• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:02
CEST 09:02
KST 16:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall6HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL41Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster15Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Help: rep cant save Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 569 users

My KeSPA v Blizzard Lecture (advice welcome)

Blogs > conTAgi0n
Post a Reply
conTAgi0n
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States335 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-11 05:59:14
October 10 2011 23:35 GMT
#1
+ Show Spoiler [tl;dr] +
ESPORTS


Towards the end of last semester, an email went out to about a symposium to be held this fall on videogames and ethics, and they were looking for student proposals. This was right around the conclusion of the KeSPA Blizzard saga, when I saw the email, that was the first thing that came to mind. Anyways I was on campus over the summer for another project (when that's done I'll probably write a blog about that too), so about a week before the deadline for proposals I wrote up this proposal and went to talk to the professor who was organizing it (he also wrote a book called Videogames and Education, which I read part of a while ago, so I found that pretty cool):

+ Show Spoiler [proposal] +
Blizzard v. KeSPA: Intellectual Property Rights in Professional Gaming



Professional gaming, or e-sports, is growing in both popularity and profitability around the world. As such, the protracted dispute between Activision Blizzard and the Korean eSports Players Association (KeSPA) over the future of professional StarCraft in South Korea sets an important example for the future of a rapidly growing industry.

StarCraft: Brood War in South Korea is the most developed and successful e-sport in the world. In 2007, Activision Blizzard, the developers of the game, went into negotiations with KeSPA, the governing body of e-sports in South Korea, over the IP rights of their games. The eventual breakdown of these negotiations led to a lawsuit that threatened for a time to bring to an end all televised broadcasting of Brood War in South Korea.

At the heart of this dispute is to what extent Blizzard’s intellectual property rights over Brood War extend to derivative works, in this case the televised matches between the progamers themselves. The legality behind this is both complex and likely to vary according to the copyright laws of the nation where the lawsuit is held.

In the end, the dispute was settled out of court and the lawsuit was dropped. The dangers disputes of this nature pose to progaming include destabilization of established pro circuits, loss of sponsors, and potentially the shutting down of pro circuits altogether. Such disputes, however, are only likely to arise when a conflict of interests occurs, and given that progaming tends to benefit game developers, such conflicts of interests are unlikely. As for its implications outside the world of gaming, this case presents a question of intellectual property rights that has no directly analogous legal precedent in the United States.


He said it was for the most part fine, his one recommendation was that I add a sentence that explains the relevance of this issue to people who aren't really concerned with e-sports. That caught me off guard a bit, it wasn't something I had even considered lol. It didn't take much to fix though, I just tacked on the last sentence in the proposal above.

Anyways he said that he couldn't promise me anything but that he thought it would fit in well. Apparently he had been meaning to contact me about possibly doing a presentation anyways because of my involvement with a StarCraft winter term course I put together with butteryllama last January.

Anyways I found out a few days after the deadline they had accepted my proposal. I don't think they got a ton of proposals, so that probably helped me.

The symposium began today, my presentation is tomorrow. The presentations have been really interesting so far, I might post a summary of some of the more interesting things presented on later. The one disappointment is that the two key speakers I was most excited to hear, Peter Molyneux and Kathy Vrabeck (former president of EA casual division), cancelled at the last minute :-(

Anyways, I'm presenting on the IP rights issue that the drama between Blizzard and Korean pro Brood War revolved around. Here's the lecture I'm planning to give:

+ Show Spoiler [lecture] +
The question at the heart of my lecture is how far a game developer’s intellectual property rights extend over their own creation. Where does the creative control of the developer end, and that of the consumer begin? As with most issues relating to intellectual property rights, the question seems abstract to the point of irrelevance in the absence of real world applications. In this lecture I will therefore focus specifically on a legal battle between Activision Blizzard and the Korean e-Sports Players Association that arose from this very question. Before I jump into discussing the lawsuit itself however, there is a lot of context and background information you have to understand to follow the case.

I’ll start with a brief introduction to the world of professional gaming, or e-sports as it is often referred to. Competitive gaming has a long history: as far back as the early 80’s organizations were holding national tournaments for arcade gamers and a few already hoped to go professional. It wasn’t until the mid 90s, however, that videogames achieved the level of sophistication and the online support necessary to sustain a competitive community of high-level gamers. It was around this time that competitive scenes for various pc games such as Quake and Age of Empires started to take off.

