• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 05:40
CET 11:40
KST 19:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book6Clem wins HomeStory Cup 288HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info4herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 26-Feb 1): herO, Clem, ByuN, Classic win2RSL Season 4 announced for March-April7Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win3Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8
StarCraft 2
General
How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Clem wins HomeStory Cup 28 Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) WardiTV Mondays $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000 WardiTV Winter Championship 2026
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ? [A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth Mutation # 510 Safety Violation Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Can someone share very abbreviated BW cliffnotes? StarCraft player reflex TE scores
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Diablo 2 thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread EVE Corporation Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Play, Watch, Drink: Esports …
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2446 users

C Programming Practice - Page 4

Blogs > CecilSunkure
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 All
obesechicken13
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States10467 Posts
November 05 2012 04:35 GMT
#61
On November 05 2012 13:31 frogmelter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2012 13:25 obesechicken13 wrote:
1) Code a case to check if it is a prime number to begin with. If it isn't, then enter the loop

If I could do this I'd be a millionaire.


It can find the prime factors of 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 pretty fast [sub 5 seconds].

Lol. I don't know if you're trolling or if you misunderstand the problem. But That number above has only one prime factor: 2.


I'm not trolling.

Since the algorithm divides, it will come up with the answer pretty fast. The factors are 2^63, and every pass will divide it by 2. Meaning the loop only needs to run 63 times.

The problem occurs when you have a huge jump, like the first prime factor is like 6,000,000,000+ or so.

Ok. well you seem to know more than I gave you credit for then.

I'm not sure if it is possible to prove if a(any) number that large is prime in 5 seconds. I just heard from wikipedia that:
There is no known useful formula that yields all of the prime numbers and no composites.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number
I think in our modern age technology has evolved to become more addictive. The things that don't give us pleasure aren't used as much. Work was never meant to be fun, but doing it makes us happier in the long run.
frogmelter
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States971 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-05 04:38:21
November 05 2012 04:36 GMT
#62
On November 05 2012 13:35 obesechicken13 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2012 13:31 frogmelter wrote:
On November 05 2012 13:25 obesechicken13 wrote:
1) Code a case to check if it is a prime number to begin with. If it isn't, then enter the loop

If I could do this I'd be a millionaire.


It can find the prime factors of 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 pretty fast [sub 5 seconds].

Lol. I don't know if you're trolling or if you misunderstand the problem. But That number above has only one prime factor: 2.


I'm not trolling.

Since the algorithm divides, it will come up with the answer pretty fast. The factors are 2^63, and every pass will divide it by 2. Meaning the loop only needs to run 63 times.

The problem occurs when you have a huge jump, like the first prime factor is like 6,000,000,000+ or so.

Ok. well you seem to know more than I gave you credit for then.

I'm not sure if it is possible to prove if a(any) number that large is prime in 5 seconds. I just heard from wikipedia that:
Show nested quote +
There is no known useful formula that yields all of the prime numbers and no composites.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller–Rabin_primality_test

Try that test

And yes, wikipedia is correct. What we are doing is a smarter brute force approach. At best we can try to mitigate the worst case run times, but there are some cases where the run time for the particular algorithm I posted will be O(sqrt(n)/2), which in some cases is still too high
TL+ Member
obesechicken13
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States10467 Posts
November 05 2012 04:37 GMT
#63
On November 05 2012 13:36 frogmelter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2012 13:35 obesechicken13 wrote:
On November 05 2012 13:31 frogmelter wrote:
On November 05 2012 13:25 obesechicken13 wrote:
1) Code a case to check if it is a prime number to begin with. If it isn't, then enter the loop

If I could do this I'd be a millionaire.


It can find the prime factors of 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 pretty fast [sub 5 seconds].

Lol. I don't know if you're trolling or if you misunderstand the problem. But That number above has only one prime factor: 2.


I'm not trolling.

Since the algorithm divides, it will come up with the answer pretty fast. The factors are 2^63, and every pass will divide it by 2. Meaning the loop only needs to run 63 times.

