EPTAye.
On October 04 2013 10:51 deathly rat wrote:
I just got back from holiday and there are a lot interesting and amusing posts here.
I don't think my view of this would surprise anyone. It's a standard scientific one of hypothesis supported by observed evidence. Suggesting a hypothesis without observation or one which has an observation which critically contradicts the hypothesis is illogical. Observations are then held up to scrutiny as to their validity. It's pretty standard.
I just got back from holiday and there are a lot interesting and amusing posts here.
I don't think my view of this would surprise anyone. It's a standard scientific one of hypothesis supported by observed evidence. Suggesting a hypothesis without observation or one which has an observation which critically contradicts the hypothesis is illogical. Observations are then held up to scrutiny as to their validity. It's pretty standard.
This only works in physics.
