|
I open this thread to remember the victims of the 9/11/1973 coup d'état in Chile and to inform about those events: to remember and to be informed is the starting point to let those things never happen again.
According to some sources the victims are to be estimated around 30.000 death 600.000 tortured Edit 2: many people complaining about the numbers. go to end post edit 2.
The coup, which had the involvement of the USA, overthrew the democratically elected government and his president Salvator Allende.
You can find some information, as a starting point, about the coup on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_Chilean_coup_d'état
and you can find the last speech of president allende here: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Salvador_Allende's_Last_Speech
and this is short excerpt of that speech: "They have force and will be able to dominate us, but social processes can be arrested by neither crime nor force. History is ours, and people make history."
---- Note: if you want to discuss the events referred in this thread it is ok, but anything that brings in, compares or whatever, the Chiles events to 9/11/2001 as a terrorist act is off-topic as is disrespectful to the victims of both events and it's not my intention doing so. in other words: don't be an asshole.
edit: found a typo thx to grumbels to final note was "... the Chiles events to 9/11/2011 as a..." and was obviously wrong. now it's " ... the Chiles events to 9/11/2001 as a..."
edit 2: many people are complaining about the numbers of deaths: I remember reading them some years ago, sorry, don't know which book. However the numbers are to be intended in this way: not just death toll of the days of the coup, but also all the deaths of the following regime. I also have to say that i do not want to make an exact claim on the numbers of death: i'm no historian and, i knew when i posted it first time, that wikipedia has other numbers. But wikipedia it's not an exact source, imho at least, it serves, to me, as a starting point of information. For completeness I'll say there are some who say 3000 are killed for sure, but then there are more missing. How many? I don't know and I don't claim right numbers, I hope that after this edit people don't complain about it and use it to prove that i'm a troll or something: those numbers are subject of historical debate, so debate about history, not about me not knowing history
|
It's good to bring back events like that to people's memory.
|
"Of these approximately 40,000 to 50,000 perfunctory arrests, several hundred individuals would later be detained, questioned, tortured, and in some cases murdered"
How are you getting your 30000 death? I took that from the wiki page you linked
|
On September 11 2011 22:36 ArcticRaven wrote: It's good to bring back events like that to people's memory.
Sure it is. Just dont use the 10 year anniversary of what happened in the US as an excuse for doing it.....
|
On September 11 2011 22:41 DaCruise wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 22:36 ArcticRaven wrote: It's good to bring back events like that to people's memory. Sure it is. Just dont use the 10 year anniversary of what happened in the US as an excuse for doing it.....
It's 38 year anniversary of what happened in Chile
|
|
On September 11 2011 22:41 DaCruise wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 22:36 ArcticRaven wrote: It's good to bring back events like that to people's memory. Sure it is. Just dont use the 10 year anniversary of what happened in the US as an excuse for doing it.....
ehhhh it happened on the same day...if today isnt a day to do it then what it? and the same CAN apply to any event in history - it still happened on a god given day. what a stupid thing to say ..... reaks of rightchousness
|
On September 11 2011 22:41 DaCruise wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 22:36 ArcticRaven wrote: It's good to bring back events like that to people's memory. Sure it is. Just dont use the 10 year anniversary of what happened in the US as an excuse for doing it.....
It happened on the same fucking day? When he should have posted it? RIP to all who lost their lifes because of this.
|
Please guys remember that this sort of informal review is more than to commemorate the dead, its about learning from the past in order to prepare for the future, please bear this in mind before posting
Its important to analyse these past events to properly understand some of the mechanics behinds what halts social progress, and to find ways to overcome them in future attempts. Its takes more than honourable goals to move peacefully into the future, it takes careful planning.
Possibly Allende's greatest achievement, and ultimate sacrafice, was in finding a way to show future generations that the way things go right now are clearly not the best, and its only a matter of ignorance which perpetuates them.
edit: please keep focus lads, the first page so far is filled up with a ridiculous debate upon the day of the year, smarten up guys
|
As horrible as it was... I feel it's ill timed... It's kind of like mentioning Hiroshima on 9/11, like reminding a man of his worst decisions on a day when he already wishes to weep. As an American I believe that the United States should be held accountable more than any nation in the world for its wrong-doings, but on a day like 9/11 I just want to say.. "Shut the fuck up, I already feel like a piece of shit, you damn idiot!"
I know, you'll probably mention something like "Well, TEN TIMES as many people died and scores times more tortured, how can you even compare your sorrow to theirs?"
And I'd answer "On the anniversary of your father's death it doesn't matter to you that he may have killed a dozen men, all that matters to you is the fact that he can no longer be by your side."
I'm sorry. I am so sorry.
EDIT: If you have half a fucking brain and read my post you'd realize that even though I said I FEEL it's ill timed that it should be posted and that I'm thankful that it WAS posted.
"Also, seeing as it's an international board..." comments are hilarious.
|
On September 11 2011 22:48 ShatterZer0 wrote: As horrible as it was... I feel it's ill timed... It's kind of like mentioning Hiroshima on 9/11, like reminding a man of his worst decisions on a day when he already wishes to weep. As an American I believe that the United States should be held accountable more than any nation in the world for its wrong-doings, but on a day like 9/11 I just want to say.. "Shut the fuck up, I already feel like a piece of shit, you damn idiot!"
I know, you'll probably mention something like "Well, TEN TIMES as many people died and scores times more tortured, how can you even compare your sorrow to theirs?"
And I'd answer "On the anniversary of your father's death it doesn't matter to you that he may have killed a dozen men, all that matters to you is the fact that he can no longer be by your side."
I'm sorry. I am so sorry. what do u mean ill-timed? he can't exactly go back to 1973 and tell them not to have a coup on sept. 11. @ OP:Thank you for this piece of info, I didnt know about it.
|
On September 11 2011 22:41 DaCruise wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 22:36 ArcticRaven wrote: It's good to bring back events like that to people's memory. Sure it is. Just dont use the 10 year anniversary of what happened in the US as an excuse for doing it..... Yeah, obviously the lives of 3000 Americans are worth more than those of 30,000 Chileans.
|
On September 11 2011 22:39 zezamer wrote: "Of these approximately 40,000 to 50,000 perfunctory arrests, several hundred individuals would later be detained, questioned, tortured, and in some cases murdered"
How are you getting your 30000 death? I took that from the wiki page you linked
Yep, 3000 were killed - OP is wrong.
|
The way you put it makes it sound like 30,000 died and 600,000 were tortured ON sept 11, and not as a result of actions on that day. Obviously it is the latter.
@people attacking DaCruise, I suppose his point is that this is the 38th aniv of this event, and there is no real importance of that aniv as opposed to a 10th, 50th or 100th. I didn't see any posts about this during any of the previous 9 years before this 10th year aniv of 9/11 so it comes off as a bitter troll who doesn't like everybody talking about the US and it's loss of citizens by showcasting that other countries have tragedies as well (which can be caused by the US) making the OP both an incosiderate asshole and a troll.
At least one could argue that and some people seem to be.
More on topic, I had not heard of this event before reading this post so I learned something new today. Shame such a horrible event had to happen.
|
On September 11 2011 22:48 ShatterZer0 wrote: As horrible as it was... I feel it's ill timed... It's kind of like mentioning Hiroshima on 9/11, like reminding a man of his worst decisions on a day when he already wishes to weep. As an American I believe that the United States should be held accountable more than any nation in the world for its wrong-doings, but on a day like 9/11 I just want to say.. "Shut the fuck up, I already feel like a piece of shit, you damn idiot!"
I know, you'll probably mention something like "Well, TEN TIMES as many people died and scores times more tortured, how can you even compare your sorrow to theirs?"
And I'd answer "On the anniversary of your father's death it doesn't matter to you that he may have killed a dozen men, all that matters to you is the fact that he can no longer be by your side."
I'm sorry. I am so sorry.
It happened on the same day.
This is an international board, this thread deserves just as much attention as the other 9/11 thread.
RIP to all the victims in both tragic 9/11 events.
|
Very important event that is forgotten by way to many people!
|
Guess what? Everyday in our calendar year is linked with the slaughter of thousands of people. The fact that you're choosing to commemorate a random one has jack shit to do with honoring the people that died in Chile and everything to do with trying to make some stupid douchebag point about US foreign policy. That's probably even more insulting to a Chilean than to an American.
p.s. the fact that you're pretending like this has nothing to do with 9/11 and are just choosing to honor people, makes you cowardly, imo. At least stand up for the point you're trying to make.
|
On September 11 2011 22:39 zezamer wrote: "Of these approximately 40,000 to 50,000 perfunctory arrests, several hundred individuals would later be detained, questioned, tortured, and in some cases murdered"
How are you getting your 30000 death? I took that from the wiki page you linked
I said: according to some sources, i don't know which ones are exact. The problem is, as you may know, that of "disappeared" (desaparecidos): it is difficult to have good estimation af the deaths of people who cannot be found. Of course i'm referring to the deaths caused not only in the days of the coup by itself, but to the deaths following it too.
On September 11 2011 22:41 DaCruise wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 22:36 ArcticRaven wrote: It's good to bring back events like that to people's memory. Sure it is. Just dont use the 10 year anniversary of what happened in the US as an excuse for doing it.....
I didn't: it's not anybody fault if they both happened the 11th of september. just that, plain and simple. If you want to know: at my university my student's group used to hang a poster about Chile every year, so, personally, it's not something i do this year for the first time. it's the first time i do on TL because i signed up here in the past year or so... have a good day 
|
On September 11 2011 22:54 BlackJack wrote: Guess what? Everyday in our calendar year is linked with the slaughter of thousands of people. The fact that you're choosing to commemorate a random one has jack shit to do with honoring the people that died in Chile and everything to do with trying to make some stupid douchebag point about US foreign policy. That's probably even more insulting to a Chilean than to an American. wtf leave this thread?
As an international observer I found this thread much more meaningful than the American 9/11 thread. Simply because I had no idea about this incident before. Memorials are held for things to be remembered and this thread serves its purpose.
|
On September 11 2011 22:52 On_Slaught wrote: The way you put it makes it sound like 30,000 died and 600,000 were tortured ON sept 11, and not as a result of actions on that day. Obviously it is the latter.
@people attacking DaCruise, I suppose his point is that this is the 38th aniv of this event, and there is no real importance of that aniv as opposed to a 10th, 50th or 100th. I didn't see any posts about this during any of the previous 9 years before this 10th year aniv of 9/11 so it comes off as a bitter troll who doesn't like everybody talking about the US and it's loss of citizens by showcasting that other countries have tragedies as well (which can be caused by the US) making the OP both an incosiderate asshole and a troll.
At least one could argue that and some people seem to be.
More on topic, I had not heard of this event before reading this post so I learned something new today. Shame such a horrible event had to happen.
Thx. This is what I meant.
|
On September 11 2011 22:54 BlackJack wrote: Guess what? Everyday in our calendar year is linked with the slaughter of thousands of people. The fact that you're choosing to commemorate a random one has jack shit to do with honoring the people that died in Chile and everything to do with trying to make some stupid douchebag point about US foreign policy. That's probably even more insulting to a Chilean than to an American.
p.s. the fact that you're pretending like this has nothing to do with 9/11 and are just choosing to honor people and is just a coincidence makes you cowardly, imo. At least stand up for the point you're trying to make. you know what America is not the centre of the planet - some americans may think it is (im gonna assume your one of those) but its not and people approach this day under a different angle.
ie. for many this day will reflect a certain day perhaps in ww2 , and compared to what happened 10 years ago it was a drop in the ocean compared to what they went through...its called personal persepctive.
|
On September 11 2011 22:58 sekritzzz wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 22:54 BlackJack wrote: Guess what? Everyday in our calendar year is linked with the slaughter of thousands of people. The fact that you're choosing to commemorate a random one has jack shit to do with honoring the people that died in Chile and everything to do with trying to make some stupid douchebag point about US foreign policy. That's probably even more insulting to a Chilean than to an American. wtf leave this thread? As an international observer I found this thread much more meaningful than the American 9/11 thread. Simply because I had no idea about this incident before. Memorials are held for things to be remembered and this thread serves its purpose. You make me sick, you really do.
|
After ten years have passed, these 'anniversaries' are usually only highlighted internationally every 10 years. After 50 years every 50th year, after 100 every 100th...
|
On September 11 2011 23:01 iamtheoneneo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 22:54 BlackJack wrote: Guess what? Everyday in our calendar year is linked with the slaughter of thousands of people. The fact that you're choosing to commemorate a random one has jack shit to do with honoring the people that died in Chile and everything to do with trying to make some stupid douchebag point about US foreign policy. That's probably even more insulting to a Chilean than to an American.
p.s. the fact that you're pretending like this has nothing to do with 9/11 and are just choosing to honor people and is just a coincidence makes you cowardly, imo. At least stand up for the point you're trying to make. you know what America is not the centre of the planet - some americans may think it is (im gonna assume your one of those) but its not and people approach this day under a different angle. ie. for many this day will reflect a certain day perhaps in ww2 , and compared to what happened 10 years ago it was a drop in the ocean compared to what they went through...its called personal persepctive.
