| Blogs > Boonbag |
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
So. Ef 50 mm 1.4 or EF 50 mm 2.5 macro or just fuck it all and go with a summicron 50, knowing of course 5d II viewfinder is as dark and blurry as my ass is.... someone tell me ! edit : btw I've been using an elmarit 100 mm f4 makro and whenever its a tad dark takes an eagle eye to make the crap focus properly.  | ||
|
josemb40
Peru611 Posts
| ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
| ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
| ||
|
Hittegods
Stockholm4642 Posts
| ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
| ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
On August 09 2011 05:16 Hittegods wrote: I'm just sad to hear that you've got a blurry ass, my condolences. thanks | ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
Hope one sees this blog, I guess, though you might want to make your question more clear in the OP, I for one am not sure exactly what you're asking. | ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
I need to buy a 50 mm lense. Canon 50 mm line up kind of fails and its hard to decide. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On August 09 2011 05:11 Boonbag wrote: and i'd rather take advice from TL nerds as photographers are all a bunch of faggots. User was warned for this post Whether that turns out to be true or not [it isn't], it doesn't impact the fact they have the answers you seek. Stop being a douche and go ask people who will know for sure instead of hoping the 1/5000 TL members who know a) see this and b) can be bothered replying | ||
|
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
For example: If you NEED macro, then obviously the 50 1.4 ain't gonna cut it If you NEED low light portraits, then obviously you want the 1.4 If you NEED autofocus, then the summicron won't work, would it? Not to mention the summicron ain't "cheap" as you are "poor" | ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
so a used summicron R goes for about 500 euros i guess the canon 1.4 IQ is shit but its still 1.4 and it's af is pure fail imo I have all i need for macro. I'm talkin about the 2.5 macro because it has far better IQ than any other 50 mm in canon lineup (sadly). the AF is the main issue because of the shit viewfinder of the 5d mark ii and most pros sadly don't know shit about third party gear and internet doesn't really have a clue either (too biased) thing is people using leica lenses on their dslr will say its the best people mounting medium format lenses on their dslr will say anything else is shit then most people will say all this doesn't matter because it won't show on the print anyhow besides low light is fine with the mark ii's iso perfomance you can perfectly shoot low light with no noise whatsoever even above 1600 iso nowadays | ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
I'm bored of internet photographic litterature. It's all so crappy. | ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
edit : another affordable option would be the 40 mm ultron in canon mount. | ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
3d is also a + | ||
|
neSix
United States1772 Posts
http://photo.stackexchange.com/ I can't offer any other advice, sorry. And my guess is that the warning was probably more related to the blatant disregarding of all professionals in the fields as anything derogatory and not so much the language used. | ||
|
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
As far as colors and contrast, most people do say the 2.5 is better than the 1.4. You don't like the Canon forums? | ||
|
Boonbag
France3318 Posts
edit : even for conspiracies | ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
WardiTV Qualifier
OSC
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
AI Arena Tournament
BSL Open Qualifier
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
