• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:31
CEST 03:31
KST 10:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed14Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? Server Blocker RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BW General Discussion Help: rep cant save
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 678 users

When is banning books okay?

Blogs > Pandain
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 Next All
Pandain
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States12989 Posts
December 02 2013 18:09 GMT
#1
I just took an honors English course and we read controversial novels, analyzed them, and basically learned what we actually believe on the issue. This is the last piece I wrote for the class.



      To ban or not to ban, that is the question. That is something prolific playwright William Shakespeare probably never would have said, but it remains extremely relevant for the modern century. As society grows in depth, books constantly force us to take new perspective on issues we are uncomfortable with. One of the easiest ways to deal with a book is to simply censor it and then forget about the issue. However, this is a weak response to the deeper quandary of how to respond to ideals which stand at odds with the values society holds. Remarkable contingencies should remain the only area where literacy restriction is possible. The only significant time when censorship is permissible should be when it threatens the physical well-being of others. Books that teach people to implement violent acts should be suppressed because they increase the possibility of violent acts, teach the wrong idea of utilizing violence to enact change, and no longer encompass the protection of free expression.

      Teaching someone how to commit an illegal act is like placing a gun in the hands of a person who simply has to load it. It allows the facilitation of crimes where normal people would not have had that knowledge. It is often said that people who commit crimes because of violent books would have committed the crimes anyway. While they certainly may have been more predisposed to do so, the possibility of the crime itself is magnified because of the information they received from novels. The work The Anarchist Cookbook is a clear example of admissible censorship. A quick look at www.anarchistcookbook.com shows that when you teach people how to commit crimes, they quickly become more infatuated with the possibility of violence. The Anarchist Textbook not only taught people to commit violent acts, but inspired them to talk about it with others. With the knowledge they receive, people become able to more realistically commit crimes which they could have only thought of beforehand. Crimes have therefore become more likely with the advent of these instructional exposés.

      Additionally, books that teach violence as an answer to life’s problems should be discouraged in democratic countries. We are past an age where we need to use violence to accomplish political goals. Violence is sometimes necessary in non-democratic countries because people are systematically abused and unable to influence change through any non-violent means. That is not the case when you have a vote and a platform on which to speak in countries such as the United States. Political participation is executed through governmental systems. Additionally, one has other means of expression. Social media sites and internet forums exist for the purposes of communication. Today’s generation encompasses people who are able to influence their contemporaries in methods previously unthinkable. In the Information Age, any opinion you have can be discussed. The fact you can enact non-violent change means that violent change should be discouraged in society because it promotes extremely unnecessary harm.

      Finally, these kinds of novels cannot be protected on the grounds of literary expression. Works of art lose their protection status when they teach people to commit illegal acts. Grounds for this can be found in the United States Supreme Court case Brandenburg v. Ohio, where the shield of freedom of speech was cast aside when it incited imminent lawless action. This is necessarily a subjective field, so it should be limited to only when an author describes technical details on how to commit an act. The thought of committing a crime, and the philosophical questions which can arise from them, are valuable and not subject to censorship. When a book however acts as a guide for lawless acts, this means it is no longer merely philosophical and instead acts as reality. This narrow focus permits the possibility of censorship while securing the abstract importance of freedom of expression.

      Novels can be controversial. They forge the thoughts of our mind and help mold our hearts as we grow up in the 21st century. While the nature of their words can be consistently debated, certain books should be prohibited when they teach people how to commit violent crimes such as rape and murder. Democracy and peace are simultaneously threatened and undervalued when these books are allowed; these novels should not be guaranteed absolution from suppression. In the question of to ban or not to ban, the answer of even unintentional violent instructional books should be the former.

Feel free to discuss


**
remedium
Profile Joined July 2011
United States939 Posts
December 02 2013 18:16 GMT
#2
I believe that the banning of a book is a sign of fear. I don't believe that it is ever ok. Proliferation of knowledge and debate is important to the development of humanity.

Also,

+ Show Spoiler +
Wow, that FBI watchlist bait.

