|
Hey guys, I am new to the Starcraft community (like many others who have flooded the scene of recent I am sure) and I played the beta for a few months before it went on hiatus.
While the beta was up I played as Terran, but I am rethinking if it is for me. Maybe some of you have specific reasons you choose your race that would help me better decide the right race for myself.
Why did you pick the race that you play? What is your favorite thing about that race?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
Zerg here - Most people just pick a race because they think they are the best (even though there is no best race), if you are terran now and like the way they work then stay with them. If you dont like them try protoss or zerg and so on till you find a good match.
|
zerg because every unit dies fast
|
Yeah I saw that, but it really wasn't getting to the question I was asking in my opinion. It seemed like it was more based on trying to calculate the percentages of each race as opposed to the reason why they choose it (even though lower in the post he mentions the why). Sorry if it seemed redundant.
p
|
United States158 Posts
Zerg: I chose it in the beginning because I loved the uniqueness of its macromechanics.
Now, I just play it because im best at it. Once the micro/macro 2 tournament ends/I am defeated, I will focus on playing random.
|
|
Well, i am also pretty new to starcraft generally.
I decided to play Protoss because it's the easiest race in terms of micromanagement :D I think i'll stay with protoss til i have an general overview of the game and better micro/macro
|
Terran, because siege tanks own. Oh and ive been a T player for 10+ years
|
Protoss because of the late game possibilities (and also Reach <3)
|
On July 02 2010 05:30 cashmate wrote: Zerg because of Jaedong. lol, stayed zerg because of jaedong. Started playing them because of the fast expands, 3rd base by 30 ftw (in sc:bw at least)
Missing a lot of the things that made zerg, zerg.
|
Protoss from BW cus I dunno chose it when i was like 14 cus it was cool or some awesome reason.
SC2 carried on toss just because. But now playing zerg too because the swarming and feel of zerg is great. At least as good as BW, in terms of really swarming. Terran still feels rigid to me.
|
I used to play to zerg in SC1 , but in SC2 i feel the zerg has lost a lot of their characteristics so i play terran in the beta because they are more versatile and have a big range of strategies in their arsenal . Frankly zerg has less units and feels like an incomplete race compared to the other 2 or i would be playing only zerg .
|
|
Zerg, being new to RTS, because it seems to be the easiest race to learn... You can change your composition very easily, you dont have to manage a ton of production facilities, and you quickly learn how positioning means everything... your units are paper.
|
Prawns,because I like vomiting on the ground and old eggs.
|
Gotta quote somehow the master of Starcraft, Bisu.
"Why did you picked Protoss?"
- " It was good and easy"
|
Protoss are the only race with mildly attractive aesthetics.
This post was severely edited down from its original
|
Zerg for most of the beta, switching to Terran now because i want to try something new... oh and I hated the baneling zvz games.
|
Protoss because they focus on 1) few, individually powerful units (something I'm a fan of) and 2) have a variety of powerful spells, which I love to use.
|
I play zerg but just because of the looks. I love the creatures and the sharp teeth and goo
|
|
Random - I want to learn all races.
|
On July 02 2010 05:47 LSGamer wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2010 05:43 Grettin wrote: Gotta quote somehow the master of Starcraft, Bisu.
"Why did you picked Protoss?"
- " It was good and easy" Wasn't Bisu the cheating one Day9 mentioned? I love that quote, although i'm probably mixing it up
No idea, some oldschool sc1 player should know this.
afaik, this quote was on some interview, maybe made by Artosis while he was visiting SKT.
|
Protoss macro seemed easiest to me when I started, and fewer units made for easier micro for a new player as well. And I just stuck with that
|
On July 02 2010 05:31 Incinerate wrote: Well, i am also pretty new to starcraft generally.
I decided to play Protoss because it's the easiest race in terms of micromanagement :D I think i'll stay with protoss til i have an general overview of the game and better micro/macro
You've got it quite the opposite. It's the most difficult race in terms of micro and macro mechanics.