It's called etiquette. If someone tells you a certain day is the anniversary where there mother passed away you don't say "So what, millions of people die everyday. You are not the center of the universe!"
|
On September 11 2011 23:08 BlackJack wrote:
It's called etiquette. If someone tells you a certain day is the anniversary where there mother passed away you don't say "So what, millions of people die everyday. You are not the center of the universe!"
but if both our mothers died on the exact same day you cant be like "dont talk about your moms death today, Mine died today assholes"
|
From what I read Pinochet was never really convicted of any crime and lived to old age in luxury. It's really quite terrible, I guess it's been a while ago since the case against him was all over the news, so I don't really remember too much of it, but it seems to be so hard to convict just about anyone guilty of war crimes.
|
|
"hi guys, I want to bring to your attentions that in Chile something horrible also happened on 9/11, let's also commemorate THEIR deaths, ok?"
"WTF!?FUCKING TROLL GET OUT SICK BASTARD!" is pretty much the response.
guys, please, calm down. This is OBVIOUSLY not meant as a troll or insult. He is trying to bring attention to a tragic event that is overlooked, so what if its also on the 10th anniversary of 9/11? is there ANY reason we can't honour and remember the victims of BOTH events? no there isnt.
so stop flaming each other in this thread please, and show more respect to the dead please?
|
On September 11 2011 23:01 k1mjee wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 22:58 sekritzzz wrote:On September 11 2011 22:54 BlackJack wrote: Guess what? Everyday in our calendar year is linked with the slaughter of thousands of people. The fact that you're choosing to commemorate a random one has jack shit to do with honoring the people that died in Chile and everything to do with trying to make some stupid douchebag point about US foreign policy. That's probably even more insulting to a Chilean than to an American. wtf leave this thread? As an international observer I found this thread much more meaningful than the American 9/11 thread. Simply because I had no idea about this incident before. Memorials are held for things to be remembered and this thread serves its purpose. You make me sick, you really do. I'm sorry for being so sick minded. Next time I should remember that some lives are worth more than others? That will make me a decent human being hopefully.
|
On September 11 2011 23:10 Twoinches wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 23:08 BlackJack wrote:
It's called etiquette. If someone tells you a certain day is the anniversary where there mother passed away you don't say "So what, millions of people die everyday. You are not the center of the universe!" but if both our mothers died on the exact same day you cant be like "dont talk about your moms death today, Mine died today assholes"
Fail analogy. It's more like
"my mother died on this day"
"Oh really? Well your mother lived in a country that used your mother's tax-payer dollars to contribute to rebels in another country that killed many other people's mothers."
|
On September 11 2011 23:10 Twoinches wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 23:08 BlackJack wrote:
It's called etiquette. If someone tells you a certain day is the anniversary where there mother passed away you don't say "So what, millions of people die everyday. You are not the center of the universe!" but if both our mothers died on the exact same day you cant be like "dont talk about your moms death today, Mine died today assholes"
The purpose of this thread is solely to deride and mock the U.S. by bringing up a past misdeed that happens to coincide with the anniversary of 9/11. This isn't about honoring and respecting victims of the Chilean rebellion - just look at the OP's post history. It looks like he specifically started posting to try to stir up some drama.
This is fucking appalling.
|
It's alright to mention this today, even if it's on the same day as the 10 year anni of 9/11. However, I feel like the OP decided to do this as a "joke" to "troll", kind of saying, "Who cares about the 10 year anniversary of those WTC bombings?". That's just a feeling I have though. I noticed he purposely mentioned US involvement, not sure of what the point of that was.
|
On September 11 2011 23:16 getSome[703] wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 23:10 Twoinches wrote:On September 11 2011 23:08 BlackJack wrote:
It's called etiquette. If someone tells you a certain day is the anniversary where there mother passed away you don't say "So what, millions of people die everyday. You are not the center of the universe!" but if both our mothers died on the exact same day you cant be like "dont talk about your moms death today, Mine died today assholes" The purpose of this thread is solely to deride and mock the U.S. by bringing up a past misdeed that happens to coincide with the anniversary of 9/11. This isn't about honoring and respecting victims of the Chilean rebellion - just look at the OP's post history. It looks like he specifically started posting to try to stir up some drama. This is fucking appalling. Ok so he joined on March 27th, tried to act like a sc2 player by posting about void rays and a "Yellow" thread , just so he can make a thread 6 months later on sept.11th to ridicule the fall of the twin towers?
If anything his past history contradicts your reasoning?
|
On September 11 2011 23:19 CoolguyBad wrote: It's alright to mention this today, even if it's on the same day as the 10 year anni of 9/11. However, I feel like the OP decided to do this as a "joke" to "troll", kind of saying, "Who cares about the 10 year anniversary of those WTC bombings?". That's just a feeling I have though. I noticed he purposely mentioned US involvement, not sure of what the point of that was. Isnt the irony all on the side of history though? I feel that you can't talk seriously about that coup d'état without mentioning the us involvement.
|
On September 11 2011 23:20 sekritzzz wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 23:16 getSome[703] wrote:On September 11 2011 23:10 Twoinches wrote:On September 11 2011 23:08 BlackJack wrote:
It's called etiquette. If someone tells you a certain day is the anniversary where there mother passed away you don't say "So what, millions of people die everyday. You are not the center of the universe!" but if both our mothers died on the exact same day you cant be like "dont talk about your moms death today, Mine died today assholes" The purpose of this thread is solely to deride and mock the U.S. by bringing up a past misdeed that happens to coincide with the anniversary of 9/11. This isn't about honoring and respecting victims of the Chilean rebellion - just look at the OP's post history. It looks like he specifically started posting to try to stir up some drama. This is fucking appalling. Ok so he joined on March 27th, tried to act like a sc2 player by posting about void rays and a "Yellow" thread , just so he can make a thread 6 months later on sept.11th to ridicule the fall of the twin towers? If anything his past history contradicts your reasoning?
If you want to ignore what the OP is so obviously doing, that's fine. A goat with half a brain would be able to identify that he's just taking a giant shit on the U.S. by highlighting their involvement and exaggerating the death toll. Maybe he didn't join TL with this intention but he's sure getting away with it now.
|
guys this has nothing to do with the 9/11 bombings so knock it off.
I find it sad that it's my first time finding out something as big as this event, unlike some less incriminating things that are hyped and shoved in my face by the media.
|
On September 11 2011 23:16 getSome[703] wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 23:10 Twoinches wrote:On September 11 2011 23:08 BlackJack wrote:
It's called etiquette. If someone tells you a certain day is the anniversary where there mother passed away you don't say "So what, millions of people die everyday. You are not the center of the universe!" but if both our mothers died on the exact same day you cant be like "dont talk about your moms death today, Mine died today assholes" The purpose of this thread is solely to deride and mock the U.S. by bringing up a past misdeed that happens to coincide with the anniversary of 9/11. This isn't about honoring and respecting victims of the Chilean rebellion - just look at the OP's post history. It looks like he specifically started posting to try to stir up some drama. This is fucking appalling.
That's not really open-minded. Please calm down, and do not derail the thread.
|
Paramount to mourning the many lost lives on this day in history, regardless of which nation the injustices took place in, is defending a perceived slight to your home country on an internet forum.
|
This thread is appalling. Anyone saying this thread is only to mock the US deserves a long ban.
Fuck you, seriously. Someone made a thread because he felt an event was forgotten, on the day of said event. It coincides with the terrorist attack, that's all. They are separate events. Keep the US stuff in one the other thread and let's keep this thread pertaining to this event.
A lot of you are pushing this aside as if it doesn't matter because you only care about 9/11 as the memorial of a terrorist event.
Congratulations, you just made light of thousands of deaths and people getting tortured.
Fucking disgusting.
|
Well this took a nose dive relatively quick.I was just reading through the 9/11 thread and was proud of TL and the people that they kept snide comments to themselves and just not post anything but RIP and what they have done on that day,or not post at all if they didn't have anything to say. Even if this thread was put up as slightly trollish in mind its just ironic to me that people go out of their way and post stuff like 9/11>anything else that happen that day. Personally I don't really care about 9/11 that much,as much as I know any other American doesn't care about,for instance,the massacre at Ovčara,Maslenica or any other civilian massacre that happened on some day during the war in my country. But what I do is I keep dumb comments to myself and wish all the best to the victims and their family's,or don't post at all.
|
On September 11 2011 22:55 pippo_jedi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 22:41 DaCruise wrote:On September 11 2011 22:36 ArcticRaven wrote: It's good to bring back events like that to people's memory. Sure it is. Just dont use the 10 year anniversary of what happened in the US as an excuse for doing it..... I didn't: it's not anybody fault if they both happened the 11th of september. just that, plain and simple. If you want to know: at my university my student's group used to hang a poster about Chile every year, so, personally, it's not something i do this year for the first time. it's the first time i do on TL because i signed up here in the past year or so... have a good day 
First, go to cnn.com, and read the front page headline.
It's not disrespectful, as your OP suggests, to compare the content of this thread with the 9/11 terrorist attack -- it's inevitable. And it certainly doesn't make anyone an "asshole," as you put it, for making that utterly minuscule leap in logic.
If your intent really is to engender memories of both tragic events' victims, you would be well-advised to remove the underlying passive-aggression towards the US 9/11 events in the first post, and instead specifically request that people take the time to remember the victims of both. Otherwise, this thread is just an offensive display to both the Chilean 9/11 coup d'état and the US 9/11 terrorist attacks.
|
So, people can't post on 9/11 about stuff that happened in 9/11 and isn't the WTC attacks? The chilean episode is a very key moment of South American history. It should be remembered, and the US participation was very clear and decisive
|
I wouldn't take this as bad as I am if it wasn't posted by someone from Italy... I just hope he's just a Chilean in Italy and i'm a fool.
|
On September 11 2011 22:55 pippo_jedi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 22:39 zezamer wrote: "Of these approximately 40,000 to 50,000 perfunctory arrests, several hundred individuals would later be detained, questioned, tortured, and in some cases murdered"
How are you getting your 30000 death? I took that from the wiki page you linked
I said: according to some sources, i don't know which ones are exact. The problem is, as you may know, that of "disappeared" (desaparecidos): it is difficult to have good estimation af the deaths of people who cannot be found. Of course i'm referring to the deaths caused not only in the days of the coup by itself, but to the deaths following it too.
The following:
"The Valech Report (officially The National Commission on Political Imprisonment and Torture Report) was a study that detailed abuses committed in Chile between 1973 and 1990 by agents of Augusto Pinochet's military regime"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valech_Report
"The commission found that 38,254 people had been imprisoned for political reasons and that most had been tortured. It also found that 30 people had been executed or "disappeared"; that is in addition to those recorded by the earlier Rettig Report."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rettig_Report
"The Rettig Report, officially The National Commission for Truth and Reconciliation Report, is a 1991 report by a commission designated by then President Patricio Aylwin (from the Concertación) encompassing human rights abuses resulting in death or disappearance that occurred in Chile during the years of military rule under Augusto Pinochet, which began on September 11, 1973 and ended on March 11, 1990"
"The report determined that 2,279 persons were killed for political reasons. This figure included 957 disappeared after arrest and 164 "victims of political violence", a figure that included police officers and others killed by left-wing extremists.[1](p1122) In 641 cases, the commission could not conclusively determine that the person was killed for political reasons. It found 508 cases that were beyond its mandate, and that in 449 cases, no information beyond the name of a disappeared person could be determined"
So total around 3000 death and 40000 tortured, proved by reports, your 30000 + 600000 is just false.
Your also making it sound like US had a big impact on this, but the truth is.
" The CIA inserted covert operatives in Chile, in order to prevent a Marxist government from arising, and conducted propaganda operations which were designed to push the Chilean president Eduardo Frei to support "a military coup which would prevent Allende from taking office on the 3rd of November."[27][28] While U.S. government hostility to the Allende government is unquestioned, the nature of the U.S. role in the coup is highly controversial. Claims of the direct US involvement in the coup have not been supported by publicly available documentary evidence"
Your just trying to make US like some monster with no evidence, maybe to make "9/11" look justified or something, I don't really understand what you're trying to achieve.
|
Same day, two events, two threads.
It's not hard to keep them separate :\
|
There's a whole memorial thing going on every year for the WTC. When it will be 38 years after these events, people will still do what they do today. the OP has every right to post a thread to commemorate the death of 3000 Chileans. 3000 people dying are still people no matter where they come from and just because the media decides to cover 9/11(WTC) a lot, doesnt mean everything else in the world has to be ignored.
|
I found http://ziomania.com/articles2011/03/50.htm on google which says the official number of deaths is roughly 3000, but there are 'credible estimates' that the real number is between three and ten times as much. So potentially there have been 30k killed, although I guess it'd be fairer to say between 10 and 30k.
In any case, I suppose this topic is controversial, but I hope people will realize that there have been a lot more massacres and mass killings than just 9/11 and it's not a bad thing to also remember the less-known ones.
|
On September 11 2011 23:33 MandoRelease wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 23:16 getSome[703] wrote:On September 11 2011 23:10 Twoinches wrote:On September 11 2011 23:08 BlackJack wrote:
It's called etiquette. If someone tells you a certain day is the anniversary where there mother passed away you don't say "So what, millions of people die everyday. You are not the center of the universe!" but if both our mothers died on the exact same day you cant be like "dont talk about your moms death today, Mine died today assholes" The purpose of this thread is solely to deride and mock the U.S. by bringing up a past misdeed that happens to coincide with the anniversary of 9/11. This isn't about honoring and respecting victims of the Chilean rebellion - just look at the OP's post history. It looks like he specifically started posting to try to stir up some drama. This is fucking appalling. That's not really open-minded. Please calm down, and do not derail the thread.
