EPTEclipse 1.0 new map - Page 2
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Starparty
Sweden1963 Posts
| ||
|
meegrean
Thailand7699 Posts
| ||
|
BluzMan
Russian Federation4235 Posts
A map must look as well as it plays. | ||
|
capek
United States585 Posts
| ||
|
jello_biafra
United Kingdom6642 Posts
| ||
|
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
 EDIT: Well assuming the map isn't totally imba/retarded... | ||
|
Durak
Canada3685 Posts
On October 15 2008 23:28 BluzMan wrote: So undecorated. A map must look as well as it plays. I don't agree. I'm not saying looks are unimportant but playability is more important. Also, I don't think that this map looks bad as is. On October 15 2008 21:02 Starparty wrote: Seems a bit uninspired to me. What role does this map fulfill that some other doesnt already do? Not saying variety isnt good, but maps ver similar to this has been done, and executed better already. Every "role" for a map has already been done. The game has been out for ages. Try not to be so negative. I think a few big problems have already been stated. T>Z and P>T looks to be the case. | ||
Empyrean
17070 Posts
On October 16 2008 00:39 Durak wrote: I don't agree. I'm not saying looks are unimportant but playability is more important. Also, I don't think that this map looks bad as is. If you compare this map to some of the others that've been posted by Starparty, nightmarejoo, etc., you'll see that this map is horribly undecorated. The terrain looks blocky with tons of straight lines, no doodads, no terrain decoration, etc. Which isn't to say it isn't a good map, but it's definitely not v1.0 worthy. Maybe like, say, a v0.95, just so you have (much needed) room for decoration before an official release of it. | ||
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
On October 15 2008 17:02 SilverSkyLark wrote: looks like bluestorm, and there are lots of places to cheese I agree, but I don't think that's a bad thing- Maps that have a lot of places to cheese are generally interesting to watch being played. | ||
|
sqwert
United States781 Posts
| ||
|
PH
United States6173 Posts
Also, like ppl have said before, it looks difficult to secure a third (especially for zerg), but maybe that's what you wanted. Other than that, it looks pretty good. A little cramped for zerg, but other than that, not bad. | ||
|
Racenilatr
United States2756 Posts
| ||
| ||
