| Blogs > Riku |
|
Marradron
Netherlands1586 Posts
On July 08 2011 20:56 Xiron wrote: why do you americans write 'mia' instead of the common 'ss' like in missing? Stands for missing in action. I believe it's a commen term in america for missing soldiers ? | ||
|
arb
Noobville17922 Posts
On July 08 2011 21:06 Marradron wrote: Stands for missing in action. I believe it's a commen term in america for missing soldiers ? I think its used everywhere, but yeah thats right | ||
|
Marradron
Netherlands1586 Posts
On July 08 2011 21:08 arb wrote: I think its used everywhere, but yeah thats right Well in europe most countries dont use it since english is not the main language. Therefore the simpler term missing is more mainstream. | ||
|
arb
Noobville17922 Posts
On July 08 2011 21:11 Marradron wrote: Well in europe most countries dont use it since english is not the main language. Therefore the simpler term missing is more mainstream. Ah true enough, whatever system you use is all good. I think ive seen a couple ss in games, a few -1/-2(dota?) and mostly MIA though. | ||
|
Inkarnate
Canada840 Posts
back sunfire cape quote demaciaaaaaaaaa | ||
|
Zorkmid
4410 Posts
On July 08 2011 20:56 Xiron wrote: why do you americans write 'mia' instead of the common 'ss' like in missing? Stands for missing in action. | ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36401 Posts
On July 08 2011 14:33 Riku wrote: I do believe you can sell hand-made fan art. Also, Riot is a chill company, so I'm sure they wouldn't have issue. I am almost certain that this is false, "they are chill, they will give me free licensing rights" has worked roughly 0 times in the history of intellectual property. | ||
|
Riku
United States1064 Posts
On July 09 2011 00:45 Hot_Bid wrote: I am almost certain that this is false, "they are chill, they will give me free licensing rights" has worked roughly 0 times in the history of intellectual property. I'm sure they aren't going to care about 5-20 shirts I make, mostly for my friends. It's basically wearable fanart, so I am almost 100% sure there wouldn't be an issue. ESPECIALLY, if I'm not making a profit from it. | ||
JBright
Vancouver14381 Posts
| ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
On July 09 2011 00:55 Riku wrote: I'm sure they aren't going to care about 5-20 shirts I make, mostly for my friends. It's basically wearable fanart, so I am almost 100% sure there wouldn't be an issue. ESPECIALLY, if I'm not making a profit from it. If they wanted to work on the edges of the law, they might sue you in order to utilize what is in all practicality a form of collateral estoppel. While their use of your case certainly does not fit perfectly into the already non-traditional concept of offensive, non-mutual collateral estoppel, assuming the appropriate jurisdiction utilizes such concepts, the rationale behind it might be useful to them. And Riku, don't get me started by saying "-_-, it's not really CE!!!" I know it's not. It's the idea that I'm trying to get at. In other words, they might go after you (an extreme case) so that when they sue people making money off mass produced tshirts they can say "we won against Riku, a 21 year old girl making tshirts for her friends, this case is easy." Precedent is what's really at issue. But I mention CE because when they mention your case, they've essentially won all future cases. You ever wonder why movie companies sue poor grandmas who downloaded Will Smith's "Hitch" then erased it the next day? It's not because they're stupid. They want the tough cases. You'd be Riot's granny. Of course, you can't forgot how the concepts of pendent jurisdiction and the Brennan's sliding scale test might be detrimental to the purported parties. | ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
OSC
WardiTV Weekly
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
