Regarding the thread about me - Page 2

You have provided no 'proof' that I even maphack or tiehack, I sometimes in my games proxy my building sometimes it pays off other time it gives me instant losses because I proxy in the WRONG place, you're using confirmation bias here, you're only confirming the case where I did it successful, what about instances where I fail to proxy the correct location?

Regarding me being a member of Mixed Fruit, Gyroscope is full of crap and is going to get his ass handed to him when I've spoken to the other founder of mixed fruit, MFCeon / Ceonsamea as Ceonsamea WILL BE having harsh words with gyroscope for his pathetic message he said in the other thread.

On October 06 2011 06:20 Initiative wrote:
I think your sig sums you up pretty well

On October 06 2011 06:54 Zelthcon wrote:
So if I protest too much I hack, if I do not defend myself at all I hack? So what isit you want me to do exactly?

Play more ladder games and upload my replays? Do you want me too stream my games live even though it makes me lag? do you want to 1v1 me with observers so they can see if I hack or not? I'm really not getting it is what you want me to do?

I can ignore this and be known as a hacker, I can defend myself then be called a whiner?

This is a lose-lose situation for me and I already know how I'm going to resolve it .

On September 17 2011 12:10 Zelthcon wrote:
This hacker database is an absolute joke, most of the "good evidence" can be literally a player who pans over the fog alot and there is many situations where you can react to the enemies army without actually knowing where it is, many things come into play...how long when you last seen his army? To defend your first incase you expect a push coming etc...

This list is an absolute joke and should be removed.
Let me break your "good" evidence down for you.

My writing = red text

Good evidence for hacks (post replays that show things on this list):

Repeated camera focus on the enemy (your) base when it is under fog, without giving unit orders (attack/move) - I do this in alot of games, it helps keep me active, reminding me to scout etc.
Repeated camera focus on your army outside your base, but under fog, especially without giving unit orders. This doesn't mean your opponent sending a marine to a XN watchtower when you have a probe there is hacks though. Oh yeah, because no one pans over the fog, during games, to CONSIDER sending a unit / their army there, again another thing that I do
Camera focus on dropships/ovies/warp prisms or any unit in an unusual location on the map for no when it is under fog and there is no reason to look there. There does not have to be a reason, to look at a place on the map, also, they may be thinking of sending a unit to check if there is an ovi, drop or warp prism coming -_-
Reactions to the army when it is under fog (this one is tricky though, as there is often a decent excuse for the hacker's army movement, for example, moving to take a XN tower, moving to secure a third, moving to threaten an expo, positioning the army better, etc. For this to be solid evidence, there should be no obvious goal for the army movement other than a reaction to what is seen via maphack.) This again, is NOT proof at all...serioulsy your 'good' evidence is TERRIBLE 'evidence', if you can even call it that. Some players do randomly move their army out for no particular reason, maybe just to poke around or check incase something is coming and if something DOES come, then that's GOOD, you're likely to catch them offguard....use common sense, this thread is not a success, it's a fail

On October 06 2011 07:05 ProTech_MediC wrote:
What kind of high masters player regularly uses blind proxy gateways as an actual strategy?