I play random in beta just to try them all and then decide upon the release. Probably will be protoss though cause they're awesome, however I find terran to be the "easiest" in terms of viable strategies. It seems like whatever you do, always works.
|
Protoss here and I just love being able to warp units in.
|
Random because I just couldn't decide which race I liked best. XD
|
Terran....
Because I'd rather here my units obey me in english than in something else.
|
|
When I first started experimenting in BW I just hated having to queue stuff up in unit producing structures as well as having to build rows of pylons and depos so I played zerg and grew to love the play style of out-basing and swarming your opponent.
|
On July 02 2010 05:47 LSGamer wrote: Wasn't Bisu the cheating one Day9 mentioned? I love that quote, although i'm probably mixing it up
If you're talking about the whole controversy of throwing games, that's Savior.
I play Terran for several reasons:
1. Easiest Macro mechanics when testing for optimal builds. You queue up a Unit, it gets made. With Zerg, you have to worry about Larvae, losing a Drone after making a building, and not missing the Queen's Spawn Larvae ability (though the Queen's ability is essentially the equivalent of calling down Mules). With Protoss, you also have have to test when the best time to use Chrono Boost is, making it take longer if you're testing for an optimal build.
2. I've always been more of a defensive type of guy. It's reassuring knowing that I don't have to worry about run-bys, which are a lot easier to do than busts.
|
Protoss and Terran ( Psy cool looking ultimate warriors with a touch of predator movie and also heavy on lazzzeerzzz pew pew and Transformers in space wiht a touch of Arnold Shvarceneger and marines from Aliens movie) I just dont like bugs (Zerg).
|
Random cause I want to learn all the tricks of all the races and cause I suck at choosing.
|
Used to be protoss (SC1, at start of SC2 beta), because they have less (read: higher food) but more powerful units that were generally larger, which made them easier to manage.
I switched to Terran in SC2 because Blizzard seems to have a obsession with them (until recently they got buffed every patch). I actually hate the manageability of Terrans base (9 different tab groups with MBS?!), as well as the ridiculous level of micro required to be optimal (seems like every unit has a spell). But in the end, even without managing everything perfectly I can come out on top because of their incredible versatility, and lack of nerfing. Furthermore, Terran are probably the most complex race, so there is still a lot of discover-ability to go on - whereas protoss can't really innovate many new strategies anymore. (I did protoss for the first two weeks of the beta, and was abusing sentries in every game at a time when people though PvP was just zealot rushes (back then sentries did terrible terrible damage to zealots, and force fields just pwnt everything).)
I did do zerg for a time, but their units are just less interesting, and (IMHO) Blizzard actually balances them (nerfing and buffing) rather than just buffing.
Yes, I know this sounds like I'm saying Terran are OP, but I'm just being honest about WHY I chose my race. I could very well be wrong about these things.
|
I started out as Zerg because I liked their ability to adapt swiftly, Then I started experimenting with the other races and settled down with Protoss, probably because I really enjoyed to combine zealots immortals and the phoenix
|
I have been playing Zerg since Brood War. It felt natural to me to produce a variety of units from a single building and have to only make one tech building to make it happen. It fits my style of gameplay. They can easily obtain map control and keep your opponent contained to an extent. This playstyle helps me exploit my opponent. However, the SC2 Zerg is not as "strong" as their BW counterpart. But the concept of Zerg is still there.
|
P because of force fields and storms and warp gates and 4gate push and colossi. Oh man i love P. I also like to play zerg because of massive numbers of units and it feels good overall. But i suck with T even though i played T most in BW. I wish i could random between Z and P.
|
|
i played random for the first 100 games or so, then i chose terran and never really looked back. i just feel the most comfortable with them, and also enjoy their style of play more.
quite odd as i was a zerg player in BW for over 6 yrs o_O
|
I preferred Terran in both because even though they aren't incredible technology of the protoss or sheer overwhelming numbers of the zerg they always find some way to get by on the skin of their teeth.
