• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:06
CEST 00:06
KST 07:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202547RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 603 users

Brood War Designer Rob Pardo speaks at UCI

Blogs > shindigs
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
shindigs
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States4795 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-16 20:59:56
November 16 2011 20:33 GMT
#1
I have the privelage of attending a talk by Rob Pardo, hosted at UCI. Rob is Executive VP of Game Design at Blizzard, and worked on BW in his earlier days, and then worked on WC3, WoW, SC2, and now Diablo III.

Unfortunately, I don't believe there is a VoD of the talk but I'd thought I'd share some really interesting points that give insights to Blizzard's design philosophy. I'll focus mostly on SC2 stuff. These are in no particular order.

When designing a game, determine if it will be an ESPORT
Rob stressed that if one was aiming to design an multiplayer or competitive game, you have to decide from the get-go that this is the type of game you're going for. Tacking on a multiplayer or a competitive aspect after the single player was designed can cause major design challenges later on that may never be fixed.

Rob cited WoW Arena as an example to this issue. WoW was never designed to be competitive, but the Arena as added anyway. Because of this WoW undergoes some very strange changes for PvE players because PvP has gotten a lot of attention. This was never the intent of Blizzard.

Uber units aren't good design
Surprisingly, Rob is not a fan of uber units, and neither is Dustin Browder. It's mainly the art department who push for the inclusion of over-the-top units because they like designing really big and massive characters.

Rob admitted that the issues with the mothership had many issues, and that uber units in general can be very anti-climatic for a battle if they are too powerful. Even the Thor was too "uber-unit" ish for WoL.

UI effects balance
Blizzard fought internally while designing SC2, partially because of the 12 unit selection vs unlimited unit selection. They recognized that the 12 unit selection introduced a unique skill set for BW, and they debated back and forth for about a year. They ultimately decided on unlimited unit selection because in game testing, players were frustrated that selecting all their units would only select 12, and it was not as intuitive for a modern game.

Rob cited examples of War 2 vs. BW as the evolution of UI brings a lot of disgruntled fans since it effects many skill sets of the game.

Keep things simple
A lot of games from Valve was brought up as an example of very well done games with very minimalist design decisions (TF2 pre-hats). Rob was a big fan of Valve's work, as he said they have the ability to keep things very minimal but still create very ground-breaking games.

While designing SC2, the team would constantly make tradeoffs if they were adding more abilities and units. Adding a new unit would mean removing an old unit from the game (WHY MARAUDER WHY).

Also, units should not have too many crazy abilities. Too many spells can cause too much noise and ambiguity to what is going on while spectating.

Rob brought up a cool example he heard from a former Pixar employee who know works in Blizzard Cinematics. Essentially, each movie/scene/game you make gives you only a limited amount of Popsicle sticks, and each stick represents a special effect, character, environment etc. You have to work within these limitations and try not to over extend the scope of the project, and this is what produces some of the best work in the industry rather than trying to do many things at once. Reminded me of Day[9]'s agenda for the Funday Monday (placing limitations on gameplay to explore new strategies).

Art is critical part of game design
Not only does art make your game look pretty, but its another read that you can give to the player. Rob talked about how units should have visible upgrades and abilities. Ironically, even with the inclusion of Zergling wings and marine shields, a lot of abilities in SC2 are still "hidden" to players (marauder concussive, storm, blink).

Valve came up again as an example of integrating art directly into game design, as in TF2 the characters have very distinct silhouettes and weapons so the role is obvious just at a glance.

Keep game times short
Rob was a fan of having people enjoy many games over a short period of time, and he cited Counter-Strike as a prime example of a game that had short round times, high competitive skill, and was well received by the public.

Rob cited DotA as a game that had long round times, and very frustrating to beginners who had to stay in an hour long game per match.

