• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:55
CEST 03:55
KST 10:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes60BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch0Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
Soulkey on ASL S20 ASL20 General Discussion BW General Discussion ASL TICKET LIVE help! :D NaDa's Body
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
i'm really bored guys
Peanutsc
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1637 users

Math Puzzle #3 - Page 3

Blogs > mieda
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 All
mieda
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States85 Posts
September 11 2010 14:21 GMT
#41
On September 11 2010 23:16 FiBsTeR wrote:
Gogogo muirhead! MIT fighting! :D

Remember me mieda? We played on iccup and east before. Do you play sc2 now?

Oh and btw it's not being able to solve problems like these that push me further and further into the less pure land of CS.


Hey Fibster, yea I remember you of course. We were in team "Galois" at iccup for brief time hah!

I don't play sc2 now, since my computer can't run it. But it's better that way, since I wasted too much time on iccup anyway .

Harvard CSL is all SC2 now. I guess it's the same for MIT CSL?
BottleAbuser
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
Korea (South)1888 Posts
September 11 2010 15:59 GMT
#42
So, as I understand it, we need to find a way to find the values for a and b? Proving the last statement, that they exist, is trivial.
Compilers are like boyfriends, you miss a period and they go crazy on you.
KristianJS
Profile Joined October 2009
2107 Posts
September 11 2010 16:09 GMT
#43
On September 12 2010 00:59 BottleAbuser wrote:
So, as I understand it, we need to find a way to find the values for a and b? Proving the last statement, that they exist, is trivial.


Um, that's not trivial at all, and is actually what you're asked to prove.

You need to be 100% behind someone before you can stab them in the back
BottleAbuser
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
Korea (South)1888 Posts
September 11 2010 19:21 GMT
#44
Once again I demonstrate my math illiteracy.

Someone mentioned that if the fields are the same, the polynomials of f and g can be proven to be of the same degree.

What if f(x) = x, and g(x) = x^3? The images of both functions are all reals, and they are not of the same degree.
Compilers are like boyfriends, you miss a period and they go crazy on you.
mieda
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States85 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-11 19:31:03
September 11 2010 19:30 GMT
#45
On September 12 2010 04:21 BottleAbuser wrote:
Once again I demonstrate my math illiteracy.

Someone mentioned that if the fields are the same, the polynomials of f and g can be proven to be of the same degree.

What if f(x) = x, and g(x) = x^3? The images of both functions are all reals, and they are not of the same degree.


Images over the rational numbers, my friend, over the rational numbers. And I already remarked that you can easily find counter examples over the reals or over the complex
Fly[DCT]
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada38 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-11 19:50:27
September 11 2010 19:49 GMT
#46
On September 12 2010 04:21 BottleAbuser wrote:
Once again I demonstrate my math illiteracy.

Someone mentioned that if the fields are the same, the polynomials of f and g can be proven to be of the same degree.

What if f(x) = x, and g(x) = x^3? The images of both functions are all reals, and they are not of the same degree.


Your choice of f and g does not satisfy the hypothesis he is given. He said f(Q) must equal to g(Q). For your f and g, they are definitely not equal.

In particular, g(Q) is smaller in your case. For example, your g(Q) does not include 2, since there is no rational number whose cube is equal to 2.


Anyways, it's a shame that I am not quite sure how to do this problem nor even understand some of the discussions (although I do have a master degree in mathematics). I have always been somewhat an analyst than an algebraist .
lalalalala
KristianJS
Profile Joined October 2009
2107 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-12 00:19:35
September 11 2010 21:00 GMT
#47
Quite stumped with this problem right now. The problem is just the approach to use...The only sort of strategy I've had that seems like it might possibly get anywhere is as follows:

For each rational number x, there is a rational q s.t. f(x)=g(q). If we fix some rational x_0 and restrict to a small neighbourhood in which g is injective, we can define a function h on the rationals such that for every x

g(h(x))=f(x)

Now we'd be done if we can show that h is a polynomial and deg(g)=deg(f), but I dunno if this can be done in any easy way. Showing that h is a polynomial might involve using an argument with the chain rule, but I'm not sure.

