EPTI hate smurfs - Page 2
| Blogs > Eeryck |
|
Coramoor
Canada455 Posts
| ||
|
DeckOneBell
United States526 Posts
On February 22 2011 05:43 Slunk wrote: This is bullshit. Nobody loses on purpose to fall down from diamond to bronze. You are just facing low level player that are better than you. It would take like 50 losses to get from diamond to bronze and only 20 to get back up, this doesnt make any sense. I've met a bronze player while I was in diamond, probably when his MMR was on the upswing. It happens. Not too hard to disconnect every other game, win one, quit right away, win one, quit right away... Repeat ad nauseum. It makes sense and it happens. | ||
|
butchji
Germany1531 Posts
| ||
|
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
EDIT: Well obviously some people sandbag and OP has found evidence of this, but just because you are in Silver and going against a team with a platinum member does not mean a player is doing anything weird. | ||
intrigue
Washington, D.C9934 Posts
| ||
|
Espelz
Germany828 Posts
But i have to agree : in 1on1 its just stupid, demoralizing for the players who don´t stand a chance, and to me it would be extremly boring to try to play bronze all the time for a different pic on the screen. | ||
|
Eeryck
United States184 Posts
On February 22 2011 07:09 intrigue wrote: pretty sure your issue is more with people being dicks, rather than mysterious malicious users on bnet2 abusing the matchmaking system just to fuck with you. don't feel gipped because you are playing a team with high 1v1-rank players, because you are matched by team rating. This is somewhat correct. Although I find those that are being dicks much easier to tolerate if I see a Victory screen at the end. ------------------ I was not saying that anyone in 2v2 was sandbagging. I guess I really can't understand how someone Platinum 1v1 teamed with someone Diamond 1v1 could make a main race team and place in Silver 2v2 then have a 50/50 win ratio with that team. Perhaps if it were off-race I could understand. ------------------ With the high level and low level friends, these teams tend not to be dicks. In fact, it is usually clear that one player is much worse and even when we get ROFL stomped by the better player, the replay and profile check after typically show this. Honestly these games tend to be fun because we do moderately well enough that if we get lucky and hit the better player with the combined attack we stand a chance in the game. Of course when we are unlucky and kill or nearly kill the lower ranked player, it is usually death by macro. =) ----------------- Anyway thanks for all the replys and reading my rant. I am done working for the day so thanks for helping me pass the time. =) | ||
|
Catch]22
Sweden2683 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.f.kth.se/~f97-jsc/smurf/SmurfIceCream.jpg) | ||
|
selboN
United States2523 Posts
On February 22 2011 05:43 Slunk wrote: This is bullshit. Nobody loses on purpose to fall down from diamond to bronze. You are just facing low level player that are better than you. It would take like 50 losses to get from diamond to bronze and only 20 to get back up, this doesnt make any sense. Lol yeah they do, I have a player on my CSL team who has 2 accounts. One is primarily for "fun" which he got demoted from Diamond to Bronze. | ||
|
Eeryck
United States184 Posts
On February 22 2011 07:51 Catch]22 wrote: Y U HAET? Haters gonna hate! I thought about that when I made the topic. I never was fond of the smurfs. I never did like how the replaced 60% of the verbs with "smurf". | ||
|
Sm3agol
United States2055 Posts
1 v 1, I can understand your beef....but team games.....they're for the lulz. When I try i can beast up 4 v 4 games due to most of the players being terrid, but why try in team games? | ||
| ||