This necessarily doesn't mean that one should 6 pool every game or designing short rush maps, as Rob stated that a professional player should be able to easily beat someone of lower skill quickly and decisively. It's not fun for any player to stick in a game longer than they have to, even if they won or lost. That was probably a better way to word this design philosophy. I thought this was the most insightful actually as it touch on issues of introducing notions of skill into the game, and having it effect game design in a positive way.

Positive incentives are better received rather than punishments
A more WoW related example. In WoW, Rob introduced a rest system to encourage some players to take a break. If a character didn't get a lot of "rest", that character would gain "Less XP" when they went to level. This was poorly received by WoW players.

Rob fixed this by introducing "rest" as a "bonus", where well rested players gained 200% XP while non-rested players gained 100% XP. In reality, the game just scaled XP gain so 200% was actually the old 100%, and the new 100% XP was actually 50% of what was in place before. Some people tried to call out Blizzard on this change, but since it was perceived as a "bonus", the community in general received it positively.

WAKE UP SHEEPLE

On Brood War
Not much design talk was on Brood War, other than lots of spreadsheets, numbers, and testing was involved. Rob's position at Blizzard was originally temporary during his work on Brood War. He thought it was amazing that an entire industry is now based around his past work. Sorry for the lack of info!

Conclusion
That's all I can remember for now. I'll edit in more if I remember something significant. Most of the talk on SC2 covered a lot of things the community is aware of such as:
-Make sure units have appropriate counters
-The game should have a skill set that can distinguish pros from amateurs
-Design the game to have a diverse amount of strategy
-Make it fun

Also something mind blowing:
Loading bars don't mean anything. Game developers put these progress bars everywhere to give people the satisfaction of seeing something "in progress" or "working".

****
Photographer@shindags || twitch.tv/shindigs
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
November 16 2011 20:43 GMT
#2
Also something mind blowing:
Loading bars don't mean anything. Game developers put these progress bars everywhere to give people the satisfaction of seeing something "in progress" or "working".


Are you sure because when I play at home with my brother his slower computer always takes longer as it should in both the loading bar and the game.
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
LunarC
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States1186 Posts
November 16 2011 20:43 GMT
#3
Dammit, I attend UCI and I missed THIS? Thanks for the write-up, it's interesting.
REEBUH!!!
BamBam
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
745 Posts
November 16 2011 20:43 GMT
#4
Good read Nice to hear a take from one of the "old guard" of Blizzard.

What really frustrates me is how many developers view ESPORTS as its own genre and you have to design it differently then other games, even though most games that are esports now were never designed with that philosophy.
"two is way better than twice as one" - artosis
shindigs
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States4795 Posts
November 16 2011 20:46 GMT
#5
On November 17 2011 05:43 Energizer wrote:
Good read Nice to hear a take from one of the "old guard" of Blizzard.

What really frustrates me is how many developers view ESPORTS as its own genre and you have to design it differently then other games, even though most games that are esports now were never designed with that philosophy.


I think the community feedback and assistance definitely put the current ESPORTS to where they are today. For future games, I think it's great, and imperative, that developers are now looking at ESPORTS as something they have to treat carefully. I have a lot of thoughts on traditional games vs. ESPORTS but that'll be my next post!
Photographer@shindags || twitch.tv/shindigs
Probe1
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States17920 Posts
November 16 2011 20:53 GMT
#6
Rob was not a fan of uber units, and neither is Dustin Browder.
Adding another unit would mean an old unit would be removed from the game (WHY MARAUDER WHY).


I'm going to leave this blog now but tell you thanks for sharing it.
우정호 KT_VIOLET 1988 - 2012 While we are postponing, life speeds by
fabiano
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Brazil4644 Posts
November 16 2011 21:06 GMT
#7
Blizzard fought internally while designing SC2, partially because of the 12 unit selection vs unlimited unit selection. They recognized that the 12 unit selection introduced a unique skill set for BW, and they debated back and forth for about a year. They ultimately decided on unlimited unit selection because in game testing, players were frustrated that selecting all their units would only select 12, and it was not as intuitive for a modern game.


