• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:05
CEST 07:05
KST 14:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy6[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
BSL Season 235Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?179
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 8/8 The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser Yamato Cup Series
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 544 Double Trouble The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder BSL Season 23 [ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy an AI researcher's take on the ladder bot BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 1 [BSL23] SM: Ret vs TerrOr -> DragOn vs StRyKeR [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro16 Group D
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine All you football fans (soccer)! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Gaming Intensity, Problemati…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8664 users

Some notes on Reynor vs Zest

Blogs > Teoita
Post a Reply
Teoita
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Italy12248 Posts
March 02 2021 04:58 GMT
#1
I figured I would write down a few notes from the IEM finals. I already summed up a few things in the LR thread in response to someone saying Protoss should go Phoenixes over Void Rays or Oracles, so let's start with that:

On March 01 2021 12:57 Teoita wrote:
By going Phoenixes you are more or less telling the Zerg they can do whatever they want until your 3rd is fully established. The vanilla 2SG does the same, but it can also branch into at least two all-ins that Zest has shown in this very tournament (he did a two SG mass Phoenix timing in the group stage, plus the charge timing from game 1 in the finals). As far as I know, Phoenix into some committed timing hasn't really been a thing in a very long time, it's a much more rigid build because of the extra gas required. On top of that, the raw number of drones killed is misleading. Basically every Protoss opening effectively kills 2-3 drones simply by forcing spores. If an Oracle kills 2-3 extra, while a bunch Phoenixes get 7, you are not getting ~200% more drone kills, you're getting only ~100%, while also spending more and giving the Zerg more freedom, if that makes sense.

At least as far as openings and setting up for the midgame goes, going some combination of Oracles and Void Rays is more flexible than straight Phoenixes imo. As a side note, Reynor gained a large advantage because Zest's first two Stargate units always telegraphed his entire game plan (he went double Void Ray if he wanted to all in, Void Ray into Oracle when he went for Stargate macro, and mass Oracle when he went single Stargate into ground), as Lambo mentioned on his stream, but that's a minor digression

Once midgame hits (which I define as "anything after starting your third"), either Protoss commits to some sort of all-in like they have been doing to mediocre success before 2SG became a thing, or you just do not have the power to be anywhere near creep. This is is also why PvZ produces such boring games, as the only interesting thing going on really are the strategy adjustments and mindgames.

So now we have our third, we're not all in, and the ball is entirely in the Zerg's court to either go Hive or do their own allin. When you have no chance but to sit back and macro, it makes sense to go for the build that sets you up best for lategame, which after the Viper nerf seems more playable than it's been in years. Another side note here is that Zest's builds were on the greedy side like that. I don't think it's a coincidence that the only game he won in the finals, Reynor was forced to push into the base with the shield batteries and cannons. Both on Deathaura and Pillars of Gold, the bulk of Zest's defensive buildings were at a base that never came near a Zerg unit. On top of that, he always went for Storm ahead of Disruptors which are supposedly much safer (at the cost of a worse lategame).


Continuing off that, I looked at the games in a bit more details and took a few extra notes. The thing that stood out the most to me was how different Reynor's builds on Deathaura and Romanticide were.

Deathaura

Reynor rushed to Hive like a madman, starting it at 6:35 (!!!!!) at the same time as his fourth hatch. Zest scouted this very early with his Oracle as well. There's basically a 120 second window between when the infestation pit starts and Hive is well on the way, in which Protoss can sense a lurker bust may be coming with enough time to react in some way - whether that's just building more static defense and positioning, or teching differently, I don't know, but it's still quite a lot of time by LotV standards. This push hits crazy fast though, by 9:20 Reynor was sieging the Protoss 4th. I have no idea what Zest's take on this game was, because first the started a Fleet Beacon but only made one Carrier, then started two Robos but only made like 2-3 Immortals, and in all this he never made extra static defenses at his fourth (which was the most likely place for Reynor to hit). That doesn't exactly scream optimized response to a scary 9 minute push.

Romanticide

On Romanticide Reynor's build seemed much less committed, he delayed his Infestation Pit and Hive and got a fourth instead. His push hit about one minute later, and as a result Zest managed to get Carriers up in time. I also think he only started to figure out what was going on a bit after 8 minutes, after starting his Fleet Beacon, when his Oracle (which had been idle-ish for a couple of minutes) revealed a bunch of queens and hydras sitting together near a 4th with gasses taken.

It could well be that Reynor adapted his build to something he saw from Stats, but I don't think there was much variation in the first 6 minutes of the game that would have triggered that.

Pillars of Gold

This looked like the scariest build of the bunch to me. The fourth hatch and etra gas timings for the Lurker build look nearly identical to this roach/ravager push, so that sucks for us Protoss. Zest only saw Roaches around the 7 minute mark because the Queens kept pushing his Oracle back, and about 90 seconds later Reynor's push was at his front door. Despite getting that scout, Zest still did not start additional static defenses at his third or natural, he simply produced Immortals non stop. He also went ahead and took his fourth after building a bunch of gates (showing at least some adaptation from the previous games).

