• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:58
CEST 12:58
KST 19:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL54Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
RECLAIM STOLEN BTC HIRE BLOCKCHAIN CYBER RETRIEVE Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Korean Starcraft League Week 77 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL BW General Discussion Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Unit and Spell Similarities
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 659 users

I'm going to need to help with this...

Blogs > GreenHorizons
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23167 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-16 02:37:59
April 16 2015 00:45 GMT
#1
EDIT: I Suppose it's relevant to mention that this Jury is the one who just convicted Aaron Hernandez of 1st Degree Murder with a mandatory Life without parole sentence.

I didn't personally follow the trial so I don't know much about the evidence or anything but this whole thing still strikes me as odd. But maybe that's just me?

Also there is an extra 'to' in the title oops.


It's a long video starts crappy, switched streams etc... and I'm already writing this while it's still playing. So I'll try to amend this or just post as appropriate but holy crap.


Just to get something out so I can start the discussion to help me digest this....

Look at the dynamic between the woman up front with the dark hair, bright top, and the man directly behind her with short hair and striped shirt.

Also it's not common an interview like this happens...?

At one point they say they all didn't want to come in there, like they were compelled against their will? (@12:50)

This just seems very strange, without biasing anyone any more I just want to hear some peoples impressions.

Poll: Would you be comfortable with these people as your Jury?

(Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): Maybe




*
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
ninazerg
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States7291 Posts
April 16 2015 02:21 GMT
#2
Everyone inherently has bias, so I can't really fault the jurors for making the decision they made. To take ordinary people, and overwhelm them with information seems counter-intuitive to creating a trial that will have a fair outcome, but right now, we're kind of stuck with this system that was designed centuries ago. Jury selection is almost always considered a controversial process, especially considering how stupid many people are. Until we have brain-scanning technology that can accurately read people's thoughts that is approved for use in court, this process will almost certainly be left open to continued failure of reasoning, manipulation, and politics.
"If two pregnant women get into a fist fight, it's like a mecha-battle between two unborn babies." - Fyodor Dostoevsky
QuanticHawk
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
United States32049 Posts
April 16 2015 02:47 GMT
#3
who the hell wants to miss weeks of work for $50 a day

their reactions were totally fine and all the points they brought up were totally valid
PROFESSIONAL GAMER - SEND ME OFFERS TO JOIN YOUR TEAM - USA USA USA
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-16 02:54:08
April 16 2015 02:53 GMT
#4
On April 16 2015 11:21 ninazerg wrote:
Everyone inherently has bias, so I can't really fault the jurors for making the decision they made. To take ordinary people, and overwhelm them with information seems counter-intuitive to creating a trial that will have a fair outcome, but right now, we're kind of stuck with this system that was designed centuries ago. Jury selection is almost always considered a controversial process, especially considering how stupid many people are. Until we have brain-scanning technology that can accurately read people's thoughts that is approved for use in court, this process will almost certainly be left open to continued failure of reasoning, manipulation, and politics.


Even mind-reading technology won't save us from manipulation and politics.
FFGenerations
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
7088 Posts
April 16 2015 03:04 GMT
#5
not entirely sure what you're getting at, you hint at things like "the interactions" but i'm not watching closely enough to go into things like that?
they just spent 36 hours together completely immersed in this shit, of course they are gonna appear "relieved" for it to be over so to speak
if you are put off by their apparent retardedness (not saying i agree) then that's pretty normal behaviour isn't it? lol
Cool BW Music Vid - youtube.com/watch?v=W54nlqJ-Nx8 ~~~~~ ᕤ OYSTERS ᕤ CLAMS ᕤ AND ᕤ CUCKOLDS ᕤ ~~~~~~ ༼ ᕤ◕◡◕ ༽ᕤ PUNCH HIM ༼ ᕤ◕◡◕ ༽ᕤ
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18824 Posts
April 16 2015 12:01 GMT
#6
There are dozens of interviews with jurors after cases that are extremely troubling. This is not one of them really lol.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
April 16 2015 13:22 GMT
#7
I can't spare and entire 18 minutes watching this but from the bits I've watched I can say it's a bit troubling. However, the fact that juries are kind of "there against their will" is not particularly surprising, everyone hates jury duty.

