• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 15:58
CET 21:58
KST 05:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners10Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11
Community News
StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!41$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship6[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win10
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon! Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close"
Tourneys
Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review
Tourneys
[BSL21] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET [ASL20] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro? Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Why we need SC3
Hildegard
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1592 users

SC:R Launch Detected - Page 3

Forum Index > BW General
973 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 47 48 49 Next All
Waxangel
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
United States33479 Posts
June 30 2017 17:20 GMT
#41
On June 30 2017 22:35 imre wrote:
Observer improvements have been terrible for SC2 casting which is 90% made of reading on screen info. Glad they're not going on this track.


If you believe that's the truth, then blame the casters, not the UI
AdministratorHey HP can you redo everything youve ever done because i have a small complaint?
eviltomahawk
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States11135 Posts
June 30 2017 17:20 GMT
#42
On June 30 2017 21:34 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Do all of those above screenshots have this F7 extra graphics effects mode on?

I don't think so. According to the Arstechnica article, F7 wasn't working in the build they were trying at the summit.
ㅇㅅㅌㅅ
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada16955 Posts
June 30 2017 17:21 GMT
#43
thanks for creating this super insightful article!
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
Kare
Profile Joined March 2009
Norway786 Posts
June 30 2017 17:32 GMT
#44
The sunken colony on creep looks like a sticker, It looks like you imported it from paint over another image of a brood war background
In life you can obtain all sorts of material wealth, but the real treasure is the epic feelings you get while doing something you love.
ldv
Profile Blog Joined April 2017
United States103 Posts
June 30 2017 17:44 GMT
#45
On July 01 2017 02:20 Waxangel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 30 2017 22:35 imre wrote:
Observer improvements have been terrible for SC2 casting which is 90% made of reading on screen info. Glad they're not going on this track.


If you believe that's the truth, then blame the casters, not the UI

heh, but if you have the information available and the casters don't use it, all the viewers are gonna bitch that they aren't paying attention and can't see that CLEARLY there's a DARK TEMPLAR being made and WHY DON'T THE OBSERVERS SEE EVERYTHING it's RIGHT THERE ON THE UI etc etc etc ad nauseum
Waxangel
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
United States33479 Posts
June 30 2017 18:02 GMT
#46
On July 01 2017 02:20 eviltomahawk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 30 2017 21:34 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Do all of those above screenshots have this F7 extra graphics effects mode on?

I don't think so. According to the Arstechnica article, F7 wasn't working in the build they were trying at the summit.


Hmmm I saw the actual guy tinkering with it, but he seemed to be a guy who was super in tune with technical details (and I'm not). maybe it just wasn't fully implemented in the way he knew it was intended t o be.
AdministratorHey HP can you redo everything youve ever done because i have a small complaint?
eviltomahawk
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States11135 Posts
June 30 2017 18:15 GMT
#47
On July 01 2017 03:02 Waxangel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 01 2017 02:20 eviltomahawk wrote:
On June 30 2017 21:34 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Do all of those above screenshots have this F7 extra graphics effects mode on?

I don't think so. According to the Arstechnica article, F7 wasn't working in the build they were trying at the summit.


Hmmm I saw the actual guy tinkering with it, but he seemed to be a guy who was super in tune with technical details (and I'm not). maybe it just wasn't fully implemented in the way he knew it was intended t o be.

Seems like I was a little mistaken since I went back to the article, and it said that F7 was implemented but was also super buggy in the build. Makes sense that they wouldn't want to show that yet in the newly released media.
ㅇㅅㅌㅅ
Freezard
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
Sweden1012 Posts
June 30 2017 18:28 GMT
#48
Super excited that they're not copying SC2 observer mode. Keeping things hidden makes the games so much more exciting, to see at some points that even the casters are not sure who's ahead and analyze it in real-time, makes for some more interesting thinking as well. Whenever I tune in to SC2 and I see someone being ahead with 50-100 supply and the casters just say "look at the supply" all the time makes it super uninteresting.
Tadah
Profile Joined February 2010
Sweden120 Posts
June 30 2017 18:44 GMT
#49
On July 01 2017 02:05 PntBttr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 01 2017 00:11 Tadah wrote:
A MESSAGE TO THE BLIZZARD SC:R TEAM

So, to me - and I think a lot of others - the bad aspects of SC:R in terms of the graphics/artwork are:

- Archons: Too uniformly spherical with far too smooth edges. First off, it deviates fundamentally from the core design, which we were lead to believe that Blizzard would adhere to "Switching from SC:BW to SC:R should feel like having watched the former without glasses, and then putting them on".
Secondly, it makes them look fat and quite honestly, goofy.

