|
these threads are so bizarre
|
On May 20 2011 08:55 elmizzt wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 08:51 vOdToasT wrote:
Plato was a fucking dumbass. He held ridicilous beliefs that have no evidence. that's a pretty mean thing to say about someone in his own blog...
Yeah really, what's with the past tense?
oh, and this is bad
|
On May 20 2011 08:55 elmizzt wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 08:51 vOdToasT wrote:
Plato was a fucking dumbass. He held ridicilous beliefs that have no evidence. that's a pretty mean thing to say about someone in his own blog...
I'm not insulting OP, I'm insulting Plato.
|
On May 20 2011 09:12 vOdToasT wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 08:55 elmizzt wrote:On May 20 2011 08:51 vOdToasT wrote:
Plato was a fucking dumbass. He held ridicilous beliefs that have no evidence. that's a pretty mean thing to say about someone in his own blog... I'm not insulting OP, I'm insulting Plato.
That is worse.
|
On May 20 2011 09:19 platorepublic wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 09:12 vOdToasT wrote:On May 20 2011 08:55 elmizzt wrote:On May 20 2011 08:51 vOdToasT wrote:
Plato was a fucking dumbass. He held ridicilous beliefs that have no evidence. that's a pretty mean thing to say about someone in his own blog... I'm not insulting OP, I'm insulting Plato. That is worse.
No, that is good. I mean bad.
|
On May 20 2011 08:51 mizU wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 08:37 Zurles wrote:On May 20 2011 08:32 Talin wrote:On May 20 2011 08:07 elmizzt wrote:
You have my sword. And you have my bow. and Myyyy Axe! So... where are we going?
We are going towards goodness.
|
|
|
It would be more constructive if you explained why you are confused.
|
On May 20 2011 09:22 platorepublic wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 08:51 mizU wrote:On May 20 2011 08:37 Zurles wrote:On May 20 2011 08:32 Talin wrote:On May 20 2011 08:07 elmizzt wrote:
You have my sword. And you have my bow. and Myyyy Axe! javascript:addUBB('img') So... where are we going? We are going towards goodness.
Not necessarily. Good can be defined such that the exploration does not lead to good. There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path.
|
On May 20 2011 09:53 duckett wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 09:22 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 08:51 mizU wrote:On May 20 2011 08:37 Zurles wrote:On May 20 2011 08:32 Talin wrote:On May 20 2011 08:07 elmizzt wrote:
You have my sword. And you have my bow. and Myyyy Axe! javascript:addUBB('img') So... where are we going? We are going towards goodness. Not necessarily. Good can be defined such that the exploration does not lead to good. There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path.
If we don't explore, how can we even know anything then?
It's better than doing nothing.
|
On May 20 2011 08:29 quandle wrote:
Plato's philosophy this? Plato's philosophy that? I thought he wrote stories about an old guy that only asked questions.
yes, and what's your point
|
On May 20 2011 09:55 platorepublic wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 09:53 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 09:22 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 08:51 mizU wrote:On May 20 2011 08:37 Zurles wrote:On May 20 2011 08:32 Talin wrote:On May 20 2011 08:07 elmizzt wrote:
You have my sword. And you have my bow. and Myyyy Axe! javascript:addUBB('img') So... where are we going? We are going towards goodness. Not necessarily. Good can be defined such that the exploration does not lead to good. There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. If we don't explore, how can we even know anything then? It's better than doing nothing.
Why is it better than doing nothing? To answer this, you would have to define better, which would presuppose a definition of good to at least some extent.
|
On May 20 2011 09:41 Hyren wrote:
I'm so confused.
Good.
|
On May 20 2011 09:57 duckett wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 09:55 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 09:53 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 09:22 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 08:51 mizU wrote:On May 20 2011 08:37 Zurles wrote:On May 20 2011 08:32 Talin wrote:On May 20 2011 08:07 elmizzt wrote:
You have my sword. And you have my bow. and Myyyy Axe! javascript:addUBB('img') So... where are we going? We are going towards goodness. Not necessarily. Good can be defined such that the exploration does not lead to good. There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. If we don't explore, how can we even know anything then? It's better than doing nothing. Why is it better than doing nothing? To answer this, you would have to define better, which would presuppose a definition of good to at least some extent.
