• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:00
CEST 22:00
KST 05:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202560RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time What tournaments are world championships? The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 810 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 157

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 155 156 157 158 159 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Souma
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
March 10 2013 22:38 GMT
#3121
On March 11 2013 07:19 oneofthem wrote:
the abortion thing turns on what kind of attitude you take towards the value of life. life quality vs life as sacred object.

i guess i could make an argument for infanticide if the right situation calls for it. it is certainly not murder unless done with malice perhaps.


Could connect it to euthanasia too, I suppose! :d
Writer
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
March 10 2013 23:00 GMT
#3122
On March 11 2013 07:38 Souma wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 11 2013 07:19 oneofthem wrote:
the abortion thing turns on what kind of attitude you take towards the value of life. life quality vs life as sacred object.

i guess i could make an argument for infanticide if the right situation calls for it. it is certainly not murder unless done with malice perhaps.


Could connect it to euthanasia too, I suppose! :d

lots of stuff split along this line. reactionary, blind, incomplete deontic morality vs refined, superior, humanly enriched consequentialism.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-10 23:04:16
March 10 2013 23:02 GMT
#3123
i don't have any particularly strenuous moral objection to infanticide. probably shouldn't admit that in public though.

of course it would be easier and more ethical just to avoid the problem in the first place, through education and family planning. nobody WANTS abortions to occur
shikata ga nai
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
March 10 2013 23:10 GMT
#3124
On March 11 2013 08:02 sam!zdat wrote:
i don't have any particularly strenuous moral objection to infanticide. probably shouldn't admit that in public though.

of course it would be easier and more ethical just to avoid the problem in the first place, through education and family planning. nobody WANTS abortions to occur

I've always thought the moral stance on abortion being "ok" could be applied up until about 6 months after birth when a self-aware consciousness can be assumed. Like you, though, I don't fancy talking about that in public. It either hints that I think it's ok or that I'm trying to paint people as monsters.
ziggurat
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada847 Posts
March 10 2013 23:16 GMT
#3125
On March 11 2013 08:10 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 11 2013 08:02 sam!zdat wrote:
i don't have any particularly strenuous moral objection to infanticide. probably shouldn't admit that in public though.

of course it would be easier and more ethical just to avoid the problem in the first place, through education and family planning. nobody WANTS abortions to occur

I've always thought the moral stance on abortion being "ok" could be applied up until about 6 months after birth when a self-aware consciousness can be assumed. Like you, though, I don't fancy talking about that in public. It either hints that I think it's ok or that I'm trying to paint people as monsters.

I'm assuming neither of you have kids. Or want them? If you ever become a parent your views on this will change.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
March 10 2013 23:17 GMT
#3126
it will definitely change depending on life experience. it will for instance change when you are surprised by an unwanted pregnancy.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
March 10 2013 23:26 GMT
#3127
On March 11 2013 08:16 ziggurat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 11 2013 08:10 aksfjh wrote:
On March 11 2013 08:02 sam!zdat wrote:
i don't have any particularly strenuous moral objection to infanticide. probably shouldn't admit that in public though.

of course it would be easier and more ethical just to avoid the problem in the first place, through education and family planning. nobody WANTS abortions to occur

I've always thought the moral stance on abortion being "ok" could be applied up until about 6 months after birth when a self-aware consciousness can be assumed. Like you, though, I don't fancy talking about that in public. It either hints that I think it's ok or that I'm trying to paint people as monsters.

I'm assuming neither of you have kids. Or want them? If you ever become a parent your views on this will change.


that's why you should have free contraception for everyone, so you can avoid even having to think about such issues. it's like the trolley problem. thinking about to solve the trolley problem is stupid. As Lenin would have said, "both are worse." the point is not to put yourself in such a stupid position as to have to be solving trolley problems.
shikata ga nai
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18825 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-10 23:31:05
March 10 2013 23:30 GMT
#3128
On March 11 2013 08:16 ziggurat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 11 2013 08:10 aksfjh wrote:
On March 11 2013 08:02 sam!zdat wrote:
i don't have any particularly strenuous moral objection to infanticide. probably shouldn't admit that in public though.

of course it would be easier and more ethical just to avoid the problem in the first place, through education and family planning. nobody WANTS abortions to occur

I've always thought the moral stance on abortion being "ok" could be applied up until about 6 months after birth when a self-aware consciousness can be assumed. Like you, though, I don't fancy talking about that in public. It either hints that I think it's ok or that I'm trying to paint people as monsters.

I'm assuming neither of you have kids. Or want them? If you ever become a parent your views on this will change.

