|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2349 Posts
Edit: this project has moved to:
http://icza.fw.hu/hu.belicza.andras.bwhf.BwhfEntryPoint/BwhfEntryPoint.html
Hi guys!
I wrote a little web application (a web site) which can be very useful for finding hackers in Starcraft replays.
If you're interested or you think it might be useful for you, here it is:
Online replay scanning for hacks
Currently it recognizes:
-Oblivion autogather/autotrain
-zerg moneyhack
-old zerg, protoss and terran moneyhacks
-building selection hack (multiple building selection)
-some multicommand hacks
More will be added later on.
Usage is simple:
-You enter the url to your browser. You find yourself on the hacker finder page.
-You post your replay (in the form of copying/pasting the actions of your replay exported by BWChart).
-You press the Analyze button, and the web application parses and analyzes your replay in quest of finding hackers and hacks in it.
Pros:
-It's pretty simple.
-Requires zero knowledge about hacks and hacking.
-Everyone can check any replay of his.
-Everyone gets results in just a few seconds.
-No program downloading and installation required.
It currently works with Internet Explorer, but I'm working on the Firefox support.
Note that it's still in development status (version 0.91), might give some false hack alerts (which will be fixed).
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
give feedback guys if it works or not.
Thanks for the effort regardless... this kind of thing would be amazing.
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2349 Posts
If you guys want hacker replays to test this, you can get hundreds from my hacker list:
Hacker list
|
|
|
Does it work for maphack ? (i have four "weird" replays vs one guy and even if i think that he maphacked, i want to be sure ).
|
|
|
Croatia9505 Posts
kroko, that Hacker list is from BGH games. Some of those players are somewhat known in BGH community... Not very much though.
lol I still laugh everytime I read quotes from that hacker list...
------------
"I'm famous" (seeing himself on hacker list)
-----------
"u dont have feelings to what happens to others" (trying to bribe me^^)
-----------
"i ran in to finish nexus... i guess thats a hack"
-----------
"we suck... noone searches..." - busted for maphack
|
Hungary11291 Posts
I just ran it once with a replay I know the opponent hacked in (Z minhack is not that hard to detect). It found that out alright, so I guess the program is working for that. No idea about other hacks though.
|
Since it is only looking at replays, and it damn sure won't run the BW engine to find out where the fog was, I guess it's not made to detect maphacks. Just the stoff he posted above. Would be nice to know if it detects the last version of those hacks which don't get recognized by the ICC launcher.
|
"The page cannot be displayed"
only me?
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2349 Posts
On February 06 2008 03:44 V6 wrote:
"The page cannot be displayed"
only me?
Refresh the page if u get that message. That's all.
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2349 Posts
On February 06 2008 02:33 Boblion wrote:
Does it work for maphack ? (i have four "weird" replays vs one guy and even if i think that he maphacked, i want to be sure ).
No, it doesn't detect maphacks. There is no use trying to. Most up-to-date maphacks come with client-side safe maphack which means no data leaves the hacker's computer which would point to using maphack. Most of the maphacks leave absolutely no marks in replays therefore making it impossible to detect them.
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2349 Posts
On February 06 2008 02:21 kroko wrote:few guys from useast :O... didnt knew any1 from that list and only regognized 2 teams there ... http://bwhf.googlegroups.com/web/BwhfEntryPoint.html some how my browser freeses when i try to check some rep I have windows xp and i am using firefox
Currently it works with Internet Explorer but not with Firefox. I'll try to add support for Firefox, but in the meantime try it with IE.
|
I think you should get toghether with someone like r1ch, masterofchaos, or tec27 (3 programmers from this site) and somehow make an interface where you can just click "browse" and point it towards your replay folder and have it auto check all the reps without having to copy paste each individual one.
|
that would mean that the website have some kind of bwchart inside of it to be able to decript the replay
|
Its working and its great 
Thank you
|
and if a lot of us will try to browse through our full folders of replays this site will die.
|
Wow, I didn't know Oblivion could do all that.
My question is if Oblivion can do like automine, then it must somehow change the individual actions of units, right? Why can't the people who made Oblivion instead make like a really great AI to fight against?
It shouldn't be too hard to improve on what's already in BW. I mean, to simulate early scouting, have the worker just run around the enemy's base constantly. You could set it up so that if the worker comes within like 5 spaces of an enemy unit, for it to make a right angle turn. Alternately, it seems like you could program in drop harasses and stuff like that fairly easily.
Could a program like Oblivion do stuff like this? Or maybe something adapted from Oblivion or such?
|
dam was really hoping that last guy who ownt me hacked 
|
one of those guys is in my clan
x.x
|
On February 06 2008 06:04 bp1696 wrote:
Wow, I didn't know Oblivion could do all that.
My question is if Oblivion can do like automine, then it must somehow change the individual actions of units, right? Why can't the people who made Oblivion instead make like a really great AI to fight against?
It shouldn't be too hard to improve on what's already in BW. I mean, to simulate early scouting, have the worker just run around the enemy's base constantly. You could set it up so that if the worker comes within like 5 spaces of an enemy unit, for it to make a right angle turn. Alternately, it seems like you could program in drop harasses and stuff like that fairly easily.
Could a program like Oblivion do stuff like this? Or maybe something adapted from Oblivion or such?
There already are ai mods, not sure if they work with the new patch though, search around.
|
The site is really really slow, the script either takes too long or it stops analyzing.
|
On February 06 2008 06:11 Pressure wrote:
one of those guys is in my clan
x.x
That sucks :/
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2349 Posts
On February 06 2008 06:35 ForAdun wrote:
The site is really really slow, the script either takes too long or it stops analyzing.
I assume you tried it with Firefox. It won't work with Firefox. With IE it runs usually around 10 seconds for analyzing a replay.
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2349 Posts
I updated the BWHF.
version 0.91 => 0.93
Changes:
-Added Firefox support.
-Removed all known false hack alerts.
-Some minor optimizations.
Actually, the analysis in Firefox runs almost twice as fast as in IE! Was a nice suprise.
If you see the old version tag below the title (0.91), refresh the page.
Don't know if it works with Opera, someone plz test it for me.
|
CA10828 Posts
|
On February 06 2008 06:17 jimminy_kriket wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2008 06:04 bp1696 wrote:
Wow, I didn't know Oblivion could do all that.
My question is if Oblivion can do like automine, then it must somehow change the individual actions of units, right? Why can't the people who made Oblivion instead make like a really great AI to fight against?
It shouldn't be too hard to improve on what's already in BW. I mean, to simulate early scouting, have the worker just run around the enemy's base constantly. You could set it up so that if the worker comes within like 5 spaces of an enemy unit, for it to make a right angle turn. Alternately, it seems like you could program in drop harasses and stuff like that fairly easily.
Could a program like Oblivion do stuff like this? Or maybe something adapted from Oblivion or such? There already are ai mods, not sure if they work with the new patch though, search around.
They do, I play quite a few for fun still.
|
|
|
this thing is cool btw, gonna give it a good bump for you, props
|
um.... mine says parse error line 1, with known hack replays.
|
you have seconds checked, you're supposed to uncheck them
|
Belgium9947 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
