EPTAnd like I said I didn't expect a "complete and sensible explanation" but an insult was uncalled for. A one-liner like the one I posted above would've sufficed.
Anyway, everything's said now, no hard feelings.
Stimy's Eulogy [TL Moderation] - Page 10
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
distant_voice
Germany2521 Posts
And like I said I didn't expect a "complete and sensible explanation" but an insult was uncalled for. A one-liner like the one I posted above would've sufficed. Anyway, everything's said now, no hard feelings. | ||
Mynock
4492 Posts
-Mynock | ||
|
Syst[eM]atic
61 Posts
agree 100%. My problem is, he didn't FIND another reason to ban me. I know this simply because there wasn't one.also, uhjoo just said in this thread that when he got pissed at a guy he discussed with, he actually looked up previous posts from that user just to find a reason to ban him. that makes me wanna throw up too. Throw up?? .... And he didn't say he searched FOR a reason to ban him, he said he searched to see IF this was a one-off moment, or continual thing, which was explained earlier... I | ||
|
distant_voice
Germany2521 Posts
On February 18 2006 08:01 Mynock wrote: Bey was talking about how Stimey "sucks a lot of modcock", not suggesting that you should do that. If that's the way you got it then you have misunderstood his reply, there was nothing insulting in it. -Mynock I understood that he meant mitsy, it just wasn't obvious that he implied that mitsy's being popular among certain mods was the reason that he didn't ban him. So if he did I didn't get that part. Now,let's not talk about it anymore. Like I said, it's over, no hard feelings. | ||
|
[X]Ken_D
United States4653 Posts
 | ||
|
Eagleheart
Sweden776 Posts
| ||
|
decafchicken
United States20168 Posts
On February 18 2006 05:04 distant_voice wrote: since you ask: When I PMed Bey why he didn't ban stimey after he made the Manifesto7-hate thread he responded: "suck a lot of modcock and thats what happens" I read that tthe first time as "suck a lot of mynock and thats what happens" | ||
uhjoo
Korea (South)1740 Posts
On February 18 2006 08:05 Syst[eM]atic wrote: f he had looked, which I'm damn sure he didn't, I wouldn't be on another name right now. My problem is, he didn't FIND another reason to ban me. I know this simply because there wasn't one. I you're seriously a dumbfuck | ||
ManaBlue
Canada10458 Posts
Stop trying to say that this place is about free expression, and pushing the boundaries of our thought and all that other BS Stimy tries to force feed you. Being a member here is like being in a click in some shitty high school. You get along with the group or you don't. Nothing more or less. Boundary pushers always get burned at the stake eventually (and apparently in Stimy's case multiple times). No one should be surprised here. As for Steve, he was testing his boundaries, and now that he's been warned he knows the fenced in area that he has to work with in being an e-badass and all that shit. It's really not as deep as everyone tries to make it. Other than the shit eatting holier than thou tone he used, Tasteless was pretty much right. | ||
|
brian
United States9643 Posts
On February 18 2006 11:24 uhjoo wrote: you're seriously a dumbfuck props on banning that kid again stupid people dont deserve a second chance the only problem ive ever seen with moderation is you're all too tolerant to stupid people thats why i think rekrul is a valuable asset to the modteam :O more often than not mitsy doesnt deserve to be banned but its the "not" part that really gets ya. why let him slide where others shouldnt? i understand that some mods like him. okay, so let him slide on that principle. but on the same token he's been banned SO many times, he should be banned the second he makes a new name, not given a billion second chances. FS is obnoxious a lot. he definitely crossed a line, that was WAY too stupid, and not worth it. but personally i find his humour indispensible | ||
|
new_construct
Canada1041 Posts
| ||
|
iamke55
United States2806 Posts
| ||
|
HappyManRun
1111 Posts
| ||
|
Syst[eM]atically
4 Posts
*This thread is inspired by Stimy, and all of his manifestations. It is a discussion of moderation, and there are no reprucussions for posting your opinion in this thread. I was under the impression that I could give my opinions on moderation as well as respond to those who accuse me in this thread with amnesty. | ||
|
IdrA
United States11541 Posts
On February 18 2006 11:45 Gene wrote: FS is obnoxious a lot. he definitely crossed a line, that was WAY too stupid, and not worth it. but personally i find his humour indispensible so many people have said that and yet the only funny/worthwhile thing hes done is the paint threads and very rarely hitting with one of his one liners. he should be confined to paint threads and nothing else or something. | ||
|
OverTheUnder
United States2929 Posts
On February 18 2006 11:25 ManaBlue wrote: This is getting sad. Outside of all the bitching, the truth you're all meandering toward is that some of us like it here because we fit in well, are chummy with certain key posters, and fit the personality mould. That's it. Stop trying to say that this place is about free expression, and pushing the boundaries of our thought and all that other BS Stimy tries to force feed you. Being a member here is like being in a click in some shitty high school. You get along with the group or you don't. Nothing more or less. Boundary pushers always get burned at the stake eventually (and apparently in Stimy's case multiple times). No one should be surprised here. As for Steve, he was testing his boundaries, and now that he's been warned he knows the fenced in area that he has to work with in being an e-badass and all that shit. It's really not as deep as everyone tries to make it. Other than the shit eatting holier than thou tone he used, Tasteless was pretty much right. agreed 100% | ||
|
Syst[eM]atically
4 Posts
I hope your moderation powers are stripped for blatant abuse. | ||
|
rpf289
United States3524 Posts
On February 18 2006 12:50 Syst[eM]atically wrote: When you get banned again, what will your new name be?Apparently you didn't read the first part of the original post, uhjoo. I hope your moderation powers are stripped for blatant abuse. Syst[eM] Syst[eM]atic Syst[eM]atically Syst[eM]... p.s. The mods are doing a wonderful job. They're doing their job and preserving the integrity of this online community by keeping people like you out. | ||
|
Syst[eM]atically
4 Posts
| ||
|
bburn
United States1039 Posts
On February 18 2006 12:42 Syst[eM]atically wrote: I was under the impression that I could give my opinions on moderation as well as respond to those who accuse me in this thread with amnesty. Apparently that assumption was incorrect. Further more what was the point of that ban. If hasn't stoped you from posting, just made you create a new account? are we to assume that this somehow taught you a lesson and the quality of your post will improve? Infact isnt a temp ban a greater punishment as you can't post for x amount of time while now you could post imediatly afterwords. What is the actual point of a ban if the poster can just start posting again... It seems as if temp bans are actually more effective and should be used instead of ordinary bans, unless those bans are going to be ip bans aswell | ||
| ||
