EPTOn July 14 2012 03:29 DidYuhim wrote:
What do you expect of a guy who was match-fixing?
What do you expect of a guy who was match-fixing?
What?
Accusing byun of matchfixing?
LOLOLOLOLOL no.
[Spoilers] GSL Metropolis Neutral Depot Situation - Page 33
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Psychonian
United States2322 Posts
What? Accusing byun of matchfixing? LOLOLOLOLOL no. | ||
|
Nuclease
United States1049 Posts
First, the cheating scandal. And now, he realizes that he can do the bunker block....mysteriously.....and doesn't say ANYTHING, takes advantage of it, and Nestea loses.  User was warned for this post User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
ohampatu
United States1448 Posts
On July 14 2012 03:36 Nuclease wrote: Losing more and more respect for ByuN. First, the cheating scandal. And now, he realizes that he can do the bunker block....mysteriously.....and doesn't say ANYTHING, takes advantage of it, and Nestea loses. take that garbage somewhere else there were many 'faults' here, none were byuns | ||
|
stratmatt
United States913 Posts
On July 14 2012 03:36 Nuclease wrote: Losing more and more respect for ByuN. First, the cheating scandal. And now, he realizes that he can do the bunker block....mysteriously.....and doesn't say ANYTHING, takes advantage of it, and Nestea loses. Bunker block is a legit strategy on a map without a neutral depot. You ever play on the ladder? Why are people acting like this strategy is instant win? The depot should honestly be removed from all maps and zergs should support the removal if they have any self respect. ZERGS DONT NEED A NEUTRAL DEPOT. | ||
|
Shiori
3815 Posts
On July 14 2012 03:36 Nuclease wrote: Losing more and more respect for ByuN. First, the cheating scandal. And now, he realizes that he can do the bunker block....mysteriously.....and doesn't say ANYTHING, takes advantage of it, and Nestea loses. Wow. This sort of posting is disgusting. Byun didn't do anything wrong. | ||
|
ravemir
Portugal595 Posts
| ||
|
ohampatu
United States1448 Posts
On July 14 2012 03:44 ravemir wrote: I knew there had to be something strange for Nestea to go down in such spectacular fashion... him playing bad, which i guess is strange, cause thats why he lost in such spectacular fashion | ||
|
NexUmbra
Scotland3776 Posts
| ||
|
Shiori
3815 Posts
On July 14 2012 03:44 ravemir wrote: I knew there had to be something strange for Nestea to go down in such spectacular fashion... Nestea got brutalized in every game. A multiple time GSL winner doesn't get titled into that level of play by a mere Bunker rush. | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On July 14 2012 03:46 Shiori wrote: Nestea got brutalized in every game. A multiple time GSL winner doesn't get titled into that level of play by a mere Bunker rush. Seriously, did we all forget his series vs sc? it started off with a bunker rush on metal, which nestea handled terribly. He still won the series and the tournament in the end. People saying that the bunker rush messed him up mentally are insulting his years of experience. | ||
|
stratmatt
United States913 Posts
| ||
|
SHOOG
United States1639 Posts
They accepted the loses and the mistake. Others might have made a big stink out of it. | ||
|
Jojo131
Brazil1631 Posts
On July 14 2012 03:36 Nuclease wrote: Losing more and more respect for ByuN. First, the cheating scandal. And now, he realizes that he can do the bunker block....mysteriously.....and doesn't say ANYTHING, takes advantage of it, and Nestea loses. ur a great fan... | ||
|
Doomwish
438 Posts
I don't have the statistics in front of me to back it up, but in any best of x series I would be willing to bet the winner of the first game is more often then not the series winner. | ||
|
dabom88
United States3483 Posts
On July 14 2012 00:02 iGn1t3 wrote: I don't think it is fair. Once Terran took the ramp, the Zerg is pretty much lost half of the game (unless Zerg did a mighty quick boss walk and bust the bunker before the marine arrives. Should there be a way to stop the game halfway? Not really. With the Queen's new range, Nestea could have just made sure the Bunker never got up by killing the SCV with a queen at the top of the ramp. | ||
|
Shiori
3815 Posts
On July 14 2012 04:06 Doomwish wrote: I feel like alot of people are downplaying how important the first set in any match is. It gives the winner so much mental momentum going into the next game. I don't have the statistics in front of me to back it up, but in any best of x series I would be willing to bet the winner of the first game is more often then not the series winner. Those statistics have less to do with psychology and more to do with, well, probabilities of someone with a high winrate winning a match when they only need to win 1 game and their opponent needs to win 2. | ||
|
Icarox
Sweden78 Posts
On July 14 2012 04:07 dabom88 wrote: Not really. With the Queen's new range, Nestea could have just made sure the Bunker never got up by killing the SCV with a queen at the top of the ramp. Bad scenario, he kills the SCV and is stuck with slowly getting the bunkers down. And is way behind from the start. The terran player can go for an easy natural and prepare for a 2base push or even better, a 2base allin and straight up beat the zerg very easily. Worst case scenario, the SCV lives and Nestea wont even be able to push down his ramp. Baaaahhhh! If theres no neutral supply depot, the terran can literally just autowin the map!  I can understand that Blizzard doesnt understand its full purpose and dont have it on each and every map on the ladder map pool. But GSL is way more involved in the metagame than them. I am not saying that Nesta would've won. But those supply depots are specifically there so that terran cant win that easily by cheesing! =/ | ||
|
fraktoasters
United States617 Posts
On July 14 2012 04:06 Doomwish wrote: I feel like alot of people are downplaying how important the first set in any match is. It gives the winner so much mental momentum going into the next game. I don't have the statistics in front of me to back it up, but in any best of x series I would be willing to bet the winner of the first game is more often then not the series winner. News flash: Winning a game has a direct correlation to winning a series. | ||
|
SnipedSoul
Canada2158 Posts
On July 14 2012 04:06 Doomwish wrote: I feel like alot of people are downplaying how important the first set in any match is. It gives the winner so much mental momentum going into the next game. I don't have the statistics in front of me to back it up, but in any best of x series I would be willing to bet the winner of the first game is more often then not the series winner. If both players have a 50% chance of winning any game the player who wins the 1st game will win the series 75% of the time. | ||
|
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
| ||