If OP didn't want this thread to be derailed then he shouldn't have ignored the elephant in the room and then instructed everyone not to talk about the elephant in the room.
|
On September 11 2011 23:27 getSome[703] wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 23:20 sekritzzz wrote:On September 11 2011 23:16 getSome[703] wrote:On September 11 2011 23:10 Twoinches wrote:On September 11 2011 23:08 BlackJack wrote:
It's called etiquette. If someone tells you a certain day is the anniversary where there mother passed away you don't say "So what, millions of people die everyday. You are not the center of the universe!" but if both our mothers died on the exact same day you cant be like "dont talk about your moms death today, Mine died today assholes" The purpose of this thread is solely to deride and mock the U.S. by bringing up a past misdeed that happens to coincide with the anniversary of 9/11. This isn't about honoring and respecting victims of the Chilean rebellion - just look at the OP's post history. It looks like he specifically started posting to try to stir up some drama. This is fucking appalling. Ok so he joined on March 27th, tried to act like a sc2 player by posting about void rays and a "Yellow" thread , just so he can make a thread 6 months later on sept.11th to ridicule the fall of the twin towers? If anything his past history contradicts your reasoning? If you want to ignore what the OP is so obviously doing, that's fine. A goat with half a brain would be able to identify that he's just taking a giant shit on the U.S. by highlighting their involvement and exaggerating the death toll. Maybe he didn't join TL with this intention but he's sure getting away with it now. Look, I am not denying the fact that this could be a troll post but there simply is no evidence. The significance of this event to Chileans/Latin Americans is probably monstrous. I respect their dead and now am aware of their tragedy, just like I respect the dead from the twin towers and their tragedy. People need to either pay their respects or leave in peace.
|
Well it's obvious why you put this thread up. It's actually disrespectful to both groups of victims. The 9/11 thread made you mad so you USE this event in history to ATTEMPT to make a point. Grow up.
|
On September 11 2011 23:45 sekritzzz wrote: Look, I am not denying the fact that this could be a troll post but there simply is no evidence.
I just prove it above ^
|
I think people should stop whining. Two tragic things happened, yes. Why do we have to compete? 9/11 was the first time we were attacked on our own soil, but in Chile thousands and thousands more people died.
I think that to compare the two is ridiculous. Sympathize with each other and stop trying o compete who's is more significant.
|
I hate to be "that guy", but there is a lot of misinformation in the OP... Considering this thread is only about the 9/11 coup d'état, adding an extra 0 to the death tole is bit ridiculous. It also says that the military imprisoned ~40,000 vs 600,000. Not trying to devalue this or anything, we just need to get the facts straight. This thread turned into a shitfest pretty quickly.
|
On September 11 2011 23:51 hotbreakfest wrote: I hate to be "that guy", but there is a lot of misinformation in the OP... Considering this thread is only about the 9/11 coup d'état, adding an extra 0 to the death tole is bit ridiculous. It also says that the military imprisoned ~40,000 vs 600,000. Not trying to devalue this or anything, we just need to get the facts straight. This thread turned into a shitfest pretty quickly. I hate to say it but I'm pretty sure that was exactly the OP's intention.
|
Instead of turning this into a 30 page flame fest let's just calm down for a second. It doesn't matter if this was a troll or not. I can understand many feel very emotional about this day but please just instead of flaming on forums spend this day doing what really matters. Honoring the dead, both Chilean and American.
|
|
My lack of history is rather frightening. I didn't even realise something of this magnitude happened in Chile. Saddening how cruel we as a people are towards each other ;(
|
On September 11 2011 23:53 muse5187 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 23:51 hotbreakfest wrote: I hate to be "that guy", but there is a lot of misinformation in the OP... Considering this thread is only about the 9/11 coup d'état, adding an extra 0 to the death tole is bit ridiculous. It also says that the military imprisoned ~40,000 vs 600,000. Not trying to devalue this or anything, we just need to get the facts straight. This thread turned into a shitfest pretty quickly. I hate to say it but I'm pretty sure that was exactly the OP's intention. I know that, but I wanted to avoid looking like a troll. Just in case. :D
|
30k deaths, well I was bawwing. Then I saw 3k death toll and I was like that's alright. Is this how this works? Bigger number wins? If that's the case we should start building monuments for Iraqis because their death toll is way bigger and therefore way more tragic compared to American casualties. AMIDOINGITRITE?
|
even if OP is a troll attempt, there's no reason to take the bait.
|
This thread doesn't shock me. It's not an odd timing as long as the American 9/11 is not discussed.
Personnally, 9/11/1973 is the first date I think about, and it feels nice to see people remembering it. However, it's a complex topic and not as much as a single event like the WTC. It has become a little taboo among many Chilean people.
|
The userbase of this website are pretty stupid and ignorant.. lol.
If it's a troll, you just got baited. Good job.
If it's not a troll, you're butthurt about someone mentioning another anniversary other than the American one, and feel the need to undermine their affairs. Retards.
User was banned for this post.
|
Most...well, "educated" (or people with an interest in international affairs or history, to be more precise) people are aware of US involvement in various South and Central American coups, support for dictatorships, and other nasty things. But I doubt for a single second anyone honestly believes the intent of this thread was to have a remembrance or tribute for the Chilean people and not to directly instigate a shitfest is completely deluded.
"I'm going to make a thread about a US-instigated coup that led to the death of thousands of people on 9/11 and not expect it to go the hell in a handbasket".
...
|
I wonder what else happened on September 11th?
brb going to wikipedia to look it up and make a thread about it with the intention of trolling this forum
|
Hi, too many post to quote, so sorry if I miss something and if it's a little non-linear
First of all, as I wrote on the note, all the people that are making comparison between the coup in 1973 and the terrorist acts on the twin towers are, in my opinion, ASSHOLES, both the kind: the one that says x death are more than y deaths trying to "defend" to OP or the ones the says that I opened this thread to troll the victims of the 9/11: I explicitly asked to stay away from that as it is disrespectful and has nothing to do with the events of 1973.
As I stated the purpose of this tread is to remember, to inform people about an event that i consider important. Are there other important events in history that should be remembered? yes, opening a thread about one does not make the others less significant, though. And anyone not thinking is important can simply ignore this thread: I do not post on the My Little Pony thread as i find it not interesting.
I mentioned USA involvement because it's a thing worth mentioning: not so many people are aware of that but I also pointed to the wiki and encouraged to read more on that so anyone can form his own idea and not be biased by what, very little in truth, I wrote.
To DaCruise: I am one of those that every year post something about this on facebook or social networks, since i consider myself part of TL community I also wrote it here. It is not my intent to be disrespectful to the ones who died on 9/11/2001 and I feel bad for the ones that can feel hurt by this thread, but this thread has nothing to do with them.
someone made i point that I'm italian and that they hope i'm a least from chile: 1) one has not to be from chile to be informed about it and to write about it, to suggest otherwise sounds silly to me 2) As it happens when I was around 2 my family took some refugees from Chile, do that piece of personal information validate my entire thread? not really, just wrote it to underline how that argument is weak. Is as if someone (ad hitlerum quote now) has to be Hebrew to discuss about holocaust, or japanese about hirosihma...
A couple of posts wrote that by writing this, it's inevitable to make comparisons as it is a elephant in the room. Well: as the opener of this thread i have the right to ask not to talk about some things: it was clear to me that i would have attracted criticism for doing it but I wanted also to make clear that my idea was another one. If people don't believe me and think i'm lying, that i'ìm a troll, well: they are entitled to have their opinion, i'm not a TL veteran and have not a long reputation so it's ok, i expect that, i only ask to be polite and don't derail this thread: you have made your point, now we can move on and be spared the long series of "F##KING TROLL" post?
If you think i'm a troll you are feeding the troll, so stop now: you're already warned the community of this, more is just feeding. If i'm not, you're attracting one or you're derailing the thread.
Peace
|
The US has a terrible track record in Latin America.
|
After reading this thread along with others that share a similar topic all that comes to my mind is "lol humanity". It's really depressing : /.
|
On September 11 2011 23:53 Paperplane wrote: Instead of turning this into a 30 page flame fest let's just calm down for a second. It doesn't matter if this was a troll or not. I can understand many feel very emotional about this day but please just instead of flaming on forums spend this day doing what really matters. Honoring the dead, both Chilean and American.
Basically this. The intention of the OP doesnt really matter. Something horrible happened 10 years ago and something horrible happened 38years ago. And in both events innocent people died.
Just honor the dead. And if you dont want to honor both deads: dont write in the other thread and show how "superior" / more important your tragic event is.... it's just disrespectful.
|
People in this thread are so salty.
Tragedy is tragedy.
Rest in peace.
|
Edit - Changed my mind, seems like a bad idea to get involved with this.
|
The story that always touches me about this entire horrible story is the life of Victor Jara, not just that, but the way he died. Being a famous folk guitarist they took him and in front of a crowd smashed his hands with guitar rifles, then would mock him to play them some of his songs. Finally, with hands bleeding and flinging blood, he conducted the entire crowd in a singing of the popular Union rally song, to which he was then shot 44 times.
Victor was an amazing musician and his story always moves me from this awful period in history.
|
On September 12 2011 00:09 pippo_jedi wrote: Hi, too many post to quote, so sorry if I miss something and if it's a little non-linear
First of all, as I wrote on the note, all the people that are making comparison between the coup in 1973 and the terrorist acts on the twin towers are, in my opinion, ASSHOLES, both the kind: the one that says x death are more than y deaths trying to "defend" to OP or the ones the says that I opened this thread to troll the victims of the 9/11: I explicitly asked to stay away from that as it is disrespectful and has nothing to do with the events of 1973.
As I stated the purpose of this tread is to remember, to inform people about an event that i consider important. Are there other important events in history that should be remembered? yes, opening a thread about one does not make the others less significant, though. And anyone not thinking is important can simply ignore this thread: I do not post on the My Little Pony thread as i find it not interesting.
I mentioned USA involvement because it's a thing worth mentioning: not so many people are aware of that but I also pointed to the wiki and encouraged to read more on that so anyone can form his own idea and not be biased by what, very little in truth, I wrote.
To DaCruise: I am one of those that every year post something about this on facebook or social networks, since i consider myself part of TL community I also wrote it here. It is not my intent to be disrespectful to the ones who died on 9/11/2001 and I feel bad for the ones that can feel hurt by this thread, but this thread has nothing to do with them.
someone made i point that I'm italian and that they hope i'm a least from chile: 1) one has not to be from chile to be informed about it and to write about it, to suggest otherwise sounds silly to me 2) As it happens when I was around 2 my family took some refugees from Chile, do that piece of personal information validate my entire thread? not really, just wrote it to underline how that argument is weak. Is as if someone (ad hitlerum quote now) has to be Hebrew to discuss about holocaust, or japanese about hirosihma...
A couple of posts wrote that by writing this, it's inevitable to make comparisons as it is a elephant in the room. Well: as the opener of this thread i have the right to ask not to talk about some things: it was clear to me that i would have attracted criticism for doing it but I wanted also to make clear that my idea was another one. If people don't believe me and think i'm lying, that i'ìm a troll, well: they are entitled to have their opinion, i'm not a TL veteran and have not a long reputation so it's ok, i expect that, i only ask to be polite and don't derail this thread: you have made your point, now we can move on and be spared the long series of "F##KING TROLL" post?
If you think i'm a troll you are feeding the troll, so stop now: you're already warned the community of this, more is just feeding. If i'm not, you're attracting one or you're derailing the thread.
Peace
You're doing too much man.
|
You can't blame the OP for the reactions, try blaming the people that reacted.
|
On September 12 2011 00:22 DamageControL wrote: Tragedy is tragedy.
This, right here, is the entire point the OP is making, we shouldn't be giving such a special consideration for 9/11 when just as many people have died in other countries even on this same day, all tragedies are terrible and they should all be remembered regardless of where the deaths originated.
|
On September 12 2011 00:24 Navillus wrote:
If you are going to on the tenth anniversary of the biggest tragedy in the US in recent memory make some thread about how all of these people died due to US foreign policy you better as fuck have actual sources for what you're claiming, especially if you're claiming 30,000 people died when the only article that you linked makes it look like at most 1,000, sure I'll accept that most people that disappeared are probably dead and that we should include deaths on days after, but only after you actually give us a freaking source, until then you should either change the OP to reflect the numbers that we're reading or stop making this claim altogether.
You have a good point: I edited to OP to be more clear. I leaved the first numbers but explained it more thoroughly, hoping it's more clear.
thank you for your post
|
On September 11 2011 23:44 Grumbels wrote:I found http://ziomania.com/articles2011/03/50.htm on google which says the official number of deaths is roughly 3000, but there are 'credible estimates' that the real number is between three and ten times as much. So potentially there have been 30k killed, although I guess it'd be fairer to say between 10 and 30k. In any case, I suppose this topic is controversial, but I hope people will realize that there have been a lot more massacres and mass killings than just 9/11 and it's not a bad thing to also remember the less-known ones.