NOPE
Stay positive!
Paljas
Profile Joined October 2011
Germany6926 Posts
December 02 2013 18:20 GMT
#3
very difficult question/topic, which certainly doesnt only applies to books.
there has been some recent discussion about it in germany due to some law issues regarding "Mein Kampf".

imo, novels should almost never be banned, despite them possibly "teaching" people how to commit criminal acts.
TL+ Member
Ettick
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States2434 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-02 18:22:55
December 02 2013 18:21 GMT
#4
I've read a lot about making improvised weapons and I will never use that knowledge to do anything morally wrong. I know that there are many people who may be inspired to do violence by things like The Anarchist Cookbook, but does that really mean that people like me should not be able to see such things as well?

+ Show Spoiler +
FBI/NSA/Illuminati watchlists etc etc
GeckoXp
Profile Blog Joined June 2013
Germany2016 Posts
December 02 2013 18:37 GMT
#5
I'm not quite sure what you mean with "teach people how to commit violent crimes such as rape and murder". If I'd be interest to commit a murder, a killing spree or whatever, I'd find ways to do so, with or without tutorials. That's exactly the same arguement I heard in the past ten years whenever another school shooting popped up: blame video games. Blame the music. Blame the movies. Never blame the society around it, which missed the warning signs, or in case of 'murica, is nice enough to hand out guns. Never blame the media to build a throne for the best and most successful killers. Never care about the victims instead of the shooters. Etc. pp.

Censoring is never a solution. Paljas mentioned it: "Mein Kampf" is discussed, but not whether or not it should be banned, more like who should publish it and in what form. The obviously best solution is to answer 'problematic' books is education. A lot argue that the financial ministry of Bavaria (iirc the copy right holder) should publish it on their own behalf with a commented section to educate and inform about context, so that the danger of it being abused a second time is minimized. Anyhow, if you ever read parts of that book, you'd soon realize that it gets mystified. Almost no modern person would actually get most of what it says, either because of the language or the completely weird ideas behind it. It's a lot talking about things which don't exist anymore anyway. Might be I never got to read 'the interesting dangerous part', but it sounded more boring than anything else.
itsjustatank
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Hong Kong9153 Posts
December 02 2013 19:05 GMT
#6
Never. Full stop.
Photographer"nosotros estamos backamos" - setsuko
Targe
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom14103 Posts
December 02 2013 19:06 GMT
#7
its never ok imo
11/5/14 CATACLYSM | The South West's worst Falco main
corumjhaelen
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
France6884 Posts
December 02 2013 19:12 GMT
#8
Really cringeworthy introduction imo. Also are you really serious here ?
Additionally, books that teach violence as an answer to life’s problems should be discouraged in democratic countries. We are past an age where we need to use violence to accomplish political goals.

Always fun to see what anglo-saxon country ask as writing though^^
‎numquam se plus agere quam nihil cum ageret, numquam minus solum esse quam cum solus esset
itsjustatank
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Hong Kong9153 Posts
December 02 2013 19:16 GMT
#9
I have more thoughts on this issue but I'm on a cell phone so I will reserve them for later. For now, your high school interpretations are deeply flawed at best and demonstrate a dangerous level of authoritarianism at worst.
Photographer"nosotros estamos backamos" - setsuko
Ovid
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
United Kingdom948 Posts
December 02 2013 19:17 GMT
#10
When that book is called 50 shades of grey.
I will make Yogg Saron priest work...
Talin
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Montenegro10532 Posts
December 02 2013 19:21 GMT
#11
On December 03 2013 03:37 GeckoXp wrote:
I'm not quite sure what you mean with "teach people how to commit violent crimes such as rape and murder". If I'd be interest to commit a murder, a killing spree or whatever, I'd find ways to do so, with or without tutorials.


This isn't as clear cut as you're making it out to be. Not everybody that sets on to committing a murder or going on a killing spree actually goes through with it.

Humans are insecure in nature, and every time they face a non-trivial obstacle (whether it comes to obtaining a weapon, learning how to use it correctly, learning how to commit a crime cleanly or from a comfortable distance, learning how to get away, etc.), they are prone to giving up on whatever criminal activity they had in mind. The more obstacles you put up, the more people will become insecure about what they're doing and quit along the way.

It's a filtering process. It may not deter the most severe of psychopaths, but it will deter enough others to make a significant difference.
Jaaaaasper
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
United States10225 Posts
December 02 2013 19:25 GMT
#12
On December 03 2013 04:17 Ovid wrote:
When that book is called 50 shades of grey.

I think you mean twilight.

