|
![[image loading]](https://jointherain634527245.files.wordpress.com/2020/07/124789.jpg?w=1000)
It's a most simple composition. Just a few flowers arranged in a vase. Yet they make such an awesome model for an aquarelle effect. Or so I like to think.
Anyway, I adore the simplicity in watercolors and such impressionism as in this picture. One can tell what's on the paper even though the remarkable details, those unmistakable signs of a truly great artist, are non - existent. In this image and we can safely say than someone of unassuming ability has been splashing around and having fun with the colors and how they blend.
 
|
Very nice. I'm no expert at art, far from it, but I have always adored how the unique detailing of impressionist artwork can convey a lot of emotion and really assert a special atmosphere, especially with watercolors: the simplicity to me acts as a thin veil of mystery that makes the person looking at the work concentrate harder on where the artist has wanted to put detail and what the purpose of said detail is in regards to the whole work.
For example, the facial expressions found on these types of paintings can at first glance look very blurred and meaningless but you can often find something more to it when observing it further.
|
I see where you're going with that. As for me, the perception of art depends on what one considers to be art. I think of art as of as truthful as possible representation of natural forms. Thus I adore classical art and Renaissance masters, also painters like Rembrandt and similar. And so I would grade impressionism and watercolors towards the bottom of a supposed art pyramid and the above styles at the pinnacle.
But just like you I am no expert, I just state opinions and mess around in Photoshop.
|
Yay, you matched your signature to the picture! Much appreciated. Flowers are pretty. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
