EPTEach medium has it's share of true gosus and absolute morons.
PC vs Console - Page 2
| Blogs > DamageControL |
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
Each medium has it's share of true gosus and absolute morons. | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
On August 20 2008 11:30 thedeadhaji wrote: completely depends on the person. PC vs Console in terms of competitive gaming is basically irrelevant, esp with the advent of advanced online gaming protals lead by xbox live that has closed the gap for ease of access for high lv competition. Each medium has it's share of true gosus and absolute morons. I suppose so, but in general when a pc gamer meets a console gamer, and there both average i say pc gamer wins | ||
|
XCetron
5225 Posts
| ||
|
Hippopotamus
1914 Posts
| ||
|
kpcrew
Korea (South)1071 Posts
On August 20 2008 02:52 DamageControL wrote: And I only played SC3 Once. thats pro didnt even know it was out yet i think pc gaming will always be better because you have the benefit of a mouse | ||
|
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
Anyhow, if you're looking at the platform itself rather than the games, the only substantial difference comes from the methods of input. Most PC games are designed around having mouse/keyboard input. Most console games are designed around having that console controller for input. This means the PC can support RTS games (lol at SC64?) and very arguably FPS better. For a turn-based strategy game, it doesn't really matter what the input is, so both do well. Same for RPG for the most part, etc. You can go through all the genres, how the games are designed around the inputs, and the like. In terms of the content of the games, it's just a Western/Eastern developer war for the most part. | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
On August 20 2008 11:53 kpcrew(Gg) wrote: thats pro didnt even know it was out yet i think pc gaming will always be better because you have the benefit of a mouse lol nub, still waiting for sc2 | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
On August 20 2008 12:48 Myrmidon wrote: Arcade gaming requires the most skill and has the best players (from game selection). =/ Anyhow, if you're looking at the platform itself rather than the games, the only substantial difference comes from the methods of input. Most PC games are designed around having mouse/keyboard input. Most console games are designed around having that console controller for input. This means the PC can support RTS games (lol at SC64?) and very arguably FPS better. For a turn-based strategy game, it doesn't really matter what the input is, so both do well. Same for RPG for the most part, etc. You can go through all the genres, how the games are designed around the inputs, and the like. In terms of the content of the games, it's just a Western/Eastern developer war for the most part. orly? Tell me more please. | ||
|
Polis
Poland1292 Posts
On August 20 2008 12:48 Myrmidon wrote: For a turn-based strategy game, it doesn't really matter what the input is, so both do well. Same for RPG for the most part, etc. Playing master of orion on fallout whit a gamepad, omg it is heaven. | ||
|
Elvin_vn
Vietnam2038 Posts
go pc | ||
MrHoon
10183 Posts
Handhelds and PCs are the greatest things ever. edit for mistake | ||
|
Kula
United States140 Posts
On August 20 2008 02:56 .kaz wrote: PC is harder because there are more buttons which means its harder to master. Simple fighting games like SC take about a day to learn the combo's and then you're a pro. There are only a few select games that are competitive for console like halo and the only reason it is so popular is because its the only good multiplayer based fps. So more buttons = harder to master? Since when do fighting games take a day to master.  You never heard of fighting game competitions? | ||
| ||