But in all seriousness, nope, never appropriate.
Hey do you want to hear a joke? Chinese production value. | I thought he had a aegis- Ayesee | When did 7ing mad last have a good game, 2012?
KristofferAG
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Norway25712 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-02 19:36:25
December 02 2013 19:32 GMT
#13
Banning books is dumb and does not accomplish anything. You can learn more about aquiring guns, killing and injuring from watching a couple documentaries on TV, or tuning in for the 9 o'clock news. If someone wants to make a pipe bomb, they'll find out how to make a pipe bomb, whether the anarchist's cookb is banned or not in his country. It accomplishes nothing.

It's a filtering process. It may not deter the most severe of psychopaths, but it will deter enough others to make a significant difference.

Honestly, if a person will go on a crime spree because a book functioned as a trigger for them, then they shouldn't even be allowed to watch tv. Books are the least of anyone's problem.
@KristofferAG | http://vestkyststoy.bandcamp.com | last.fm/user/KristofferAG
Pandain
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States12989 Posts
December 02 2013 19:34 GMT
#14
On December 03 2013 04:16 itsjustatank wrote:
I have more thoughts on this issue but I'm on a cell phone so I will reserve them for later. For now, your high school interpretations are deeply flawed at best and demonstrate a dangerous level of authoritarianism at worst.


Will be excited to hear them.
Also it wasn't high school, it was Honors College, but not that that would impact the strength of the statements anyway.

I do believe that the only time books should be banned is when it more acts as a guide for violent acts(not just illegal ones imo); violent acts are almost always wrong in domestic society. There's no reason literary expression should protect guides to bombing and murder, why pamphlets on how to Rufi someone should exist, or other things. It passes the line of artistic expression and instead infringes on the physical status of others.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18825 Posts
December 02 2013 19:36 GMT
#15
Banning is generally bad, but I would like to see a moratorium on "to be or not to be" constructions. All in all, OP, content notwithstanding, Id watch the overly flourishing language. When a two, three, and four syllable word will all do, the three and four are not inherently superior and in many ways detract from the persuasive capacity of your writing. I can already guarantee that your teachers probably don't mark you hard for ornamental language, but if you want to keep writing and see it improve, I'd work on moderating the fancy. You will run into teachers who don't like mouthfuls, and in terms of writing for the general public, this becomes even more true.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
GeckoXp
Profile Blog Joined June 2013
Germany2016 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-02 19:39:49
December 02 2013 19:39 GMT
#16
On December 03 2013 04:21 Talin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2013 03:37 GeckoXp wrote:
I'm not quite sure what you mean with "teach people how to commit violent crimes such as rape and murder". If I'd be interest to commit a murder, a killing spree or whatever, I'd find ways to do so, with or without tutorials.


This isn't as clear cut as you're making it out to be. Not everybody that sets on to committing a murder or going on a killing spree actually goes through with it.

Humans are insecure in nature, and every time they face a non-trivial obstacle (whether it comes to obtaining a weapon, learning how to use it correctly, learning how to commit a crime cleanly or from a comfortable distance, learning how to get away, etc.), they are prone to giving up on whatever criminal activity they had in mind. The more obstacles you put up, the more people will become insecure about what they're doing and quit along the way.

It's a filtering process. It may not deter the most severe of psychopaths, but it will deter enough others to make a significant difference.


Yah, that's a very bold statement you do there. You simply assume there'd be less murders, rapes, or whatever if there'd be less books with certain content. The same way that less (no) alcohol would lead to less crimes, I guess, to a more healthy life style and whatnot. Guess what, look at history of your own country and tell me what you'll find.

You're talking about people, which are anything but the standard, ordinary every-day person you'll meet. Anyone who commits any form of really violent crime does this due to many variables. Reading a book might give him a target or what crime to commit, maybe which method to use, but it will for sure not kick an on/off switch. A healthy person will not do shit, only because he once read about it. If that was the case, crime records would go up, everytime the latest hollywood horror/slasher/murica-style movie came out, or whenever books like the Hunger Games would be released. Every single time. It just doesn't happen. Censorship is just a cheap scapegoat for morons.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18825 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-02 19:42:43
December 02 2013 19:42 GMT
#17
On December 03 2013 04:34 Pandain wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2013 04:16 itsjustatank wrote:
I have more thoughts on this issue but I'm on a cell phone so I will reserve them for later. For now, your high school interpretations are deeply flawed at best and demonstrate a dangerous level of authoritarianism at worst.


