The Ten Dragons - Page 5

On January 09 2010 12:57 Hinanawi wrote:
An Advanced Statistical Study of Zerg Rankings:

Abstract:
In the past, uncertainty has gripped the Starcraft community regarding the ranking of Zerg players in terms of performance. A popular ranking system, known as the "Maestro Theory" has exhibited considerable popularity since its inception. Herein I discuss an enhanced player rating system based on random shit that makes players I like look good and players I don't like look bad hard statistics.

Introduction:
With the rise of the forces of Aiur and the rapid decline of the Zerg race, it has become increasingly hard easy to determine whether or not The Maestro has fallen from the high point era now known as 'the era before Bisu raped him'. These changes, sparked by new imbalanced maps for Protoss and Terran, have amplified the fall of the Zerg Race Savior. Not surprisingly, Savior has been suffering mightily at the hands of everyone as of late, constantly missing from Starleagues as of late. The question then may be asked: Which Zerg players constitute the new "Maestros" and shall represent the Zerg race for years to come?

With the aim of casting some light on the current Zerg situation, this article offers an overview of the complexity of ranking Zerg players and considers the diversity of success from various aspects of progaming.

Historical Background:
In the early days of progaming, Zerg players have always experienced hardships when it came to success. We all remember how hilarious sad it was when Yellow always ended up coming up just a little bit short. I dislike Terran players. I dislike Terran players a lot.

However, even with their limited success, Zergs persevered onwards, finally gaining recognition as Savior, the Maestro burst onto the scene and shocked the scrub imba Terrans. Forever changing the way Zergs played against everyone, the Zerg race experienced it's first stint of success, with Savior leading the way.

Why Only 1?:
The volatile matchup of Zerg vs Terran has always been an Achilles Heel for Zerg players. Historically, Terrans have won over 53% of games vs Zerg players, and has generally been considered an easy matchup for Terrans. Mediocre Terrans such as CuteAngel have even been quoted saying, "HAHAHA, MANNER CC IN YOUR MAIN BISU" in the past (and that's not even TvZ). After statistical surveys compiled by Korean netizens, the Maestro (Savior) was selected for his >50% win rates in ZvT awesome hair to be the head of the Zerg race.

Does this theory still hold?:
Fast forward two years and a half later to mid 2009. The era of the Maestro has come and gone. Savior hasn't consistently made it to even the latter stages of Starleagues as of recent, not to mention winning a Starleague. With the Terrans not sucking as much hookers and blow he wasted his prize money on, everyone has been completely dominating the Maestro. Thus, the old Korean statistical survey holds little to no credibility anymore, thus necessitating the need for a new ranking system of Zerg players.

Proposal for Maestro Requirements:
Based upon data gathered and regressed (holding all else constant), we ('we' referring to me and my mum, who I asked for advice on this) have concluded that in order to qualify as a maestro, one:

Must be a somewhat kinda decent Zerg player.
AND
Must not have been born on November 23rd, 1987.

Statistical Analysis :
Therefore from our proposal, we compile a list of Maestros, before and after.

Current "Maestros":
None

New Maestros:
Jaedong
Calm
EffOrt
Kwanro
ZerO
OctZerg

Slain Maestros:
sAviOr - Violates the second requirement.

Ramifications:
Entirely according to popular belief, Savior is no longer among the best of the Zerg race. With lackluster Proleague results and his disappearance from the latest Starleagues, Savior has fallen from his high and mighty throne. His fall from grace is evident by the fact that he failed to destroy everyone in 2009.

Closing Comments:
The analysis presented in this article may be debated by many people. The first of many arguments that may arise would be the "This is pretty dumb". You've got a point there.

Sources:
* theonion.com

On January 09 2010 12:57 Hinanawi wrote:
An Advanced Statistical Study of Zerg Rankings:

Abstract:
In the past, uncertainty has gripped the Starcraft community regarding the ranking of Zerg players in terms of performance. A popular ranking system, known as the "Maestro Theory" has exhibited considerable popularity since its inception. Herein I discuss an enhanced player rating system based on random shit that makes players I like look good and players I don't like look bad hard statistics.

Introduction:
With the rise of the forces of Aiur and the rapid decline of the Zerg race, it has become increasingly hard easy to determine whether or not The Maestro has fallen from the high point era now known as 'the era before Bisu raped him'. These changes, sparked by new imbalanced maps for Protoss and Terran, have amplified the fall of the Zerg Race Savior. Not surprisingly, Savior has been suffering mightily at the hands of everyone as of late, constantly missing from Starleagues as of late. The question then may be asked: Which Zerg players constitute the new "Maestros" and shall represent the Zerg race for years to come?

With the aim of casting some light on the current Zerg situation, this article offers an overview of the complexity of ranking Zerg players and considers the diversity of success from various aspects of progaming.

Historical Background:
In the early days of progaming, Zerg players have always experienced hardships when it came to success. We all remember how hilarious sad it was when Yellow always ended up coming up just a little bit short. I dislike Terran players. I dislike Terran players a lot.

However, even with their limited success, Zergs persevered onwards, finally gaining recognition as Savior, the Maestro burst onto the scene and shocked the scrub imba Terrans. Forever changing the way Zergs played against everyone, the Zerg race experienced it's first stint of success, with Savior leading the way.

Why Only 1?:
The volatile matchup of Zerg vs Terran has always been an Achilles Heel for Zerg players. Historically, Terrans have won over 53% of games vs Zerg players, and has generally been considered an easy matchup for Terrans. Mediocre Terrans such as CuteAngel have even been quoted saying, "HAHAHA, MANNER CC IN YOUR MAIN BISU" in the past (and that's not even TvZ). After statistical surveys compiled by Korean netizens, the Maestro (Savior) was selected for his >50% win rates in ZvT awesome hair to be the head of the Zerg race.

Does this theory still hold?:
Fast forward two years and a half later to mid 2009. The era of the Maestro has come and gone. Savior hasn't consistently made it to even the latter stages of Starleagues as of recent, not to mention winning a Starleague. With the Terrans not sucking as much hookers and blow he wasted his prize money on, everyone has been completely dominating the Maestro. Thus, the old Korean statistical survey holds little to no credibility anymore, thus necessitating the need for a new ranking system of Zerg players.

Proposal for Maestro Requirements:
Based upon data gathered and regressed (holding all else constant), we ('we' referring to me and my mum, who I asked for advice on this) have concluded that in order to qualify as a maestro, one:

Must be a somewhat kinda decent Zerg player.
AND
Must not have been born on November 23rd, 1987.

Statistical Analysis :
Therefore from our proposal, we compile a list of Maestros, before and after.

Current "Maestros":
None

New Maestros:
Jaedong
Calm
EffOrt
Kwanro
ZerO
OctZerg

Slain Maestros:
sAviOr - Violates the second requirement.

Ramifications:
Entirely according to popular belief, Savior is no longer among the best of the Zerg race. With lackluster Proleague results and his disappearance from the latest Starleagues, Savior has fallen from his high and mighty throne. His fall from grace is evident by the fact that he failed to destroy everyone in 2009.

Closing Comments:
The analysis presented in this article may be debated by many people. The first of many arguments that may arise would be the "This is pretty dumb". You've got a point there.

Sources:
* theonion.com