I'm going to be brutally honest in saying that the media has a large role to play in this. No, im not one of those "OMG MEDIA ZIONIST PIGS CONTROL THE LAND" sort of people but clearly the media does come into effect in this case. Compared to other events in recent history, 9/11 is a minor blip on a radar filled with mass genocides (in some cases upto 20% of a countrys population killed) and other brutal acts of the lifes of innocent civilians whether it by by their goverments or some rogue group.
In other words, would we be standing here to day commemorating the lives lost of people in a terrorist attack if the events of 9/11 were to have happened in Johannesburg, South Africa rather than than New York. Can you tell me the date and time of the terrorist attacks on London, Madrid or Bali (off the top head)? How many innocent lives were lost in India/Pakistan in 1947? But I'm sure that most of us could answer these questions if they were asked about 9/11. Why is that?
Why do we remember those who have died on 9/11 but only a few of us can commemorate the thousands of people who die each day due to poverty or those who have died in the past because of rogue terrorist groups or corrupt governments? It really comes down to what we hear, see and read about about how the media prioritises these events.
Please dont take this out of context and turn my words into "OH HE HATES AMERICA, WHO CARES ABOUT 9/11 BLAH BLAH BLAH SOCIAL ENGINEERING ZIONIST" because your missing the point.
RIP. All innocent lives lost, under any circumastance, at anytime in history, for what ever reason.
tlrd; what makes 9/11 so special when there have been countless of acts, hundreds of times worse than what happened on 9/11.
|
Plz keep coming with stuff like this. People need to know more about the crap that western countries have done since WW2. Right after WW2 the US was so insanely powerful they could basically do whatever they wanted so they did. Remember MCcarthy remember truman. It's the way the world works. It is surprising that the only crap the US got back are the bombing of the embassies in Nairobi and Dar Es Salaam and 9/11. Things in South America could have turned out a lot worse for the US. I would not find it surprising at all if there were radical left wing terrorist groups rooted in South America targeting US citizens/embassies but it seems there aren't and most South American governments function relatively well compared to the way they did in the 70's and 80's. A little list Cuba Guatemala Nicaragua Panama Colombia Chile Argentina And that's just south America
Iraq Iran Afghanistan Pakistan Saudi Arabia Cambodia Vietnam
The list of countries the US military/CIA messed with big time is pretty much endless. I don't know much about Africa but I bet its ugly. I am not even mentioning the list of dictators/authoritarian regimes that were allowed to rule their country without the west uttering any word of protest to their conduct. It is critical to understand the extent of american foreign operations ( covert and not covert, military and financial ) and the unrivalled power they had trough the 50's,60's,70's, 80's and 90's to understand 9/11 and put it in perspective.
|
On September 11 2011 22:41 DaCruise wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 22:36 ArcticRaven wrote: It's good to bring back events like that to people's memory. Sure it is. Just dont use the 10 year anniversary of what happened in the US as an excuse for doing it.....
Not everyone lives their lives on the US schedule.
|
I just want to say that 30k death is a gross overestimation. Trusting anything but the oficial numbers is just ofensive to me, given how many resources have been used to gather testimonies and evidence to come up with the real numbers. So please, fix it.
|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On September 12 2011 00:43 g. wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2011 23:44 Grumbels wrote:I found http://ziomania.com/articles2011/03/50.htm on google which says the official number of deaths is roughly 3000, but there are 'credible estimates' that the real number is between three and ten times as much. So potentially there have been 30k killed, although I guess it'd be fairer to say between 10 and 30k. In any case, I suppose this topic is controversial, but I hope people will realize that there have been a lot more massacres and mass killings than just 9/11 and it's not a bad thing to also remember the less-known ones. I'm going to be brutally honest in saying that the media has a large role to play in this. No, im not one of those "OMG MEDIA ZIONIST PIGS CONTROL THE LAND" sort of people but clearly the media does come into effect in this case. Compared to other events in recent history, 9/11 is a minor blip on a radar filled with mass genocides (in some cases upto 20% of a countrys population killed) and other brutal acts of the lifes of innocent civilians whether it by by their goverments or some rogue group. In other words, would we be standing here to day commemorating the lives lost of people in a terrorist attack if the events of 9/11 were to have happened in Johannesburg, South Africa rather than than New York. Can you tell me the date and time of the terrorist attacks on London, Madrid or Bali (off the top head)? How many innocent lives were lost in India/Pakistan in 1947? But I'm sure that most of us could answer these questions if they were asked about 9/11. Why is that? Why do we remember those who have died on 9/11 but only a few of us can commemorate the thousands of people who die each day due to poverty or those who have died in the past because of rogue terrorist groups or corrupt governments? It really comes down to what we hear, see and read about about how the media prioritises these events. Please dont take this out of context and turn my words into "OH HE HATES AMERICA, WHO CARES ABOUT 9/11 BLAH BLAH BLAH SOCIAL ENGINEERING ZIONIST" because your missing the point. RIP. All innocent lives lost, under any circumastance, at anytime in history, for what ever reason. tlrd; what makes 9/11 so special when there have been countless of acts, hundreds of times worse than what happened on 9/11.
I think it's partly because it was a crack in what had been seen to be the impenetrable armour of the US. Places like the UK, Spain and Indonesia etc. have all had a much longer history of terrorism so it was less of a shocking thing to happen. I also have a feeling it was one of the largest death tolls in a single event. Not that that means it should be any more important, just some thoughts on why it is seen to be.
|
Thanks for the thread. I immediately knew that there will be many controversial posts following the OP, but I took this opportunity to once again browse wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11) to improve my knowledge of history a bit once again. Maybe i will read the 9/12 page tomorrow ^_^
|
I'm not going to enter this debate, just saying that people argueing about "X thousands dead? IT WAS Y THOUSANDS AT THE MOST!" is just pathetic and some other words I'm not gonna post.
¡Venceremos!
|
The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex.
|
On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex.
This. Hurts me so much to see people try to put down the OP.
Disgusting.
|
In all honesty, the OP is pretty awful. There wasn't very much time put into this post and as a result it comes off like a troll. I took the time to read about the events he linked and I'm glad I did, I would just like to see more time put into the original post to improve the readability of it.
|
On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex.
Has nothing to do with superiority complex. After the Japanese tsunami some Americans tried to "honor" the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. Other Americans shouted down those people, too.
|
On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. Nor are we allowed to discuss the 13,372 - 32,969 civilian deaths as a result of NATO's retaliation to a rogue group of terrorists.
|
Plz keep coming with stuff like this. People need to know more about the crap that western countries have done since WW2. Right after WW2 the US was so insanely powerful they could basically do whatever they wanted so they did. Remember MCcarthy remember truman. It's the way the world works. It is surprising that the only crap the US got back are the bombing of the embassies in Nairobi and Dar Es Salaam and 9/11. Things in South America could have turned out a lot worse for the US. I would not find it surprising at all if there were radical left wing terrorist groups rooted in South America targeting US citizens/embassies but it seems there aren't and most South American governments function relatively well compared to the way they did in the 70's and 80's. A little list Cuba - x Guatemala - x Nicaragua - x Panama Colombia - x Chile - x Argentina - x And that's just south America
Iraq - x Iran - x Afghanistan - x Pakistan - y Saudi Arabia* Cambodia - x Vietnam - x
Countries where US involvement was response to Soviet involvement are marked with an X.
Pakistan is marked with a Y because the US and Pakistan had good relations until the USSR was gone and jihadis moved on to their next target, which was already picked as the US.
Saudi Arabia has an asterisk because Saudis either liked or didn't care one way or the other about the Saudi-US relationship until Osama bin Laden got his panties twisted about us (and not him) saving the country from Saddam Hussein in 1991.
But let's look at what countries were "messed with" by the other side:
Afghanistan Albania Angola Argentina Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Bulgaria Cambodia Chile China Colombia Congo Cuba Czech Republic and Slovakia Egypt Finland Georgia Germany Greece Grenada Guatemala Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Italy Japan Kazakhstan Korea Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lithuania Macedonia Moldova Mongolia Montenegro Nicaragua Philippines Poland Romania Russia Serbia Syria Turkey Ukraine Uzbekistan Vietnam
The list of countries the US military/CIA messed with big time is pretty much endless. I don't know much about Africa but I bet its ugly. I am not even mentioning the list of dictators/authoritarian regimes that were allowed to rule their country without the west uttering any word of protest to their conduct. It is critical to understand the extent of american foreign operations ( covert and not covert, military and financial ) and the unrivalled power they had trough the 50's,60's,70's, 80's and 90's to understand 9/11 and put it in perspective.
Pure fantasy thinking. Literally every sentence contains at least one inaccuracy, some of them very egregious.
|
look i respect what happened. but it seems like ur using the fact that theres a thread alrdy on sep 11 2001 and making a parallel thread on this issue to state ur anti us sentiment. i dont think its appropriate and i think ur a troll. it happened in 1973, u could post this on any other day but decide to do it today and use the sept 11 date as an excuse. ur a troll. and im colombian. i know about this, ur still trolling and its obvious. but w.e, it shows how understanding mods are sometimes considering they left this open for u and u only have 7 posts.
|
On September 12 2011 01:08 ch33psh33p wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. This. Hurts me so much to see people try to put down the OP. Disgusting. Oh well, that's quite logical, considering that the CIA heavily supported Pinochet and helped a lot the coup. Nobody wants to be reminded that they have been the bad one, especially when nothing has changed.
September 11, a thought for the innocent victims of the WTC. And a thought for the victims of the Shouth-American dictatorships America supported for thirty years in their anti-communist paranoiac and imperialist ideology. They deserve to be honored equally.
|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On September 12 2011 01:12 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. Has nothing to do with superiority complex. After the Japanese tsunami some Americans tried to "honor" the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. Other Americans shouted down those people, too.
That was really different. The people saying stuff after the Japanese tsunami were saying that it was payback for Pearl Harbour, saying the people deserved to die (also happened after Japan beat the US in the women's football world cup). No one in this thread is saying the people in the WTC deserved to die.
|
On September 12 2011 01:12 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. Has nothing to do with superiority complex. After the Japanese tsunami some Americans tried to "honor" the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. Other Americans shouted down those people, too. Neither was the attack on Pearl Harbor on the same day, nor is what happened on the internet "honor the lives" of anyone; see this for reference.
|
Mixed feelings about this thread. Thanks for informing us about what happened. But i feel like you're trying to prove a point or something. You guys say the date is a coincidence but we don't see "remember what happened on x date" every single day on TL. I probably didn't articulate how i feel very well unfortunately.
|
On September 12 2011 01:12 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. Has nothing to do with superiority complex. After the Japanese tsunami some Americans tried to "honor" the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. Other Americans shouted down those people, too.
Just to make it clear: I'm not saying all of the americans have the superiority complex, and there's also diferent levels of it.
|
On September 12 2011 01:15 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +Plz keep coming with stuff like this. People need to know more about the crap that western countries have done since WW2. Right after WW2 the US was so insanely powerful they could basically do whatever they wanted so they did. Remember MCcarthy remember truman. It's the way the world works. It is surprising that the only crap the US got back are the bombing of the embassies in Nairobi and Dar Es Salaam and 9/11. Things in South America could have turned out a lot worse for the US. I would not find it surprising at all if there were radical left wing terrorist groups rooted in South America targeting US citizens/embassies but it seems there aren't and most South American governments function relatively well compared to the way they did in the 70's and 80's. A little list Cuba - x Guatemala - x Nicaragua - x Panama Colombia - x Chile - x Argentina - x And that's just south America
Iraq - x Iran - x Afghanistan - x Pakistan - y Saudi Arabia* Cambodia - x Vietnam - x Countries where US involvement was response to Soviet involvement are marked with an X. Pakistan is marked with a Y because the US and Pakistan had good relations until the USSR was gone and jihadis moved on to their next target, which was already picked as the US. Saudi Arabia has an asterisk because Saudis either liked or didn't care one way or the other about the Saudi-US relationship until Osama bin Laden got his panties twisted about us (and not him) saving the country from Saddam Hussein in 1991. But let's look at what countries were "messed with" by the other side: Afghanistan Albania Angola Argentina Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Bulgaria Cambodia Chile China Colombia Congo Cuba Czech Republic and Slovakia Egypt Finland Georgia Germany Greece Grenada Guatemala Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Italy Japan Kazakhstan Korea Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lithuania Macedonia Moldova Mongolia Montenegro Nicaragua Philippines Poland Romania Russia Serbia Syria Turkey Ukraine Uzbekistan Vietnam Show nested quote +The list of countries the US military/CIA messed with big time is pretty much endless. I don't know much about Africa but I bet its ugly. I am not even mentioning the list of dictators/authoritarian regimes that were allowed to rule their country without the west uttering any word of protest to their conduct. It is critical to understand the extent of american foreign operations ( covert and not covert, military and financial ) and the unrivalled power they had trough the 50's,60's,70's, 80's and 90's to understand 9/11 and put it in perspective. Pure fantasy thinking. Literally every sentence contains at least one inaccuracy, some of them very egregious. Look, my mother had to flee Argentina because of the fascist dictatorship your country installed and supported.
