EPTpersonally, i don't think jaedong is ever going to get into any slump. man bisu and flash are too good, too.
[spoilers] The next generation - Page 7
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
SlayerS_`HackeR`
United States190 Posts
personally, i don't think jaedong is ever going to get into any slump. man bisu and flash are too good, too. | ||
|
anTi_
United States499 Posts
 [z-zone]SoO will dominate, he's 30 years old, 100% in 2 matchups, he will be #1 someday, I guarantee that. | ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8551 Posts
| ||
|
Quak
Argentina1 Post
| ||
|
Kentor
United States5784 Posts
![[image loading]](http://scforall.com/upload_file/u_img/323030393432325F32.jpg) lol from scforall.com | ||
|
qrs
United States3637 Posts
HoeJJa and Thezerg, although it's probably wishful thinking. I still think that Thezerg will make a comeback (does winning his last two games against  JangBi and  HiyA count?) | ||
|
Gryffindor_us
United States5606 Posts
 ! | ||
|
anTi_
United States499 Posts
On April 23 2009 08:22 scwizard wrote: And this is evidence of? If you're going to call someone a liar for instance, saying "do you notice how often they look away when you speak to them" is not the best way to start forming a logical argument. I wasn't trying to create an argument, I'm more or less in shock that you edit every single one of your posts and yet they are still pointless and retarded. | ||
|
latent
United States428 Posts
Mind you, the amount of "decline" is extremely limited for the first several years. This is why we see highly successful NFL quarterbacks playing well into their 30s. This is also why they say you need to conduct your best research by the age of 35 if you hope to win a Nobel Prize. | ||
JWD
United States12607 Posts
On April 23 2009 15:24 latent wrote: There will be no next generation for a very long time. From a physiological standpoint, the body's reaction time only begins to decline at an average age of 37. The brain's decision making processes also begin to decline around 28. Mind you, the amount of "decline" is extremely limited for the first several years. This is why we see highly successful NFL quarterbacks playing well into their 30s. This is also why they say you need to conduct your best research by the age of 35 if you hope to win a Nobel Prize. You obviously know nothing about the average professional StarCraft career. Yeah, Boxer and Elky are only 28, they are still dominant right? | ||
|
IdrA
United States11541 Posts
On April 23 2009 15:24 latent wrote: There will be no next generation for a very long time. From a physiological standpoint, the body's reaction time only begins to decline at an average age of 37. The brain's decision making processes also begin to decline around 28. Mind you, the amount of "decline" is extremely limited for the first several years. This is why we see highly successful NFL quarterbacks playing well into their 30s. This is also why they say you need to conduct your best research by the age of 35 if you hope to win a Nobel Prize. rofl so thats why boxer and garimto are still raping faces than you for enlightening me | ||
|
Railz
United States1449 Posts
On April 23 2009 15:24 latent wrote: There will be no next generation for a very long time. From a physiological standpoint, the body's reaction time only begins to decline at an average age of 37. The brain's decision making processes also begin to decline around 28. Mind you, the amount of "decline" is extremely limited for the first several years. This is why we see highly successful NFL quarterbacks playing well into their 30s. This is also why they say you need to conduct your best research by the age of 35 if you hope to win a Nobel Prize. That isn't really how the mind works...The greatest Strategists and Scientists of the 20th Cent. were all decently old men.. What Boxer suffers from isn't 'old age' but he has always had weaker macro and in a day and age where macro reigns in supreme, he has to really be creative to win, and he does quite well. | ||
|
JWD
United States12607 Posts
On April 23 2009 15:35 Railz wrote: That isn't really how the mind works...The greatest Strategists and Scientists of the 20th Cent. were all decently old men.. What Boxer suffers from isn't 'old age' but he has always had weaker macro and in a day and age where macro reigns in supreme, he has to really be creative to win, and he does quite well. Come on, Boxer hasn't "done quite well" in years. I mean...the last time he played a Starleague game was May 2007. A combination of intense competition and rigorous practice demands are what make "generations" so short in professional StarCraft. Practicing full-time, non-stop is a difficult lifestyle to maintain, especially when every month there are new progamers on the scene who haven't been worn down by years of it. Stress injuries are a problem, but I think the real impediments to successful generation-spanning SC careers is mental. | ||
|
De4ngus
United States6533 Posts
| ||
|
JWD
United States12607 Posts
On April 23 2009 15:47 De4ngus wrote: Hahaha Latent, why are you always wrong...... Honestly I'm beginning to think he knows nothing about pro BW or StarCraft at all, and just accidentally found TL one day and decided to post here. | ||
|
latent
United States428 Posts
JWD, please don't reply to my posts anymore. I would greatly appreciate it. On the other hand, if you can prove you know more than me, then by all means go ahead. I highly doubt your analytic skills supercede my own. | ||
|
latent
United States428 Posts
On April 23 2009 15:35 Railz wrote: That isn't really how the mind works...The greatest Strategists and Scientists of the 20th Cent. were all decently old men.. What Boxer suffers from isn't 'old age' but he has always had weaker macro and in a day and age where macro reigns in supreme, he has to really be creative to win, and he does quite well. Actually, the greatest scientists were most competent when they were young. As they grew older their celebrity status grew, but nonetheless their greatest work was done in their youth. | ||
|
IdrA
United States11541 Posts
On April 23 2009 16:17 latent wrote: Isn't it obvious weaker players were dominant at a time when Starcraft was less competitive? Even Boxer says he's a better play now than he was at his "prime". JWD, please don't reply to my posts anymore. I would greatly appreciate it. On the other hand, if you can prove you know more than me, then by all means go ahead. I highly doubt your analytic skills supercede my own. was starcraft less competitive when nada dominated? oov dominated? savior? every previous generation was simply dominant because of lack of competition, but this current one is the real deal? | ||
|
latent
United States428 Posts
On April 23 2009 16:21 IdrA wrote: was starcraft less competitive when nada dominated? oov dominated? savior? every previous generation was simply dominant because of lack of competition, but this current one is the real deal? Um...yes, yes, and yes? APMs have gone up, strategies and timings have been refined, etc. Do you know ANYTHING about ANY PROFESSIONAL SPORT in the history of the world??? | ||
|
IdrA
United States11541 Posts
On April 23 2009 16:22 latent wrote: Um...yes, yes, and yes? APMs have gone up, strategies and timings have been refined, etc. Do you know ANYTHING about ANY PROFESSIONAL SPORT in the history of the world??? On April 23 2009 15:24 latent wrote: There will be no next generation for a very long time. whats stopping the next generation then? | ||
| ||
