• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:39
CEST 20:39
KST 03:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent9Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature4
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues20LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments2Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris75
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast What happened to Singapore/Brazil servers?
Tourneys
WardiTV Mondays Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast
Brood War
General
The Korean Terminology Thread [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent FlaSh on ACS Winners being in ASL ASL20 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group B [ASL20] Ro16 Group A BWCL Season 63 Announcement [IPSL] ISPL Season 1 Winter Qualis and Info!
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
Nomor CS NeoBank 0822'606969 The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Collective Intelligence: Tea…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1091 users

Losing My Religion - My Struggle with god - Page 4

Blogs > ImAbstracT
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-19 15:49:13
February 19 2013 15:44 GMT
#61
he Bible is not presented as such. It is the authoritative and inerrant Word of God. To disagree with it, in a sense, is to disagree with your creator.


First, I don't understand why me talking about immorality would lead you to this remark. I'm a bit confused, so I'll take on your word on face value rather than trying to connect the dots. My apologies if my response isn't what you're looking for because of that.

In my opinion, the Bible does not say anything like that -- what you're saying is more doctrinal rather than actually biblical.

The Bible was put together by a council. There are *many* books related to the bible that didn't make the cut -- the people who put it together tried to put together a coherent message. Again, many of the books of the Bible has MANY motivations when it was written. You should take a look at such a history.

The verse that's most commonly quoted doesn't say that it *is* the word of God -- but inspired by God. You look at the Bible to look at the inspiration behind it, not just the words on the surface.

I also believe it is foolish for you to tell me "it is to disagree with my creator" to not read the Bible as the literal word of God. For me it doesn't matter whether or not Genesis happened or not, the point is that it gives tremendous insight into our spiritual walk. That is what matters.

Why is that such a faulty assumption. Let's say the Biblical narrative is correct. We are made by God as logical and rational creatures. Even subconsciously we are weighing pro's and con's in our head. We are constantly looking for evidence in the world around us to validate or challenge what we believe. Therefor, the supreme God of the universe, who made us as such, reveals himself in a way which is the total opposite. He creates us as logical beings who have to ascend to God by faith without evidence. Heb 11:1 "Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen." 2 Cor 5: 7 "We live by faith, not by sight."


Because when we look for evidence we have a "theory" we want to prove. God isn't a theory. God is God. He is who he is. Look at the disciples -- they were by Jesus the entire time, saw all of the miracles. They believed that he would be the Messiah. Look at what happened when Jesus was arrested -- they all denied him and scurried away. All of those miracles, those evidence, what are they? They were for the theories that we feed to ourselves, but the second that theory that we have crumbles apart we run away from it all.

There's a reason why we call Christianity a "relationship" -- and once you understand that, those versus will make much more sense.
mintiefresh
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada52 Posts
February 19 2013 15:58 GMT
#62
@OP

I just want to say thanks for your post and sharing your feelings. It was very heartfelt (to me at least). I have spent most of my young adult life struggling with the perceived gap between science and religion. For example, the events in Genesis 1-11 are so incredibly different from what is taught in school (Earth is 6000 years old vs. millions, evolution vs. creation, etc). I had a hard time trying to reconcile the differences between scientific facts from Scripture (ie, the mustard seed is the smallest seed when it is really not) and what we discover from our science.

That all changed when I took a Christian theology course at my university. My professor, Dr. Denis Lamoureux, has a doctorate in evolutionary biology and a doctorate in theology, specializing in Genesis 1-11. Needless to say, he has spent his entire life studying this. The class changed my life and I thought perhaps some of his material would be of interest to you.

I would definitely recommend you check out his book "I love Jesus and I accept Evolution." Also his website has essays regarding his official stance on this subject (Evolutionary Creation), as well as his testimony and some lectures on youtube regarding the subject.

Website: http://www.ualberta.ca/~dlamoure/
Essay on Evolutionary Creation: http://www.ualberta.ca/~dlamoure/evolutionary_creation.pdf

To summarize my thoughts, I think God is a concept that cannot be proven. Otherwise we would not have a definite choice. So if creation was so obvious, this would leave us with no choice but to believe in God. For man to truly be free from God, there must be no obvious signs that God is there. But because of that, I believe that leaves the door open to so much interpretation and doubt and etc. So I have a feeling you will be struggling with this for a long time. In the end, I believe this is what makes faith so incredibly challenging for some people (especially myself).

On the flip side, I don't think morality is a scientific principle. I think it would be almost offensive to attempt to attempt to fit emotions such as love and hate into a formula. To me, science studies nature. And theology will study morality and spiritual truths. I don't think you can mix the two.