It had nothing to do with Soviets. Chile had nothing to do with Soviet either. It had to do with a democratic left wing government which was bad for the american companies that exploited Chile at that time. Period.
When you guys can recognize your mistakes, and your crimes, you will be a much greater country. I don't have a shame to look at what France did in Algeria and admit it was monstrous. And I won't try to find excuses about the "other side" or whatever.
Now if we take your second list and apply to same criteria to the first one, it's basically the whole world.
|
On September 12 2011 01:16 imallinson wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:12 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. Has nothing to do with superiority complex. After the Japanese tsunami some Americans tried to "honor" the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. Other Americans shouted down those people, too. That was really different. The people saying stuff after the Japanese tsunami were saying that it was payback for Pearl Harbour, saying the people deserved to die (also happened after Japan beat the US in the women's football world cup). No one in this thread is saying the people in the WTC deserved to die.
Some of them were saying those things and some of them weren't. But they were all completely classless.
|
On September 12 2011 01:15 HeavenS wrote: look i respect what happened. but it seems like ur using the fact that theres a thread alrdy on sep 11 2001 and making a parallel thread on this issue to state ur anti us sentiment. i dont think its appropriate and i think ur a troll. it happened in 1973, u could post this on any other day but decide to do it today and use the sept 11 date as an excuse. ur a troll. and im colombian. i know about this, ur still trolling and its obvious. but w.e, it shows how understanding mods are sometimes considering they left this open for u and u only have 7 posts. So you are advising him to make a post remembering September the 11th, on say..... July the 27th? Then you criticize his post history when he actually joined months ago. He has a right to lurk, you know.
|
This. Hurts me so much to see people try to put down the OP.
Disgusting.
I think it's pretty disgusting from all sides, Allende wasn't some democratic innocent poor man. He ignored thousands of court rulings and ignored the legislature at his pleasure, and did little if anything to stop the increasing militarization of leftist groups while keeping the right-leaning authorities under a very tight leash (partly for fear if he mobilized them they would overthrow him). Also he did little if anything to stop the civil disturbances that were taking place between leftists and rightists in the months leading up to the successful coup (there was an unsuccessful one in the summer).
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Agreement_of_the_Chamber_of_Deputies_of_Chile
That's the resolution passed by the Chamber of Deputies that gave the "green light" so to speak to the military to remove him from office. Which he did for them by committing suicide with a gold-plated submachine gun given to him as a gift by Fidel Castro.
The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex.
It can't be discussed because "American superiority complex" = "pointing out that there were two sides." Anything other than blanket, mindless condemnation of America = "American superiority complex."
Oh well, that's quite logical, considering that the CIA heavily supported Pinochet and helped a lot the coup. Nobody wants to be reminded that they have been the bad one, especially when nothing has changed.
I know, it makes people pretty mad to be reminded that Allende was two-stepping towards a violent dictatorship of the proletariat.
September 11, a thought for the innocent victims of the WTC. And a thought for the victims of the Shouth-American dictatorships America supported for thirty years in their anti-communist paranoiac and imperialist ideology. They deserve to be honored equally.
I prefer American "imperialism" to Soviet imperialism, oddly enough so do most of the people who experienced the latter... it's kind of weird how it's mostly only people who benefited from American "imperialism" who complain about it.
|
They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old: Age shall not weary them, nor the years contemn. At the going down of the sun and in the morning We will remember them.
|
On September 12 2011 01:21 sekritzzz wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:15 HeavenS wrote: look i respect what happened. but it seems like ur using the fact that theres a thread alrdy on sep 11 2001 and making a parallel thread on this issue to state ur anti us sentiment. i dont think its appropriate and i think ur a troll. it happened in 1973, u could post this on any other day but decide to do it today and use the sept 11 date as an excuse. ur a troll. and im colombian. i know about this, ur still trolling and its obvious. but w.e, it shows how understanding mods are sometimes considering they left this open for u and u only have 7 posts. So you are advising him to make a post remembering September the 11th, on say..... July the 27th? Then you criticize his post history when he actually joined months ago. He has a right to lurk, you know.
no im saying the intent of the op doesnt seem honest. i dont think he really wants to remember that date i think he just wants us to think about how big of assholes americans can be because he saw a thread on sept 2001 so hes trying to point it out for us.
|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On September 12 2011 01:20 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:16 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:12 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. Has nothing to do with superiority complex. After the Japanese tsunami some Americans tried to "honor" the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. Other Americans shouted down those people, too. That was really different. The people saying stuff after the Japanese tsunami were saying that it was payback for Pearl Harbour, saying the people deserved to die (also happened after Japan beat the US in the women's football world cup). No one in this thread is saying the people in the WTC deserved to die. Some of them were saying those things and some of them weren't. But they were all completely classless.
I know it was a vocal minority saying this. My point is it is a stupid comparison to make in the first place.
edit: I don't see anyone here doing stuff like this: + Show Spoiler +
|
On September 12 2011 01:21 DeepElemBlues wrote:I think it's pretty disgusting from all sides, Allende wasn't some democratic innocent poor man. Show nested quote +The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. It can't be discussed because "American superiority complex" = "pointing out that there were two sides." Anything other than blanket, mindless condemnation of America = "American superiority complex." Show nested quote +Oh well, that's quite logical, considering that the CIA heavily supported Pinochet and helped a lot the coup. Nobody wants to be reminded that they have been the bad one, especially when nothing has changed. I know, it makes people pretty mad to be reminded that Allende was two-stepping towards a violent dictatorship of the proletariat. Show nested quote +September 11, a thought for the innocent victims of the WTC. And a thought for the victims of the Shouth-American dictatorships America supported for thirty years in their anti-communist paranoiac and imperialist ideology. They deserve to be honored equally. I prefer American "imperialism" to Soviet imperialism, oddly enough so do most of the people who experienced the latter... it's kind of weird how it's mostly only people who benefited from American "imperialism" who complain about it. Believe me, Argentinian didn't have a good time under Videla. I bet they didn't have a better time than Romanians under Ceausescu. Your imperialism has been just as shameful, devastating, disgusting and immoral than the Soviet one.
Now, people who say "Oh we did horribly wrong, but some other people did horrible things too so let's not recognize it, let's not apologize and let's not admit anything at all" have suspicious moral values. If you justification for America's crimes is that Soviet Russia was wrong, I'm sorry to tell you that you won't go far. There will always be someone worse (and I don't think Soviet Russia was even worse in terms of international policy).
But yeah, the good Americans vs evil x. Black and white. God save us. All that stuff.
|
I didn't even know about this...
RIP, poor victims.
|
I'm glad Pinochet overthrew the political leaders of a country heading in the direction of communism. Many people may dislike Pinochet and call him a mass murderer, but he really did bring back democracy to Chile in a time of need; but not in a civil way, which sometimes being civil gets you nowhere.
|
I hate this thread. It's not an "american superiority complex" that causes people to disagree with this thread. It's the fact that the OP clearly has an agenda. Why else would he point out the "US involvement"? You have to know what you're getting into when posting a thread like this on a day like today, and I'd be surprised if that wasn't the whole point.
Also, 9/11 is a sad day in AMERICAN history. If TL has a Chilean-based forum, post this there. Let me put it this way... would I go to Chile and tell people to mourn for our 9/11? No, I wouldn't. THAT'S the difference.
|
I remember reading/studying about this in my Social Studies class a few years ago, but I don't remember all the details, as it was only mentioned in passing along with other, similar, events during the Cold War.
Thanks for bringing it up again, I'm going to read into it more, refresh my memory, and probably deepen my knowledge of it as well.
On September 12 2011 01:31 Holophonist wrote: I hate this thread. It's not an "american superiority complex" that causes people to disagree with this thread. It's the fact that the OP clearly has an agenda. Why else would he point out the "US involvement"? You have to know what you're getting into when posting a thread like this on a day like today, and I'd be surprised if that wasn't the whole point.
Also, 9/11 is a sad day in AMERICAN history. If TL has a Chilean-based forum, post this there. Let me put it this way... would I go to Chile and tell people to mourn for our 9/11? No, I wouldn't. THAT'S the difference. 1. Because the US was involved. 2. TL is an International forum, not an American forum. Get over yourself.
|
On September 12 2011 01:31 Holophonist wrote: I hate this thread. It's not an "american superiority complex" that causes people to disagree with this thread. It's the fact that the OP clearly has an agenda. Why else would he point out the "US involvement"? You have to know what you're getting into when posting a thread like this on a day like today, and I'd be surprised if that wasn't the whole point.
Also, 9/11 is a sad day in AMERICAN history. If TL has a Chilean-based forum, post this there. Let me put it this way... would I go to Chile and tell people to mourn for our 9/11? No, I wouldn't. THAT'S the difference.
Dude TL isnt american-based. Its international. The people who made team liquid are dutch, so he has all right to post that here.
|
On September 12 2011 01:26 imallinson wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:20 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:16 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:12 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. Has nothing to do with superiority complex. After the Japanese tsunami some Americans tried to "honor" the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. Other Americans shouted down those people, too. That was really different. The people saying stuff after the Japanese tsunami were saying that it was payback for Pearl Harbour, saying the people deserved to die (also happened after Japan beat the US in the women's football world cup). No one in this thread is saying the people in the WTC deserved to die. Some of them were saying those things and some of them weren't. But they were all completely classless. I know it was a vocal minority saying this. My point is it is a stupid comparison to make in the first place.
My point wasn't that it was a vocal minority. My point was that not everyone was so forward in saying "Japan deserved this." Some people were simply saying "let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor." Then you realize that is also a passive-agressive douchebag thing to say even though there is nothing inherently wrong with the sentence "let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor"
|
On September 12 2011 01:31 Holophonist wrote: I hate this thread. It's not an "american superiority complex" that causes people to disagree with this thread. It's the fact that the OP clearly has an agenda. Why else would he point out the "US involvement"? You have to know what you're getting into when posting a thread like this on a day like today, and I'd be surprised if that wasn't the whole point.
Also, 9/11 is a sad day in AMERICAN history. If TL has a Chilean-based forum, post this there. Let me put it this way... would I go to Chile and tell people to mourn for our 9/11? No, I wouldn't. THAT'S the difference. Funny because if Chilean 9/11 should be in a Chilean forum, American 9/11 should be in an American forum. So what about the other thread?
|
On September 12 2011 01:27 Biff The Understudy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:21 DeepElemBlues wrote:This. Hurts me so much to see people try to put down the OP.
Disgusting. I think it's pretty disgusting from all sides, Allende wasn't some democratic innocent poor man. The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. It can't be discussed because "American superiority complex" = "pointing out that there were two sides." Anything other than blanket, mindless condemnation of America = "American superiority complex." Oh well, that's quite logical, considering that the CIA heavily supported Pinochet and helped a lot the coup. Nobody wants to be reminded that they have been the bad one, especially when nothing has changed. I know, it makes people pretty mad to be reminded that Allende was two-stepping towards a violent dictatorship of the proletariat. September 11, a thought for the innocent victims of the WTC. And a thought for the victims of the Shouth-American dictatorships America supported for thirty years in their anti-communist paranoiac and imperialist ideology. They deserve to be honored equally. I prefer American "imperialism" to Soviet imperialism, oddly enough so do most of the people who experienced the latter... it's kind of weird how it's mostly only people who benefited from American "imperialism" who complain about it. Believe me, Argentinian didn't have a good time under Videla. I bet they didn't have a better time than Romanians under Ceausescu. Your imperialism has been just as shameful, devastating, disgusting and immoral than the Soviet one. Now, people who say "Oh we did horribly wrong, but some other people did horrible things too so let's not recognize it, let's not apologize and let's not admit anything at all" have suspicious moral values. If you justification for America's crimes is that Soviet Russia was wrong, I'm sorry to tell you that you won't go far. There will always be someone worse (and I don't think Soviet Russia was even worse in terms of international policy). But yeah, the good Americans vs evil x. Black and white. God save us. All that stuff. Calm down man, between you French and us Brits I think we've caused a lot more damage mankind than the Americans. And just like we don't like to be constantly reminded from everywhere that we committed all these atrocities, neither do American people all the time, epsecially on this day, so just chill out.
|
On September 12 2011 01:31 KentHenry wrote: I'm glad Pinochet overthrew the political leaders of a country heading in the direction of communism. Many people may dislike Pinochet and call him a mass murderer, but he really did bring back democracy to Chile in a time of need; but not in a civil way, which sometimes being civil gets you nowhere. That's the most disgusting and disturbing post I have seen on this forum.
|
It was a truly sad day in history. I remember in 2001 when the WTC attacks happened and I realized it was a man made event, I thought immediately - oh what a coincidence.
Here is an interview with a Chilean-American. It was very touching personally, the horror he felt at both events.
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/9/8/epitaph_for_another_9_11_reknown
Also whoever thinks that Pakistan is not fucked up because of US involvement doesn't know Pakistani history.