Sadly when they said you get to have a jury of your peers, they didn't say they'd be smart or reasonable.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
QuanticHawk
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
United States32049 Posts
April 16 2015 14:00 GMT
#8
are you ever gonna come back and give us a list of 'odd' things? And something other than laughing please, or you need to read about laughing as a coping mechanism.
PROFESSIONAL GAMER - SEND ME OFFERS TO JOIN YOUR TEAM - USA USA USA
Titusmaster6
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States5937 Posts
April 16 2015 16:18 GMT
#9
I'm completely fine with these people as my jury. What specifics are you trying to digest?
Shorts down shorts up, BOOM, just like that.
Yorbon
Profile Joined December 2011
Netherlands4272 Posts
April 16 2015 17:16 GMT
#10
Why are these people interviewed at all? I wouldn't feel comfortable saying anything at all.

I watched a little around 14 minutes in the video, but couldn't really discover something weird. They talk about focussing on the case, reducing bias as much as possible. If they really meant that, i would be fine with such a jury. I'm not a fan of juries compared to judges in general, but I imagined something far worse considering this blog.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23167 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-16 19:28:27
April 16 2015 19:27 GMT
#11
On April 16 2015 22:22 Djzapz wrote:
I can't spare and entire 18 minutes watching this but from the bits I've watched I can say it's a bit troubling. However, the fact that juries are kind of "there against their will" is not particularly surprising, everyone hates jury duty.

Sadly when they said you get to have a jury of your peers, they didn't say they'd be smart or reasonable.


Not at jury duty against their will, That they didn't want to give the interview but it sounded like they were under the impression that they didn't have a choice.

While the laughing seems odd after condemning a man to life in prison it's not what bothered me, as I also tend to laugh at inappropriate times as a coping mechanism.

I guess if people don't see it they don't see it. There were a few that seemed not clueless based on their responses, but the guy in the blue and white stripped shirt seems like the only one I would want on a jury for me, particularly if I was innocent. The rest of them look like without a fellow juror telling them the legal stuff in deliberation they would just side with the better story/whatever the social alphas are pushing on the group.

The woman in front of him clearly didn't get along with him during deliberations. You can see it on her face practically every time he speaks. He was obviously one of the people during deliberations consistently reminding people of the legal aspects, likely to the dismay of the woman up front.

People seem to say they would be comfortable with these people as their jury, but only one actually said yes in the poll?

Makes me wonder if permabans were done by jury would people be comfortable with this jury deciding on their ban. My bottom line is that it doesn't make a lot of sense to have lawyers making complicated legal cases to people who couldn't pass a basic test on the related legal material. It seems more like sophistry with a slight chance at a few jurors actually understanding their responsibility.

These people knew about as much about the legal requirements to prove murder as they would about a permanent ban offense (going into the process). I just imagine DaPhreak arguing against Farv that Igne should be permanently banned to a randomly selected group of TL'ers. Would we really think that the conclusion would be based on a strict interpretation of set rules? Or whoever had a more convincing story/did the best job at jury selection?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4782 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-16 22:00:20
April 16 2015 21:59 GMT
#12
Are you for real?

People laugh during funerals of their loved ones.

You presume innocence of Hernandez despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

You are able to tell from an 18 minute, for the involved extremely uncomfortable situation, not only the intellect of the jurors but also their characters as well as what has happened behind closed doors.

You are using a hidden poll as an argument (I doubt you have had very many votes - I for one didn't vote).

You obviously have an axe to grind with the US legal system/any legal authority, but this is ridiculous.

EDIT: Also, that sig of yours. Brilliant stuff.
QuanticHawk
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
United States32049 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-16 22:49:18
April 16 2015 22:36 GMT
#13
On April 17 2015 04:27 GreenHorizons wrote:
These people knew about as much about the legal requirements to prove murder as they would about a permanent ban offense (going into the process).

looool

did you just finish a intro to law or philosophy elective or something

I take it the blog ban means yes

it's pretty funny seeing you comment about how little these jurors know about the legal system when the only thing you seem to know about it is that you don't like it
PROFESSIONAL GAMER - SEND ME OFFERS TO JOIN YOUR TEAM - USA USA USA
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23167 Posts
April 16 2015 22:38 GMT
#14
On April 17 2015 06:59 Ghostcom wrote:
Are you for real?

People laugh during funerals of their loved ones.

You presume innocence of Hernandez despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

You are able to tell from an 18 minute, for the involved extremely uncomfortable situation, not only the intellect of the jurors but also their characters as well as what has happened behind closed doors.