In any case, I said I would try to keep this short and here I am with a long post. Of course this is a vast and complex topic, so I don't think a public forum is the best way for me to talk to you.

Feel free to send me a PM. I would love to discuss with you further on this subject. All the best in your spiritual journey.

Cheers.



ImAbstracT
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
519 Posts
February 19 2013 16:03 GMT
#63
First, I don't understand why me talking about immorality would lead you to this remark. I'm a bit confused, so I'll take on your word on face value rather than trying to connect the dots. My apologies if my response isn't what you're looking for because of that.

In my opinion, the Bible does not say anything like that -- what you're saying is more doctrinal rather than actually biblical.

The Bible was put together by a council. There are *many* books related to the bible that didn't make the cut -- the people who put it together tried to put together a coherent message. Again, many of the books of the Bible has MANY motivations when it was written. You should take a look at such a history.

The verse that's most commonly quoted doesn't say that it *is* the word of God -- but inspired by God. You look at the Bible to look at the inspiration behind it, not just the words on the surface.

I also believe it is foolish for you to tell me "it is to disagree with my creator" to not read the Bible as the literal word of God. For me it doesn't matter whether or not Genesis happened or not, the point is that it gives tremendous insight into our spiritual walk. That is what matters.

I agree. The Bible does not claim to be inerrant. Paul, in Timothy, does say all Scripture is God-breathed. Some may say that points to inerrancy, but at the very least it says that the OT is inspired.

Let me ask you this. If you agree the Bible is not inerrant, and that some of the stories such as the creation narrative in Genesis are not accurate, then how can you trust any of the spiritual insights? How do you pick and choose what is real and true while the others are bullshit?

There's a reason why we call Christianity a "relationship" -- and once you understand that, those versus will make much more sense.

I know, the whole "Its a relationship, not a religion" bumper sticker. The Bible sets forth an entire world view, not just a relationship. It says how man should live his life, the roll of the government, how we got here, why it rains, who God is, and how man is to respond to him. To regurgitate my question from above, if some of those has been proven wrong on what grounds can you accept the rest?
"I want you to take a moment, and reflect, on how much of a failure you are" - IdrA
ImAbstracT
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
519 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-19 16:42:13
February 19 2013 16:09 GMT
#64
I have read many of the theistic evolution arguments. BB Warfield was a theologian around the time Darwin published Origins, and he came to accept it as well.

The reason why I do not accept this view is that I believe evolution and the concept of God to be incompatible. Evolution is not order. It has lead to the extinction of 99.9 percent of all species which have been on this planet alone. The thought that a god could just sit in his throne and watch billions of the creatures he created suffer and die for no purpose is diabolical. And if a Christian says, "We were that purpose" then how can such arrogance be reconciled with the order to be humble?
"I want you to take a moment, and reflect, on how much of a failure you are" - IdrA
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
February 19 2013 18:17 GMT
#65
Let me ask you this. If you agree the Bible is not inerrant, and that some of the stories such as the creation narrative in Genesis are not accurate, then how can you trust any of the spiritual insights? How do you pick and choose what is real and true while the others are bullshit?


I know, the whole "Its a relationship, not a religion" bumper sticker. The Bible sets forth an entire world view, not just a relationship. It says how man should live his life, the roll of the government, how we got here, why it rains, who God is, and how man is to respond to him. To regurgitate my question from above, if some of those has been proven wrong on what grounds can you accept the rest?


Why do we believe in science, when the methodology also gave us false conclusions quite a bit? We don't believe in the results of the science but we believe in the method, the process, and the spirit. Anytime we take these ideals and apply them, we're bound to make mistakes one way or another because the picture we see isn't the whole picture, or we may have applied it badly, or maybe there's just something we just don't understand. Imagine if every time someone publishes some result and it turns out they were wrong for whatever reason. Are we going to not believe in the scientific method now?

I'm not saying "cherry pick". I am saying, what matters is this spirit, in the same way. The Bible is a story of people, and people are sensitive to a lot of different factors. Religion doesn't provide us with "truths", it provides us with a path that we walk towards.

It's our nature, really. If we don't understand a statistical concept or a model we will so often say "well, that's because we're not good enough". But when it comes down to philosophy or economics or religion or things like that, we are so damn quick to deride the other side as "quacks" and "has no idea what they're talking about" -- because we have our own opinions, our own mold on what we believe.