That and the boom of siege tanks firing...so satisfying.
|
Zerg because I was ten and I thought they were soo cool. Mostly because of the over minds intro speech. Awaken my child! I also loved bugs when I was little
|
I've always gravitated to the "human" race in almost any game. Usually game designers make them average in all categories. This plays to my jack of all trades style, and usually appeals to me.
If I had to change for SC2, which I've considered, I'd go Protoss. For some reason, Protoss style just "clicks" for me. Maybe it's just an easy race, but I just understand the game flow as Protoss. I'm holding out because I'm stubborn and my favorite training partner (my cousin) is Protoss.
Maybe I'll switch, but I enjoy the versatility for now of Terran.
|
New to SC at all and Protoss since last Ladder-Reset.
One Reason are the Units.. there... NOW! Mechanics of Warpgates buffering my not-the-best-Macro at the beginning of my history at this game.
The other is that I am _obsessed_ about Bisu's Forge-FE into Corsair Build in PvZ, described in Day[9]'s Podcasts and want to force it to work in SC2 in any way as well.
|
I play zerg because I just love every aspect of it. The ability to expand so rapidly, the inexpensive units, the ability to tech switch in a moment's notice, the havoc you can cause with burrow, (it's like energyless cloak for every unit), infestors, the way the creep looks, and I just felt the most comfortable with its macro mechanics (I'm much better at managing larva injections than I am at managing unit production facilities). The only thing I don't like about it is that the only unit that can deal with terran mech, the brood lord, is tier 20000000000 or something similar to that.
I tried Terran out, and I liked it a bit. I just felt really restricted by it. I love to expand, which certainly is not a very terran trait. I fucking LOVE ravens and ghosts, though. I play random whenever I play 2v2, and whenever I get terran, I mass the shit out of ravens and ghosts, even if that is the most terrible, gas guzzling unit composition terran could possibly have.
And I hate protoss. I wasn't going to play it as my main race, I didn't want to be associated with the pathological cheesers that play it. Whenever I get it in 2v2 I play macro oriented and just mass up stalkers with blink. It always works because nobody ever expects a protoss player to play a straight up macro game. Blink stalkers are hella fun to micro, too.
So yeah, that's basically my thoughts on all the races and why I do/do not enjoy them.
|
There is so many thread already made about this subject, you should try to use the serch function just in the left bar
|
On July 02 2010 06:23 tfmdjeff wrote:
And I hate protoss. I wasn't going to play it as my main race, I didn't want to be associated with the pathological cheesers that play it. Whenever I get it in 2v2 I play macro oriented and just mass up stalkers with blink. It always works because nobody ever expects a protoss player to play a straight up macro game. Blink stalkers are hella fun to micro, too.
.
That's racist.
|
I picked protoss when I first started. I thought pylon warp, stalker blink, and collossi would be extremely flexible but it wasn't remotely. They were good tricks but protoss in general didn't have the flexibillity and mobillity I was looking for. I Did my first placement matches as toss and placed in the silver leauge "pre diamond league".
So after some frustration I tried zerg and loved it. Zerg's macro and micro offer amazing flexibillity. With both it's military and economic units produced from the same building you can focus on either one exclusively. It can go all in offensively like no other race and build a strong army very early, it can focus entirely on macro and build up an economic advantage extremely quickly. It has a wide range of units that are fast, mobile, and yet effective in ways terran and toss can only dream of. Went from silver to platinum overnight with Zerg and I love it :-).
|
I can't stand playing T or P because of low mobility. I love the amount of information and map control you can have as zerg.
|
In sc2 it's Zerg, because I really like the feel of the race. T and P just rubbed me the wrong way. From opening BOs to late game strategies, from basic units to late game units, both T and P just felt plain old wrong. I guess maybe I feel they changed too much or too little from BW.
I really enjoy playing Zerg, the units are fast, agile and good attackers. They compliment my aggressive play style. Overlords give you good scouting information, and the creep speed boost is good too. Also, having only 1 unit producing structure is very comforting, even though Z's macro mechanic is by far the most unforgivable out of the 3 races.
