|
|
|
Kentor
United States5784 Posts
wowww what programs do you use to do this?
|
On May 30 2009 15:09 Kentor wrote:
wowww what programs do you use to do this?
Photoshop~
Gimp should work as well, though
|
United States12607 Posts
Sweet work! Vector art is awesome...vector art of Fantasy is especially awesome.
His lips look a bit too feminine to me.
|
On May 30 2009 15:37 JWD wrote:
Sweet work! Vector art is awesome...vector art of Fantasy is especially awesome.
His loops look a bit too feminine to me.
Fantasy is always especially awesome :o!
What are loops?
|
That's great work! I should have thought about doing this myself.
|
|
|
United States12607 Posts
On May 30 2009 15:49 Dead9 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 30 2009 15:37 JWD wrote:
Sweet work! Vector art is awesome...vector art of Fantasy is especially awesome.
His loops look a bit too feminine to me. Fantasy is always especially awesome :o! What are loops?
oh my god, I meant "lips". NO idea why it came out "loops". The brain does funny things sometimes...
|
On May 30 2009 16:04 JWD wrote:Show nested quote +On May 30 2009 15:49 Dead9 wrote:On May 30 2009 15:37 JWD wrote:
Sweet work! Vector art is awesome...vector art of Fantasy is especially awesome.
His loops look a bit too feminine to me. Fantasy is always especially awesome :o! What are loops? oh my god, I meant "lips". NO idea why it came out "loops". The brain does funny things sometimes...
Haha
And I'm not doing Bisu :[
Fantasy took like 8? hours
|
u made him look like peggy hill. good job
|
Kentor
United States5784 Posts
are they really vectors as in they are scalable to any dimension? or no?
|
NeverGG
United Kingdom5399 Posts
Nice work - I especially like the eyes and hair.
|
On May 30 2009 16:37 Kentor wrote:
are they really vectors as in they are scalable to any dimension? or no?
They are in the actual photoshop file
And I spent a full two hours making just the eyes >_<
|
|
|
9071 Posts
Very well made, I like the hair a lot, personally have problems with making that
|
Is it me or is there something missing from him? Regardless nice work.
|
|
|
you made him look very attractive... IRL he looks like a twerp imo
|
Belgium6784 Posts
Cool!
You should consider using illustrator for this though =) its made for vector art
|
u gotta skate8152 Posts
|
On May 31 2009 02:07 KizZBG wrote:hehehe
Haha, nice.
|
That's pretty sweet.
If you plan on doing anymore sometime soon I suggest  NaDa,  Reach or  Jaedong
|
On May 31 2009 02:57 Grobyc wrote:That's pretty sweet. If you plan on doing anymore sometime soon I suggest NaDa, Reach or Jaedong
I'd probably do NaDa or Bisu if I did do another
But they take foreverr =S
|
Nice. Fantasy is a worthy subject to draw.
|
|
|
your title is very misleading.. i thought there were actual vectors..
or art terms and technical terms don't play along nicely. art needs to fix itself
On May 30 2009 16:49 Dead9 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 30 2009 16:37 Kentor wrote:
are they really vectors as in they are scalable to any dimension? or no? They are in the actual photoshop file And I spent a full two hours making just the eyes >_<
they are not vectors. they are pixels.
On May 31 2009 02:06 Xeofreestyler wrote:You should consider using illustrator for this though =) its made for vector art
illustrator is for vector-based work and photoshop is for pixel-based work.
|
On May 31 2009 16:06 rwong48 wrote:your title is very misleading.. i thought there were actual vectors.. or art terms and technical terms don't play along nicely. art needs to fix itself Show nested quote +On May 30 2009 16:49 Dead9 wrote:On May 30 2009 16:37 Kentor wrote:
are they really vectors as in they are scalable to any dimension? or no? They are in the actual photoshop file And I spent a full two hours making just the eyes >_< they are not vectors. they are pixels. Show nested quote +On May 31 2009 02:06 Xeofreestyler wrote:You should consider using illustrator for this though =) its made for vector art illustrator is for vector-based work and photoshop is for pixel-based work.
My title isn't misleading at all
This is a true vector; download the photoshop file if you don't believe me (PM me if you want me want me to reload it, although I doubt many people downloaded it)
I realize that some extremists (and the uninformed) believe that Photoshop cannot create vectors, but they are wrong
First off, what is a vector?
"Vector graphics is the use of geometrical primitives such as points, lines, curves, and shapes or polygon(s), which are all based on mathematical equations, to represent images in computer graphics." Source
Yes, Photoshop does use mathematical equations to create their vector shapes
"but wait, i see pixels when i zoom in?!? that's not a true vector!!!"
Yes, this is because Photoshop is primarily a raster-based program.
But you're doing it wrong. Instead of zooming in, try doubling the size of the vector. Or tripling. Or quadrupling.
Surprise surprise, it doesn't pixelate!
So yes, Photoshop can create actual vectors.
|
|
|
South Africa4316 Posts
On May 31 2009 16:06 rwong48 wrote:your title is very misleading.. i thought there were actual vectors.. or art terms and technical terms don't play along nicely. art needs to fix itself Show nested quote +On May 30 2009 16:49 Dead9 wrote:On May 30 2009 16:37 Kentor wrote:
are they really vectors as in they are scalable to any dimension? or no? They are in the actual photoshop file And I spent a full two hours making just the eyes >_< they are not vectors. they are pixels. Show nested quote +On May 31 2009 02:06 Xeofreestyler wrote:You should consider using illustrator for this though =) its made for vector art illustrator is for vector-based work and photoshop is for pixel-based work.
If you use shapes in Photoshop, then it creates vectors, not pixels. Looking at this fantasy picture, Dead9 probably used the pen tool to create the shapes which form the fantasy image. That means the PSD contains vectors. However, the jpeg is obviously rasterized, so if you zoom in on that you'll get pixellation and what not.
|
Pardon my newbishness. But isn't there a software to automatically vectorize that kind of thing? It doesn't look difficult. It's just a matter of looking for the neighbor pixels with similar colors until you cannot find any more (just like the bucket tool does) then make an object out of it. Paint that object with the average color from those pixels. You'd need to manually set the threshold for each object probably, so it separates the only things you want. But it would still take years less time than clicking on each vertex.
I know there are many raster -> vector tools. Tho I never used them extensively. Couldn't they be used to speed up this type of work?
|
On May 31 2009 22:10 alffla wrote:nice work dude  somehow he looks very soft. but overall looks like a good match his eyes shuold be darker though i guess? haha keep it up!
I was scared to use shading that was too dark/too light =X
And yeah, there are programs to make those, but they don't look very good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i470.photobucket.com/albums/rr67/qawsec/fantasyvectorbase.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i470.photobucket.com/albums/rr67/qawsec/fantasyvectorneck-3.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i470.photobucket.com/albums/rr67/qawsec/fantasyvector-1.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i470.photobucket.com/albums/rr67/qawsec/SaviorLineart.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i43.tinypic.com/11tbw2a.jpg)