I know many parents that are pro-choice, and many whom are pro-life. How can this be?
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
March 10 2013 23:33 GMT
#3129
if you wanna kill dat baby don't have a servant loitering around the vicinity just fyi.

source: histories
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
March 10 2013 23:36 GMT
#3130
On March 11 2013 08:16 ziggurat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 11 2013 08:10 aksfjh wrote:
On March 11 2013 08:02 sam!zdat wrote:
i don't have any particularly strenuous moral objection to infanticide. probably shouldn't admit that in public though.

of course it would be easier and more ethical just to avoid the problem in the first place, through education and family planning. nobody WANTS abortions to occur

I've always thought the moral stance on abortion being "ok" could be applied up until about 6 months after birth when a self-aware consciousness can be assumed. Like you, though, I don't fancy talking about that in public. It either hints that I think it's ok or that I'm trying to paint people as monsters.

I'm assuming neither of you have kids. Or want them? If you ever become a parent your views on this will change.

Of course. It's more of an exercise than a deep-seated belief or actual moral standing. You define some moral points that are, more or less, arbitrary and see what their limits are. You take arguments to their strange, twisted ends in order to find what you personally use as your moral guide. Many times, you can do this and find something that is morally/ethically logical and consistent, but not always. This would be one of those times where it's hard to find a consistent moral standing.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
March 10 2013 23:37 GMT
#3131
On March 11 2013 08:33 oneofthem wrote:
if you wanna kill dat baby don't have a servant loitering around the vicinity just fyi.

source: histories


somebody should stage a 21st century version of sophocles where oedipus is aborted, but then kept alive in an artificial womb
shikata ga nai
Roe
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada6002 Posts
March 10 2013 23:44 GMT
#3132
On March 11 2013 08:26 sam!zdat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 11 2013 08:16 ziggurat wrote:
On March 11 2013 08:10 aksfjh wrote:
On March 11 2013 08:02 sam!zdat wrote:
i don't have any particularly strenuous moral objection to infanticide. probably shouldn't admit that in public though.

of course it would be easier and more ethical just to avoid the problem in the first place, through education and family planning. nobody WANTS abortions to occur

I've always thought the moral stance on abortion being "ok" could be applied up until about 6 months after birth when a self-aware consciousness can be assumed. Like you, though, I don't fancy talking about that in public. It either hints that I think it's ok or that I'm trying to paint people as monsters.

I'm assuming neither of you have kids. Or want them? If you ever become a parent your views on this will change.


that's why you should have free contraception for everyone, so you can avoid even having to think about such issues. it's like the trolley problem. thinking about to solve the trolley problem is stupid. As Lenin would have said, "both are worse." the point is not to put yourself in such a stupid position as to have to be solving trolley problems.


There will still be people who don't want to use it even if it's given out to them.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
March 10 2013 23:56 GMT
#3133
that's why you have comprehensive sex-positive sex ed in schools.
shikata ga nai
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-11 00:15:42
March 11 2013 00:06 GMT
#3134
On March 11 2013 08:37 sam!zdat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 11 2013 08:33 oneofthem wrote:
if you wanna kill dat baby don't have a servant loitering around the vicinity just fyi.

source: histories


somebody should stage a 21st century version of sophocles where oedipus is aborted, but then kept alive in an artificial womb

snow white is a stem cell clone of her mother who becomes jealous and tries to abort the experiment. but alas.

the prince is her father's clone for even more exciting drama.

+ Show Spoiler +
dem dwarves are failed prototypes. fairy godmother is the lead scientist
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-11 01:28:03
March 11 2013 01:26 GMT
#3135
I've been doing a little reading about the ethics of abortion for a bioethics class, so here's a quick (and slightly relevant) summary:

In Catholicism, abortion is pretty much always a no-no. The only time it is allowed is "indirect", where abortion is not the intent of the abortion-- an example would be like if the mother had cancer and the fetus would be killed by chemotherapy. Of course, that enters the gray area where the risk of chemo vs the risk to the child compete, and that becomes hard to decide. I didn't see anything about rape, so I suppose that children from rape should be carried to term anyways...

In Judaism, abortion is more permissible. The fetus is treated "as the thigh of the mother", which implies that it generally should not be destroyed or mutilated, but can be to preserve the greater whole. For example, if the mother had flesh-eating disease in her leg the doctor could cut it off to save her. Extending this analogy to the fetus, the mother could abort it if it presented some danger to her. However, this "danger" can be psychological or physical, and then it gets complicated. If the child tested positive for Tay-Sachs, the mother can abort if she feels she cannot take on the psychological burden. Unfortunately again, this sort of decision framework gives the mother a lot of leeway. On the other end of the spectrum, a girl who got pregnant because she didn't use protection could say that having a child would make her depressed, ruin her life and should be aborted.

Islam begins to treat the fetus as a person (it is "ensouled") at around 4 months. Before then, abortion is generally permissible. That's the only real rule. Note that Islamic bioethics is the least developed of the fields.