The problem occurs when you have a huge jump, like the first prime factor is like 6,000,000,000+ or so.

Ok. well you seem to know more than I gave you credit for then.

I'm not sure if it is possible to prove if a(any) number that large is prime in 5 seconds. I just heard from wikipedia that:
There is no known useful formula that yields all of the prime numbers and no composites.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller–Rabin_primality_test

Try that test

No. Good night. I'll do sieve when I feel like it in the future.
I think in our modern age technology has evolved to become more addictive. The things that don't give us pleasure aren't used as much. Work was never meant to be fun, but doing it makes us happier in the long run.
frogmelter
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States971 Posts
November 05 2012 04:55 GMT
#64
On November 05 2012 13:37 obesechicken13 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2012 13:36 frogmelter wrote:
On November 05 2012 13:35 obesechicken13 wrote:
On November 05 2012 13:31 frogmelter wrote:
On November 05 2012 13:25 obesechicken13 wrote:
1) Code a case to check if it is a prime number to begin with. If it isn't, then enter the loop

If I could do this I'd be a millionaire.


It can find the prime factors of 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 pretty fast [sub 5 seconds].

Lol. I don't know if you're trolling or if you misunderstand the problem. But That number above has only one prime factor: 2.


I'm not trolling.

Since the algorithm divides, it will come up with the answer pretty fast. The factors are 2^63, and every pass will divide it by 2. Meaning the loop only needs to run 63 times.

The problem occurs when you have a huge jump, like the first prime factor is like 6,000,000,000+ or so.

Ok. well you seem to know more than I gave you credit for then.

I'm not sure if it is possible to prove if a(any) number that large is prime in 5 seconds. I just heard from wikipedia that:
There is no known useful formula that yields all of the prime numbers and no composites.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller–Rabin_primality_test

Try that test

No. Good night. I'll do sieve when I feel like it in the future.


Good night, and good luck
TL+ Member
teamamerica
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States958 Posts
November 05 2012 07:45 GMT
#65
Hey can someone tell me if my thought process is right? I'm thinking of how to find if a number is prime given fermats little thm. which states a^p is equivalent to a in mod p (I'm taking a class which covers basic public key exchange).

Knowing that to figure if some p is prime it's just a matter of figuring a^p, and for large p you can use the fast powering algorithm. That splits finding a^p as finding the product to a raised to the binary expansion of p. I.e. a^5 becomes
a^(2^2) *a(2^0). Since this entire set of operations is done mod p, we never exceed p (for overflow - this is how pythons math.pow(x,y,z) works). So we end up with log2 multiplications to perform.

But on thinking about this, why how come you can't just use a=1 and then it would seem that every p is prime o.O...Anyone tell me what obvious part I'm doing wrong/missing?
RIP GOMTV. RIP PROLEAGUE.
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-05 08:29:41
November 05 2012 08:25 GMT
#66
On November 05 2012 16:45 teamamerica wrote:
Hey can someone tell me if my thought process is right? I'm thinking of how to find if a number is prime given fermats little thm. which states a^p is equivalent to a in mod p (I'm taking a class which covers basic public key exchange).

Knowing that to figure if some p is prime it's just a matter of figuring a^p, and for large p you can use the fast powering algorithm. That splits finding a^p as finding the product to a raised to the binary expansion of p. I.e. a^5 becomes
a^(2^2) *a(2^0). Since this entire set of operations is done mod p, we never exceed p (for overflow - this is how pythons math.pow(x,y,z) works). So we end up with log2 multiplications to perform.

But on thinking about this, why how come you can't just use a=1 and then it would seem that every p is prime o.O...Anyone tell me what obvious part I'm doing wrong/missing?

Fermat's probable prime theorem is probable. You have to repeat the test for various moduli.

Even then, it's ridiculously fast to repeat ~100 times to get good confidence.