- Dragoon attacks: Seems as though the way the 'Phase disruptor" projectiles travel across the screen has been altered by having the speed be nearly constant as opposed to constantly accelerating. This is one of the many examples regarding elements of this game's design that you don't realize you care about until someone tampers with it.

A Dragoon attack should be akin to the cracking of a whip or the firing of a catapult. It just isn't visually satisfying otherwise. The impact of the projectiles as is (in SC:R currently) simply doesn't pack any punch.


- Death animations: The death animations all suffer from a serious and seemingly systematic flaw - they take too long. This is a problem for a number of reasons.

1) It clutters up the screen. This is mostly, if not exclusively, a consequence of this flaw as it relates to unit explosions (not so much other death animations). This problem leads to decreased visibility for the player and creates a lot of distracting "white noise" on screen for spectators.

2) Having prolonged death-animations - almost 'slow motion'-like when compared to SC:BW - lessens the positive audio/visual experience for players and viewers alike. In SC:BW unit deaths are "short and sweet", giving an immediate and high-intensity punch to the viewer's/player's senses - just the way it should be.

Also, please stick to your own stated design philosophy and simply focus on improving the graphics instead of reinventing the artwork. I'm specifically thinking of how the deaths of Zealots, Marines, Zerglings and Ultralisk have all been changed dramatically for the worse.

Not only is there less blood in the case of Zerglings and Ultralisks, but there is also a non-aestethic problem stemming from the way in which Marines perish, or more specifically the immediate aftereffects of them having died. Previously (in SC:BW) when a Marine had just died a ring of blood was created centered on the spot where it had stood which enabled viewers/players to visually estimate how many had been killed in a particular engagement.

In short, please refrain from being hijacked by your impulses to put your own stamp on the game's artwork and animations and simply stick to your initial goal of making SC:R a more high resolution version of SC:BW

THANKS.

Oi vey somebody got told their opinion was important and really took it to heart.


Well why wouldn't it be important here If what I am saying is correct and If the things I pointed out matters? Both of which appears to be the case judging by the plethora of posts here and on Blizzard's forums echoing many of the concerns I outlined.
Dromar
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States2145 Posts
June 30 2017 18:45 GMT
#50
On June 30 2017 21:35 -Archangel- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 30 2017 21:26 Jealous wrote:
On June 30 2017 20:54 opisska wrote:
Viper must be having an orgasm somewhere while reading all this nonsense about "creating the suspense"!

Anyway, the whole part about the observer mode is such an amazing description of what is currently wrong with almost all software - instead of letting the users (in this case the broadcasters) chose on their own from a variety of options, they are gonna not provide the options at all, because they know better and GOD FORBID there were some options that aren't commonly used or, even worse, the options were too many and "confusing", because everyone nowadays is a total idiot and can't handle more than three checkboxes per screen! There is so much shit like that across SC2, so I should be happy that the BW guys also get a taste of the brave new world.

I still don't understand what is the point of this whole thing when they aren't changing almost anything. We have known for a while that it wouldn't solve the reasons why I don't want to play BW and it apparently also is not going to address much of the reasons I don't want to watch it (apart from the terrible old graphics).

I know that this is just your opinion, so it's difficult for me to say that you are outright wrong, because it is just your preference.

But as a BW player/watcher, my opinion is that your opinion is dogshit. People complain about BW "elitists" showing up in their forums and saying shit like "I don't want to play and I don't want to watch it either rofl," but here we are.

You are exactly the elitist nobody likes. He is not asking for observer tools to be forced to be always on.
If they existed and if not having them is so superior then I am sure people will not be using them in major tournaments, right?


Not really. People do things that aren't to their benefit just because they can all the time. Drugs, unhealthy food, etc.