You are using a hidden poll as an argument (I doubt you have had very many votes - I for one didn't vote).

You obviously have an axe to grind with the US legal system/any legal authority, but this is ridiculous.

EDIT: Also, that sig of yours. Brilliant stuff.


The hell are you talking about? I specifically said I didn't think the laughing was an issue... I didn't presume innocence, I said I didn't know because I didn't follow, based on what little I've read I think he was definitely guilty of some sort of murder charge but I haven't read up on the specific laws in the state or the evidence but reporting and the way the question was asked made it sound like Murder 1 wasn't a slam dunk?

Not sure what the problem with a hidden poll is? The reason I chose to hide it was so that people just answered the question instead of being influenced by what was popular or not.

Obviously I don't 'know' much about them. But I think the types of answers they gave reflects on their process. Also the way they reacted to each other gives us clues about the interactions.

You managed to make up a bunch of stuff I didn't say and ignore the points I just made. I'm glad you got to vent though.

Like I said having been in a situation where I was faced with a plea deal or a prosecutor attempting to throw the book at me for something I didn't do I have personally had to weigh accepting a shitty plea deal admitting to a crime I didn't commit or go to trial with prosecutor convinced I had committed the crime/s and a defense attorney advising me to take the deal. If it hadn't been for friend of mine being from a well off family and hiring private counsel, no one would of even looked for the random businesses surveillance tape that showed we were attacked first and that I hadn't instigated the violence.

Maybe I could of gone to trial and been found not-guilty, but the idea that if the guy had bounced his head on the concrete on the way down and died it could of been totally different is terrifying. I probably still wouldn't have been up for murder 1 but it would of been scary as shit to have my fate in these people's hands.

I'd venture to say no one who doesn't see a problem has ever had the justice system refuse to believe the truth you are telling them all the way up to their lawyer telling them they needed to decide if they were taking the deal as they suggested or going to a trial their defense was not confident in.

Forgiving the stress and that some are thinkers more than speakers that group as a whole did not display the level of sophistication I would hope a jury (especially in a complicated nuanced legal case) would show even under those circumstances..

So you're right that I have issues with how criminal justice is administered and such but this is hardly any extreme example of anything.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23167 Posts
April 16 2015 22:57 GMT
#15
On April 17 2015 07:36 QuanticHawk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 17 2015 04:27 GreenHorizons wrote:
These people knew about as much about the legal requirements to prove murder as they would about a permanent ban offense (going into the process).

looool

did you just finish a intro to law or philosophy elective or something

I take it the blog ban means yes

it's pretty funny seeing you comment about how little these jurors know about the legal system when the only thing you seem to know about it is that you don't like it

No, just been through it, reported for jury duty and have seen potential jurors and known jurors. This reminded me of the ones I wouldn't trust to make a decision about my car 'based on the evidence' let alone someones life.

If you wan't to have a discussion I'd happily unban you, but if you just want to try to insult me or whatever it will stand.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4782 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-16 23:22:19
April 16 2015 22:59 GMT
#16
You have edited out the part about why you find the laughing troubling in your OP, so I can't go back and quote that (good job at framing).

The overall tone in your posts, your title as well as your post in the NFL-thread, combined with constantly talking about whether or not you would want these jurors if you were innocent along with your posting history makes it seem very obvious that you find the entire juror decision dubious and that Hernandez was possibly innocent.

The issue with using a hidden poll and stating only 1 voted yes should be so obvious that I wouldn't have to walk you through it, but since you have now made it public we can now all laugh at the fact that you at that time at the most had 7 respondents and tried to pass it off as if an overwhelming majority agreed with you that the juror-group was dubious.

You have shamelessly been trying to blow an awkward situation where average Joes/Janes were put in nationwide media-spotlight of a high-profile murder case out of proportion.

I'm sorry you have had a bad experience with the legal system, that however does not mean that the legal system as a whole is flawed.

EDIT: I do realize that you know have stated that you also think he is guilty.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23167 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-16 23:32:57
April 16 2015 23:24 GMT
#17
On April 17 2015 07:59 Ghostcom wrote:
You have edited out the part about why you find the laughing troubling in your OP, so I can't go back and quote that (good job at framing).