Note that Carmichael Numbers break Fermat's Little Theorem, but I believe the density of Carmichael numbers goes down for big numbers, so this can be ignored for applications like RSA.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
teamamerica
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States958 Posts
November 05 2012 12:41 GMT
#67
On November 05 2012 17:25 mmp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2012 16:45 teamamerica wrote:
Hey can someone tell me if my thought process is right? I'm thinking of how to find if a number is prime given fermats little thm. which states a^p is equivalent to a in mod p (I'm taking a class which covers basic public key exchange).

Knowing that to figure if some p is prime it's just a matter of figuring a^p, and for large p you can use the fast powering algorithm. That splits finding a^p as finding the product to a raised to the binary expansion of p. I.e. a^5 becomes
a^(2^2) *a(2^0). Since this entire set of operations is done mod p, we never exceed p (for overflow - this is how pythons math.pow(x,y,z) works). So we end up with log2 multiplications to perform.

But on thinking about this, why how come you can't just use a=1 and then it would seem that every p is prime o.O...Anyone tell me what obvious part I'm doing wrong/missing?

Fermat's probable prime theorem is probable. You have to repeat the test for various moduli.

Even then, it's ridiculously fast to repeat ~100 times to get good confidence.

Note that Carmichael Numbers break Fermat's Little Theorem, but I believe the density of Carmichael numbers goes down for big numbers, so this can be ignored for applications like RSA.


Oh whoa, I never knew it was probable - also never knew about Carmicheal numbers (or that Fermats thm. failed at all TT). Well at least tomorrow when I ask my teacher some questions I'll look like I've actually been doing the reading!

Anyway, I saw some posts about learning C++ - I'm always an advocate for good books, esp. in languages where it's easy to do stuff the wrong way. So there's
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/388242/the-definitive-c-book-guide-and-list
RIP GOMTV. RIP PROLEAGUE.
dakalro
Profile Joined September 2010
Romania525 Posts
November 05 2012 15:24 GMT
#68
On November 04 2012 17:29 spinesheath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2012 07:25 Lysenko wrote:
On November 04 2012 04:15 CecilSunkure wrote:
On November 04 2012 02:09 Sawamura wrote:
now if could write some C++ program practice ^_^ hehehe thanks for the practice anyway 5/5

I could do that. I'm thinking of some object oriented C first though. You know, virtualizing some C++ features in C.


I was on my way to a much longer post, but I don't want to get in the way of what you're doing here with a lot of negativity, so I'll just ask. Who learns C today, absent a specific need to write embedded code, modify a UNIX or Linux kernel, or write a driver?

I'm speaking as someone who paid several years of bills as a C programmer, working on both embedded applications and desktop applications. This was, however, 17 years ago, before (as far as I have personally seen, which is why I'm asking) the entire world moved on to C++.



** I mean, I can see doing it out of nostalgia, or because I got a cheap deal on some single-chip-computer development board, but that's about it. Is this a topic of interest for typical, highly-motivated CS students these days? I'm not saying it's bad, I just don't get it.

You learn C to work with the crappy old codebase many companies still have. If you start a new project from scratch, you better have a damn good reason to use C. But if you work on something that uses old code, chances are it uses C.

That's no reason to start with C as your first language though.


I can tell you from 1st hand experience that you would miss your mobile phone functionality if C were to vanish now :D. C is here to stay and it will keep running the backend of a lot of stuff.
nath
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1788 Posts
November 05 2012 16:56 GMT
#69
On November 04 2012 17:29 spinesheath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2012 07:25 Lysenko wrote:
On November 04 2012 04:15 CecilSunkure wrote:
On November 04 2012 02:09 Sawamura wrote:
now if could write some C++ program practice ^_^ hehehe thanks for the practice anyway 5/5

I could do that. I'm thinking of some object oriented C first though. You know, virtualizing some C++ features in C.