So let's say you do nothing, then.
|
On May 20 2011 10:02 platorepublic wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 09:57 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 09:55 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 09:53 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 09:22 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 08:51 mizU wrote:On May 20 2011 08:37 Zurles wrote:On May 20 2011 08:32 Talin wrote:On May 20 2011 08:07 elmizzt wrote:
You have my sword. And you have my bow. and Myyyy Axe! javascript:addUBB('img') So... where are we going? We are going towards goodness. Not necessarily. Good can be defined such that the exploration does not lead to good. There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. If we don't explore, how can we even know anything then? It's better than doing nothing. Why is it better than doing nothing? To answer this, you would have to define better, which would presuppose a definition of good to at least some extent. So let's say you do nothing, then.
Yes.
|
On May 20 2011 10:02 duckett wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 10:02 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 09:57 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 09:55 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 09:53 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 09:22 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 08:51 mizU wrote:On May 20 2011 08:37 Zurles wrote:On May 20 2011 08:32 Talin wrote:On May 20 2011 08:07 elmizzt wrote:
You have my sword. And you have my bow. and Myyyy Axe! javascript:addUBB('img') So... where are we going? We are going towards goodness. Not necessarily. Good can be defined such that the exploration does not lead to good. There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. If we don't explore, how can we even know anything then? It's better than doing nothing. Why is it better than doing nothing? To answer this, you would have to define better, which would presuppose a definition of good to at least some extent. So let's say you do nothing, then. Yes.
You just did.
|
On May 20 2011 10:14 platorepublic wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 10:02 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 10:02 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 09:57 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 09:55 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 09:53 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 09:22 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 08:51 mizU wrote:On May 20 2011 08:37 Zurles wrote:On May 20 2011 08:32 Talin wrote:
[quote]
And you have my bow.
and Myyyy Axe! javascript:addUBB('img') So... where are we going? We are going towards goodness. Not necessarily. Good can be defined such that the exploration does not lead to good. There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. If we don't explore, how can we even know anything then? It's better than doing nothing. Why is it better than doing nothing? To answer this, you would have to define better, which would presuppose a definition of good to at least some extent. So let's say you do nothing, then. Yes. You just did.
If a post is made in a blog, and no one reads it, was it truly written?
|
On May 20 2011 10:14 platorepublic wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 10:02 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 10:02 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 09:57 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 09:55 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 09:53 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 09:22 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 08:51 mizU wrote:On May 20 2011 08:37 Zurles wrote:On May 20 2011 08:32 Talin wrote:
[quote]
And you have my bow.
and Myyyy Axe! javascript:addUBB('img') So... where are we going? We are going towards goodness. Not necessarily. Good can be defined such that the exploration does not lead to good. There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. If we don't explore, how can we even know anything then? It's better than doing nothing. Why is it better than doing nothing? To answer this, you would have to define better, which would presuppose a definition of good to at least some extent. So let's say you do nothing, then. Yes. You just did.
We are not finished.
|
On May 20 2011 10:18 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2011 10:14 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 10:02 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 10:02 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 09:57 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 09:55 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 09:53 duckett wrote:On May 20 2011 09:22 platorepublic wrote:On May 20 2011 08:51 mizU wrote:On May 20 2011 08:37 Zurles wrote:
[quote]
and Myyyy Axe! javascript:addUBB('img') So... where are we going? We are going towards goodness. Not necessarily. Good can be defined such that the exploration does not lead to good. There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. If we don't explore, how can we even know anything then? It's better than doing nothing. Why is it better than doing nothing? To answer this, you would have to define better, which would presuppose a definition of good to at least some extent. So let's say you do nothing, then. Yes. You just did. If a post is made in a blog, and no one reads it, was it truly written?
Good going. You just broke philosophy. >:o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
