![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/TBBfTsxQ/tix.png)
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ - Page 186
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
TnY
12 Posts
![]() | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland25995 Posts
On September 21 2025 20:27 Che cazzo wrote: First of all, SCV rush is allowed. Second, there is no rule about multi accounts. Almost half of bot game players have multi accounts. If you gonna report me for this reason, make report on all the players having multi account. Why only me? Cause your intention is just to ban me. And don't lie about my message. Recently what I am saying to you is only this, nothing else: "Don't join SAB game." And also ameba told you not to join SAB as you remember, cos you are keep trying to join SAB games with 1900mmr and most games you joined are extremely unbalanced and ruined. Winning/Losing of bot game is not dependent on how many experts are in team, but is dependent on how many noobies are ruining the team. I mean you would be banned if people didn’t have lives to live, and the rules weren’t deliberately made to be unambiguous and easy to moderate and administer. You take pride in being as shitty as possible while not breaking any of the rules. Bravo, give yourself a wee tap on the back. It’s genuinely pathetic. ‘SCV rush is alllowed’ Lmao. This isn’t some unorthodox, or indeed orthodox strategy you’re employing, where a teammate may be disagreeing, in classic BGH style. You’re employing garbage, that you know is garbage and sandbagging your team in the process. But it’s in the rules amirite guys? You are the absolute worst kind of gamer imaginable and you’re just lucky there isn’t some community council operating to ban for just general shiftiness, because you’d be first to be thrust into the guillotine | ||
|
Che cazzo
200 Posts
On September 22 2025 10:35 WombaT wrote: I mean you would be banned if people didn’t have lives to live, and the rules weren’t deliberately made to be unambiguous and easy to moderate and administer. You take pride in being as shitty as possible while not breaking any of the rules. Bravo, give yourself a wee tap on the back. It’s genuinely pathetic. ‘SCV rush is alllowed’ Lmao. This isn’t some unorthodox, or indeed orthodox strategy you’re employing, where a teammate may be disagreeing, in classic BGH style. You’re employing garbage, that you know is garbage and sandbagging your team in the process. But it’s in the rules amirite guys? You are the absolute worst kind of gamer imaginable and you’re just lucky there isn’t some community council operating to ban for just general shiftiness, because you’d be first to be thrust into the guillotine You are definitely wrong. You need more objective point of view for your DRAMA. When I say to team going SCV rush, 80% players welcome or accept. And it is an effective option when ally race combination is bad, or as 4pool counter. If you think SCV rush is problem, just go to admin and cry, suggest him forbidding it. I am not your baby sitter, not interested in your stupid DRAMA😂 | ||
|
Che cazzo
200 Posts
On September 22 2025 10:20 TnY wrote: ![]() Chaos Joker…not bad, I like it 😁 Would be better if AI provided rival matches: --GosuNinja-- vs SuperHyd: auto loser match SuperHyd vs JaeQueen: china derby, 赤壁之战 trashley vs SuperHyd: nooby zerg match victor1985 vs Topper_HarIey: goonies match Cwt)RealFint vs Cwt)RealCI_Int (also as known as, 1ManZerg vs lManZerg): gay match SCV_Ready! vs --GosuNinja--: toxic match (different thing is, SCV_Ready! is toxic to ally team when lose, while --GosuNinja-- is toxic to enemy team when lose) | ||
|
pompi
10 Posts
| ||
|
kurrrak
Poland136 Posts
On September 22 2025 17:50 Che cazzo wrote: Chaos Joker…not bad, I like it 😁 Would be better if AI provided rival matches: --GosuNinja-- vs SuperHyd: auto loser match SuperHyd vs JaeQueen: china derby, 赤壁之战 trashley vs SuperHyd: nooby zerg match victor1985 vs Topper_HarIey: goonies match Cwt)RealFint vs Cwt)RealCI_Int (also as known as, 1ManZerg vs lManZerg): gay match SCV_Ready! vs --GosuNinja--: toxic match (different thing is, SCV_Ready! is toxic to ally team when lose, while --GosuNinja-- is toxic to enemy team when lose) Feels like some of presented diagnoses are off. Maybe model needs more samples. | ||
|
yosh1_0
16 Posts
On September 13 2025 06:01 D3AD-R3TARD wrote: @D3AD-R3TARD The 3 minute rule is in place for this exact reason: to elimintate 5 pools, canon rushes, messing with terran wall and so on. The BGHMMR system is based on an assumption that skill of the team is combined skill of all the players. All of those early tactics can eliminate one player and give a win to a team without any input from other players. And that breakes the MMR system because the result of 1v1 becomes the result of the 3v3 game so 4 out of 6 players gain/lose MMR regardless of their performance in that game. I would imagine that SCV Rushes fall in to this category. I personally believe as it is an exploit -- when a player stacks SCV on vespene geyser -- that is banned in pro level play we should ban it here. | ||
|
Che cazzo
200 Posts
On September 22 2025 22:28 yosh1_0 wrote: I would imagine that SCV Rushes fall in to this category. I personally believe as it is an exploit -- when a player stacks SCV on vespene geyser -- that is banned in pro level play we should ban it here. That’s your wish, not my concern. Under the current rules, SCV rush is not a bannable action as previously declared by admin. Even if it becomes bannable in the future, you cannot apply it retroactively to ban me. So what you should suggest to the admin is simply this: Let’s ban SCV rushes from now on. | ||
|
TnY
12 Posts
![]() | ||
|
Che cazzo
200 Posts
