|
the reason i banned you was not that politics thread
your dumbass posts there just indicated to me you might be a candidate to get banned, and once i looked at all your posts, i made the apparently right decision to ban you, since it's obvious you still haven't learned a damn thing
i should ban you again, but one more chance for you, make it count
You are a liar.
You didn't ban me because of anything but those posts.
I had over 300 posts and none of the other mods seemed to have a problem. You took the political argument too personally and that is why you banned me. There was a reason you banned me without saying a word. You knew it was ridiculously unjust and unreasonable. A much greater portion of my posts have been useful and relevant than those in political argument threads.
Since I've come back I've made nothing but posts having to do with the subject that are generally positive in tone (perhaps minus the previous one).
EDIT: These are all my opinions and should be taken with a grain of salt.
|
United Kingdom10597 Posts
|
Braavos36401 Posts
hi chibi
wanna make a bet to see who can spam more crap and get banned first?
|
United Kingdom10597 Posts
|
Syst[em]atic of course he banned you and said nothing because he is a coward. At least this time he warned you that if you say something he doesn't like he'll ban you.
Thinking about what drone was saying earlier about going through someones "quality" of posts before making a ban I now think is bull shit. Either a post goes over the top of what the ruels are and deserves a ban, or it doesn't. Looking at all their posts is pretty stupid because if the post was a flame or spam the poster would have been banned at the time.
|
|
|
United Kingdom10597 Posts
|
4492 Posts
On February 17 2006 19:09 ChoboCop wrote:
The only thing I ask from TL.net is someway to keep up with threads I post on. Two days later I always forget about threads that I liked. If I use search it only returns threads where my name is mentioned, not threads in which I posted. This is annoying and stops me from contributing to the forum. What if I wanted to see the last thread fakesteve posted in; not the posts about him being banned? There is no way for me to do this.
A signature goes a looong way in solving that problem (not to mention other practical uses)...
-Mynock
|
On February 18 2006 00:10 Mynock wrote:Show nested quote +On February 17 2006 19:09 ChoboCop wrote:
The only thing I ask from TL.net is someway to keep up with threads I post on. Two days later I always forget about threads that I liked. If I use search it only returns threads where my name is mentioned, not threads in which I posted. This is annoying and stops me from contributing to the forum. What if I wanted to see the last thread fakesteve posted in; not the posts about him being banned? There is no way for me to do this. A signature goes a looong way in solving that problem (not to mention other practical uses)... -Mynock
holy shit.
i seriously never though of that, ever.
I just thought it was an e-penis thing. Guess i learned something new, still too lazy to do it though;/
|
On February 17 2006 21:13 HappyManRun wrote:Show nested quote +On February 17 2006 06:48 Liquid`Drone wrote:
yeah ilvy is pretty much correct (like usual! :D ). some bans have been entirely caused by a moderator disliking a poster.
which is obviously bad.
Drone ftw. Sometimes I get absolutely sick of ppl like Rek and Bey who are so immature in their behaviors and just ban ppl they don't like w/ little to no reason what so ever and people have to suck up to them. Someone makes a comment, kind of out of line yet still very funny to the very least, people replied "lol gold" and rek came, and went "Not funny!" then banned him. Then people would proceed and say "OMG 1000foot tall rekrul~ <3 <3" That's just sychophantic, and makes me want to throw up, real violently.
agree 100%.
also, uhjoo just said in this thread that when he got pissed at a guy he discussed with, he actually looked up previous posts from that user just to find a reason to ban him. that makes me wanna throw up too.
|
Sydney2287 Posts
On February 18 2006 00:45 joeki wrote:Show nested quote +On February 17 2006 21:13 HappyManRun wrote:On February 17 2006 06:48 Liquid`Drone wrote:
yeah ilvy is pretty much correct (like usual! :D ). some bans have been entirely caused by a moderator disliking a poster.
which is obviously bad.
Drone ftw. Sometimes I get absolutely sick of ppl like Rek and Bey who are so immature in their behaviors and just ban ppl they don't like w/ little to no reason what so ever and people have to suck up to them. Someone makes a comment, kind of out of line yet still very funny to the very least, people replied "lol gold" and rek came, and went "Not funny!" then banned him. Then people would proceed and say "OMG 1000foot tall rekrul~ <3 <3" That's just sychophantic, and makes me want to throw up, real violently. agree 100%. also, uhjoo just said in this thread that when he got pissed at a guy he discussed with, he actually looked up previous posts from that user just to find a reason to ban him. that makes me wanna throw up too.
Throw up?? ....