That isn't a good reason to allow unlimited selection imho... too bad the wrong side won the internal fights.........

Also a pity there wasn't more on BW, but nice read anyway, thanks!
"When the geyser died, a probe came out" - SirJolt
marttorn
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Norway5211 Posts
November 16 2011 21:07 GMT
#8
Positive incentives are better received rather than punishments
A more WoW related example. In WoW, Rob introduced a rest system to encourage some players to take a break. If a character didn't get a lot of "rest", that character would gain "Less XP" when they went to level. This was poorly received by WoW players.

Rob fixed this by introducing "rest" as a "bonus", where well rested players gained 200% XP while non-rested players gained 100% XP. In reality, the game just scaled XP gain so 200% was actually the old 100%, and the new 100% XP was actually 50% of what was in place before. Some people tried to call out Blizzard on this change, but since it was perceived as a "bonus", the community in general received it positively


I really liked this part. It's just one of those genius moves. Near my residence, there are two grocery stores. Both of them have the same prices for fruit. They both get about the same amount of customers.

However, one of them suddenly up's their prices by a lot, without telling anybody. Then, a few days later, on TV there is an ad from this grocery store informing everyone about their amazing new policy on selling fruit, which results in them lowering their prices on fruit by a considerable amount. They do lower the price of their fruit, but only back to the original price that the other grocery store has maintained for all this time.

But, suddenly the sales of this grocery store goes up! After all, they cut their prices!

It's kind of the same philosophy behind it, very clever stuff, and the kind that most "sheeple" don't think about.
memes are a dish best served dank
Hypertension
Profile Joined April 2011
United States802 Posts
November 16 2011 21:10 GMT
#9
Positive incentives are better received rather than punishments.

This is actually an age old truism. If you are asking for something bad, try to find a positive spin. A lot of times you can get people to support things that rationally they should be against. Sales people do this all the time to get you to spend more money.
Buy boots first. Boots good item.
blabber
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States4448 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-16 21:20:54
November 16 2011 21:16 GMT
#10
On November 17 2011 05:43 LunarC wrote:
Dammit, I attend UCI and I missed THIS? Thanks for the write-up, it's interesting.

it was pretty boring lol.

the free snacks, however, were not
blabberrrrr
Xeris
Profile Blog Joined July 2005
Iran17695 Posts
November 16 2011 21:22 GMT
#11
If he says too many abilities == bad ... why does it seem as if every new unit in HoTS will have 3-4 abilities O_O
twitter.com/xerislight -- follow me~~
infinity2k9
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United Kingdom2397 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-16 21:41:26
November 16 2011 21:36 GMT
#12
On November 17 2011 06:06 fabiano wrote:
Show nested quote +
Blizzard fought internally while designing SC2, partially because of the 12 unit selection vs unlimited unit selection. They recognized that the 12 unit selection introduced a unique skill set for BW, and they debated back and forth for about a year. They ultimately decided on unlimited unit selection because in game testing, players were frustrated that selecting all their units would only select 12, and it was not as intuitive for a modern game.


That isn't a good reason to allow unlimited selection imho... too bad the wrong side won the internal fights.........

Also a pity there wasn't more on BW, but nice read anyway, thanks!


I'm surprised this was a debate at all. Who are the guys in Blizzard who understand where we are coming from? Cause every other interview i saw was nothing like that.

Also from the things you note it sounds like SC2 would be well designed for competitive play... but it's really not. How did they manage to get shit like TvP 5 second battles deciding the game with any of these things in mind.
Probe1
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States17920 Posts
November 16 2011 21:42 GMT
#13
On November 17 2011 06:22 Xeris wrote:
If he says too many abilities == bad ... why does it seem as if every new unit in HoTS will have 3-4 abilities O_O

Disagreements with the current design philosophy then
우정호 KT_VIOLET 1988 - 2012 While we are postponing, life speeds by
Perguvious
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States1783 Posts
November 16 2011 21:44 GMT
#14
very interesting, I'll link this to a friend of mines who is interested in game design. Thanks
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
November 16 2011 22:06 GMT
#15
I'm so disappointed they ended up not sticking with the unit selection cap, but it's so awesome that it was a tough decision for them.
Hello
shindigs
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States4795 Posts
November 16 2011 23:13 GMT
#16
With regard with the unit selection cap, I agree with it from a design standpoint. A player interacting with a modern game would expect as many units as possible being selected when boxing a bunch of them, having it any other way is pretty counter-intuitive for the majority of people.

