Americans.) It's not simply that it's hard, it's that it's hard and in the meantime they face fairly dire straights and as a whole they make significant contributions when they're here. Your friend is far less likely to be immigrating for their own survival. Beyond that, we've become dependent on it. The level of immigration reform, and the expediency required, is never going to be achieved in today's political climate, yet at the same time tens of billions of dollars of our economy depends on those immigrants. It's not fair to your friend, but your friend is likely coming from a better situation and is more able to handle the hardship of the current process. Your friend is also likely to have a job that requires more of the government's attention than a minimum wage farm worker. For the sake of the country in the short term, we're better off that they turn a blind eye. Thank you for the random identity politics. I'm not "Asian American."
It's true that billions of people around the world have quite hard or shitty lives. That's unfortunate. But you have some dots to connect before convincing me that having a shitty life combined with managing to set foot on a country's soil is sufficient reason for the country to let you stay there outside (or inside) the law. 11 million people's lives were not in extraordinary peril to make them come here.
I'm very suspicious also when someone says our economy is dependent on people living here outside the law, working outside the protections of labor law, usually not paying taxes (even if only due to hardship). Is that the USA anyone wants? Bring in impoverished drone workers, exploit them, then claim there's nothing else we can do? This is the same argument... that the problem is insurmountable (really saying that it can't be fixed in a day) so we can't turn the ship in a direction to fix the whole system.
On February 23 2016 14:27 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2016 11:39 ticklishmusic wrote:On February 23 2016 11:06 xDaunt wrote:On February 23 2016 10:18 ticklishmusic wrote:On February 23 2016 09:16 jcarlsoniv wrote: Yes and no, it's a bit hard to tell with caucuses. NH turned out very well, even considering any advantages he may have had there. <3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3 Actually I'm willing to drop the banbet, I'd miss having a reasonable (and as xDaunt says, intellectually honest) Bernie supporter here and probably just not touch this thread for a month. GH is Bernie-splaining to no end. I've decided not to be annoyed but entertained by it for the most part. I think GH deserves an achievement award for most improved poster. He's actually been tolerable for some time now. I'm going to go ahead and say that he's more palatable to you because you don't really have a horse in this race and you agree with his Hillary bashing. On February 23 2016 10:21 GreenHorizons wrote:On February 23 2016 10:18 ticklishmusic wrote:On February 23 2016 09:16 jcarlsoniv wrote: Yes and no, it's a bit hard to tell with caucuses. NH turned out very well, even considering any advantages he may have had there. <3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3 Actually I'm willing to drop the banbet, I'd miss having a reasonable (and as xDaunt says, intellectually honest) Bernie supporter here and probably just not touch this thread for a month. GH is Bernie-splaining to no end. I've decided not to be annoyed but entertained by it for the most part. Oh well now that's just sad. "Bernie-splaining" really? What does "Bernie-splaining" even mean to you*? Your ability to explain why Hillary Schillary is losing and St. Bernard is winning (sometimes with an asterisk) despite the evil so-and-so's. EDIT: Oh and Trump said he would deport the undocumented immigrant's American children too. Not sure how many there are, but with 11 million people Trump very well could be talking about deporting millions of Americans as well as the 11 million undocumented folks. First I hear that Trump's a monster because he's interested in deporting people who are here illegally, which would, although everyone keeps saying how impossible it is, also break up families and separate parents from their children. Yet if he wants to end unconditional birthright citizenship, he's a monster again.
|
There is no good justification for allowing illegal immigration. It's not humanitarian. It's not good for national security. It's not good for the economy. And it undermines the rule of law.
|
On February 24 2016 02:42 xDaunt wrote: There is no good justification for allowing illegal immigration. It's not humanitarian. It's not good for national security. It's not good for the economy. And it undermines the rule of law.
Isn't like half of California's agricultural workforce illlegal atm? I guess people in California like having food on their table?
|
On February 24 2016 02:44 Nyxisto wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2016 02:42 xDaunt wrote: There is no good justification for allowing illegal immigration. It's not humanitarian. It's not good for national security. It's not good for the economy. And it undermines the rule of law. Isn't like half of California's agricultural workforce illlegal atm? I guess people in California like having food on their table? Then bring them in legally and raise the price of food to be commensurate with increased pay (to the extent that it's necessary). Are you really going to argue in favor of indentured servitude?
|
On February 24 2016 02:34 ticklishmusic wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2016 02:16 Jibba wrote:On February 24 2016 01:53 ticklishmusic wrote: not as much as jindal tho
our republican governor is worse than yours
Snyder > Jindal > Kasich Also, a choice quote from one of his previous senior advisors: I would argue that running a state or whatever like a business isn't a bad thing, it's just that these folks were basically shitty businessmen who didn't realize or know that financials =/= fundamentals. It's like share buybacks which are the dumbest thing ever, it creates no value and just artificially pumps up EPS with money that could be spent in actually growing the company.
no. the word republic comes from res publica. which is literally "public affairs". a business is a private entity, those are fundamentally different things that mustn't be confused with each other.
sure skills needed to run a business or for someone in office are not that far apart actually, though there are different requirements needed in order to achieve certain goals. it basically boils down to shareholder vs. stakeholder. yes some business people will now say - but but jobs are good for everyone - which is true as well - though there are so many factors besides jobs public officials have to take into account when making decisions - reelection for one.
and the pure economic approach kinda sucks anyway - flint's a good example no? saving money no matter the cost. as long as people keep their mouths shut everything will be fine. and even if you concede that they did not want to poison the people on purpose - which is very likely - grave negligence should easily be proven.
|
On February 24 2016 02:46 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2016 02:44 Nyxisto wrote:On February 24 2016 02:42 xDaunt wrote: There is no good justification for allowing illegal immigration. It's not humanitarian. It's not good for national security. It's not good for the economy. And it undermines the rule of law. Isn't like half of California's agricultural workforce illlegal atm? I guess people in California like having food on their table? Then bring them in legally and raise the price of food to be commensurate with increased pay (to the extent that it's necessary). Are you really going to argue in favor of indentured servitude?
No the work conditions aren't good but it's a fact that they're an important part of the workforce right now, so there is a benefit for the economy and it actually relies on them. So why not legalize their status right now instead of throwing them out first?
Don't move the goalpost. I wasn't defending illegal labour, I was just saying that there is good reason to not deport those people.
|
Pretty sure the there is a strong financial reason not to do it. And the rule of law is already undermined by them being here. And once again, deporting 11 million people will be a logistical and PR nightmare. It’s doomed to fail and just make people more angry at the government. I am personally against plans that are doomed to failure.
And it will never happen. That is the reason why it has taken this long. The only reason to attempt it is pure spite and some hollow argument bout “holding up the law” that we failed to enforce for 15-20 years.
|
On February 24 2016 02:34 ticklishmusic wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2016 02:16 Jibba wrote:On February 24 2016 01:53 ticklishmusic wrote: not as much as jindal tho
our republican governor is worse than yours
Snyder > Jindal > Kasich Also, a choice quote from one of his previous senior advisors: I would argue that running a state or whatever like a business isn't a bad thing, it's just that these folks were basically shitty businessmen who didn't realize or know that financials =/= fundamentals. It's like share buybacks which are the dumbest thing ever, it creates no value and just artificially pumps up EPS with money that could be spent in actually growing the company. Share buybacks do have a use. There's not always enough investment opportunity for companies and via buying back your shares you can return the money to shareholders instead of having it sit idle.
|
|
|
|