EPTStop saying "I'm rank 5 platinum". - Page 2
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
leveller
Sweden1840 Posts
| ||
|
Synwave
United States2803 Posts
Be jealous!* *The above statement was brought to you by pointless beta ladder ranks and pointless threads coalition. Building a better tomorrow at the sacrifice of today. | ||
|
shinosai
United States1577 Posts
Oh does it? http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=23766800567&sid=5000&pageNo=2 Post 35 Sorry I misunderstood what the OP was referring to. I didn't mean to imply that one division is ranked better than the other, but simply explaining the basics of divisions. As far as comparison across divisions it's certainly something we've considered but there are issues, such that the rankings in one division don't directly translate to the other divisions. So you couldn't compare division 10 to division 48 and compare one player's points to another. | ||
|
zealing
Canada806 Posts
 with 1402 ratting ye ye | ||
|
link0
United States1071 Posts
| ||
|
Aprikosen
Sweden53 Posts
| ||
|
RogerChillingworth
3008 Posts
Well done. YOU AINT FOOLING ME, SIR. | ||
BroOd
Austin10831 Posts
| ||
|
FortuneSyn
1826 Posts
On May 08 2010 02:38 Talic_Zealot wrote: It is in fact the same. Since you are not playing people that are only in your division. On May 08 2010 02:43 Alou wrote: 1400 = 1400. You're not playing people in only your division so it is roughly the same. I mean some guy could hypothetically randomly get all the extremely good people, but it's honestly roughly the same. No it does not. Next time you play someone thats "even" with you, go check and see if his rating equals your own. Most of the time / 50% of the time it does not. the rating is basically there to show you how "good" you are relative to others in your division, not between divisions. If you are 200 pts below somebody in your division, that person is 200 pts better than you. That does not apply if you are in separate divisions. edit: proof (found by shinosai) http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=23766800567&sid=5000&pageNo=2 | ||
|
RatherGood
Canada147 Posts
 It's definitely a step up from just stating your ranking, but to be perfectly honest, I don't think your rank in beta should really bolster your credentials or add support to your argument. At the end of the day, everything should just be supported with good analysis, facts, and logic. Especially in beta with such a small pool of players, most inexperienced. | ||
|
Snowfield
1289 Posts
On May 08 2010 02:52 FortuneSyn wrote: + Show Spoiler + On May 08 2010 02:38 Talic_Zealot wrote: It is in fact the same. Since you are not playing people that are only in your division. On May 08 2010 02:43 Alou wrote: 1400 = 1400. You're not playing people in only your division so it is roughly the same. I mean some guy could hypothetically randomly get all the extremely good people, but it's honestly roughly the same. No it does not. Next time you play someone thats "even" with you, go check and see if his rating equals your own. Most of the time / 50% of the time it does not. the rating is basically there to show you how "good" you are relative to others in your division, not between divisions. If you are 200 pts below somebody in your division, that person is 200 pts better than you. That does not apply if you are in separate divisions. edit: proof (found by shinosai) http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=23766800567&sid=5000&pageNo=2 But there's no way to go up in divisions, so 1400 == 1400 | ||
|
FortuneSyn
1826 Posts
On May 08 2010 02:59 Snowfield wrote: But there's no way to go up in divisions, so 1400 == 1400 What an excellent piece of logic you have there. reading skills: A+ | ||
|
BroOd
Austin10831 Posts
On May 08 2010 02:52 FortuneSyn wrote: No it does not. Next time you play someone thats "even" with you, go check and see if his rating equals your own. Most of the time / 50% of the time it does not. the rating is basically there to show you how "good" you are relative to others in your division, not between divisions. If you are 200 pts below somebody in your division, that person is 200 pts better than you. That does not apply if you are in separate divisions. edit: proof (found by shinosai) http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=23766800567&sid=5000&pageNo=2 I think the Blizzard poster in there may have mis-spoken. Can you explain why they would be different? I can't figure it out. The only thing I can think of that would separate the divisions would be the length of time one player has over another in accruing bonus points. Apart from that, why wouldn't their rankings be basically relative to one another? Everyone plays outside his own division, so why would 1400 points earned in division 53 not be similar to 1400 points earned in division 54? Your point about whether you are "even" with your opponent is irrelevant, as the favored system is almost certainly broken at the moment. | ||
|
selboN
United States2523 Posts
How would you know? You don't even have the beta, just read your key-begging thread. | ||
|
QueueQueue
Canada1000 Posts
| ||
|
The6357
United States1268 Posts
On May 08 2010 03:04 selboN wrote: How would you know? You don't even have the beta, just read your key-begging thread. harsh... | ||
|
deo1
United States199 Posts
On May 08 2010 02:36 Chill wrote: i agree but i dont think you need to make a thread about this/ Of course you don't. | ||
|
zealing
Canada806 Posts
no its not, stop saying it is, your wrong accept it and F10 S. | ||
|
shinosai
United States1577 Posts
On May 08 2010 03:04 BroOd wrote: I think the Blizzard poster in there may have mis-spoken. Can you explain why they would be different? I can't figure it out. The only thing I can think of that would separate the divisions would be the length of time one player has over another in accruing bonus points. Apart from that, why wouldn't their rankings be basically relative to one another? Everyone plays outside his own division, so why would 1400 points earned in division 53 not be similar to 1400 points earned in division 54? Your point about whether you are "even" with your opponent is irrelevant, as the favored system is almost certainly broken at the moment. I don't see why we would assume the Blizzard poster would be wrong. They usually give us pretty accurate information, and if they don't, they generally correct it. They would be different if every division existed in its own bubble, and gave points based on how well you were doing in comparison to your division rather than comparing yourself to the player base as a whole. Which is precisely what the blue poster implies when he says that points are not directly comparable between divisions. | ||
|
Alou
United States3748 Posts
On May 08 2010 03:04 selboN wrote: How would you know? You don't even have the beta, just read your key-begging thread. Grubal is on my friends list in beta. He has beta, assuming it is the same one. | ||
| ||