I was on my way to a much longer post, but I don't want to get in the way of what you're doing here with a lot of negativity, so I'll just ask. Who learns C today, absent a specific need to write embedded code, modify a UNIX or Linux kernel, or write a driver?

I'm speaking as someone who paid several years of bills as a C programmer, working on both embedded applications and desktop applications. This was, however, 17 years ago, before (as far as I have personally seen, which is why I'm asking) the entire world moved on to C++.



** I mean, I can see doing it out of nostalgia, or because I got a cheap deal on some single-chip-computer development board, but that's about it. Is this a topic of interest for typical, highly-motivated CS students these days? I'm not saying it's bad, I just don't get it.

You learn C to work with the crappy old codebase many companies still have. If you start a new project from scratch, you better have a damn good reason to use C. But if you work on something that uses old code, chances are it uses C.

That's no reason to start with C as your first language though.

maybe in germany, in the US old codebases hardly ever use C
Founder of Flow Enterprises, LLC http://flow-enterprises.com/
nath
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1788 Posts
November 05 2012 16:57 GMT
#70
On November 06 2012 00:24 dakalro wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2012 17:29 spinesheath wrote:
On November 04 2012 07:25 Lysenko wrote:
On November 04 2012 04:15 CecilSunkure wrote:
On November 04 2012 02:09 Sawamura wrote:
now if could write some C++ program practice ^_^ hehehe thanks for the practice anyway 5/5

I could do that. I'm thinking of some object oriented C first though. You know, virtualizing some C++ features in C.


I was on my way to a much longer post, but I don't want to get in the way of what you're doing here with a lot of negativity, so I'll just ask. Who learns C today, absent a specific need to write embedded code, modify a UNIX or Linux kernel, or write a driver?

I'm speaking as someone who paid several years of bills as a C programmer, working on both embedded applications and desktop applications. This was, however, 17 years ago, before (as far as I have personally seen, which is why I'm asking) the entire world moved on to C++.



** I mean, I can see doing it out of nostalgia, or because I got a cheap deal on some single-chip-computer development board, but that's about it. Is this a topic of interest for typical, highly-motivated CS students these days? I'm not saying it's bad, I just don't get it.

You learn C to work with the crappy old codebase many companies still have. If you start a new project from scratch, you better have a damn good reason to use C. But if you work on something that uses old code, chances are it uses C.

That's no reason to start with C as your first language though.


I can tell you from 1st hand experience that you would miss your mobile phone functionality if C were to vanish now :D. C is here to stay and it will keep running the backend of a lot of stuff.

very true
Founder of Flow Enterprises, LLC http://flow-enterprises.com/
RoyGBiv_13
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1275 Posts
November 05 2012 18:31 GMT
#71
On November 06 2012 01:56 nath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2012 17:29 spinesheath wrote:
On November 04 2012 07:25 Lysenko wrote:
On November 04 2012 04:15 CecilSunkure wrote:
On November 04 2012 02:09 Sawamura wrote:
now if could write some C++ program practice ^_^ hehehe thanks for the practice anyway 5/5

I could do that. I'm thinking of some object oriented C first though. You know, virtualizing some C++ features in C.


I was on my way to a much longer post, but I don't want to get in the way of what you're doing here with a lot of negativity, so I'll just ask. Who learns C today, absent a specific need to write embedded code, modify a UNIX or Linux kernel, or write a driver?

I'm speaking as someone who paid several years of bills as a C programmer, working on both embedded applications and desktop applications. This was, however, 17 years ago, before (as far as I have personally seen, which is why I'm asking) the entire world moved on to C++.



** I mean, I can see doing it out of nostalgia, or because I got a cheap deal on some single-chip-computer development board, but that's about it. Is this a topic of interest for typical, highly-motivated CS students these days? I'm not saying it's bad, I just don't get it.

You learn C to work with the crappy old codebase many companies still have. If you start a new project from scratch, you better have a damn good reason to use C. But if you work on something that uses old code, chances are it uses C.