But since the roach nerf, and the subsequent change of ZvZ dynamics from roach wars to ling/bling wars my conviction to this race has been wavering. I just hate with all my heart the ling/bling spam that ZvZ has degenerated into. A complete snoozefest to watch AND play at the same time. Lately I've been experimenting with Protoss, but I think I'll stay Z since I just don't feel at home with P ;/.
|
Protoss, since back in starcraft 1 I simply thought aliens with laser weapons was awesome. I was young, I swear!
In SC2 the warpin mechanic made me fall in love with them all over again, and seeing as how my favorite BW unit (the carrier) is still there it's all fine.
|
I've always been a Terran guy. For whatever reason, I always opt to play the "good guys"/race most comparable to ours (for example: GDI in CnC, Humans in WC3, etc). I ended up switching to Protoss in SC1 because Protoss was in my opinion easier to play than Terran. For SC2, I felt that it was a great time to start fresh and pick Terran.
|
zerg cause it is easiest to macro with
|
Bosnia-Herzegovina439 Posts
|
On July 02 2010 06:26 DanielD wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2010 06:23 tfmdjeff wrote:
And I hate protoss. I wasn't going to play it as my main race, I didn't want to be associated with the pathological cheesers that play it. Whenever I get it in 2v2 I play macro oriented and just mass up stalkers with blink. It always works because nobody ever expects a protoss player to play a straight up macro game. Blink stalkers are hella fun to micro, too.
. That's racist.
Is something racist if it's completely true? I'd think it'd just be a statement of fact.
|
I chose random to start because I felt it was the best way to get a very general and 'big picture' feel of all the races at once. Although each race certainly has their quirks and playstyles, locking on to the commonalities and fundamentals of SC2 all at once was, IMHO, the best way to learn the game.
I approached WC3 and SC/BW the same way.
|
Stim. I guess that says everything.
|
Terran, I love their buildings (oddly enough). I love making steady long pushes with mech + scvs building turrets/supply depots/bunkers/sensor towers with a huge army of siege tanks/hellions/thor +raven and just working my way across the map into a contain or win. That is most fun to me just surviving/harassing and turtling on 2 bases to prep for timing pushes makes me happy! <3 Terran, I used to play zerg in sc1 and started with zerg in sc2 but I felt like it just isn't right for me, I always feel so....vulnerable as zerg I cannot stand it, even though it is just a mental thing!
|
I for some reason loved protoss when I was 10 and couldn't actually play the game. Love still continues for mainly lore reasons. I mean cmon... Fenix and Tassadar. You can't go wrong.
Also in SC2 its the race I am both most familiar with the hotkeys and I think it's macro mechanics are extremely newb friendly. Warpgates force you to have good non-cueing macro.
Also... REAVA REAVA REEEAVAAAAAA! ( I miss you buddy)
|
On July 02 2010 05:56 habermas wrote:Show nested quote +On July 02 2010 05:31 Incinerate wrote: Well, i am also pretty new to starcraft generally.
I decided to play Protoss because it's the easiest race in terms of micromanagement :D I think i'll stay with protoss til i have an general overview of the game and better micro/macro You've got it quite the opposite. It's the most difficult race in terms of micro and macro mechanics. I play random in beta just to try them all and then decide upon the release. Probably will be protoss though cause they're awesome, however I find terran to be the "easiest" in terms of viable strategies. It seems like whatever you do, always works.
macro wise protoss is the easiest, They arnt that hard to micro either but none of the races are rly hard in that department. Terran and Zerg are about = in difficulty.
This reminds me of all tho protoss r ezy jokes back in bw
|
terran, because i was a cnc3 player, terran play-style is similar to that game, hit plat before the beta ended with no prior experience in sc1 so Terran ftw
|
Started out as Protoss early but switched to Terran now. Mostly because marines are awesome.
|
|
|
|