There is a reason why Pakistanis hate american foreign policy. Its not because we hate your freedom btw.
|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On September 12 2011 01:34 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:26 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:20 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:16 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:12 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. Has nothing to do with superiority complex. After the Japanese tsunami some Americans tried to "honor" the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. Other Americans shouted down those people, too. That was really different. The people saying stuff after the Japanese tsunami were saying that it was payback for Pearl Harbour, saying the people deserved to die (also happened after Japan beat the US in the women's football world cup). No one in this thread is saying the people in the WTC deserved to die. Some of them were saying those things and some of them weren't. But they were all completely classless. I know it was a vocal minority saying this. My point is it is a stupid comparison to make in the first place. My point wasn't that it was a vocal minority. My point was that not everyone was so forward in saying "Japan deserved this." Some people were simply saying "let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor." Then you realize that is also a passive-agressive douchebag thing to say even though there is nothing inherently wrong with the sentence "let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor"
OK point taken, but I'm missing how the Pearl Harbour comparison is relevant.
|
Believe me, Argentinian didn't have a good time under Videla. I bet they didn't have a better time than Romanians under Ceausescu. Your imperialism has been just as shameful, devastating, disgusting and immoral than the Soviet one.
No matter how hard you try to make the two equivalent, the Communist system was far more shameful, devastating, disgusting, and immoral.
Now, people who say "Oh we did horribly wrong, but some other people did horrible things too so let's not recognize it, let's not apologize and let's not admit anything at all" have suspicious moral values. If you justification for America's crimes is that Soviet Russia was wrong, I'm sorry to tell you that you won't go far. There will always be someone worse (and I don't think Soviet Russia was even worse in terms of international policy).
I don't recall any Americans saying we shouldn't recognize where we made mistakes or did things from the start that were wrong.
The problem is that people like you present a double standard and demand that the US admit that it was actually worse (which is total nonsense) and anyone who objects is immediately subjected to your bad relativistic and childish arguments ("Saying someone else did it too doesn't make it right!" Is this fourth grade? We're talking about nations not people, the world is a little more complex).
I would never say the USSR was brutal and evil just because of the revenge they took on Germany in 1945, the Germans attacked them and were brutal and evil towards them first and were literally trying to wipe them out.
And consequently I'm not going to condemn the US for "propping up" right-wing dictatorships instead of allowing left-wing dictatorships to be propped up by the Soviet Union.
It wasn't the US that lied at the end of WWII and occupied half of Europe, it wasn't the US that poured money and agents into Greece and Turkey first, it wasn't the US that caused Kim il Sung to invade South Korea in 1950, it wasn't the US that blockaded West Berlin in 1948, it wasn't the US that shelled Quemoy and Matsu, and it wasn't the US that killed ~100,000,000 people through deliberate starvation, mass shootings, labor to death in gulags, beatings from a Red Guard mob, etc.
Bolded part essentially strips you of all credibility to speak on the subject.
I'm sorry the blood-soaked animals you like so much lost and aren't able to kill tens of millions of people anymore. That's how I feel about your minimization of Communist atrocities and exaggeration of "American" ones.
But yeah, the good american. Black and white. All that stuff.
You're talking about yourself, you realize that right? The good Communist. Black and white. All that stuff.
Also whoever thinks that Pakistan is not fucked up because of US involvement doesn't know Pakistani history.
Yeah it was our fault we supported Haq after he started doing this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zia-ul-Haq's_Islamization
Which is directly responsible for the low-grade civil war engulfing your country now.
There is a reason why Pakistanis hate american foreign policy. Its not because we hate your freedom btw.
Actually it is.
It's partly because of anti-Semitism, and Islamic supremacism among Pakistanis.
Basically if Pakistanis started joining the 20th century - not the 21st, the 20th - there'd be a lot less problems.
Not the US' fault that at the least a significant minority of your countrymen support terrorist massacres and terrorist oppression. It wasn't the CIA that killed Benazhir Bhutto, it was your own intelligence agency-connected Islamist terrorists.
|
On September 12 2011 01:36 drag_ wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:27 Biff The Understudy wrote:On September 12 2011 01:21 DeepElemBlues wrote:This. Hurts me so much to see people try to put down the OP.
Disgusting. I think it's pretty disgusting from all sides, Allende wasn't some democratic innocent poor man. The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. It can't be discussed because "American superiority complex" = "pointing out that there were two sides." Anything other than blanket, mindless condemnation of America = "American superiority complex." Oh well, that's quite logical, considering that the CIA heavily supported Pinochet and helped a lot the coup. Nobody wants to be reminded that they have been the bad one, especially when nothing has changed. I know, it makes people pretty mad to be reminded that Allende was two-stepping towards a violent dictatorship of the proletariat. September 11, a thought for the innocent victims of the WTC. And a thought for the victims of the Shouth-American dictatorships America supported for thirty years in their anti-communist paranoiac and imperialist ideology. They deserve to be honored equally. I prefer American "imperialism" to Soviet imperialism, oddly enough so do most of the people who experienced the latter... it's kind of weird how it's mostly only people who benefited from American "imperialism" who complain about it. Believe me, Argentinian didn't have a good time under Videla. I bet they didn't have a better time than Romanians under Ceausescu. Your imperialism has been just as shameful, devastating, disgusting and immoral than the Soviet one. Now, people who say "Oh we did horribly wrong, but some other people did horrible things too so let's not recognize it, let's not apologize and let's not admit anything at all" have suspicious moral values. If you justification for America's crimes is that Soviet Russia was wrong, I'm sorry to tell you that you won't go far. There will always be someone worse (and I don't think Soviet Russia was even worse in terms of international policy). But yeah, the good Americans vs evil x. Black and white. God save us. All that stuff. Calm down man, between you French and us Brits I think we've caused a lot more damage mankind than the Americans. And just like we don't like to be constantly reminded from everywhere that we committed all these atrocities, neither do American people all the time, epsecially on this day, so just chill out. I know, and when Algerian or Africans remind us our history we don't start to justify ourselves saying we were right. I know the crimes France has committed, and they are pretty serious. And when I read about colonization and how we treated the populations, I feel pain in my whole body. We were the bad ones.
But when I see people like DeepemBlue who justify, refuse to recognize the crimes that his country committed only 30 years ago (and never apologized for) because of some ideological blindness and typical manicheism, I find it really problematic.
|
On September 12 2011 01:34 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:26 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:20 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:16 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:12 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. Has nothing to do with superiority complex. After the Japanese tsunami some Americans tried to "honor" the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. Other Americans shouted down those people, too. That was really different. The people saying stuff after the Japanese tsunami were saying that it was payback for Pearl Harbour, saying the people deserved to die (also happened after Japan beat the US in the women's football world cup). No one in this thread is saying the people in the WTC deserved to die. Some of them were saying those things and some of them weren't. But they were all completely classless. I know it was a vocal minority saying this. My point is it is a stupid comparison to make in the first place. My point wasn't that it was a vocal minority. My point was that not everyone was so forward in saying "Japan deserved this." Some people were simply saying "let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor." Then you realize that is also a passive-agressive douchebag thing to say even though there is nothing inherently wrong with the sentence "let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor" A lot of people completely disagree with the concept of memorial days for specific events and thus find it interesting to point out the obvious logical inconsistencies with honoring the deaths of 3000 people on a particular day whereas ignoring far more impacting events.
|
On September 12 2011 01:31 Holophonist wrote: I hate this thread. It's not an "american superiority complex" that causes people to disagree with this thread. It's the fact that the OP clearly has an agenda. Why else would he point out the "US involvement"? You have to know what you're getting into when posting a thread like this on a day like today, and I'd be surprised if that wasn't the whole point.
Also, 9/11 is a sad day in AMERICAN history. If TL has a Chilean-based forum, post this there. Let me put it this way... would I go to Chile and tell people to mourn for our 9/11? No, I wouldn't. THAT'S the difference. By your definition TL is an american forum, which is clearly wrong. This is an international forum, and people can post topics of different countries whenever they feel like it. were in a freaking GENERAL forum after all.
|
On September 12 2011 01:39 imallinson wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:34 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:26 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:20 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:16 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:12 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. Has nothing to do with superiority complex. After the Japanese tsunami some Americans tried to "honor" the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. Other Americans shouted down those people, too. That was really different. The people saying stuff after the Japanese tsunami were saying that it was payback for Pearl Harbour, saying the people deserved to die (also happened after Japan beat the US in the women's football world cup). No one in this thread is saying the people in the WTC deserved to die. Some of them were saying those things and some of them weren't. But they were all completely classless. I know it was a vocal minority saying this. My point is it is a stupid comparison to make in the first place. My point wasn't that it was a vocal minority. My point was that not everyone was so forward in saying "Japan deserved this." Some people were simply saying "let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor." Then you realize that is also a passive-agressive douchebag thing to say even though there is nothing inherently wrong with the sentence "let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor" OK point taken, but I'm missing how the Pearl Harbour comparison is relevant. Saying "Let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor", right after the tsunami was a thinly veiled way of saying that they are happy the tsunami happened because of what the japanese did at pearl harbor. It's overt douchebaggery.
|
What the hell is a 38th year anniversary? Do you do this every year or just on years corresponding to 10th (20th, 25th...) anniversary for 9/11. I don't know anybody that does things for a 38th year anni, and doesn't do it every year.
I DO know a lot of people who do special things for dates like multiples of 5 or 10.
Fuck off with your agenda. Pretend to be as self righteous as you want with your bullshit "oh noes I didn't mean to do anything" but we arn't buying it. So lastly, fuck you OP.
|
On September 12 2011 01:42 muse5187 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:39 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:34 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:26 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:20 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:16 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:12 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. Has nothing to do with superiority complex. After the Japanese tsunami some Americans tried to "honor" the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. Other Americans shouted down those people, too. That was really different. The people saying stuff after the Japanese tsunami were saying that it was payback for Pearl Harbour, saying the people deserved to die (also happened after Japan beat the US in the women's football world cup). No one in this thread is saying the people in the WTC deserved to die. Some of them were saying those things and some of them weren't. But they were all completely classless. I know it was a vocal minority saying this. My point is it is a stupid comparison to make in the first place. My point wasn't that it was a vocal minority. My point was that not everyone was so forward in saying "Japan deserved this." Some people were simply saying "let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor." Then you realize that is also a passive-agressive douchebag thing to say even though there is nothing inherently wrong with the sentence "let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor" OK point taken, but I'm missing how the Pearl Harbour comparison is relevant. Saying "Let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor", right after the tsunami was a thinly veiled way of saying that they are happy the tsunami happened because of what the japanese did at pearl harbor. It's overt douchebaggery.
So true. The people who died in japan because of the tsunami have nothing to do with what happened at pearl harbor.
|
On September 12 2011 01:31 KentHenry wrote: I'm glad Pinochet overthrew the political leaders of a country heading in the direction of communism. Many people may dislike Pinochet and call him a mass murderer, but he really did bring back democracy to Chile in a time of need; but not in a civil way, which sometimes being civil gets you nowhere.
Bravo. I am really glad that you are speaking your mind about this. It lets everyone know what kind of a person you are.
Sad fact is that you aren't the only one who feels this to be true. I'd say 50% of the americans who know about the war crimes will probably feel the same way. Unfortunately 90% of these 50% are political leaders, intelligence agents, military officers - basically your ruling elite.
Also I am impressed by the level of doucheness displayed by people who are arguing over the number of casualties of Pinochet. Does the fact that ONLY 3000 people dying at his hands making him less of a monster? Does it matter that less people died in Chile than in WTC? Do you see people arguing over the casualty figures from WTC? Unfuckingbelievable.
|
You might aswell check the September 12 Turkish Coup d'etat aswell. The numbers are pretty much similar, 600.000 people detained, tortured in inhumane ways, a lot of people have disappeared and died. The worst thing is that the young, bright and intellectual leftists of Turkey were pretty much wiped out or forced into hiding completely. A lot of my country's problems can be traced back to this event. It's that much important.
EDIT: The demon who caused these events also justified it by "protecting the country against communism threat". It's all about US and how to kiss their ass, no matter what you do to your people. There were people who've gone mad due to the treatment they've got from the jailers, some committed suicide because they couldn't take it anymore. And who do you blame? Communism. Fucking brilliant.
It's anniversary is tomorrow. A dark, dark spot in our history.
|
I never said TL is an american-based forum. But clearly the vast majority of people on this forum are at least english-speaking and it makes a WTC 9/11 post far more appropriate than a Chilean-based one. No? Anybody care to argue the ratio of Americans to Chileans on TL? or are you done with strawman arguments?
|
On September 12 2011 01:47 Holophonist wrote: I never said TL is an american-based forum. But clearly the vast majority of people on this forum are at least english-speaking and it makes a WTC 9/11 post far more appropriate than a Chilean-based one. No? Anybody care to argue the ratio of Americans to Chileans on TL? or are you done with strawman arguments? Who gives you the authority to say which topic is more appropriate anyway?
|
But when I see people like DeepemBlue who justify, refuse to recognize the crimes that his country committed only 30 years ago (and never apologized for) because of some ideological blindness and typical manicheism, I find it really problematic.
What's really problematic is your repeated projection of your own Manichean thinking and ideological blindness on the issue.
Confusing also that refusing to swallow your opinion 100% means "refus[al] to recognize" and "justify."
