In his statement, he is saying that he did not have monetary support and couldn't even ask his parents for help. Therefore he joined Axiom.
Tell me, legally, isn't there a contrast in his statements? Firstly it was "No, it was not about money", and then "I had no monetary support...". He did say he joined for money as he's 24 with no job.
CranK can be sued legally if Jessica can prove her loss. He is in trouble for lying and deception.