And he didn't say he searched FOR a reason to ban him, he said he searched to see IF this was a one-off moment, or continual thing, which was explained earlier...
|
United States5262 Posts
okay i know why mitsy/stimey was banned, but was it a permanent ban? i for one thought that mitsy did have some good posts especially on the strategy forum, but on other posts he tended to leave himself open to flaming.
why was fakesteve banned?
what is trolling?
i'm sorry i'm asking so many questions i'm a freaking noob
|
steve was banned because his ego got a bit too inflated and needed a cool down.
trolling is making useless posts, going off topic, spamming, flaming, asking to be flamed, and basically disrupting the thread in general.
|
Alot of people keep bringing up the fact that both of them made good posts. You don't really need to repeat this over and over. We all know already that they contributed at times. The issue that you could/should be debating over is whether this: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?currentpage=2&topic_id=36848 and things alike should be allowed.
It's good to voice your opinion about it but I can already guarantee you that we will never ever let people who act like that stay on TL.
I haven't seen Bey make any bans like the one just mentioned. He's a good mod as far as I know. If you want to trash him like that it would be appreciated if you atleast showed some evidence/links.
|
since you ask:
When I PMed Bey why he didn't ban stimey after he made the Manifesto7-hate thread he responded: "suck a lot of modcock and thats what happens"
I don't question Bey in general, some of the best threads here are under his belt, but it just wasn't an appropriate response, especially seeing how eventually it went down the way I expected. I admit that my PM was kinda angry (the topic all in caps) but still.... of course I don't expect him to do what I want him to, but he could've written: "It's being taken into consideration, nothing more to say right now" or something like that. Not more effort than coming up with his attempt at humor.
|
On February 16 2006 23:12 uhjoo wrote:
mani put it just perfect here and he is absolutely a GREAT mod
gogogo mani 
close topic now!
joking 
|
On February 18 2006 01:23 jkillashark wrote:
okay i know why mitsy/stimey was banned, but was it a permanent ban? i for one thought that mitsy did have some good posts especially on the strategy forum, but on other posts he tended to leave himself open to flaming.
You must be joking.
|
On February 18 2006 05:04 distant_voice wrote:
since you ask:
When I PMed Bey why he didn't ban stimey after he made the Manifesto7-hate thread he responded: "suck a lot of modcock and thats what happens"
I don't question Bey in general, some of the best threads here are under his belt, but it just wasn't an appropriate response, especially seeing how eventually it went down the way I expected. I admit that my PM was kinda angry (the topic all in caps) but still.... of course I don't expect him to do what I want him to, but he could've written: "It's being taken into consideration, nothing more to say right now" or something like that. Not more effort than coming up with his attempt at humor.
I think you misunderstood him. It's not an attempt at humor.
He's talking about the fact that there's admins in the team that like stimey no matter what he does. Bey is not in a position in our mod-team to take action on a sensitive issue like this one where other mods might disagree, and with that he decided not to ban stimey obviously.
|
I'm glad that this site has a high tolerance level in general, which has made for some great threads and laughs while also of course some generic BS threads.
About Stimey? He was amusing at first, but then he got kind of annoying, though the threads usually started out alright, they ended with nitpicking and epenis contests. I don't really care wether he's gone or here. Generally speaking, the posters can choose to ignore people for being retards, but of course this is a bit different when it comes to moderators and the ones in charge of running the site.
Fakesteve? Totally unfunny guy 90% of the time, and mostly just stale old generic insults.
Generally speaking though I'm glad the tolerance level is high on this site, because otherwise it would just be another boring politically correct site. Keep up the good work guys!
|
Beyonder
Netherlands15103 Posts
On February 18 2006 05:04 distant_voice wrote:
since you ask:
When I PMed Bey why he didn't ban stimey after he made the Manifesto7-hate thread he responded: "suck a lot of modcock and thats what happens"
I don't question Bey in general, some of the best threads here are under his belt, but it just wasn't an appropriate response, especially seeing how eventually it went down the way I expected. I admit that my PM was kinda angry (the topic all in caps) but still.... of course I don't expect him to do what I want him to, but he could've written: "It's being taken into consideration, nothing more to say right now" or something like that. Not more effort than coming up with his attempt at humor.
Hahha, you wanted me to write a complete and sensible explanation after you pm'd me with:
'Subject: WHAT THE FUCK' containing the question 'why isn't mitsy banned after his last thread? Is he every mods' brother or what?'
Not an appropriate response to such a quality question? boo-hoo.
I don't read nor post on this forum nearly enough anymore to moderate people with a lot of posts and way more activity than me, thus I don't. I still feel that Stimey should be banned again and again and again though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