The overall tone in your posts, your title as well as your post in the NFL-thread, combined with constantly talking about whether or not you would want these jurors if you were innocent along with your posting history makes it seem very obvious that you find the entire juror decision dubious and that Hernandez was possibly innocent.

The issue with using a hidden poll and stating only 1 voted yes should be so obvious that I wouldn't have to walk you through it, but since you have now made it public we can now all laugh at the fact that you at that time at the most had 7 respondents and tried to pass it off as if an overwhelming majority agreed with you that the juror-group was dubious.

You have shamelessly been trying to blow an awkward situation where average Joes/Janes where put in nationwide media-spotlight of a high-profile murder case out of proportion.

I'm sorry you have had a bad experience with the legal system, that however does not mean that the legal system as a whole is flawed.



I didn't edit it today and I didn't edit that out...I said before you even made you post that the laughing wasn't my problem...

Regardless of what you are imagining I meant, I explicitly said before this post that, based on the little I know about the details, that imo he was definitely guilty of something, so I in no way insinuated he was innocent and if that was the perception, me specifically saying otherwise should have cleared that up.

I also didn't change the poll. It's only private until people vote...

You seem to be projecting your own impressions onto why this even bothered me. I don't think every aspect of the legal system is flawed or that all the flaws have obvious or available remedies. My larger concerns are that the law disproportionately harms poor people and minorities and some of the reasons that happens can be addressed. But my issue with this was just the temperament (There's certainly a better word for what I mean) many of the jurors showed, and the general feeling of unease it put in me that they could of been my jury (not literally) is what bothered me.

Responses like the guy in the back gave is what I would hope my jurors would more or less sound like. With standards like "what a reasonable person would do" that you find in laws, several of those people are not what I imagine when I think of a "reasonable person" given I'm making snap judgments that aren't fair to them, I think there were some clear (to some at least) signs.


EDIT: Also the whole post trial press conference. @~12:50 they sound like they are under the impression they don't have a choice but to answer some questions.

Also what farv was saying in that there are far worse examples of post trial interviews and how many of them go unnoticed bothered me. Let alone the juries that are even worse but just never speak out.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Glowsphere
Profile Blog Joined November 2014
United States170 Posts
April 17 2015 00:05 GMT
#18
We let an idiot's vote count as much as anyone else's in elections, why not in jury too?
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23167 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-17 00:20:37
April 17 2015 00:18 GMT
#19
On April 17 2015 09:05 Glowsphere wrote:
We let an idiot's vote count as much as anyone else's in elections, why not in jury too?


Well I think one key difference is what we presume the result of an election is vs the outcome of a court case. An election just represents the preference of those who voted, whereas a jury's decision means something else.

As an example we could say that voters preferred Obama over Romney, but it wouldn't make sense to say a jury decided that they preferred a guilty or not-guilty verdict.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
April 17 2015 03:12 GMT
#20
Jurors are people randomly selected from the community and then chosen through voir dire. There were probably worse jurors that the defense got rid of during the process. But you can't get rid of everyone. That is your answer.

What I don't understand is your interest in this case. Hernandez is clearly a fucked up human being.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 1: Playoffs Day 3
ByuN vs ChamLIVE!
herO vs Reynor
Tasteless1234
Crank 929
IndyStarCraft 146
Rex98
3DClanTV 93
IntoTheiNu 39
LiquipediaDiscussion
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Master Swan Open #93
CranKy Ducklings80
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Tasteless 1234
Crank 929
IndyStarCraft 146
Rex 98
ForJumy 17
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3828
Horang2 1497
Larva 1337
Flash 1032
Stork 313
Jaedong 291
actioN 214
Hyun 169
BeSt 161
Last 110
[ Show more ]
TY 87
Soulkey 83
sorry 69
Free 29
GoRush 28
Mong 28
Shinee 25
NaDa 22
yabsab 19
Barracks 16
sSak 16
Mind 10
ivOry 6
SilentControl 5
Dota 2
XaKoH 661
XcaliburYe572
canceldota61
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1730
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor223
Other Games
DeMusliM210
SortOf178
B2W.Neo168
Lowko79
Organizations
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 642
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 6
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV343
League of Legends
• Lourlo2660
Upcoming Events
WardiTV European League
1h 3m
FEL
5h 3m
RSL Revival
23h 3m
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
1d 1h
WardiTV European League
1d 1h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 7h
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV European League
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.