That's no reason to start with C as your first language though.

maybe in germany, in the US old codebases hardly ever use C


As an american engineer who codes entirely in C, I disagree.

Also, I help build a corporate C compiler, ask me anything about those silly optimizations you want, though, under the hood its really just black magic.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
Lysenko
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Iceland2128 Posts
November 05 2012 19:50 GMT
#72
On November 06 2012 00:24 dakalro wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2012 17:29 spinesheath wrote:
On November 04 2012 07:25 Lysenko wrote:
On November 04 2012 04:15 CecilSunkure wrote:
On November 04 2012 02:09 Sawamura wrote:
now if could write some C++ program practice ^_^ hehehe thanks for the practice anyway 5/5

I could do that. I'm thinking of some object oriented C first though. You know, virtualizing some C++ features in C.


I was on my way to a much longer post, but I don't want to get in the way of what you're doing here with a lot of negativity, so I'll just ask. Who learns C today, absent a specific need to write embedded code, modify a UNIX or Linux kernel, or write a driver?

I'm speaking as someone who paid several years of bills as a C programmer, working on both embedded applications and desktop applications. This was, however, 17 years ago, before (as far as I have personally seen, which is why I'm asking) the entire world moved on to C++.



** I mean, I can see doing it out of nostalgia, or because I got a cheap deal on some single-chip-computer development board, but that's about it. Is this a topic of interest for typical, highly-motivated CS students these days? I'm not saying it's bad, I just don't get it.

You learn C to work with the crappy old codebase many companies still have. If you start a new project from scratch, you better have a damn good reason to use C. But if you work on something that uses old code, chances are it uses C.

That's no reason to start with C as your first language though.


I can tell you from 1st hand experience that you would miss your mobile phone functionality if C were to vanish now :D. C is here to stay and it will keep running the backend of a lot of stuff.


To all the folks who keep bringing up embedded applications in response to my comments about C largely not being used today (and the comments on my comments) please note that embedded applications are one of the specific examples (among others) I mentioned that would benefit from learning C.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
]343[
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States10328 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-05 22:04:44
November 05 2012 22:02 GMT
#73
bros bros there exist polynomial-time primality tests like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AKS_primality_test

factoring, on the other hand, is not known to be in P (which is why RSA hasn't been broken, yet)

(in fact a lot of cryptography relies on stuff which is not proven, such as: "factoring is hard"; "discrete log is hard"; and "there exists a pseudorandom number generator" [which is true if "discrete log is hard"])

On November 05 2012 17:25 mmp wrote:
Fermat's probable prime theorem is probable. You have to repeat the test for various moduli.


hmm, I guess it's probabilistic if you choose random guys a and take a^n-1... but yeah the converse of Fermat's Little Theorem is not necessarily true.
Writer
obesechicken13
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States10467 Posts
November 06 2012 03:48 GMT
#74
On November 06 2012 07:02 ]343[ wrote:
bros bros there exist polynomial-time primality tests like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AKS_primality_test

Wiki says the original test had a worst case of Õ(log^12(n))
So that's like log(log(log(log...log(n)))))...)))
12 iterated logarithms. I had to go on wolfram to brush up on iterated logarithms. In that case checking for primes is pretty damn fast.

The Euler problem in question though was considered the third easiest question on the site. I highly doubt everyone who solved the problem knew AKS primality test considering the next few problems look really easy in comparison.
I think in our modern age technology has evolved to become more addictive. The things that don't give us pleasure aren't used as much. Work was never meant to be fun, but doing it makes us happier in the long run.
icystorage
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Jollibee19350 Posts
November 08 2012 13:13 GMT
#75
my solution to #5 used a simple bubble sort :D
+ Show Spoiler +

#include <stdio.h> /* printf */

/* Swap the contents of two pointers. Do not modify the prototype.
Use your function from PointerPractice_3 here. */
void SwapInts(int *a,int *b )
{
/* Place your code here. Modify these lines. */
int temp = *a;
*a = *b;
*b = temp;
}