The problem is that this leads to unit clumping, which I think is something they're trying to address in HotS without reinventing the game or UI.
Photographer@shindags || twitch.tv/shindigs
rauk
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States2228 Posts
November 16 2011 23:30 GMT
#17
decreasing unit selection is the simplest way of fixing clumping and deathballs (and probably the only other way), while keeeping to browder's mantra of not going "backwards" on unit pathing. sadly, this means that we'll always having atrocious clumping and deathballing because i find it pretty unlikely that blizz would decrease unit selection in an expansion.
PowerDes
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States520 Posts
November 16 2011 23:33 GMT
#18
The picture that accompanied the "balance" slide during the presentation was a mothership

xD
twitch.tv/PowerDes
shindigs
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States4795 Posts
November 16 2011 23:37 GMT
#19
On November 17 2011 08:30 rauk wrote:
decreasing unit selection is the simplest way of fixing clumping and deathballs (and probably the only other way), while keeeping to browder's mantra of not going "backwards" on unit pathing. sadly, this means that we'll always having atrocious clumping and deathballing because i find it pretty unlikely that blizz would decrease unit selection in an expansion.


It is indeed the simplest way but I don't think it's worth sacrificing the intuitiveness of the UI design (I speak ESPORTS heresy). I think they just have to incentivize splitting your units up and not clumping, or make deathballs/clumps less effective than they are now. You could still see clumping at lower levels, but you would need to clump less if you wish to rank up.

Perhaps this will just be fixed as the overall skill increases?

I know the shredder is an attempt to break up the Terran ball, but its still a very awkward solution in my opinion.
Photographer@shindags || twitch.tv/shindigs
StarStruck
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
25339 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-16 23:50:31
November 16 2011 23:47 GMT
#20
On November 17 2011 06:22 Xeris wrote:
If he says too many abilities == bad ... why does it seem as if every new unit in HoTS will have 3-4 abilities O_O



Lots of the points he said don't add up. Dustin is the lead game designer. He should been able to say no to Chris and the rest of the artists when it came down to such units in the multi-player. Keep them in for the single-player campaign. Fine.

-_-

On November 17 2011 07:06 PH wrote:
I'm so disappointed they ended up not sticking with the unit selection cap, but it's so awesome that it was a tough decision for them.


Somewhere I believe they have to find a balance between the two. How many control groups and units can the casuals really produce and control at a time?

If it were me, I would have bumped the control groups up to 24 and judging from how the game is currently played. I would have increased the max pop from 200 to something like 220. There are a lot of players who cap relatively easily with a good amount of bases, I think they could definitely use more units.
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 55m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .267
Nathanias 218
BRAT_OK 63
StarCraft: Brood War
Sexy 31
Bale 8
Dota 2
monkeys_forever325
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1150
Foxcn293
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe108
Liquid`Ken41
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu391
Other Games
tarik_tv9883
summit1g6866
Grubby3325
FrodaN1566
C9.Mang0217
Sick54
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV35
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta88
• poizon28 50
• musti20045 42
• Hupsaiya 26
• Kozan
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Eskiya23 16
• Azhi_Dahaki2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22694
League of Legends
• Doublelift2928
Other Games
• imaqtpie1362
• Shiphtur403
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
11h 55m
Reynor vs Zoun
Solar vs SHIN
Classic vs ShoWTimE
Cure vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 12h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.