EPTNow I used the program after I played with an AI and the biggest shock that happened is:
+ Show Spoiler +
![[image loading]](http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/6910/apmz.jpg)
isn't it bad?
MY APM Pattern
| Blogs > Ambergris_sTarTer |
|
Ambergris_sTarTer
Philippines166 Posts
Now I used the program after I played with an AI and the biggest shock that happened is: + Show Spoiler + isn't it bad? | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
im confused | ||
|
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
| ||
|
exeexe
Denmark937 Posts
| ||
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11598 Posts
speed up yo! | ||
|
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
| ||
|
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11598 Posts
| ||
|
prototype.
Canada4215 Posts
| ||
|
wooozy
3813 Posts
| ||
|
vectorix108
United States4633 Posts
| ||
swanized
Canada2480 Posts
On October 03 2010 05:22 Subversive wrote: Doesn't that make you faster than Stork? :p O_O stork, has 350 if I recall | ||
|
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
What I honestly don'y know is how they already have 200 EAPM by the first two or three minutes. Sometimes with th scouting probe to use I might get like 160, but nowhere near 200 and until I actually have an army to start moving around the map I don't know what they are doing to have 200 EAPM that soon. | ||
|
Terranist
United States2496 Posts
On October 03 2010 05:19 CaucasianAsian wrote: my APM is hovering around 350 at the moment, with my EAPM around 240 speed up yo! so is the OSL just not good enough for you? | ||
|
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11598 Posts
| ||
|
Impervious
Canada4218 Posts
| ||
|
Ambergris_sTarTer
Philippines166 Posts
On October 03 2010 05:15 Divinek wrote: you spam early game like everyone else? im confused it appears that. | ||
|
Biochemist
United States1008 Posts
On October 03 2010 07:33 CaucasianAsian wrote: i didn't say i was good. i just suck at the game. my micro isn't nearly good enough, nor is my timings. I have the opposite problem. I'm not good either, but I made it to C (zerg) with something like 50-70 EAPM where all of my opponents have 150+ I'm too slow  | ||
|
meathook
1289 Posts
On October 03 2010 08:48 Biochemist wrote: I have the opposite problem. I'm not good either, but I made it to C (zerg) with something like 50-70 EAPM where all of my opponents have 150+ I'm too slow Masslings ftw. | ||
|
Biochemist
United States1008 Posts
Nah, I tried to always play standard  But I lost a lot of games because my third or lurkers would be too late in ZvT because I didn't maintain my macro during muta harass and such. | ||
|
Ambergris_sTarTer
Philippines166 Posts
On October 03 2010 08:48 Biochemist wrote: I have the opposite problem. I'm not good either, but I made it to C (zerg) with something like 50-70 EAPM where all of my opponents have 150+ I'm too slow You know what, I envy you. You at least can fight with that kind of speed. I'm slow too but never had an experience to try at least a C opponent | ||
|
Impervious
Canada4218 Posts
On October 04 2010 22:03 Ambergris_sTarTer wrote: You know what, I envy you. You at least can fight with that kind of speed. I'm slow too but never had an experience to try at least a C opponent TBH, the difference between D+ and C- is only things like slightly better timings and doing a bunch of little things right that you miss at D+. I'd bet a C feels the same about the difference between a C and a C-..... I know someone in the B ranks that described the same type of differences between himself and a C+ player as well, so I'd guess it holds true everywhere on the ranking (until the B+/A- bracket, then I dunno, because that is a seriously tough line to cross)..... I hit C- pretty comfortably in my 3rd season (not a very active player) with just a bit over 100 apm on average, and about 90 EAPM..... And I'd still consider myself pretty terrible - poor micro, poor macro, and poor timings. | ||
|
meathook
1289 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/331/patternq.png) Heh.. what does it mean? | ||
| ||