/* Print contents of an array. Do not modify this function. */
void PrintArray( const int* array, const int size )
{
int i;
for(i = 0; i < size; ++i, ++array)
{
if(i != size - 1)
printf( "%d, ", *array);
else
printf( "%d\n", *array);
}
}

int main( void )
{
/* Create array on the stack. */
int stackArray[] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 };

/* Get size of array. stackArray can be treated as pointer to first element. */
int arraySize = sizeof( stackArray ) / sizeof( *stackArray );

/* Can treat name of an array as pointer to first element. */
PrintArray( stackArray, arraySize );

/* Reverse the array here */
/**/
/**/
/**/
int i, j;
for (i = (arraySize - 1); i > 0; i--)
{
for (j = 1; j <= i; j++)
{
if (stackArray[j-1] < stackArray[j])
{
SwapInts(&stackArray[j-1], &stackArray[j]);
}
}
}

PrintArray( stackArray, arraySize );

/* Correct output:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0 */

return 0;
}
LiquidDota StaffAre you ready for a Miracle-? We are! The International 2017 Champions!
SeeDLiNg
Profile Joined January 2010
United States690 Posts
December 19 2012 18:04 GMT
#76
So, I know what it's finding... But I don't really know how it's finding it...

int arraySize = sizeof( stackArray ) / sizeof( *stackArray );

Can someone break down how exactly this is finding the arraySize for me please?
CecilSunkure
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States2829 Posts
December 19 2012 21:05 GMT
#77
On December 20 2012 03:04 SeeDLiNg wrote:
So, I know what it's finding... But I don't really know how it's finding it...

int arraySize = sizeof( stackArray ) / sizeof( *stackArray );

Can someone break down how exactly this is finding the arraySize for me please?

Sure!

So with an array on the stack C actually knows the number of elements in the array. So when you do sizeof( stackArray ) the stackArray has not yet implicitly decayed into a pointer, and is actually being treated as a proper array. C multiplies the size of a single element in the array by the number of arrays, and this returns the number of bytes the entire array takes up within memory.

So then sizeof( *stackArray ) is implicitly decaying the stackArray identifier into a pointer and then dereferencing it. The value of *stackArray is that of the first element in the array, since an array's identifier can always be implicitly decayed into a pointer to the first element. So then the size of the first element is 4 bytes: the size of the integer first element.

Then you divide the size of bytes in total by the size in bytes of the first element to get the number of elements total.
Prev 1 2 3 4 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 20m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech153
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 8452
Calm 6754
GuemChi 1626
Flash 1460
firebathero 1265
Horang2 721
Larva 459
Mini 271
actioN 238
Soma 234
[ Show more ]
Leta 213
ZerO 136
Hyun 123
Last 121
Mong 103
Pusan 81
ggaemo 72
sorry 63
910 62
Sharp 59
Mind 53
Shuttle 52
Backho 35
sSak 31
GoRush 25
Free 20
zelot 19
NaDa 19
Shine 16
Noble 13
Sacsri 10
Movie 10
Dota 2
Fuzer 209
XcaliburYe133
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King122
Westballz50
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor324
Other Games
gofns18945
singsing1407
B2W.Neo1037
ZerO(Twitch)23
MindelVK15
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1224
BasetradeTV111
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 23
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 62
• LUISG 34
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2189
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1h 20m
WardiTV Winter Champion…
4h 20m
OSC
13h 20m
Replay Cast
22h 20m
Wardi Open
1d 1h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 6h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 23h
LiuLi Cup
2 days
Reynor vs Creator
Maru vs Lambo
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
LiuLi Cup
3 days
Clem vs Rogue
SHIN vs Cyan
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
3 days
KCM Race Survival
3 days
LiuLi Cup
4 days
Scarlett vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs herO
Online Event
4 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
Serral vs Zoun
Cure vs Classic
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
Rongyi Cup S3
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W8
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
WardiTV Winter 2026
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.