Confusing also that just because the CIA "supported" the coup (how? Do you even know? I bet you have no idea exactly what the extent of American involvement was), as if there never would have been a coup if the CIA had not instigated it. Which isn't true of course.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._intervention_in_Chile#1973_coup
This is what I'm talking about, you don't even know what really happened, you just mindlessly talk about "crimes." The real US crime is that the CIA supported Pinochet after the coup while publicly the US was condemning him, not the coup itself.
|
On September 12 2011 01:46 redviper wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:31 KentHenry wrote: I'm glad Pinochet overthrew the political leaders of a country heading in the direction of communism. Many people may dislike Pinochet and call him a mass murderer, but he really did bring back democracy to Chile in a time of need; but not in a civil way, which sometimes being civil gets you nowhere. Bravo. I am really glad that you are speaking your mind about this. It lets everyone know what kind of a person you are. Sad fact is that you aren't the only one who feels this to be true. I'd say 50% of the americans who know about the war crimes will probably feel the same way. Unfortunately 90% of these 50% are political leaders, intelligence agents, military officers - basically your ruling elite. Also I am impressed by the level of doucheness displayed by people who are arguing over the number of casualties of Pinochet. Does the fact that ONLY 3000 people dying at his hands making him less of a monster? Does it matter that less people died in Chile than in WTC? Do you see people arguing over the casualty figures from WTC? Unfuckingbelievable.
The reason people are arguing over it is because the OP clearly designed this to be in opposition to people wanting to grieve over 9/11. He did so by claiming far higher casualties than the WTC 9/11 and also by mentioning the US involvement.
|
On September 12 2011 01:40 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +Believe me, Argentinian didn't have a good time under Videla. I bet they didn't have a better time than Romanians under Ceausescu. Your imperialism has been just as shameful, devastating, disgusting and immoral than the Soviet one. No matter how hard you try to make the two equivalent, the Communist system was far more shameful, devastating, disgusting, and immoral. Show nested quote +Now, people who say "Oh we did horribly wrong, but some other people did horrible things too so let's not recognize it, let's not apologize and let's not admit anything at all" have suspicious moral values. If you justification for America's crimes is that Soviet Russia was wrong, I'm sorry to tell you that you won't go far. There will always be someone worse (and I don't think Soviet Russia was even worse in terms of international policy).
I don't recall any Americans saying we shouldn't recognize where we made mistakes or did things from the start that were wrong. The problem is that people like you present a double standard and demand that the US admit that it was actually worse (which is total nonsense) and anyone who objects is immediately subjected to your bad relativistic and childish arguments ("Saying someone else did it too doesn't make it right!" Is this fourth grade? We're talking about nations not people, the world is a little more complex). I would never say the USSR was brutal and evil just because of the revenge they took on Germany in 1945, the Germans attacked them and were brutal and evil towards them first and were literally trying to wipe them out. And consequently I'm not going to condemn the US for "propping up" right-wing dictatorships instead of allowing left-wing dictatorships to be propped up by the Soviet Union. It wasn't the US that lied at the end of WWII and occupied half of Europe, it wasn't the US that poured money and agents into Greece and Turkey first, it wasn't the US that caused Kim il Sung to invade South Korea in 1950, it wasn't the US that blockaded West Berlin in 1948, it wasn't the US that shelled Quemoy and Matsu, and it wasn't the US that killed ~100,000,000 people through deliberate starvation, mass shootings, labor to death in gulags, beatings from a Red Guard mob, etc. Bolded part essentially strips you of all credibility to speak on the subject. I'm sorry the blood-soaked animals you like so much lost and aren't able to kill tens of millions of people anymore. That's how I feel about your minimization of Communist atrocities and exaggeration of "American" ones. You're talking about yourself, you realize that right? The good Communist. Black and white. All that stuff. Man. Either we know what we talk about, either we stop this discussion.
When has Argentina being under the threat of a Soviet style dictatorship? Never. They didn't even have a left wing government when the military took the power. They were some risks, because that's what people wanted, and so the "land of the free" (and of hypocrisy) helped the far right generals to take the power and to keep it. That was preventive.
Now, Allende was democratically elected and never wanted to imitate the Leninist dictatorships. Just that you know.
I'll stop this discussion right now, because it's a topic related to my history, and I'll really start being rude. And don't say "yeah, you are biased and emotional". I'll try to explain you:
If your parents had had to flee a country because young "leftists" or alleged "leftists" were threatened at any moment to be arbitrarily tortured and thrown alive from helicopter to the sea because they were "subversive", and that they left behind them friends or family who disappeared and got killed, all of that with the full support and help of an other country, and that you saw some clueless guy from that country saying that it was not that bad and it was justified, you know how you would feel?
You would feel like puking. I'm out of here.
Ps: oh, and by the way: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/04/10/kissingers-1976-cable-reopens-controversy-over-operation-condo/ http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2010-04-12.asp (that can help too) Concerning Wikipedia: What a surprise the internal inquiries found out that CIA was guilty of nothing.
|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On September 12 2011 01:42 muse5187 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:39 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:34 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:26 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:20 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:16 imallinson wrote:On September 12 2011 01:12 BlackJack wrote:On September 12 2011 01:05 Marais wrote: The chilean 9/11 is much more important than the american one for some people (mostly chileans). But looks like it cant even be discussed becose of the american superiority complex. Has nothing to do with superiority complex. After the Japanese tsunami some Americans tried to "honor" the lives lost at Pearl Harbor. Other Americans shouted down those people, too. That was really different. The people saying stuff after the Japanese tsunami were saying that it was payback for Pearl Harbour, saying the people deserved to die (also happened after Japan beat the US in the women's football world cup). No one in this thread is saying the people in the WTC deserved to die. Some of them were saying those things and some of them weren't. But they were all completely classless. I know it was a vocal minority saying this. My point is it is a stupid comparison to make in the first place. My point wasn't that it was a vocal minority. My point was that not everyone was so forward in saying "Japan deserved this." Some people were simply saying "let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor." Then you realize that is also a passive-agressive douchebag thing to say even though there is nothing inherently wrong with the sentence "let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor" OK point taken, but I'm missing how the Pearl Harbour comparison is relevant. Saying "Let's commemorate those that died on Pearl Harbor", right after the tsunami was a thinly veiled way of saying that they are happy the tsunami happened because of what the japanese did at pearl harbor. It's overt douchebaggery.
Ahhh ok I see. I still don't think this thread has anything to do with saying America deserved this because of what happened in Chile. It's about remembering a terrible tragedy that happened just like the US 9/11 thread.
|
I feel like this was a direct way to diminish 9/11/2001, but whatever. Then again, Nixon was president during this time and we all know what he did. It's sad that Chile had to go through 17 years of military rule.
|
On September 12 2011 01:44 dogabutila wrote: What the hell is a 38th year anniversary? Do you do this every year or just on years corresponding to 10th (20th, 25th...) anniversary for 9/11. I don't know anybody that does things for a 38th year anni, and doesn't do it every year.
I DO know a lot of people who do special things for dates like multiples of 5 or 10.
Fuck off with your agenda. Pretend to be as self righteous as you want with your bullshit "oh noes I didn't mean to do anything" but we arn't buying it. So lastly, fuck you OP.
Hey, will you not have a 9/11 anniversary in 2013, the 40th year of the Chilean anniversary? So on 9/11/2013 we will promise not to talk about the WTC or terorrism but instead keep the national discourse about American foreign policy in South America, the terror of Pinochet and the hero that was Allende?
|
On September 12 2011 01:47 Bleak wrote: You might aswell check the September 12 Turkish Coup d'etat aswell. The numbers are pretty much similar, 600.000 people detained, tortured in inhumane ways, a lot of people have disappeared and died.
EDIT: The demon who caused these events also justified it by "protecting the country against communism threat". It's all about US and how to kiss their ass, no matter what you do to your people. There were people who've gone mad due to the treatment they've got from the jailers, some committed suicide because they couldn't take it anymore. And who do you blame? Communism. Fucking brilliant.
It's anniversary is tomorrow. A dark, dark spot in our history.
Sorry but that coup isn't at a convenient date for someone trying to make a point so it will be ignored.
|
On September 12 2011 01:46 redviper wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:31 KentHenry wrote: I'm glad Pinochet overthrew the political leaders of a country heading in the direction of communism. Many people may dislike Pinochet and call him a mass murderer, but he really did bring back democracy to Chile in a time of need; but not in a civil way, which sometimes being civil gets you nowhere. Bravo. I am really glad that you are speaking your mind about this. It lets everyone know what kind of a person you are. Sad fact is that you aren't the only one who feels this to be true. I'd say 50% of the americans who know about the war crimes will probably feel the same way. Unfortunately 90% of these 50% are political leaders, intelligence agents, military officers - basically your ruling elite. Also I am impressed by the level of doucheness displayed by people who are arguing over the number of casualties of Pinochet. Does the fact that ONLY 3000 people dying at his hands making him less of a monster? Does it matter that less people died in Chile than in WTC? Do you see people arguing over the casualty figures from WTC? Unfuckingbelievable.
Population of USA as of census 2011 307,006,550.
307,006,550 / 2 = 153,503,275 ( Number of people you covered with your first blanket statement) 153,503,275 * 0.90 = 135,152,948 ( Number of "ruling elite")
![[image loading]](http://i53.tinypic.com/b874ig.jpg) Good numbers you got there. Why don't you use a bigger blanket statement.
|
On September 12 2011 01:53 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:47 Bleak wrote: You might aswell check the September 12 Turkish Coup d'etat aswell. The numbers are pretty much similar, 600.000 people detained, tortured in inhumane ways, a lot of people have disappeared and died.
EDIT: The demon who caused these events also justified it by "protecting the country against communism threat". It's all about US and how to kiss their ass, no matter what you do to your people. There were people who've gone mad due to the treatment they've got from the jailers, some committed suicide because they couldn't take it anymore. And who do you blame? Communism. Fucking brilliant.
It's anniversary is tomorrow. A dark, dark spot in our history. Sorry but that coup isn't at a convenient date for someone trying to make a point so it will be ignored.
Hmm, serious? Or irony? Frankly I'm confused
|
On September 12 2011 01:19 Biff The Understudy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:15 DeepElemBlues wrote:Plz keep coming with stuff like this. People need to know more about the crap that western countries have done since WW2. Right after WW2 the US was so insanely powerful they could basically do whatever they wanted so they did. Remember MCcarthy remember truman. It's the way the world works. It is surprising that the only crap the US got back are the bombing of the embassies in Nairobi and Dar Es Salaam and 9/11. Things in South America could have turned out a lot worse for the US. I would not find it surprising at all if there were radical left wing terrorist groups rooted in South America targeting US citizens/embassies but it seems there aren't and most South American governments function relatively well compared to the way they did in the 70's and 80's. A little list Cuba - x Guatemala - x Nicaragua - x Panama Colombia - x Chile - x Argentina - x And that's just south America
Iraq - x Iran - x Afghanistan - x Pakistan - y Saudi Arabia* Cambodia - x Vietnam - x Countries where US involvement was response to Soviet involvement are marked with an X. Pakistan is marked with a Y because the US and Pakistan had good relations until the USSR was gone and jihadis moved on to their next target, which was already picked as the US. Saudi Arabia has an asterisk because Saudis either liked or didn't care one way or the other about the Saudi-US relationship until Osama bin Laden got his panties twisted about us (and not him) saving the country from Saddam Hussein in 1991. But let's look at what countries were "messed with" by the other side: Afghanistan Albania Angola Argentina Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Bulgaria Cambodia Chile China Colombia Congo Cuba Czech Republic and Slovakia Egypt Finland Georgia Germany Greece Grenada Guatemala Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Italy Japan Kazakhstan Korea Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lithuania Macedonia Moldova Mongolia Montenegro Nicaragua Philippines Poland Romania Russia Serbia Syria Turkey Ukraine Uzbekistan Vietnam The list of countries the US military/CIA messed with big time is pretty much endless. I don't know much about Africa but I bet its ugly. I am not even mentioning the list of dictators/authoritarian regimes that were allowed to rule their country without the west uttering any word of protest to their conduct. It is critical to understand the extent of american foreign operations ( covert and not covert, military and financial ) and the unrivalled power they had trough the 50's,60's,70's, 80's and 90's to understand 9/11 and put it in perspective. Pure fantasy thinking. Literally every sentence contains at least one inaccuracy, some of them very egregious. Look, my mother had to flee Argentina because of the fascist dictatorship your country installed and supported. It had nothing to do with Soviets. Chile had nothing to do with Soviet either. It had to do with a democratic left wing government which was bad for the american companies that exploited Chile at that time. Period. When you guys can recognize your mistakes, and your crimes, you will be a much greater country. I don't have a shame to look at what France did in Algeria and admit it was monstrous. And I won't try to find excuses about the "other side" or whatever. Now if we take your second list and apply to same criteria to the first one, it's basically the whole world.