On September 23 2025 13:14 TnY wrote: ![]() Looking at the reputation chart, it’s clear that many of the players who have filed ban reports against me are actually positioned lower than I am in reputation. However, it is quite disappointing that your AI fails to grasp the true essence of toxicity. In the reputation chart, I may be ranked ahead of --GosuNinja-- and SCV_Ready!, but being lumped together with them is deeply humiliating. --GosuNinja-- and SCV_Ready! are innate toxickers by nature, whereas I have only adopted toxicity as a means of communication within this toxic community. + 33565 has officially and publicly confirmed this: carsta >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ninja, topper.(also ninja, topper are 1v1 dodgers. They already know they cannot win me in 1v1.) | ||
|
pompi
10 Posts
every other player can beat you in what position you want | ||
|
Che cazzo
200 Posts
On September 23 2025 20:33 pompi wrote: i think that even answering to your criticism is a waste of time. why would you waste your time for this. dont be a child every other player can beat you in what position you want Whether I respond or just keep my mouth shut, you should focus on doing your own job. I don’t waste my time talking with pretentious PC hypocrites and emotion-peddling communists. You’re nothing more than a crybaby outsider, upset at being left out of this drama, desperately posting your little counter-comments. And to the anonymous poster who’s already written four comments — if you want people to actually respect what you say, then show your Battle.net ID. Everyone else shows their ID when they speak. Hiding like this just makes you another coward in the crowd. | ||
|
NinjaGosu
31 Posts
On September 23 2025 14:03 Che cazzo wrote: Looking at the reputation chart, it’s clear that many of the players who have filed ban reports against me are actually positioned lower than I am in reputation. However, it is quite disappointing that your AI fails to grasp the true essence of toxicity. In the reputation chart, I may be ranked ahead of --GosuNinja-- and SCV_Ready!, but being lumped together with them is deeply humiliating. --GosuNinja-- and SCV_Ready! are innate toxickers by nature, whereas I have only adopted toxicity as a means of communication within this toxic community. + 33565 has officially and publicly confirmed this: carsta >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ninja, topper.(also ninja, topper are 1v1 dodgers. They already know they cannot win me in 1v1.) Funy and delusanal posts autoloser searching for fun and reason mostly far from reality big bullshits mainly with some little true about some players - example i don't care about APM, rare mention even the word apm and it means nothing to me i can have whatever apm i want, example 2 No need validation my 1v3 2v3 1v1 wins vs top players says it all and the reps can confirmed, why and what to validate more xD 2v3 winnin rank 1 with f rank ally if we talk about the bot and at 2v2 win reps vs all top 2v2 players. Seems some autolosers need atention and validation :D so they try to analise players, copy paste words of others cos they dont have their own but mainly toxic spammer noobs 70% latly all always blame others and search problem of others :D :D :D GL HF User was warned for this post | ||
|
NinjaGosu
31 Posts
On September 13 2025 06:01 D3AD-R3TARD wrote: I just looked at BGHMMR stats and the least used race is - by far - terran. So it seems that zerg is not doing so bad in BGHMMR. The 3 minute rule is in place for this exact reason: to elimintate 5 pools, canon rushes, messing with terran wall and so on. The BGHMMR system is based on an assumption that skill of the team is combined skill of all the players. All of those early tactics can eliminate one player and give a win to a team without any input from other players. And that breakes the MMR system because the result of 1v1 becomes the result of the 3v3 game so 4 out of 6 players gain/lose MMR regardless of their performance in that game. Bots not working well latly. Admin not here often cos mainly nonsense spam in the forum ? | ||
|
kAra
Germany1387 Posts
what is bot doing? | ||
|
lastscer
14 Posts
On September 13 2025 06:01 D3AD-R3TARD wrote: I just looked at BGHMMR stats and the least used race is - by far - terran. So it seems that zerg is not doing so bad in BGHMMR. The 3 minute rule is in place for this exact reason: to elimintate 5 pools, canon rushes, messing with terran wall and so on. The BGHMMR system is based on an assumption that skill of the team is combined skill of all the players. All of those early tactics can eliminate one player and give a win to a team without any input from other players. And that breakes the MMR system because the result of 1v1 becomes the result of the 3v3 game so 4 out of 6 players gain/lose MMR regardless of their performance in that game. Please keep in mind that close points (11/12, 1/3, etc.) 9 pool timing is earlier than 3 minutes. I have seen games when Terran makes a slow bunker, or toss gets the first zealot surrounded, but was able to get away by quitting before the 3 mins mark. This is unfair to Zerg players given 9 pool is one of the most popular build. I would argue the 3 minutes rule gives an unfair advantage to Protoss and Terran players, which makes the hardest race on BGH MMR, Zerg, even more challenging to play. | ||
|
ameba..
34 Posts
There is no any data on https://bghmmr.eu. | ||
|
rich-
United States144 Posts
| ||
|
ameba..
34 Posts
How to generate this kind of AI analysis report? On September 23 2025 13:14 TnY wrote: ![]() | ||
|
TnY
12 Posts
2. Use prompts to ask about player profiles Actual prompts included below as examples for what to put. ![]() | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/RGyXBnMx/image-4.png)
![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/fbJgH1g/image-4.png)