Of all these games, the most successful by far was StarCraft, a science fiction real time strategy game developed by Blizzard Entertainment in 1997. The game became wildly popular in South Korea, where a financial downturn coincided with the spread of broadband Internet to make spending time in cheap gaming cafés known as PC Bangs a popular past time. As its popularity grew, major companies began sponsoring tournaments, players, and eventually entire teams.

By the early 2000s, professional StarCraft in South Korea had become a cultural phenomenon and the most successful e-sport of all time. Players earn stable salaries from their corporate sponsors and live and train together with their teammates in company-provided practice houses. They compete in front of live audiences of cheering fans, and their games are broadcast on prime time television by two separate cable stations dedicated to the coverage of professional gaming. There are three main leagues in which professional StarCraft players compete, the most important of which is Proleague. Proleague is a team league organized in the format of a yearlong tournament in which all teams have matches on a regular basis, and is really the bread and butter of the professional StarCraft circuit.

This entire infrastructure was and still is managed and overseen by a governing body formed in 2000 known as the Korean e-Sports Players Association, commonly abbreviated as KeSPA. Despite its name, KeSPA is made up of representatives of the various sponsors involved, and mostly represents their interests.

Now that we’ve established some background information, where did all the trouble begin? Blizzard Entertainment was content for a long time to observe from afar as its game developed into a professional e-sport without involving themselves directly. Then, in 2007, KeSPA claimed the broadcasting rights for Proleague and sold them to the highest bidder, a sports marketing company. The two broadcasting stations objected to KeSPA’s claim on the grounds that they created and ran Proleague almost entirely by themselves, but in the end were forced to give in.

This episode sparked Blizzard’s involvement. They felt that KeSPA had violated their intellectual property rights in claiming broadcasting rights over Proleague. Thus in 2007 Blizzard and KeSPA enter negotiations over the matter.

Nothing more of note is said or heard about these negotiations for three years. 2010 comes around. Blizzard Entertainment is now Activision Blizzard as a result of a merger, and the release of StarCraft 2 is fast approaching. Whereas the original StarCraft’s success was a happy accident, Activision Blizzard is developing and promoting StarCraft 2 as an e-sport. In April 2010, about three months before the release of StarCraft 2, Activision Blizzard breaks off negotiations with KeSPA, claiming in a public statement that their rights were not being recognized and negotiations had gone nowhere.

In response, KeSPA claimed that they had been willing to pay a “reasonable” fee for use of Blizzard games, but that Blizzard had made a series of unreasonable demands, upon which they refused to negotiate. These demands, which KeSPA published in violation of a non-disclosure agreement, included full ownership of all broadcasted materials, the right to authorize all league operations, and ownership of all broadcasted materials.

May 2010, one month later. Activision Blizzard sells the broadcasting rights for all Blizzard games in South Korea – including both StarCraft 1 and 2 – to a smaller broadcasting station, GomTV, and their parent company Gretech. To continue operating and broadcasting StarCraft legally, therefore, KeSPA and the broadcasting companies must now negotiate with Gretech. They are given a grace period until August for all the current leagues to finish. One of the broadcasting companies reaches an agreement with Gretech for a major tournament they are running that extends past the end of the grace period.

Negotiations between KeSPA and Gretech don’t start until late July. They meet four times, and the last meeting goes very poorly. While these negotiations were also conducted under a non-disclosure agreement, it seems that the main point of contention was scheduling. GomTV would be running a new StarCraft 2 league and wanted Proleague to give up prime time slots to avoid competition between the two. KeSPA refused and that was the end of negotiations. Gretech warned that a lawsuit would be unavoidable if Proleague continued to be broadcast. KeSPA had already announced that they intended to start the next season of Proleague regardless of how negotiations turned out.

The off-season ends without a settlement and all of the StarCraft leagues start up again. Activision Blizzard files lawsuits against both broadcasting companies in late October.

The cases are heard together over three court sessions, and both sides offer four main points.

Let’s start with the broadcasting companies. Their first argument was that there are limits to Blizzard’s IP rights over their games, particularly with respect to derivative works. While the broadcasters acknowledged the developers had some claim to broadcast materials, Blizzard could not fairly ask for full ownership of all content produced with their games.

For their second argument, the broadcasting companies pointed to article 29 of the copyright act of South Korea, which grants the right to play recorded materials for a public audience so long as they are not charging listeners or viewers for the performance. They argued that because viewers are not charged for attending StarCraft matches or watching from home, article 29 applies.