I'll think some more but I don't seem to be getting anywhere so far @_@


EDIT: Note by the way that when you restrict to a neighbourhood of x_0 you can WLOG assume that f(x_0)=g(x_0), which may help. My geometric intuition is that if you normalize like this and then look at a rational close to x_0, then f and g must vary continuously and furthermore they have to vary in more or less the same way. But this intuition is too general and is not enough to pin down the solution...
You need to be 100% behind someone before you can stab them in the back
mieda
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States85 Posts
September 12 2010 04:16 GMT
#48
On September 12 2010 06:00 KristianJS wrote:
Quite stumped with this problem right now. The problem is just the approach to use...The only sort of strategy I've had that seems like it might possibly get anywhere is as follows:

For each rational number x, there is a rational q s.t. f(x)=g(q). If we fix some rational x_0 and restrict to a small neighbourhood in which g is injective, we can define a function h on the rationals such that for every x

g(h(x))=f(x)

Now we'd be done if we can show that h is a polynomial and deg(g)=deg(f), but I dunno if this can be done in any easy way. Showing that h is a polynomial might involve using an argument with the chain rule, but I'm not sure.

I'll think some more but I don't seem to be getting anywhere so far @_@


EDIT: Note by the way that when you restrict to a neighbourhood of x_0 you can WLOG assume that f(x_0)=g(x_0), which may help. My geometric intuition is that if you normalize like this and then look at a rational close to x_0, then f and g must vary continuously and furthermore they have to vary in more or less the same way. But this intuition is too general and is not enough to pin down the solution...


You can look at it locally at each point, or look at what happens when x and q get very large (from f(x) = g(q)), and perhaps this might give an idea how to show deg f = deg g.
mieda
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States85 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-12 05:43:52
September 12 2010 05:43 GMT
#49
On September 12 2010 06:00 KristianJS wrote:
Quite stumped with this problem right now. The problem is just the approach to use...The only sort of strategy I've had that seems like it might possibly get anywhere is as follows:

For each rational number x, there is a rational q s.t. f(x)=g(q). If we fix some rational x_0 and restrict to a small neighbourhood in which g is injective, we can define a function h on the rationals such that for every x

g(h(x))=f(x)

Now we'd be done if we can show that h is a polynomial and deg(g)=deg(f), but I dunno if this can be done in any easy way. Showing that h is a polynomial might involve using an argument with the chain rule, but I'm not sure.

I'll think some more but I don't seem to be getting anywhere so far @_@


EDIT: Note by the way that when you restrict to a neighbourhood of x_0 you can WLOG assume that f(x_0)=g(x_0), which may help. My geometric intuition is that if you normalize like this and then look at a rational close to x_0, then f and g must vary continuously and furthermore they have to vary in more or less the same way. But this intuition is too general and is not enough to pin down the solution...


How about thinking along this line: modulus some details omitted, you can find a global function h(x) for x sufficiently large, so that g(h(x)) = f(x) (as you have written). Clearly |h(x)| -> infinity as x -> infinity. Assume for now h(x) > 0 for x sufficiently large, and start going through integer values of x as x -> infinity. The rational root theorem guarantees that h(x) will always lie in some fixed discrete subgroup of Q (in fact (1/a)*Z where a is the leading coefficient of g).
mieda
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States85 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-12 15:10:32
September 12 2010 14:46 GMT
#50
Solution

The idea is that (mod the full details) there's a fixed discrete subgroup L of Q such that for any integer x, the rational solutions, viewed in y, of g(y) = f(x) are all in L. To extract the behavior of y as x varies, and compare the coefficients at the same time, i.e. the growth rates, you can consider expressions of the form g(y') - g(y) = f(x+1) - f(x) where y' is the corresponding rational number such that g(y') = f(x+1). By mean value theorem (don't quite need this, since f,g are polynomials so one can potentially do all the computations by algebra) the expression extracts out y' - y in terms of f'(x) and g'(y) roughly, and this gives a good comparison of y as x varies. This is the idea, and I do some computations to show that this works.

Also, simple valuation calculations (plug in this, plug in that rational number, compare the p-adic valuations) don't really seem to get anywhere, as I give plenty of counter examples to the claims of one of the posters above.
KristianJS
Profile Joined October 2009
2107 Posts
September 12 2010 20:31 GMT
#51
I have to admit that the solution to this problem eluded me. I was probably a bit too reluctant to actually start manipulating polynomial expressions and looking for too slick a proof. A nice problem though!
You need to be 100% behind someone before you can stab them in the back
gyth
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
657 Posts
September 12 2010 21:35 GMT
#52
So, given that f(x) and g(y) have congruent ranges, prove that they are linear transformations of each other???