I watched a video about an experiment where people were given a button which shocked them when pressed. They pressed it, found out it shocked them, and when asked if they wanted to press the button again, of course they said no. Then the person was left to wait in a room, and the button was left with them. The majority of people pressed the button at least once while waiting, just out of boredom.

The point is, people don't act rationally much of the time, and it's actually irrational to expect that they will. If the options are offered, they will likely be used, even to the detriment of the overall viewer experience. The observer options in SC2 are a terrific and relevant example to this.

I'm not saying the options they choose to (or not to) implement will be the perfect choice. I'm just saying more isn't necessarily better.
raff100
Profile Joined April 2011
498 Posts
June 30 2017 19:11 GMT
#51
On July 01 2017 03:28 Freezard wrote:
Super excited that they're not copying SC2 observer mode. Keeping things hidden makes the games so much more exciting, to see at some points that even the casters are not sure who's ahead and analyze it in real-time, makes for some more interesting thinking as well. Whenever I tune in to SC2 and I see someone being ahead with 50-100 supply and the casters just say "look at the supply" all the time makes it super uninteresting.

I'm with you,watching BW has been super interesting for me,especially because of the absence of tools like production tab/supply.
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-30 19:42:53
June 30 2017 19:17 GMT
#52
On June 30 2017 20:54 opisska wrote:
Viper must be having an orgasm somewhere while reading all this nonsense about "creating the suspense"!

Anyway, the whole part about the observer mode is such an amazing description of what is currently wrong with almost all software - instead of letting the users (in this case the broadcasters) chose on their own from a variety of options, they are gonna not provide the options at all, because they know better and GOD FORBID there were some options that aren't commonly used or, even worse, the options were too many and "confusing", because everyone nowadays is a total idiot and can't handle more than three checkboxes per screen! There is so much shit like that across SC2, so I should be happy that the BW guys also get a taste of the brave new world.

I still don't understand what is the point of this whole thing when they aren't changing almost anything. We have known for a while that it wouldn't solve the reasons why I don't want to play BW and it apparently also is not going to address much of the reasons I don't want to watch it (apart from the terrible old graphics).



Haha you can not like it, but it's true that there is more suspense if you don't know everything.
With that being said, i still would say that the features should be in the game, if you wanna use it or not that's another question.

Well now it's possible to play broodwar on modern technology and it looks decent. That's the purpose i guess, also new features like matchmaking and profiles, etc. I am happy with it
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Waxangel
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
United States33479 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-30 19:24:40
June 30 2017 19:24 GMT
#53
the thing you will hate most about SC:R observing for the first three months is the observers abusing the infinite zoom in/out, because like the rest of us, they can't be disciplined with their great new toys.
AdministratorHey HP can you redo everything youve ever done because i have a small complaint?
WGT-Baal
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
France3413 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-30 19:30:11
June 30 2017 19:26 GMT
#54
A couple questions for further refs or if you get to ask Blizzard later:
Will we be able to make unlimited accounts? (like now)
How about the clan system? (tags)
Crosserver rankings (a la overwatch?) or one rank per server?
Race based ranking? (one per race?)
Will it be possible to play the campaign offline? (i assume it will)

Thx for this article!

Edit: 2 more questions: will there be tools for clan league/nation war support?
Horang2 fan
fishjie
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States1519 Posts
June 30 2017 19:59 GMT
#55
disappointed on the lack of observer features, because it would be cool to see casts on the sc2 guys like soulkey and rain who have switched back play on the remastered version

BUT OTHERWISE SICK SCREENSHOTS
L_Master
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States8017 Posts
June 30 2017 20:42 GMT
#56
On July 01 2017 04:24 Waxangel wrote:
the thing you will hate most about SC:R observing for the first three months is the observers abusing the infinite zoom in/out, because like the rest of us, they can't be disciplined with their great new toys.


LOL. You're totally right. That's going to make for some frustrating moments when you're wanting to see one thing but the obs is busy having a zoom party :D
EffOrt and Soulkey Hwaiting!
MamiyaOtaru
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1687 Posts
June 30 2017 21:04 GMT
#57
On July 01 2017 00:11 Tadah wrote:
A MESSAGE TO THE BLIZZARD SC:R TEAM

So, to me - and I think a lot of others - the bad aspects of SC:R in terms of the graphics/artwork are:

- Archons: Too uniformly spherical with far too smooth edges. First off, it deviates fundamentally from the core design, which we were lead to believe that Blizzard would adhere to "Switching from SC:BW to SC:R should feel like having watched the former without glasses, and then putting them on".
Secondly, it makes them look fat and quite honestly, goofy.