Their third argument was that article 28 of the copyright act of South Korea also applies, which allows for the use of quotations of works made public in ways similar to the fair use clause in American law. Additionally, the broadcasting companies point out that Blizzard has already profited greatly from professional StarCraft, and are only now making an issue of it in an attempt to abuse their rights.

Their final argument was that Blizzard’s demands in negotiations went well beyond their intellectual property rights, and that despite having sold exclusive rights to broadcasting their games to Gretech, Blizzard continued to take an active role both in the lawsuit and in negotiations.

On to Activision Blizzard’s and Gretech’s case. Their first argument was this case is without proper precedent, and is a clear violation of their IP rights.

Secondly, Blizzard and Gretech contested the claim that article 29 applies to this case. Article 29 specifically allows the performance of recorded materials. StarCraft broadcasts are not simply the playing of commercially pre-recorded material, but instead include additional features such as professional game play and casting.

For their third point Blizzard and Gretech also argued that article 28 doesn’t apply. Article 28 specifically protects the use of works for the purposes of news reporting, criticism, education, and research. StarCraft broadcasts fall into none of these categories. Additionally, they argued that claiming the broadcasting companies’ use of their game had not contributed positively to the development of the industry, as they were relying on IP violations to sustain their business practices.

For their final point they stressed the fact that one of the broadcasting stations had come to an agreement with Gretech for one of their tournaments over the summer, and thus had previously recognized their rights despite not doing so at present.

So how did all of this play out? Who won? Everybody, in a sense. Gretech washed their hands of the situation and returned broadcasting rights for the original StarCraft to Activision Blizzard, who continued attempts at negotiation. With only a few sticking points left, Blizzard settled negotiations with KeSPA and the broadcasting companies out of court and dropped the case. Essentially, Blizzard backed off from some of their more aggressive demands while KeSPA and the broadcasting stations paid licensing fees to Blizzard and agreed to display the Blizzard logo more prominently.

After the drama of Blizzard v. KeSPA and the fight over the future of the world’s most successful e-sport, the entire conflict was resolved without any definitive answer to the question at the crux of the matter: how far do a game developer’s intellectual property rights extend over the use of their products, specifically in the context of professional competition?

It’s a question with very important implications for competitive gaming. The legal battle alone nearly ended professional StarCraft in South Korea. Bad press is an anathema to sponsors. Even more dangerous, one of the options Blizzard seriously considered was filing an injunction to stop all broadcasting of StarCraft 1 until the court case had been settled. Had that gone through, the injunction alone would likely have dealt a fatal blow to an industry that for all its achievements, is still very fragile.

Blizzard initially demanded 100% ownership of all broadcast materials and the final say in matters ranging from choice in sponsorship to player contracts. If that were set as a precedent, it would grant game developers a monopolistic control over competitive play of their titles. It is worth noting that game developers do have a lot to gain in reputation and sales if their games are successful competitively. At the same time, the ultimate goal of a game developer is to maximize sales, not promote e-sports. These are not always goals that coincide.

This dispute also has interesting implications for intellectual property rights in general. Blizzard was correct that this case is without a clear legal precedent, and the jurisprudence of intellectual property rights is complicated and varies between countries. There are a couple key legal principles that apply, however.

The first of these is to note that the broadcast materials constitute derivative works. Derivative works are works that include copyrighted material as a significant component, but are sufficiently modified as to constitute an original creation. Clearly, professional StarCraft matches fall into this category. The game itself is copyrighted, but the performances of the players are as original as the performances of competitors in any other game or sport.

Under American copyright law, the copyright owner has the exclusive rights to authorize the creation of derivative works. This is fairly cut and dry. In most cases, all this means for professional gaming organizers is paying royalties, and if a game developer makes more onerous demands, organizers can simply not invest.

As demonstrated in this case, however, there does exist the potential for situations in which taking things to court becomes the last option for both parties. As professional gaming grows and becomes more profitable, the likelihood of these situations will only increase. The best hope in American copyright law for the organizers and broadcasters of professional gaming leagues in this case is the fair use clause. Fair use is determined on the basis of four criteria, and qualifies as a complete defense against copyright infringement should it apply.

The first of these for criteria is the purpose and character of a work. Works that are considered transformative in their use of copyrighted material tend to pass this test, whereas works that merely “supersede the objects” of the copyrighted material tend to fail this test. This test is perhaps best known for protecting parodies from copyright infringement suits. In this case everything hinges on whether an individual’s game play qualifies as “transformative,” which is almost impossible to predict. There are no legal precedents for this and there are no explicit guidelines for determining what qualifies as transformative.

