EPTBut this crap? -.-
[SPL] Playoffs - STX SouL vs Samsung KHAN Day2 - Page 43
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21247 Posts
But this crap? -.- | ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:23 faseman wrote: It's not so much blaming it as much as it's confusing and doesn't make a whole lot of sense. STX wins more games overall but it all came down to one ace match? Just not a fan really. I've never really seen such a strange format. Have you ever watched tennis? A basketball playoff series? A team needs to win what matters, not useless numbers... | ||
|
TwoStep
United States294 Posts
| ||
|
okum
France5779 Posts
Games don't lose themselves. | ||
|
Zato-1
Chile4253 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:21 OneOther wrote: Hahaha are people really complaining about the format? Both teams knew very well how it worked. They understood that matches mattered, not games. KHAN did what it needed to win on fair ground? Not liking the format is fine. This doesn't mean it was unfair, though- Khan won fair and square. | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22261 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:20 ArvickHero wrote: tbh it really did seem like an autowin, Calm has great ZvP and Jangbi is kinda.. sucking it in PvZ Yeah, but they were all smiles & high fives... the SC Gods hit them with a karma-bolt.  | ||
ArvickHero
10387 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:22 FirstBorn wrote: Khan won first round 4-3 and STX won second round 4-1. Ergo STX won more matches but still had the chance to play the final ace match. That's why I think it's a bit unfair. If the results were reversed with STX winning just like how Khan did, would you be calling for STX to hand over the win to Khan in the name of fairness? | ||
|
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21247 Posts
| ||
|
SuperArc
Austria7781 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:24 TwoStep wrote: So...anyone play tennis? No one bitches about that. Tiebreak in the fifth too. only US have tie break in the fifth set | ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:23 faseman wrote: It's not so much blaming it as much as it's confusing and doesn't make a whole lot of sense. STX wins more games overall but it all came down to one ace match? Just not a fan really. I've never really seen such a strange format. It's basically like tennis, with each set of games counting as a set. Khan won the first set 4-3, STX took the second set 4-1. Instead of playing a third set, they jumped straight to sudden death with an Ace Match to settle the tie. Khan won the sudden death match, so they take the series. Doesn't matter if you win 6-0, 6-0 in first two sets of tennis, if you lose the next three 6-7, 6-7, 6-7 you still lose the match. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:22 FirstBorn wrote: Khan won first round 4-3 and STX won second round 4-1. Ergo STX won more matches but still had the chance to play the final ace match. That's why I think it's a bit unfair. It's perfectly fair. It doesn't matter if you win 4-0, or 4-3 it's the MATCH COUNT not the GAME COUNT that determines the winner. Hence, it's either 2-0, or 1-1 then super Ace to win the entire thing. If game count matters then the team that goes 4-0 wins the match and can get fucked over if the other team wins the other 3 games and more tomorrow even though they "finished" the match ala NORMAL PROLEAGUE RULES. What you people complaining about are asking for is a change to the fundamental way PL works. That would be stupid and unfair to the teams. | ||
|
3clipse
Canada2555 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:21 OneOther wrote: Hahaha are people really complaining about the format? Both teams knew very well how it worked. They understood that matches mattered, not games. KHAN did what it needed to win on fair ground? The fact that both teams understood the system doesn't lend it any sort of credibility. The entire point of a bo7 is to reduce variance and let the most skilled team win. You throw all that out the fucking window when you stage a bo1 as a tiebreaker. | ||
|
Presony-Boy
Israel812 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:19 city42 wrote: If they used the old format, which is just one BO7, Samsung would have won yesterday. What difference does it make? you do realize that if they used the old format the games might have been different, the preparations for the game would have been different and the outcome couldve been different. so stop talking bullshit like it matters. khan won, undeserved win imo but there is nothing to do about. i just hope that khan will get raped next round. | ||
|
kaleidoscope
Singapore2887 Posts
They had the country ranking and they are comparing it based on no. of gold medals.. But if you count the no. of medals won instead, the countries ranking will be different.. I'm neutral with this format, but just a little pity for STX as they played their best and showing some very nice games.. | ||
|
darktreb
United States3019 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:25 3clipse wrote: The fact that both teams understood the system doesn't lend it any sort of credibility. The entire point of a bo7 is to reduce variance and let the most skilled team win. You throw all that out the fucking window when you stage a bo1 as a tiebreaker. Yeah but that gets balanced out by having TWO BO7s before.... | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22261 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:23 faseman wrote: It's not so much blaming it as much as it's confusing and doesn't make a whole lot of sense. STX wins more games overall but it all came down to one ace match? Just not a fan really. I've never really seen such a strange format. Have you followed professional sports, at all, ever? | ||
Live2Win
United States6657 Posts
It would be freaking epic if they made them play a third round in winner's league format... | ||
|
3clipse
Canada2555 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:25 ArvickHero wrote: If the results were reversed with STX winning just like how Khan did, would you be calling for STX to hand over the win to Khan in the name of fairness? Calling for Khan to hand over the win? I don't think any of us are suggesting that we should be the victors; we're suggesting it shouldn't be over yet. | ||
|
faseman
Australia215 Posts
If you compare it to tennis it's like losing 7-5 in sets and THEN playing a tie-break. Just doesn't make much sense. | ||
|
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21247 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:26 darktreb wrote: Yeah but that gets balanced out by having TWO BO7s before.... That makes it even more ridiculous. You put time and effort into making a potential 14 games, but STILL have the ultimate outcome decided by one game. | ||
| ||