My personal belief is that abortion should be illegal except in cases of rape, incest or a serious threat to the mother's health, in conjunction with good sex ed and decently-priced contraceptives. I've gotten some interesting responses in the vein of "you're not entitled to an opinion" or "say that when you're pregnant".
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
radiatoren
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Denmark1907 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-11 14:53:45
March 11 2013 13:59 GMT
#3136
On March 11 2013 10:26 ticklishmusic wrote:
I've been doing a little reading about the ethics of abortion for a bioethics class, so here's a quick (and slightly relevant) summary:

In Catholicism, abortion is pretty much always a no-no. The only time it is allowed is "indirect", where abortion is not the intent of the abortion-- an example would be like if the mother had cancer and the fetus would be killed by chemotherapy. Of course, that enters the gray area where the risk of chemo vs the risk to the child compete, and that becomes hard to decide. I didn't see anything about rape, so I suppose that children from rape should be carried to term anyways...

In Judaism, abortion is more permissible. The fetus is treated "as the thigh of the mother", which implies that it generally should not be destroyed or mutilated, but can be to preserve the greater whole. For example, if the mother had flesh-eating disease in her leg the doctor could cut it off to save her. Extending this analogy to the fetus, the mother could abort it if it presented some danger to her. However, this "danger" can be psychological or physical, and then it gets complicated. If the child tested positive for Tay-Sachs, the mother can abort if she feels she cannot take on the psychological burden. Unfortunately again, this sort of decision framework gives the mother a lot of leeway. On the other end of the spectrum, a girl who got pregnant because she didn't use protection could say that having a child would make her depressed, ruin her life and should be aborted.

Islam begins to treat the fetus as a person (it is "ensouled") at around 4 months. Before then, abortion is generally permissible. That's the only real rule. Note that Islamic bioethics is the least developed of the fields.

My personal belief is that abortion should be illegal except in cases of rape, incest or a serious threat to the mother's health, in conjunction with good sex ed and decently-priced contraceptives. I've gotten some interesting responses in the vein of "you're not entitled to an opinion" or "say that when you're pregnant".

I think it is completely wrong to take a stance on abortion only through religious ethics. There are a lot more secular ways to take a stance and the above is completely devoid of fetus development. The first month of a pregnancy the female body treats the fetus as a parasite, while at 6 ½ month there is a good chance that the child is viable outside of the mothers womb. I just cannot see why these informations aren't more important to your decission than religious ethics. It would seem like a more interesting point to talk about when a child is in a state where abortion should be impermissible and/or restrictions based on the parents information. My stance is probably irrelevant since I do not have kids, but I am very far to the side of pro choice on most issues and I therefore disagree with you on when abortion is ok since I take the pragmatic 3 month hat on in most cases when dealing with allowance of abortion.

Edit: My only pro life stances are on information about sex and non-serious illness genetics. Go kill the fetus and be proud!
Repeat before me
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 11 2013 15:02 GMT
#3137
WASHINGTON — Eight senators who have spent weeks trying to write a bipartisan bill to overhaul immigration laws have privately agreed on the most contentious part of the draft — how to offer legal status to the nation's 11 million illegal immigrants.

According to aides familiar with the closed-door negotiations, the bill would require illegal immigrants to register with Homeland Security Department authorities, file federal income taxes for their time in America and pay a still-to-be-determined fine. They also must have a clean law enforcement record.

Once granted probationary legal status, immigrants would be allowed to work but would be barred from receiving federal public benefits, including food stamps, family cash assistance, Medicaid and unemployment insurance.

The group's current draft is largely in line with President Obama's call to set a pathway to earned citizenship as part of a broader immigration reform package, as well as with recent efforts by prominent Republican lawmakers to resolve an issue that hurt GOP candidates in November's election.

Though the draft is a long way from becoming law, immigration advocates expressed guarded optimism about a possible breakthrough.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
March 11 2013 16:40 GMT
#3138
On March 11 2013 22:59 radiatoren wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 11 2013 10:26 ticklishmusic wrote:
I've been doing a little reading about the ethics of abortion for a bioethics class, so here's a quick (and slightly relevant) summary:

In Catholicism, abortion is pretty much always a no-no. The only time it is allowed is "indirect", where abortion is not the intent of the abortion-- an example would be like if the mother had cancer and the fetus would be killed by chemotherapy. Of course, that enters the gray area where the risk of chemo vs the risk to the child compete, and that becomes hard to decide. I didn't see anything about rape, so I suppose that children from rape should be carried to term anyways...