Reading your posts you clearly have some notion of God. It's very likely that I don't believe in the God that you believe in, because to a certain extent when it comes to things like God it's so easy to project ideals and notions onto God and call it a god and what not. This is what means to seek God (or at least, what I currently believe it to be)
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-19 18:20:38
February 19 2013 18:18 GMT
#66
^And this is also, Milkis, why you should learn about every religion, and not just pick one and be, say, a "Christian"

On February 20 2013 01:03 ImAbstracT wrote:
if some of those has been proven wrong on what grounds can you accept the rest?


because it's just a book that some people wrote a long time ago about how they were trying to find some meaning in the world. The mistake is thinking that you should "accept" it in the way you are thinking about it.
shikata ga nai
AmorFatiAbyss
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
51 Posts
February 19 2013 18:35 GMT
#67
Despite what people lie and tell themselves because they don't like the alternative, you cannot "create" your own purpose or meaning for life. If a chair was conscious it could not "decide" for it's purpose to be a table. You are confined to the limits set by your universe, your biology, your experiences. Every person is confined to the same purpose. And the only possible way life could have meaning is if it was created by an external consciousness for a specific purpose. Objects which are the result of indifference and purposeless cause/effect cannot have meaning, no matter how much they've been programmed to desire it.

What we call "purpose" or "meaning" these days has simply come to mean "what am I gonna do with all this free time I have as a result of industrialization?"

Where you trip up OP is focusing solely on Christianity. Looking for evidence about the truthfulness of the bible says absolutely nothing about the important questions, such as the existence of God. You've lumped the two together as if they were a single question, which is natural because you were raised that way. So make your title "my struggle with Christianity" and not "my struggle with God," because those are not synonymous. God is something there is no evidence for or against, something which is necessarily dependent upon faith and not logic or science. You either believe faith is worthwhile or you don't.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
February 19 2013 18:38 GMT
#68
On February 20 2013 03:35 AmorFatiAbyss wrote:
Despite what people lie and tell themselves because they don't like the alternative, you cannot "create" your own purpose or meaning for life. If a chair was conscious it could not "decide" for it's purpose to be a table. You are confined to the limits set by your universe, your biology, your experiences.


To paraphrase a wise man:

Men make their own meaning, but not under conditions of their own choosing.
shikata ga nai
AmorFatiAbyss
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
51 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-19 18:50:57
February 19 2013 18:50 GMT
#69
On February 20 2013 03:38 sam!zdat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2013 03:35 AmorFatiAbyss wrote:
Despite what people lie and tell themselves because they don't like the alternative, you cannot "create" your own purpose or meaning for life. If a chair was conscious it could not "decide" for it's purpose to be a table. You are confined to the limits set by your universe, your biology, your experiences.


To paraphrase a wise man:

Men make their own meaning, but not under conditions of their own choosing.

The conditions are deterministic.

Men do precisely what their physical brain tells them to do. Which can include deluding themselves into inventing a "meaning" for their actions, of course.
Milkis
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
5003 Posts
February 19 2013 18:58 GMT
#70
On February 20 2013 03:18 sam!zdat wrote:
^And this is also, Milkis, why you should learn about every religion, and not just pick one and be, say, a "Christian"


I absolutely agree (I don't think I implied that you should only learn about Christianity). But at the same time, I still don't fully understand Christianity -- how can I make a full judgment regarding religion when I'm only able to look at them on the surface?
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-19 18:59:47
February 19 2013 18:59 GMT
#71
eh, whatever man, I'm not getting into this with you. go read some philosophy and get back to me in a few years

(edit: not you milkis the other guy)
shikata ga nai
AmorFatiAbyss
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
51 Posts
February 19 2013 19:05 GMT
#72
On February 20 2013 03:59 sam!zdat wrote:
eh, whatever man, I'm not getting into this with you. go read some philosophy and get back to me in a few years

(edit: not you milkis the other guy)

Believe me, I've read plenty of philosophy. I don't make it my refuge from reality like you do, though.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-19 19:14:55
February 19 2013 19:11 GMT
#73
Yeah, my life is pretty much defined by taking refuge from unpleasant truths

edit: the fact remains, you chose to believe that. it's an illusion which you cannot escape. stop trying to pretend like it isn't.

edit: "reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away"
shikata ga nai
AmorFatiAbyss
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
51 Posts
February 19 2013 19:30 GMT
#74
An illusion which you cannot escape? It's not about escaping it, it's about rejecting it. You simply have to remind yourself that the human mind is fully capable of tricking itself. Even science is coming to confirm this fact.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-19 19:31:54
February 19 2013 19:31 GMT
#75
Let's see you reject it then. Stop making choices. You have no free will.

les non-dupes errent
shikata ga nai
AmorFatiAbyss
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
51 Posts
February 19 2013 19:59 GMT
#76
On February 20 2013 04:31 sam!zdat wrote:
Let's see you reject it then. Stop making choices. You have no free will.

les non-dupes errent

Oh, choices still exist. I just don't have any choice in the choices I make.