I'm sorry but saying there was nothing to do with soviet union and/or that the country was not in terrible shape its not true.
|
Can't an Italian commemorate a random day in Chilean history that Chileans don't even commemorate, and one that happens to coincide with the commemoration of 9/11, without people accusing him of having ulterior motives?
|
On September 12 2011 01:54 muse5187 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:46 redviper wrote:On September 12 2011 01:31 KentHenry wrote: I'm glad Pinochet overthrew the political leaders of a country heading in the direction of communism. Many people may dislike Pinochet and call him a mass murderer, but he really did bring back democracy to Chile in a time of need; but not in a civil way, which sometimes being civil gets you nowhere. Bravo. I am really glad that you are speaking your mind about this. It lets everyone know what kind of a person you are. Sad fact is that you aren't the only one who feels this to be true. I'd say 50% of the americans who know about the war crimes will probably feel the same way. Unfortunately 90% of these 50% are political leaders, intelligence agents, military officers - basically your ruling elite. Also I am impressed by the level of doucheness displayed by people who are arguing over the number of casualties of Pinochet. Does the fact that ONLY 3000 people dying at his hands making him less of a monster? Does it matter that less people died in Chile than in WTC? Do you see people arguing over the casualty figures from WTC? Unfuckingbelievable. Population of USA as of census 2011 307,006,550. 307,006,550 / 2 = 153,503,275 ( Number of people you covered with your first blanket statement) 153,503,275 * 0.90 = 135,152,948 ( Number of "ruling elite") ![[image loading]](http://i53.tinypic.com/b874ig.jpg) Good numbers you got there. Why don't you use a bigger blanket statement.
Thank god the American public school system is so awesome that you while you guys have no reading skills atleast you know how to make charts!
I said "50% of the americans who know about the war crimes" and "90% of that 50%".
|
Why aren't people getting banned here? seriously, its the same people derailing this thread over and over again in an attempt to close it.
|
Not sure why so much hate towards the OP for pointing out something that most people have very little idea about, and yet is still an important date in the annals of history. Yeah, sure 9/11 was a decade ago, but doesn't this also have have a lesson to teach us about the dangers of suppressing democracy for ideological gain or for the purpose of protecting one's own interests, just with the WTC attacks and their own terrible aftermath (suppression of civil rights, situation in middle east, fostering of hatred and prejudice ect.).
|
On September 12 2011 01:47 Holophonist wrote: I never said TL is an american-based forum. But clearly the vast majority of people on this forum are at least english-speaking and it makes a WTC 9/11 post far more appropriate than a Chilean-based one. No? Anybody care to argue the ratio of Americans to Chileans on TL? or are you done with strawman arguments? I'll bite.
Also, 9/11 is a sad day in AMERICAN history. If TL has a Chilean-based forum, post this there. Let me put it this way... would I go to Chile and tell people to mourn for our 9/11? No, I wouldn't. THAT'S the difference. Ok, so you emphasize "AMERICAN history", and tell people to post this in a "Chilean-based forum", directly implying that TL is an American forum, as "AMERICAN history" belongs here, but things related to Chile should be in a Chilean based forum.
Then you say that you wouldn't go to Chile and tell them to mourn for the WTC attacks, implying that making this post here is equivalent to going to America and telling them to mourn for this tragedy.
So, there's no straw-man here, as you directly implied that this is an American forum, or at least centered on America.
Now the next points:
But clearly the vast majority of people on this forum are at least english-speaking and it makes a WTC 9/11 post far more appropriate than a Chilean-based one. No? Anybody care to argue the ratio of Americans to Chileans on TL? This is an English forum, so of course the vast majority of people on it are English speaking. However, could you explain how this makes the WTC attacks a more appropriate subject? Because the attacks happened in an English speaking country? That's pitiful. We should obviously close all threads related to happenings in Non-English speaking European countries, Asia, and Africa. If a thread is made for discussion, I don't see the relevance in the language of the country it is concerned with.
Next, what does the ratio of Americans to Chileans matter for threads like these? If Americans are in the majority, then we can't speak of things besides the United States? Also, are people who are not Chilean not allowed to discuss or take interest in this topic?
As TL is an INTERNATIONAL forum, people are in general interested in INTERNATIONAL events, not just American ones, or ones that happen in English-speaking countries.
Your arguments are weak, and don't make sense.
|
Man. Either we know what we talk about, either we stop this discussion.
Are you really going to go that way.
When has Argentina being under the threat of a Soviet style dictatorship? Never. They didn't even have a left wing government when the military took the power. They were some risks, because that's what people wanted, and so the "land of the free" (and of hypocrisy) helped the far right generals to take the power and to keep it. That was preventive.
You mean Chile, and what you're saying is inaccurate.
Now, Allende was democratically elected and never wanted to imitate the Leninist dictatorships. Just that you know.
Not only inaccurate, but dishonest. Allende was moving in an authoritarian direction, not surprising behavior for South/Latin American leaders regardless of their being "left" or "right." Saying he didn't want imitate Leninist dictatorship doesn't mean he didn't want to imitate dictatorship in general.
No I don't think he was moving toward a full-on one-party Communist state, but an authoritarian government of the type Venezuela has today? Yes.
If your parents had had to flee a country because young "leftists" or alleged "leftists" were threatened at any moment to be arbitrarily tortured and thrown alive from helicopter to the sea because they were "subversive", and that they left behind them friends or family who disappeared and got killed, all of that with the full support and help of an other country, and that you saw some clueless guy from that country saying that it was not that bad and it was justified, you know how you would feel?
"The full support and help of an other country" is just your fantasy land.
I am seeing some clueless guy saying some of the most horrible things people have ever done to one another weren't that bad, and you're right, it makes me want to puke that you'd say "Soviet[s] not that bad" while bitching about the US.
If your parents had fled the USSR - oh wait, that was almost impossible - and everyone they knew who stayed behind had starved to death thanks to the State stealing all their grain or shooting them when they resisted their grain being stolen, would you feel the way you do now about who was wrong and who was right? Of course not.
So you're posting stuff about 3 years after the coup, when I already said that the real US crime was supporting Pinochet after the coup?
Look, my mother had to flee Argentina because of the fascist dictatorship your country installed and supported.
You mean the fascist dictatorship in Argentina that had been around since 1945? America installed that?
Where do you get your "facts" from, back issues of Pravda? Honestly.
|
On September 12 2011 01:59 GoTuNk! wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2011 01:19 Biff The Understudy wrote:On September 12 2011 01:15 DeepElemBlues wrote:Plz keep coming with stuff like this. People need to know more about the crap that western countries have done since WW2. Right after WW2 the US was so insanely powerful they could basically do whatever they wanted so they did. Remember MCcarthy remember truman. It's the way the world works. It is surprising that the only crap the US got back are the bombing of the embassies in Nairobi and Dar Es Salaam and 9/11. Things in South America could have turned out a lot worse for the US. I would not find it surprising at all if there were radical left wing terrorist groups rooted in South America targeting US citizens/embassies but it seems there aren't and most South American governments function relatively well compared to the way they did in the 70's and 80's. A little list Cuba - x Guatemala - x Nicaragua - x Panama Colombia - x Chile - x Argentina - x And that's just south America
Iraq - x Iran - x Afghanistan - x Pakistan - y Saudi Arabia* Cambodia - x Vietnam - x Countries where US involvement was response to Soviet involvement are marked with an X. Pakistan is marked with a Y because the US and Pakistan had good relations until the USSR was gone and jihadis moved on to their next target, which was already picked as the US. Saudi Arabia has an asterisk because Saudis either liked or didn't care one way or the other about the Saudi-US relationship until Osama bin Laden got his panties twisted about us (and not him) saving the country from Saddam Hussein in 1991. But let's look at what countries were "messed with" by the other side: Afghanistan Albania Angola Argentina Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Bulgaria Cambodia Chile China Colombia Congo Cuba Czech Republic and Slovakia Egypt Finland Georgia Germany Greece Grenada Guatemala Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Italy Japan Kazakhstan Korea Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lithuania Macedonia Moldova Mongolia Montenegro Nicaragua Philippines Poland Romania Russia Serbia Syria Turkey Ukraine Uzbekistan Vietnam The list of countries the US military/CIA messed with big time is pretty much endless. I don't know much about Africa but I bet its ugly. I am not even mentioning the list of dictators/authoritarian regimes that were allowed to rule their country without the west uttering any word of protest to their conduct. It is critical to understand the extent of american foreign operations ( covert and not covert, military and financial ) and the unrivalled power they had trough the 50's,60's,70's, 80's and 90's to understand 9/11 and put it in perspective. Pure fantasy thinking. Literally every sentence contains at least one inaccuracy, some of them very egregious. Look, my mother had to flee Argentina because of the fascist dictatorship your country installed and supported. It had nothing to do with Soviets. Chile had nothing to do with Soviet either. It had to do with a democratic left wing government which was bad for the american companies that exploited Chile at that time. Period. When you guys can recognize your mistakes, and your crimes, you will be a much greater country. I don't have a shame to look at what France did in Algeria and admit it was monstrous. And I won't try to find excuses about the "other side" or whatever. Now if we take your second list and apply to same criteria to the first one, it's basically the whole world. I'm sorry but saying there was nothing to do with soviet union and/or that the country was not in terrible shape its not true. 1- Situation was terrible before he came to power: 35% inflation in 1970. 2- He was democratically elected and never manifested any intention or sign to keep the power or abolish democracy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvador_Allende
|
This is getting ridiculous. There are a million events that happened on September 11th throughout history. Why pick this one if NOT to try and throw it in the US's face? You guys are absolutely blind.
|
1- Situation was terrible before he came to power: 35% inflation in 1970.
Situation was worse when he killed himself in the face of the coup:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chile_under_Allende
2- He was democratically elected and never manifested any intention or sign to keep the power or abolish democracy.
Untrue, no matter how many times Allende lovers say it, it's well-documented that this opinion was first birthed from Cuban and Soviet propaganda agents. Allende not only manifested intentions and signs, he acted on them, to weaken the fabric of Chilean institutions for his own benefit.
|
@OP, Appreciate that you don't really accept wikipedia as your one true source, as it's not accepted by 99% of colleges, since it doesn't even pass as it's own tests of accuracy.
@DeepElemBlues, I am a Russian Refugee(Live in the US now) o.o; but lucky me, our family was one who fought against Soviet Russia, so almost my entire family is dead on my mothers and fathers dead, total alive in my family right now is 6 people.
|
On September 12 2011 02:03 DeepElemBlues wrote:Are you really going to go that way. Show nested quote +When has Argentina being under the threat of a Soviet style dictatorship? Never. They didn't even have a left wing government when the military took the power. They were some risks, because that's what people wanted, and so the "land of the free" (and of hypocrisy) helped the far right generals to take the power and to keep it. That was preventive. You mean Chile, and what you're saying is inaccurate. Show nested quote +Now, Allende was democratically elected and never wanted to imitate the Leninist dictatorships. Just that you know.
Not only inaccurate, but dishonest. Allende was moving in an authoritarian direction, not surprising behavior for South/Latin American leaders regardless of their being "left" or "right." Saying he didn't want imitate Leninist dictatorship doesn't mean he didn't want to imitate dictatorship in general. No I don't think he was moving toward a full-on one-party Communist state, but an authoritarian government of the type Venezuela has today? Yes. Show nested quote +If your parents had had to flee a country because young "leftists" or alleged "leftists" were threatened at any moment to be arbitrarily tortured and thrown alive from helicopter to the sea because they were "subversive", and that they left behind them friends or family who disappeared and got killed, all of that with the full support and help of an other country, and that you saw some clueless guy from that country saying that it was not that bad and it was justified, you know how you would feel? "The full support and help of an other country" is just your fantasy land. I am seeing some clueless guy saying some of the most horrible things people have ever done to one another weren't that bad, and you're right, it makes me want to puke that you'd say "Soviet[s] not that bad" while bitching about the US. If your parents had fled the USSR - oh wait, that was almost impossible - and everyone they knew who stayed behind had starved to death thanks to the State stealing all their grain or shooting them when they resisted their grain being stolen, would you feel the way you do now about who was wrong and who was right? Of course not. So you're posting stuff about 3 years after the coup, when I already said that the real US crime was supporting Pinochet after the coup? Show nested quote + Look, my mother had to flee Argentina because of the fascist dictatorship your country installed and supported.
You mean the fascist dictatorship in Argentina that had been around since 1945? America installed that? Where do you get your "facts" from, back issues of Pravda? Honestly. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_War#US_involvement_with_the_Junta I was talking about Argentina and this is accurate. Bye
|
Wow I'm surprised at the sheer volume of angry Americans in this thread.
It's a forum how can one interpret this thread as trying to steal the 9/11 threads thunder when they can both co-exist without interrupting each other at all.
Guess what, I'm from an English speaking country and I want to remember both of these events without degrading the lives lost with pathetic whining over something that's not only completely off-topic from both events, but incredibly insensitive too.
RIP to those who lost their lives.
|
On September 12 2011 02:05 Holophonist wrote: This is getting ridiculous. There are a million events that happened on September 11th throughout history. Why pick this one if NOT to try and throw it in the US's face? You guys are absolutely blind.
Hey calm down, i have lots of Chilean friends who on this day every year get to together to remember what happened in their country and why they had to flee it. There are legitimate reasons to bring this event up so that people can discuss and remember it.
|
5386 Posts
Closing this verbal foodfight.
|
|
|
|