The second criterion, the nature of the copied work, protects expression of information that belongs in public domain, and does not protect professional gaming.

The third criterion is amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole. None of these criteria, of course, were designed with professional gaming in mind, but this third one is perhaps the least clear in its application to this issue. What percentage of the videogame is being used when you broadcast a round of multiplayer mode?

The last criterion is the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. This last criterion is especially important. Videos or broadcasts of professional gamers obviously do not act as a substitute for owning and being able to play the game itself, so making the case that broadcasts encroach upon the market for the game they show would be exceedingly difficult. All things considered, no clear conclusion can at this point be drawn as to whether the fair use defense would pass muster if a case like this went to court. The issue is further complicated by the fact that game developers can set stipulations for use of their products in derivative works in end-user licensing agreements, the enforceability of which is still in question.

I opened by asking where the rights of the game developer end and where those of the consumer begin. The legal system does not yet have a clear answer to this question. My personal stance is that there’s a limit to how much control a game developer can rightfully demand over the use of their product, and that Activision Blizzard overstepped that limit. Certainly Blizzard has the right to collect royalties for the use of their games in televised tournaments. That being said, professional StarCraft broadcasts are truly original products that represent a huge amount of time, passion, and hard work on the part of the players, the commentators, and everyone else involved. To demand ownership of and control over these broadcasts is not only a detriment to the professional scene, but also a devaluation of all that time and effort and a violation of the intellectual property rights of the individuals involved.

The challenge for me is covering a topic in 10-15 minutes that requires presenting so much background info. It's not perfect and I'm going to be working with it a lot tonight, along with practicing it to make sure my delivery is relatively fluid. I'm also thinking about throwing together a simple powerpoint (just a few key images, maybe a couple short summaries of important points) to supplement this. Any feedback at all is of course very welcome, even if it's excessively negative, anything that helps me improve is welcome.

Symposium Website, it's hosted by DePauw University

Huge thanks to all the translators here on teamliquid, especially Milkis, the translated articles were invaluable. I'll add a list of sources later for anyone interested, it's mostly translations on here.

+ Show Spoiler +
sick brag blog


Edit: Also go figure, my first blog was also my first post as a drone, my second blog is also my first post as a chogoling.

*****
Torenhire
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States11681 Posts
October 10 2011 23:50 GMT
#2
Choboling?


I read through the lecture, it's pretty good. TBH I think content is good, however presenting that in 10-15 minutes is probably gonna be tough. I didnt time how fast I read it, and obviously reading is different than speaking, but good luck.
SirJolt: Well maybe if you weren't so big and stupid, it wouldn't have hit you.
MisterFred
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2033 Posts
October 11 2011 00:10 GMT
#3
I have one big tip - do not reveal to anyone your username. Also, "As for its implications outside the world of gaming, this case presents a question of intellectual property rights that has no directly analogous legal precedent in the United States." - there seems to be the obvious analogy of Scrabble tournaments, Boggle tournaments, etc. I dunno if any of those were non-company run, but it could be relevant.
"The victor? Not the highest scoring, nor the best strategist, nor the best tactitian. The victor was he that was closest to the Tao of FFA." -.Praetor
flamewheel
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
October 11 2011 00:51 GMT
#4
conTAgi0n so qt <3
Writerdamn, i was two days from retirement
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 58m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 314
StarCraft: Brood War
actioN 233
Nal_rA 173
JulyZerg 80
Rock 35
ajuk12(nOOB) 33
Noble 21
Bale 12
Dota 2
XcaliburYe128
NeuroSwarm71
BananaSlamJamma18
League of Legends
JimRising 718
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1395
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King254
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor126
Other Games
summit1g7344
shahzam883
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick945
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH303
• OhrlRock 4
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• ZZZeroYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota276
League of Legends
• Rush1283
• Lourlo1080
• Stunt457
• HappyZerGling114
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
2h 58m
RSL Revival
2h 58m
ByuN vs Classic
Clem vs Cham
WardiTV European League
8h 58m
Replay Cast
16h 58m
RSL Revival
1d 2h
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
WardiTV European League
1d 8h
FEL
1d 8h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 19h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
[ Show More ]
FEL
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL: ProLeague
3 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Disclosure: This page contains affiliate marketing links that support TLnet.

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.