- Dragoon attacks: Seems as though the way the 'Phase disruptor" projectiles travel across the screen has been altered by having the speed be nearly constant as opposed to constantly accelerating. This is one of the many examples regarding elements of this game's design that you don't realize you care about until someone tampers with it.

A Dragoon attack should be akin to the cracking of a whip or the firing of a catapult. It just isn't visually satisfying otherwise. The impact of the projectiles as is (in SC:R currently) simply doesn't pack any punch.

- Death animations: The death animations all suffer from a serious and seemingly systematic flaw - they take too long. This is a problem for a number of reasons.

1) It clutters up the screen. This is mostly, if not exclusively, a consequence of this flaw as it relates to unit explosions (not so much other death animations). This problem leads to decreased visibility for the player and creates a lot of distracting "white noise" on screen for spectators.

2) Having prolonged death-animations - almost 'slow motion'-like when compared to SC:BW - lessens the positive audio/visual experience for players and viewers alike. In SC:BW unit deaths are "short and sweet", giving an immediate and high-intensity punch to the viewer's/player's senses - just the way it should be.

Also, please stick to your own stated design philosophy and simply focus on improving the graphics instead of reinventing the artwork. I'm specifically thinking of how the deaths of Zealots, Marines, Zerglings and Ultralisks have all been changed dramatically for the worse.

Not only is there less blood in the case of Zerglings and Ultralisks, but there is also a non-aestethic problem stemming from the way in which Marines perish, or more specifically the immediate aftereffects of them having died. Previously (in SC:BW) when a Marine had just died a ring of blood was created centered on the spot where it had stood which enabled viewers/players to visually estimate how many had been killed in a particular engagement.

In short, please refrain from being hijacked by your impulses to put your own stamp on the game's artwork and animations and simply stick to your initial goal of making SC:R a more high resolution version of SC:BW

THANKS.

pretty much in full agreement with this. When we first saw those gifs there were complaints (some from me) about how much they had changed from BW and earlier videos of SC:R. A lot of responses to that were along the lines of "why complain about a compressed gif? Who knows what it actually looks like!!!" Well now we see it loks pretty much like the gifs. I'm not a fan of how so many of the sprites are changed. The buildings and units themselves are looking pretty good, but the marine and zergling death splats, the tank explosions, the mutas popping all look different, have different silhouettes if you like. A unit dying is just as important to understanding what's happening as a live one is. Wish they weren't making all these changes
eviltomahawk
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States11135 Posts
June 30 2017 21:25 GMT
#58
On July 01 2017 03:28 Freezard wrote:
Super excited that they're not copying SC2 observer mode. Keeping things hidden makes the games so much more exciting, to see at some points that even the casters are not sure who's ahead and analyze it in real-time, makes for some more interesting thinking as well. Whenever I tune in to SC2 and I see someone being ahead with 50-100 supply and the casters just say "look at the supply" all the time makes it super uninteresting.

If I'm not mistaken, I think supply and resource counts are in the observer mode added in patch 1.18.
ㅇㅅㅌㅅ
dark.matter
Profile Joined April 2017
179 Posts
June 30 2017 21:54 GMT
#59
On July 01 2017 06:04 MamiyaOtaru wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 01 2017 00:11 Tadah wrote:
A MESSAGE TO THE BLIZZARD SC:R TEAM

So, to me - and I think a lot of others - the bad aspects of SC:R in terms of the graphics/artwork are:

- Archons: Too uniformly spherical with far too smooth edges. First off, it deviates fundamentally from the core design, which we were lead to believe that Blizzard would adhere to "Switching from SC:BW to SC:R should feel like having watched the former without glasses, and then putting them on".
Secondly, it makes them look fat and quite honestly, goofy.

- Dragoon attacks: Seems as though the way the 'Phase disruptor" projectiles travel across the screen has been altered by having the speed be nearly constant as opposed to constantly accelerating. This is one of the many examples regarding elements of this game's design that you don't realize you care about until someone tampers with it.

