EPTMvp is a prime Terran - Page 3
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Heavenfallz
Australia73 Posts
| ||
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
On October 21 2012 23:02 Dayrlan wrote: Corollary. MVP will win an infinite number of GSLs. Proof. Suppose that GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr are all of the GSLs MVP will win. Let q = (2*3*5*7...*r)+1 and let p be a prime GSL number dividing q. Then GSLp cannot be any of GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr, as otherwise p would divide the difference q-(2*3*5*7...*r) = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, GSLp must be another GSL that MVP will win. Q.E.D. Well done, Mr. Euklid  | ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
| ||
|
emythrel
United Kingdom2599 Posts
| ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
On October 21 2012 23:47 emythrel wrote: always wondered why people dont consider 1 a prime. It is divisible only by itself and 1 to make a whole number, doesn't that qualify it as a prime? it's an exception deal with it | ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
On October 21 2012 23:02 Dayrlan wrote: Corollary. MVP will win an infinite number of GSLs. Proof. Suppose that GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr are all of the GSLs MVP will win. Let q = (2*3*5*7...*r)+1 and let p be a prime GSL number dividing q. Then GSLp cannot be any of GSL2, GSL3, GSL5, GSL7, ..., GSLr, as otherwise p would divide the difference q-(2*3*5*7...*r) = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, GSLp must be another GSL that MVP will win. Q.E.D. That requires an additional assumption. | ||
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
On October 21 2012 23:47 emythrel wrote: always wondered why people dont consider 1 a prime. It is divisible only by itself and 1 to make a whole number, doesn't that qualify it as a prime? It depends on the definition of prime numbers. For example, you can define them by how you did, which would make 1 a prime number. But you can also define them by: a number is a prime number if and only if it is divisible by exactly 2 numbers. Then 1 isn't a prime number, because it is (the only number that is ) only divisible by one number, by 1. The reason why math uses the second definition and not the one you have given, is that there are a few theorems about prime numbers which only work for prime numbers =/= 1, as the unity number one has various special properties which other numbers don't have. | ||
|
Sankanyo
United States140 Posts
hahahah! that is an interesting correlation | ||
|
RiSkysc2
696 Posts
| ||
|
HeeroFX
United States2704 Posts
| ||
|
Mazzi
440 Posts
| ||
|
Dayrlan
United States248 Posts
On October 21 2012 23:33 GhostLink wrote: Well, there we have it! LOL btw :D thank you so much for this post Can i include this in the OP? Ha - sure. ^.^ | ||
|
Dayrlan
United States248 Posts
On October 21 2012 23:50 EtherealDeath wrote: That requires an additional assumption. That there are infinitely many GSL numbers ~_~ i.e. that there are infinitely many GSLs. So we can "weaken" the corollary as "If SC2 doesn't die, then MVP will win infinitely many GSL titles." ^^ | ||
|
Dayrlan
United States248 Posts
No! I've been found out! | ||
|
m1rk3
Canada412 Posts
On October 21 2012 22:01 Biggun69 wrote: Cool Story Bro this guy didn't get it at all. | ||
|
orBitual
United States96 Posts
| ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
On October 21 2012 23:43 HaXXspetten wrote: wouldn't surprise me if some superstitious people actually believed this ^^ What? You don't believe? How can you not believe in MVP?! | ||
|
Zhazulo
Sweden226 Posts
| ||
|
IPA
United States3206 Posts
| ||
|
SinO[Ob]
France897 Posts
| ||
| ||