You cannot stop something that has never begun.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-19 20:22:03
February 19 2013 20:06 GMT
#77
So your point is irrelevant, because you wouldn't be able to tell the difference either way. You still have to make choices. Who cares if God already knows what choice you're going to make? I don't see what difference that makes.

Anyway, this is all a different question than the question of searching for meaning in existence, I don't really see what determinism has to do with it.

edit: and you still have to explain how the epiphenomenon of consciousness could arise from the simple rearrangement of objects which are not themselves conscious, that is extremely troubling

edit: if anything, determinism makes the problem even more problematic! how can I find meaning in a deterministic existence? I suppose I could become a calvinist, but then I would have to be a calvinist, and I can't think of anything more depressing than that.
shikata ga nai
crazyweasel
Profile Joined March 2011
607 Posts
February 19 2013 21:46 GMT
#78
On February 19 2013 04:49 sam!zdat wrote:
Nice blog

I'd just like to leave you, however, with the seed of doubt, that there are more sophisticated ways to think about religion than the way in which you were raised, and there are more sophisticated ways to think about the critique of religion than Dawkins and Hitchens. Keep asking questions I love a curious mind! If you decide that NOW you have found the Truth, then you have just made the same mistake as before

Show nested quote +

Confucius said, "When everyone dislikes something, it should be examined. When everyone likes something, it should be examined."




fair words as usual samzdat
crazyweasel
Profile Joined March 2011
607 Posts
February 19 2013 21:54 GMT
#79
I am proud of OP. sharing this with us; it must be hard to overcome this. realizing what we believed in so deeply is in fact not what we thought it was.
crazyweasel
Profile Joined March 2011
607 Posts
February 19 2013 22:03 GMT
#80
On February 20 2013 04:30 AmorFatiAbyss wrote:
An illusion which you cannot escape? It's not about escaping it, it's about rejecting it. You simply have to remind yourself that the human mind is fully capable of tricking itself. Even science is coming to confirm this fact.


the rephrase with exactitude you thoughts I'd say that human have this biological tendancy of religious thoughts. mostly because, like primates, we recognize links of causality, we learn through them, everything. with our higher cognitve capacity, though we humans, have a much more complex sociality which involves semantics, which allows us to think of this causality. which mostly explain why we have such things as beliefs. Yes science confirms this fact. Illusion? partially.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 21m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 519
IndyStarCraft 97
UpATreeSC 89
JuggernautJason42
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3362
Shuttle 1708
Rain 1369
EffOrt 864
ggaemo 209
Hyuk 196
firebathero 187
TY 184
Dewaltoss 167
Soulkey 92
[ Show more ]
PianO 85
Sharp 77
sSak 73
Leta 61
Mind 44
Killer 33
scan(afreeca) 21
Terrorterran 14
Dota 2
Gorgc8036
qojqva4140
resolut1ontv 287
XcaliburYe162
League of Legends
Reynor122
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps996
fl0m635
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu204
Other Games
Grubby3116
FrodaN1822
ceh9596
B2W.Neo574
Beastyqt432
SortOf87
QueenE63
MindelVK19
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1507
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH209
• davetesta43
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 21
• FirePhoenix16
• Michael_bg 4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV532
• masondota2386
League of Legends
• Nemesis4527
• TFBlade757
Other Games
• imaqtpie990
• Shiphtur289
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
5h 21m
Kung Fu Cup
17h 21m
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
OSC
21h 21m
Moja vs Babymarine
Solar vs TBD
sOs vs goblin
Nice vs INexorable
sebesdes vs Iba
Nicoract vs TBD
NightMare vs TBD
OSC
1d 5h
ReBellioN vs PAPI
Spirit vs TBD
Percival vs TBD
TriGGeR vs TBD
Shameless vs UedSoldier
Cham vs TBD
Harstem vs TBD
RSL Revival
1d 15h
Cure vs SHIN
Reynor vs Zoun
Kung Fu Cup
1d 17h
The PondCast
1d 18h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Maru
Online Event
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Team Wars
3 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
BSL Team Wars
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Clem vs herO
Serral vs Bunny
Reynor vs Zoun
Cosmonarchy
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
[BSL 2025] Weekly
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Maestros of the Game
4 days
BSL Team Wars
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Copa Latinoamericana 4
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21: BSL Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
EC S1
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.