EPT![[image loading]](http://teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/maps/67_Paradoxxx_thumbnail.jpg)
The following statement is true - Page 2
| Blogs > shimmy |
|
Lhyviathan
Australia975 Posts
| ||
|
Krohm
Canada1857 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/714/compellsad9.jpg) Old, but still funny. | ||
|
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.acc.umu.se/%7Ezqad/cats/1174330218-1174131217792.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://www.acc.umu.se/%7Ezqad/cats/1174330218-1174131435015.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://www.acc.umu.se/%7Ezqad/cats/1174330218-1174138729049.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://www.acc.umu.se/%7Ezqad/cats/1174330218-1174138782496.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://www.acc.umu.se/%7Ezqad/cats/1174330218-1174140456173.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://www.acc.umu.se/%7Ezqad/cats/1174330218-1174140490498.jpg) | ||
|
spec. opps
United States127 Posts
| ||
|
jgad
Canada899 Posts
On May 25 2008 05:13 JeeJee wrote: i dunno why people always use the 2 statement version the 1 statement version always seemed more elegant to me 'This statement is not true' I think it has to do with systems and the idea that you can have two, true, well-formed statements which, when they are coupled, break down. If you are talking about elegantly expressing any paradox, then your statement is probably the simplest, you're quite right. But the two statements, I guess, describe different sorts of paradoxes and are, as such, both useful fundamental constructs. Great thread, by the way. Anyone interested in this sort of stuff really needs to read the book "Gödel, Escher, Bach" by Douglas Hofstadter. It will twist your head in knots but it's well worth it. | ||
|
minus_human
4784 Posts
On May 25 2008 04:29 Steelflight-Rx wrote: I read kennigits guide to girls, and it worked last night. Win. obvious fail + Show Spoiler + jk jk, Kennigit's awesome, and his guide offered quite a laugh  | ||
|
spec. opps
United States127 Posts
| ||
| ||