Will be excited to hear them.
Also it wasn't high school, it was Honors College, but not that that would impact the strength of the statements anyway.

I do believe that the only time books should be banned is when it more acts as a guide for violent acts(not just illegal ones imo); violent acts are almost always wrong in domestic society. There's no reason literary expression should protect guides to bombing and murder, why pamphlets on how to Rufi someone should exist, or other things. It passes the line of artistic expression and instead infringes on the physical status of others.

The problem here is that you have not shown how the books or the ideas contained within are themselves what infringes on the "physical" status of others (which, I'll add, isn't as clear as it could be to begin with); you are just hoping that everyone else jumps from book to actor as seamlessly as you do.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Ovid
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
United Kingdom948 Posts
December 02 2013 19:44 GMT
#18
Just to throw something into the ring, I know it's not the same as a "book" but in the UK certain extremist groups have magazines that are banned.
Surely a book or magazine explaining in great detail on how to build a bomb and spreading extremist views and a desire to use aforementioned device should be banned?

Not because of the extremist views but because of the security threats it poses?
I will make Yogg Saron priest work...
Pandain
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States12989 Posts
December 02 2013 19:48 GMT
#19
On December 03 2013 04:42 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2013 04:34 Pandain wrote:
On December 03 2013 04:16 itsjustatank wrote:
I have more thoughts on this issue but I'm on a cell phone so I will reserve them for later. For now, your high school interpretations are deeply flawed at best and demonstrate a dangerous level of authoritarianism at worst.


Will be excited to hear them.
Also it wasn't high school, it was Honors College, but not that that would impact the strength of the statements anyway.

I do believe that the only time books should be banned is when it more acts as a guide for violent acts(not just illegal ones imo); violent acts are almost always wrong in domestic society. There's no reason literary expression should protect guides to bombing and murder, why pamphlets on how to Rufi someone should exist, or other things. It passes the line of artistic expression and instead infringes on the physical status of others.

The problem here is that you have not shown how the books or the ideas contained within are themselves what infringes on the "physical" status of others (which, I'll add, isn't as clear as it could be to begin with); you are just hoping that everyone else jumps from book to actor as seamlessly as you do.


I'm not saying we should censor books really ever on the sole basis of the ideas contained; even novels like American Psycho(which is actually anti-serial killer and conserumism) which seem to promote violent acts can be useful for expression and I think it's expression enough and not enough definitive to point that it motivates violent acts.

Only when they instead start to act as a guide for murder. Even if it glorifies it, that's okay although wrong. But if you teach someone, give commentary, best ways and worst ways. Well that's pretty unacceptable in any society and objectively wrong.
Targe
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom14103 Posts
December 02 2013 19:50 GMT
#20
On December 03 2013 04:44 Ovid wrote:
Just to throw something into the ring, I know it's not the same as a "book" but in the UK certain extremist groups have magazines that are banned.
Surely a book or magazine explaining in great detail on how to build a bomb and spreading extremist views and a desire to use aforementioned device should be banned?

Not because of the extremist views but because of the security threats it poses?

this information will be obtainable in by other means
11/5/14 CATACLYSM | The South West's worst Falco main
1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #15
MilkiCow vs NicoractLIVE!
Jumy vs TBD
xJustxJordanx23
Liquipedia
Replay Cast
00:00
SEL S2 Last Chance Qualifier 1
CranKy Ducklings115
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 244
SpeCial 104
CosmosSc2 27
RuFF_SC2 8
StarCraft: Brood War
[sc1f]eonzerg 42
Icarus 9
Dota 2
monkeys_forever796
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K924
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe94
Other Games
summit1g16155
tarik_tv7690
shahzam1328
ViBE254
JimRising 173
NeuroSwarm118
Trikslyr77
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2611
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH215
• Hupsaiya 68
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22562
League of Legends
• Scarra2189
• TFBlade404
• Rush166
Upcoming Events
Epic.LAN
10h 29m
Big Brain Bouts
14h 29m
sebesdes vs SpeCial
Harstem vs YoungYakov
GgMaChine vs uThermal
CranKy Ducklings
1d 8h
Epic.LAN
1d 10h
CSO Contender
1d 15h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 16h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Online Event
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Esports World Cup
4 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
[ Show More ]
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.