I'm not sure what the right call in this situation is, but all the useless static defense at the fourth definitely doesn't help. Disruptors may work though - using Zoun's build against Armani from the Super Tournament, building a 5 minute (blind) robo means you can start you first Disruptor around 6:45. By the time Zerg hits with this push you can have 3-4ish Disruptors, which at least one shot queens so it definitely looks better than the four High Templar and handful of Immortals Zest had. The caveat of course is you have to commit to either Storm or Disruptors blindly, and there may be other situations in which you would rather have Templar tech. We'll find out as the Disruptor branch of the build gets explored some more.

Bonus: Oxide

On Oxide Zest goes for a fake double stargate into chargelot allin. The timing of the third is completely different, which in principle makes it easy to scout for Zerg, except the Void Ray prevents that easy scout, so that's nice. What is a bit iffy is that Zest kind of needs to rush a second Void Ray, over an Oracle, and that gives his build away to some extent. I think optimizing the order of the initial Stargate units (say, by always opening two Void Rays, and only adding an Oracle as a third unit if you're not going to go double Stargate) would go a long way in messing with the Zerg's head, at least in a bo5/bo7.
Meanwhile, Reynor went for melee upgrades over ranged (which is what you would get for a roach or lurker build) at around 4:30, so he's clearly not thinking about any German Taxi/Polish Subway/Italian Fashion Walk (which is what Lambo wanted to call the Pillars game - I wholly stand behind this name)/Great Book of Zerg Bullshit build. He also starts a Lair and Baneling Nest super late, but takes a 4th at the standard time. Much like the Deathaura game, this is not exactly what an optmized response to a scary push looks like in my head. Maybe Reynor expected a mass Phoenix build like in the group stage.

So yeah, PvZ is still shit to watch but at least the meta isn't stale and it feels like there's a lot Protoss can do before really figuring out the matchup. There were definitely lots of plays and adjustments Zest could have made in the games that he lost.

****
ModeratorProtoss all-ins are like a wok. You can throw whatever you want in there and it will turn out alright.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland27382 Posts
March 05 2021 02:46 GMT
#2
Interesting, I find PvZ’s intricacies translate much better to post
hoc build analysis than as a contemporary viewing experience that’s for sure.

Have you seen any of Lambo’s discussion on their ‘Team Europe’ prep for these eventualities or Reynor’s recent interview with Harstem?

I haven’t got through it all but it’s good content on what they were thinking, so comparing some of it with what you thought their rationale was might be interesting, even if just for your curiosity.

I’m intrigued to see if Protoss can figure out smoother transitions, which seem to be an issue at the minute. Or indeed if gambling more rather than trying to catch-all is the approach to lategame.

It might not be stable but it might be better than trying to be all things to all men and being rounded.

You cheese blind and hope, the strength is in the risk, likewise doing a pre-planned hard all-in. Works or it doesn’t. People don’t tend to take that kind of big risk/big reward gamble so much when playing a straight macro game, and maybe they should, at least in PvZ, which is quite a unique matchup in terms of flow in the game. PvT and TvZ have (relatively) equivalent eco, supply counts and ability to be aggressive, PvZ just doesn’t function like that.

I’m not sure, it’ll be interesting to see how things develop. Zoun just going disruptors blind with his style would clearly have been better against some of Reynor’s pushes (assuming Reynor didn’t sniff it out). On the other hand a few vipers and bye bye disruptors, and temps are more reliable/less vulnerable to vipers in that sense.

Thing is even reliable Templars don’t do shit to lurkers with a bunch of Queens at your base, so you may as well gamble on disruptors if that’s a likely scenario.

It’s tricky, but I think it’s how Protoss should approach macro PvZ against the best Zergs, in theory. For PvT, ZvP, TvZ and ZvT the option of ‘I’m going to play solid, straight up and try to just outplay my opponent and react where necessary’ is a fallback for the world’s best. In PvZ given how the races interact, the mid-game supply deficit and difficulty in non-commital army movement etc and the Zerg eco explosion and some of the awkward Protoss transitions I think you’re potentially best off just gambling on a really strong, tight tech transition than trying to round it out and deal with multiple eventualities. You see games where there’s say, a gateway force with a few Archons, Voids from early game, some Immortals and Templars with storm with one Carrier out and a second about to pop with no interceptors at like 130/140 supply and it just gets rolled. Just go blind build like a million blind immortals with some storm, or go double robo disruptor early, or whatever.

Anyway I suck at Starcraft and am mostly rambling, but enjoyed the breakdown and if you feel my brand of bollocks is worth responding to that’d be great!
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
TL+ Member
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
2026 GSTL: Playoffs Round 2
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft684
NeuroSwarm 173
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 1944
GuemChi 1404
Leta 647
Yoon 50
sorry 49
Icarus 5
League of Legends
JimRising 718
Counter-Strike
taco 259
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox535
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor220
Other Games
Maynarde170
Livibee130
ViBE56
Mew2King39
Sick22
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH26
• mYiSmile15
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22196
League of Legends
• Lourlo1138
• Rush944
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
4h 55m
Shine vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
5h 55m
Monday Night Weeklies
10h 55m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 4h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 4h
Light vs EffOrt
OSC
1d 6h
PiGosaur Cup
1d 18h
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
GSL
6 days
Yamato Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.