Girl faces death for burning "something" - Page 10

On August 22 2012 00:55 Vandrad wrote:


No all of religion does nothing but create problems

On August 21 2012 21:21 exterminatus wrote:
Nuclear war between India and Pakshitstan would be victory for mankind.
Better to have nuclear pollution instead of these "humans".

User was warned for this post

On August 22 2012 01:10 OceanLab wrote:

I'm not religious myself, but that's just plain wrong and ignorant. Extremists in every religions cause problems, but that's like saying drinking a glass of wine is wrong because getting shit-faced is wrong.

Wilders, like Westergaard and the other Danish cartoonists, has been widely vilified for "seeking to inflame" the Muslim community. Even if this had been his intention, this criticism represents an almost supernatural coincidence of moral blindness and political imprudence. The point is not (and will never be) that some free person spoke, or wrote, or illustrated in such a manner as to inflame the Muslim community. The point is that only the Muslim community is combustible in this way. The controversy over Fitna, like all such controversies, renders one fact about our world especially salient: Muslims appear to be far more concerned about perceived slights to their religion than about the atrocities committed daily in its name. Our accommodation of this psychopathic skewing of priorities has, more and more, taken the form of craven and blinkered acquiescence.

There is an uncanny irony here that many have noticed. The position of the Muslim community in the face of all provocations seems to be: Islam is a religion of peace, and if you say that it isn't, we will kill you. Of course, the truth is often more nuanced, but this is about as nuanced as it ever gets: Islam is a religion of peace, and if you say that it isn't, we peaceful Muslims cannot be held responsible for what our less peaceful brothers and sisters do. When they burn your embassies or kidnap and slaughter your journalists, know that we will hold you primarily responsible and will spend the bulk of our energies criticizing you for "racism" and "Islamophobia."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sam-harris/losing-our-spines-to-save_b_100132.html

On August 22 2012 01:13 TheSwedishFan wrote:

If you were born there i think you would fit in perfectly. There are idiots on both sides of the fence. Like you just proved.

This is a really sad story. It's wierd how these men seek to accuse this girl for something they're not sure of she've done. How can this stand any ground in front of a jury?

On August 22 2012 01:10 OceanLab wrote:

I'm not religious myself, but that's just plain wrong and ignorant. Extremists in every religions cause problems, but that's like saying drinking a glass of wine is wrong because getting shit-faced is wrong.

On August 22 2012 03:22 erin[go]bragh wrote:



Technically alcohol is a poison and a drug, just one thats become so ingrained in society that it's forgotten about and not looked at as such...

Kinda like something else....

On August 22 2012 03:48 Bahamut1337 wrote:


You can also die from drinking to much water

On August 22 2012 03:52 Flamingo777 wrote:

I think you're missing the point. One is necessary for consumption daily.

On August 22 2012 01:10 OceanLab wrote:

I'm not religious myself, but that's just plain wrong and ignorant. Extremists in every religions cause problems, but that's like saying drinking a glass of wine is wrong because getting shit-faced is wrong.

On August 22 2012 04:15 Thylacine wrote:
Ahh, Religion doesen't harm anyone! See?! See?

And btw, Islam is a religion of peace.

On August 22 2012 01:16 paralleluniverse wrote:

Extremist Buddhists aren't stoning people for blasphemy or flying planes into the buildings. Neither are extremist Christians, the extent to which they irritate me are "merely" their lobbying efforts on abortion and repression of sex in general.

These groups don't blow themselves up for virgins in Heaven or murder cartoonists. Islamist do.

On August 22 2012 04:54 RogerX wrote:
The fact that there are no evidence itself should be enough to stop charges. If it wasn't a third world country.
However, I wonder how international rights organisation will respond to this, or have they already?

On August 22 2012 04:22 dUTtrOACh wrote:


Do I detect a few hints of sarcasm? It's hard without being able to hear the tone in your voice or interpret body language.

On August 22 2012 00:44 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:

They went in at the behest of the Afghani government to crush Islamofascist fanatics. I blame the US and Saudis for supporting terrorism and Islamic extremism against a secular, forward-minded Afghani government because the US govt. apparently preferred the spread of Islamic extremism instead of Soviet influence in a place in which it already existed coupled with a poor country moving forward. Look where that got us with Taliban, 9/11, etc... It was a stupid move on our part.

That said, why do we support Saudi Arabia so much? Sure, the ruler of Mecca is a faithful bitch to Uncle Sam (funny how that works out), but they are among the most radicalized and fundamentalist people in the world. I guess our interests mean more than promoting secularism and forward-progress in an increasingly backward region. To be frank, our actions and policies are no different from what any power past or present has done, but it isn't making the situation better in the Mideast... a lot worse if anything and this goes as far back as the 50s.

On August 22 2012 05:20 GNS wrote:
once again religion causes problems ...