A Dragoon attack should be akin to the cracking of a whip or the firing of a catapult. It just isn't visually satisfying otherwise. The impact of the projectiles as is (in SC:R currently) simply doesn't pack any punch.

- Death animations: The death animations all suffer from a serious and seemingly systematic flaw - they take too long. This is a problem for a number of reasons.

1) It clutters up the screen. This is mostly, if not exclusively, a consequence of this flaw as it relates to unit explosions (not so much other death animations). This problem leads to decreased visibility for the player and creates a lot of distracting "white noise" on screen for spectators.

2) Having prolonged death-animations - almost 'slow motion'-like when compared to SC:BW - lessens the positive audio/visual experience for players and viewers alike. In SC:BW unit deaths are "short and sweet", giving an immediate and high-intensity punch to the viewer's/player's senses - just the way it should be.

Also, please stick to your own stated design philosophy and simply focus on improving the graphics instead of reinventing the artwork. I'm specifically thinking of how the deaths of Zealots, Marines, Zerglings and Ultralisks have all been changed dramatically for the worse.

Not only is there less blood in the case of Zerglings and Ultralisks, but there is also a non-aestethic problem stemming from the way in which Marines perish, or more specifically the immediate aftereffects of them having died. Previously (in SC:BW) when a Marine had just died a ring of blood was created centered on the spot where it had stood which enabled viewers/players to visually estimate how many had been killed in a particular engagement.

In short, please refrain from being hijacked by your impulses to put your own stamp on the game's artwork and animations and simply stick to your initial goal of making SC:R a more high resolution version of SC:BW

THANKS.

pretty much in full agreement with this. When we first saw those gifs there were complaints (some from me) about how much they had changed from BW and earlier videos of SC:R. A lot of responses to that were along the lines of "why complain about a compressed gif? Who knows what it actually looks like!!!" Well now we see it loks pretty much like the gifs. I'm not a fan of how so many of the sprites are changed. The buildings and units themselves are looking pretty good, but the marine and zergling death splats, the tank explosions, the mutas popping all look different, have different silhouettes if you like. A unit dying is just as important to understanding what's happening as a live one is. Wish they weren't making all these changes


Yep. I agree as well. I also noted the valkryie vollies take up so much visual space, hard to see the muta count under them.
TT1
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada10011 Posts
June 30 2017 23:21 GMT
#60
"The chat looks more like SC2’s chat channels."

in what way? i hope this isn't the case
ab = tl(i) + tl(pc), the grand answer to every tl.net debate
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 47 48 49 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL 21
20:00
ProLeague - RO32 Group A
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs OyAji
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
ZZZero.O214
LiquipediaDiscussion
LAN Event
18:00
Stellar Fest: Day 2
ByuN vs LamboLIVE!
Zoun vs Scarlett
Clem vs TriGGeR
ComeBackTV 922
UrsaTVCanada819
IndyStarCraft 299
EnkiAlexander 73
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 299
Railgan 42
elazer 36
Nathanias 33
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 1612
ZZZero.O 214
White-Ra 117
UpATreeSC 65
HiyA 21
Dota 2
febbydoto11
League of Legends
KnowMe84
Counter-Strike
kRYSTAL_34
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu382
Khaldor251
Other Games
Grubby3903
Beastyqt735
Pyrionflax226
Fuzer 211
mouzStarbuck136
ArmadaUGS104
ToD74
goatrope56
Mlord22
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick708
Counter-Strike
PGL168
Other Games
BasetradeTV64
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 37
• 3DClanTV 24
• Airneanach24
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2831
• Ler99
• lizZardDota269
League of Legends
• imaqtpie2760
Other Games
• Scarra564
• Shiphtur272
• tFFMrPink 18
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
2h 2m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
13h 2m
WardiTV Korean Royale
15h 2m
LAN Event
18h 2m
IPSL
21h 2m
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
BSL 21
23h 2m
spx vs rasowy
HBO vs KameZerg
Cross vs Razz
dxtr13 vs ZZZero
Replay Cast
1d 12h
Wardi Open
1d 15h
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
BSL 21
6 days
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual

Upcoming

SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.