|
On May 31 2010 18:39 Barfboy wrote: GG
would investing into reavers have helped stork out? Yea, if he had a reaver or two along with the HTs at the expos w/cannons up like top left, they would've been secure vs infinite amount of lings. No idea why Stork didn't make any.
|
On May 31 2010 18:39 Barfboy wrote: GG
would investing into reavers have helped stork out? I think he did the same amount of damage with these storms, he just let himself contained for too long, and couldnt match the macro of zerg that was built up during the contain, even though he was super cost-effective.
|
On May 31 2010 18:39 MasterK(wwp) wrote: stork was even or ahead in expos most of the game but somehow he was starved out?
dont think he ever had more than soo, he got his 4th after soo had his for a while
toss have more miners remember, = deplete faster
|
Looked like Stork played twice as well as Soo and lost.
|
|
Stork always entertains even when he loses.
|
Stork kept making zealots and archons in preparation for ultraling but Soo just kept making lurkers and lings which annihilated Stork's army.
GG
|
On May 31 2010 18:41 Balfazar wrote: Looked like Stork played twice as well as Soo and lost.
nice one
|
Russian Federation3329 Posts
Stork had a very well played game... he just lost 11 o clock~  I'm a Fan of SKT1 but come on Protosses... really????
|
9070 Posts
hey, the game was fantastic. for a long period of time stork had more working bases, but soo did an incredible job
|
That was a really good game, didn't know that soo could play like this.
But I am a bit confused how Stork lost, mining out 4 1/2 bases against 5 bases zerg, but he couldn't make a move for the last 15 minutes. Cracklings are not that expensive I guess.
|
On May 31 2010 18:41 Balfazar wrote: Looked like Stork played twice as well as Soo and lost. Oh yeah, Stork really showed who's boss when he managed to kill one hatchery the entire game.
|
Not a very good game from a spectator's standpoint because not much strategy was involved and all Soo did was make units and exchanged armies. Nice lurker fields and scourging observers I guess, but he threw away a lot of units throughout the game. Know which lings aren't under swarm!!
Stork... sigh... arbiter? really? you cocky little... Good game for Soo though.
|
I wonder if we will have another protoss capable of actually winning games against semi decent opposition before the end of pro bw
|
stork couldn't do any significant damage to soo despite being secure economically, and as others have already mentioned - protoss almost always depletes their minerals more quickly - so protoss can't simply be content with trading armies, which is what happened throughout this game until soo was able to seize the momentum by starting to shut down stork's bases.
|
On May 31 2010 18:43 sAAvior wrote:I wonder if we will have another protoss able to winning games against semi decent opposition before the end of pro bw 
Against terran sure, but I don't see the metagame of PvZ changing any time soon which pretty much means every protoss will die the minute they meet a semi decent zerg.
|
Russian Federation3329 Posts
|
Some of you have ridiculously high standards for a good game.
|
On May 31 2010 18:43 TheMute wrote: Not a very good game from a spectator's standpoint because not much strategy was involved and all Soo did was make units and exchanged armies. Nice lurker fields and scourging observers I guess, but he threw away a lot of units throughout the game. Know which lings aren't under swarm!!
Stork... sigh... arbiter? really? you cocky little... Good game for Soo though. That arbiter wasnt cocky, it was desperate. Though, I'm sure Stork has some skill with it in PvZ, and it can be part of some valid strategy in his hands.
|
Good storms from Stork.
But...in retrospect, perhaps it would have been a wiser investment to put the money in reavers instead of arbiter.
Then again, if Stork successfully recalled into the Zerg main, maybe that would be different.
Then again, Soo was making nothing but lings and defilers anyway.
|
|
|
|