In Judaism, abortion is more permissible. The fetus is treated "as the thigh of the mother", which implies that it generally should not be destroyed or mutilated, but can be to preserve the greater whole. For example, if the mother had flesh-eating disease in her leg the doctor could cut it off to save her. Extending this analogy to the fetus, the mother could abort it if it presented some danger to her. However, this "danger" can be psychological or physical, and then it gets complicated. If the child tested positive for Tay-Sachs, the mother can abort if she feels she cannot take on the psychological burden. Unfortunately again, this sort of decision framework gives the mother a lot of leeway. On the other end of the spectrum, a girl who got pregnant because she didn't use protection could say that having a child would make her depressed, ruin her life and should be aborted.

Islam begins to treat the fetus as a person (it is "ensouled") at around 4 months. Before then, abortion is generally permissible. That's the only real rule. Note that Islamic bioethics is the least developed of the fields.

My personal belief is that abortion should be illegal except in cases of rape, incest or a serious threat to the mother's health, in conjunction with good sex ed and decently-priced contraceptives. I've gotten some interesting responses in the vein of "you're not entitled to an opinion" or "say that when you're pregnant".

I think it is completely wrong to take a stance on abortion only through religious ethics. There are a lot more secular ways to take a stance and the above is completely devoid of fetus development. The first month of a pregnancy the female body treats the fetus as a parasite, while at 6 ½ month there is a good chance that the child is viable outside of the mothers womb. I just cannot see why these informations aren't more important to your decission than religious ethics. It would seem like a more interesting point to talk about when a child is in a state where abortion should be impermissible and/or restrictions based on the parents information. My stance is probably irrelevant since I do not have kids, but I am very far to the side of pro choice on most issues and I therefore disagree with you on when abortion is ok since I take the pragmatic 3 month hat on in most cases when dealing with allowance of abortion.

Edit: My only pro life stances are on information about sex and non-serious illness genetics. Go kill the fetus and be proud!


Well, given that the US is still a *fairly* religious nation, I think its important to understand where the beliefs of the population on abortion are coming from. I myself am pretty non-religious, but as an aspiring doctor (god I sound pompous when I say that) I think its important to understand a patient's beliefs to better treat them.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
sc2superfan101
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
3583 Posts
March 11 2013 16:43 GMT
#3139
On March 11 2013 22:59 radiatoren wrote:
The first month of a pregnancy the female body treats the fetus as a parasite

I'm somewhat curious what this means...
My fake plants died because I did not pretend to water them.
Souma
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-11 18:32:19
March 11 2013 18:30 GMT
#3140
Donald Trump said Monday that he’d be willing to foot the bill for the White House tours that President Barack Obama’s administration nixed because of sequestration budget cuts.

Last week, Newt Gingrich recommended that Trump fund the tours, tweeting:

Donald trump should offer to pay for the white house tours. He can afford it and it would show who cares more for American students
— Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) March 8, 2013



“I think it’s so nice of Newt to suggest that, I don’t know anything about it… . I like Newt a lot,” Trump said Monday on Fox News’s “Fox & Friends. “I didn’t hear this, but it sounds reasonable to me. Why not?”

Trump said that he thinks the tours were canceled to prove a political point.

“I guess it’s political. They want to hurt the people … If you look at what’s going on, I guess they’re trying to make a political point. It’s just really ridiculous. I don’t think it’s a big deal, frankly. But it does make us look awfully bad and awfully pathetic,” Trump said.

Last week, Obama administration officials announced that they were canceling White House tours to deal with sequestration, the $1.2 trillion automatic cuts in federal spending over a decade that took effect March 1.

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/trump-willing-to-fund-white-house-tours-88682.html?hp=f3


This is so ridiculous. Out of the things we can cut, White House tours should be the least controversial/political. What else would you rather cut? More from education? More from health research? More from defense?

I usually don't care what Donald Trump/Gingrich have to say, but I've been getting constituent calls about the same thing, and it's flabbergasting how there are those who would rather see more cuts to pivotal programs as opposed to cuts to White House tours.
Writer
Prev 1 155 156 157 158 159 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 14h
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JuggernautJason149
Nathanias 102
BRAT_OK 49
MindelVK 46
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 1458
Larva 742
TY 183
sas.Sziky 36
Aegong 27
JulyZerg 7
Dota 2
capcasts90
Counter-Strike
fl0m2717
Stewie2K418
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu507
Other Games
tarik_tv5256
Grubby2464
FrodaN2308
Hui .303
oskar173
crisheroes144
Trikslyr59
Sick42
PPMD27
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 23 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 28
• poizon28 27
• tFFMrPink 12
• LUISG 9
• Adnapsc2 6
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 22
• FirePhoenix6
• HerbMon 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22252
• WagamamaTV951
League of Legends
• Nemesis4711
• Doublelift3190
Other Games
• imaqtpie1115
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
14h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
18h
CSO Cup
20h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
22h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 13h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 18h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 22h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.