Well I have the same question too when the Admin councils voted for Ash. But since Ash talked to me privately that he want to represent BGHers.com, so I did reconsider his participation. Also, he was the longest KoTH survival in BGH 1on1 event. So yeah, he CAN be on BGHers, and why not?

Ash

Malaysia1978 Posts

January 21 2007 18:12 GMT

#425

heh i'm not good.. and i play bgh more often than i do on low money so why not ? ^^ I don't play competitively anymore

btw i'm a manager in MYM, not a player

CoralReefer

Canada2069 Posts

January 21 2007 18:41 GMT

#426

are you kidding me?
"Surado / Austria VS CoralReefer / MrSpliffy 2-0"

after we played these games, x-men-loki told us that they were not "official" matches, and indeed surado and austria were not supposed to play with each other.

normally i wouldn't have minded, but i went into these games knowing it was auto loss.

thedeadhaji

39489 Posts

January 21 2007 18:46 GMT

#427

ah you're right

On January 16 2007 15:54 Gandalf wrote:
op bghers on USWEST.

Heres the bghers.com team:

For BGH: 3on3 teams are X-MeN-RaiN/X-MeN-Pickle/to.ash and clan [Craft]
2on2 teams are Austria/Protech_Marine and Surado-/npnl.fedor

For LOW: 1on1 players are: X-MeN-RaiN, npnl.fedor, to.ash, Surado-, X-MeN-Pickle, Protech_Marine
2on2 teams are: Player[Craft]/Tarzan[Craft] and Austria/Prince[Craft]

the teams were different. I didnt realize.

intrigue

Washington, D.C9934 Posts

January 21 2007 19:24 GMT

#428

ahhh i just watched all the replays
to anyone playing this again - please, please, PLEASE go ppp vs ppp, unless you're going ppz and you know your z has sick enough micro to distract and get free kills

one and only one p can tech on each team (depending on what you scout), the other two are forced to go 4-6gate zealot before goon. it's painfully obvious that tl.net completely underestimated how zealot-heavy the bghers were going

a rematch would be fun! and i would like to play in the team games but i'm expecting my ban any time now =)

thedeadhaji

39489 Posts

January 21 2007 19:29 GMT

#429

lol ban b/c you lost? Did you post that earlier somewhere?

intrigue

Washington, D.C9934 Posts

January 21 2007 19:38 GMT

#430

manifesto7 posted that somewhere

thedeadhaji

39489 Posts

January 21 2007 19:56 GMT

#431

ohh right

Aphelion

United States2720 Posts

January 21 2007 20:23 GMT

#432

Ban that noob. Oh yea, all those TLnetters than played for BGHers : YOUR EXILED, TRAITORS!

DarK]N[exuS

China1441 Posts

January 21 2007 23:28 GMT

#433

On January 22 2007 04:24 intrigue wrote:
ahhh i just watched all the replays
to anyone playing this again - please, please, PLEASE go ppp vs ppp, unless you're going ppz and you know your z has sick enough micro to distract and get free kills

one and only one p can tech on each team (depending on what you scout), the other two are forced to go 4-6gate zealot before goon. it's painfully obvious that tl.net completely underestimated how zealot-heavy the bghers were going

a rematch would be fun! and i would like to play in the team games but i'm expecting my ban any time now =)

Well it's definitely true that a lot of the top BGH teams pick PPP but I think that you can go PPZ and still be ok, or that if you are just godly you can pick a non P race (like in some of those games where Testie went Z when teamed with Koolam, Testie just has extremely good game-sense and his ability to tell when to make lings/drones is even more useful than normal on a map like BGH).

intrigue

Washington, D.C9934 Posts

January 21 2007 23:30 GMT

#434

where can i get good replays of hunters 3vs3 play? i think i'm interested in team games now =) especially if i don't have to play p for it

CoralReefer

Canada2069 Posts

January 21 2007 23:32 GMT

#435

i saw some reps of testie /koolam vs surado / austria where testie was zerg and terran. the PP team could have easily won both games, but they seemed too afraid to attack either of them at the right moments.

DarK]N[exuS

China1441 Posts

January 21 2007 23:34 GMT

#436

Well "P Wars" is really popular with the top Korean teamplay teams so most of those games are PPP v PPP making it quite hard to find actually skilled team replays that involved other races, especially 3v3 instead of 2v2.

There are quite a few teamplay replays here but a majority are Pwars and not particularly recent (basic mechanics and build orders have not changed in years for teamplay though):

http://clannexus.wo.to/

Also YaoYuan has a few but many of the more interesting sounding links are dead

Hot_Bid

Braavos36379 Posts

January 22 2007 00:03 GMT

#437

On January 22 2007 08:34 DarK]N[exuS wrote:
http://clannexus.wo.to/

hm i have not heard of this clan. will go check it out.

FreeZEternal

Korea (South)3396 Posts

January 22 2007 00:33 GMT

#438

omg -.- PPP vs PPP is really fun. I've played tons of those games before. You guys should have 2 gate and go directly to DT while the other two to goon. BM LOL

sweatpants

United States940 Posts

January 22 2007 00:44 GMT

#439

I have a great old Nada PP vs PP on hunters, if anyone is interested... Although I think it's popular enough that everyone has it lol

CubEdIn

Romania5359 Posts

January 22 2007 01:57 GMT

#440

The ONLY thing I really disagree with in this MU was that the 2v2 low money team was different than the 2v2 BGH team.

The point was to take average players from one side and average players from the other and see how they stack up on bgh then on low, if you change the team it screws up the whole bgh -> low balance.