Take f(x) = x^3 + 4x and g(x) = x^3 + x^2 - 2x.

Do these functions satisfy the conditions given in the problem?
(for what values of a,b?)
The plural of anecdote is not data.
mieda
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States85 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-12 22:29:25
September 12 2010 21:58 GMT
#53
On September 13 2010 06:35 gyth wrote:
So, given that f(x) and g(y) have congruent ranges, prove that they are linear transformations of each other???


Yes, that there's an affine coordinate change, y = ax + b

Take f(x) = x^3 + 4x and g(x) = x^3 + x^2 - 2x.
Do these functions satisfy the conditions given in the problem?
(for what values of a,b?)


They don't. But that's a specific counter-example to Muirhead's claim (one of the two). What he wrote is that either v(f(x)) <= 0 or v(f(x)) >= 2, and v(g(p)) is not in that range, with p = 2, based on v(4) = 2 and v(2) = 1. Read what he wrote above. He was claiming in general that if p^r exactly divides a_1 but not b_1 then v(f(x)) <= 0 or v(f(x)) >= 2 and v(g(p)) > 1 and v(g(p)) <= 2. This example certainly has v(g(p)) = 3 though.

The other example, a better one, is g(x) = x^3 + x^2 - 2x and g(x+1) = x^3 + 4x^2 + 3x. Clearly g(x) and g(x+1) share the same image on the ratoinals, but look at the coefficients of g(x+1) and g(x). 3 and -2 have different p-adic valuations for p = 3 and p = 2. Again, read what he proposed as a solution above.

What he thought is that if the coefficients of least degree are not the same (or rather, differ by more than a multiplicative unit of Z, plus/minus 1), then you can find a prime p so that the p-adic valuations of f(x) are always within certain range, and g(p) would not fall within that range. This is *not* true. The second example is actually good enough to kill this type of argument. I left the first example there to make a point that one can write down polynomials randomly and invalidate his argument.

There are some other flaws in his argument, and one crucial flaw among them is that he's trying to prove a_i = +/- b_i for each i. Immediately, you can see something is dead off. But we like to play devil's advocate and assume that for a bit. That's still nowhere near close to proving that f(x) = g(ax + b) for some a,b. You can cook up plenty of examples very easily where f(x) never has the form g(ax + b) and yet the coefficients of f(x) are +/- of corresponding coefficients of g(x).
mieda
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States85 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-12 23:19:11
September 12 2010 22:19 GMT
#54
On September 13 2010 05:31 KristianJS wrote:
I have to admit that the solution to this problem eluded me. I was probably a bit too reluctant to actually start manipulating polynomial expressions and looking for too slick a proof. A nice problem though!


Thanks. I'm glad that you were having fun! That is the point of my starting this thread in the first place anyway. I tried to put an interesting fact/problem so more people could enjoy. Maybe I should have waited a big longer to release the solution and you could've produced a proof as well. But then again, Monday is coming up and we'll all be busy, so I felt I should release my solution today.

Maybe a short proof exists, and I have some vague ideas thinking of line bundles, but this will have to wait it seems.

Unlike IMO problems where short solutions exist and one only needs to try some limited number of techniques mixed together, this one actually I think inevitably would require a lot of technical digging if one wants to stick to elementary methods.

When I was involved in IMO back in the days (back then was still Titu coaching MO stuff. Kind of a strange guy.. but a good coach w/e) we would practice with problems from shortlist or longlist, and some of them had solutions that were quite long, really pushing one's technical mastery of the techniques (high school techniques albeit). I got this problem back then and I was proud that I was the only high schooler who could solve this problem in the black team. That didn't help the fact that I was an illegal resident and was not allowed to travel out . .
Prev 1 2 3 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 6m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft463
RuFF_SC2 142
CosmosSc2 65
Vindicta 39
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 669
Shuttle 548
Light 161
Aegong 108
NaDa 31
ajuk12(nOOB) 20
Dota 2
monkeys_forever811
NeuroSwarm159
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K435
Fnx 401
PGG 75
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0378
Mew2King62
Other Games
summit1g7454
shahzam888
JimRising 607
Trikslyr66
Nina47
ViBE32
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH98
• davetesta31
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 20
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4784
Other Games
• Scarra1124
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
8h 6m
Zoun vs Classic
Map Test Tournament
9h 6m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 1h
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
1d 6h
RSL Revival
1d 8h
Reynor vs Cure
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Online Event
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.