• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:06
CEST 21:06
KST 04:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature4Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy9uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event18
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris31Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!13Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195
StarCraft 2
General
Aligulac - Europe takes the podium A Eulogy for the Six Pool Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax 2v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Esports World Cup 2025 WardiTV Mondays RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below
Brood War
General
ASL20 - worst advertising ever... BSL Polish World Championship 2025 20-21 September BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL Season 20 Ro24 Groups Flash On His 2010 "God" Form, Mind Games, vs JD
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro24 Group F [ASL20] Ro24 Group D [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [IPSL] CSLAN Review and CSLPRO Reimagined!
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The year 2050 European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
High temperatures on bridge(s) Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment"
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Breaking the Meta: Non-Stand…
TrAiDoS
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1173 users

College Apps: Ask Me Anything - Page 4

Blogs > love1another
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
love1another
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1844 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-04 20:13:36
September 04 2010 20:13 GMT
#61
On September 05 2010 05:11 matjlav wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2010 03:48 love1another wrote:
2.) Extracurriculars that don't imply unethical/illegal activity can almost never hurt. They say to the college "I'm not a weirdo/robot."


This is definitely true, but I think it's kind of an understatement.

Especially when you're talking about Ivy League schools, where pretty much everyone who gets accepted is going to have near-perfect grades and SAT scores (unless they're a minority), what you did outside of school is going to be what makes your application.

Some extracurriculars may help demonstrate certain qualities you have (like leadership) or give you some sort of experience in your intended field (academic clubs, etc.), but that's not the most important part. Extracurriculars not only prove that you're capable of multitasking many responsibilities outside of one area, but they also provide evidence for the college that you are a well-adjusted individual by showing that you have hobbies and interests. These qualities all point to you being a more successful person down the line. (Also, you will be hard pressed to find anything to write an essay about in your application if you haven't done anything outside of schoolwork.)

This. In addition, another key advantage of extracurriculars comes down to definition: Extracurriculars are something you do on your own initiative. A self-motivated learner is something that all top schools are looking for, and being involved in an extracurricular activity is an excellent way to demonstrate this quality.
"I'm learning more and more that TL isn't the place to go for advice outside of anything you need in college. It's like you guys just make up your own fantasy world shit and post it as if you've done it." - Chill
geometryb
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
United States1249 Posts
September 04 2010 20:14 GMT
#62
what can i do if i didn't get accepted into the school I wanted?
Linx_101
Profile Joined November 2008
Canada166 Posts
September 04 2010 20:15 GMT
#63
On September 05 2010 01:16 SubtleArt wrote:
On average what grades do you need to enter a good univiersity? I wanna enter some sort of science courses (cause that's where I want my career to be headed) at a good Canadian university like WAterloo, Queens, or Mcgill. Not sure if my marks are up to scratch though (low 90s in history, english and math, but only only 86 in Chemistry and 84 in biology).

Also, what grades do Canadian universities look at? Does the first term of grade 12 matter as much as your grade 11 marks? I'm in grade 12 this year. Basically, if I can get 90s in Chem and Biology this year will universities still accept me or will they go "na, ur grade 11 marks sucked for the sciences and you're trying to enter a science course....GTFO"?

And yes, how many schools should I apply to?

Grade 11 marks matter. However you should also work your ass-off first term of grade 12 as they look at those even more. Typically with me, they looked at gr. 11 marks when looking for early acceptances, solid gr. 11 marks - more chance of an early acceptance. Universities won't decline you for having bad gr. 11 marks though, it just may take longer for you to get an acceptance letter.
An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind - Mahatma Gandhi
love1another
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1844 Posts
September 04 2010 20:16 GMT
#64
On September 05 2010 05:14 geometryb wrote:
what can i do if i didn't get accepted into the school I wanted?

Did you get waitlisted or flat-out rejected? If you got wait-listed it's quite likely that if you express continued interest in the school, via emails, and updates, that you can still get in. My friend got into both Yale and Princeton on waitlist simply by continuing to let them know he was interested.

If, however, you got flat-out rejected, it's 99% of the time not worth your time to push the issue further. Evaluate your other options and almost always you'll find that wherever you end up will be awesome.
"I'm learning more and more that TL isn't the place to go for advice outside of anything you need in college. It's like you guys just make up your own fantasy world shit and post it as if you've done it." - Chill
geometryb
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
United States1249 Posts
September 04 2010 21:01 GMT
#65
when do people usually visit colleges? before they apply or after they get accepted?
love1another
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1844 Posts
September 04 2010 21:13 GMT
#66
On September 05 2010 06:01 geometryb wrote:
when do people usually visit colleges? before they apply or after they get accepted?

I know people who have done both. In my experience, the "before accepted" trips are optional, but the "after accepted" trips are basically mandatory.
"I'm learning more and more that TL isn't the place to go for advice outside of anything you need in college. It's like you guys just make up your own fantasy world shit and post it as if you've done it." - Chill
love1another
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1844 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-04 21:22:23
September 04 2010 21:21 GMT
#67
On September 05 2010 05:12 KazeHydra wrote:
I'm going to say something that I notice a lot of high school students don't ask but should know and consider. It may be slightly off topic, but too many seniors don't think about this. I highly discourage applying/attending a college that you barely managed to get into. I'll explain.

It's very common for people to apply to top colleges with no real expectations because they understand their grades/scores/etc are not too great, but by some miracle they get in, all happy that they got into such a great school. In 2 or 3 years, they drop out, sometimes even in 1 year. Although it's great that you got accepted, it's really not a good decision to go to a school that you didn't think you had a decent chance for (unless you're just being paranoid). This is because, to be blunt, you probably can't actually handle it. Despite what parents may say (maybe this is just an Asian parent thing; being an Asian, I wouldn't know) going to the best college you can get into is not always the wisest choice.

Now, this is not always the case. Sometimes students slacked off in high school, get into a good college and then take school seriously and succeed. Good for them! But, please think carefully when it comes to the top schools, or at least the best schools that you apply for. Underestimating the rigor of college (particularly the "upper tier" ones) is not something to be taken lightly. If after contemplation, you think you can succeed in such a place, by all means go for it. I'm not here to prevent it; I just want to make people aware of it. Choosing your college is a huge decision; don't make a bad decision because of a college's prestige. I'm sorry to say I probably can't help with any specific questions regarding this, and I feel awkward leaving such questions to OP, but whenever I encounter "applying to college" topics, I almost always see this issue neglected, despite being a serious consideration in my opinion.

That's the end of my little rant. Good luck to all applicants and good job helping others, OP.


Well... given that the acceptance rate at all the top schools of which you speak are <10%, you can almost rest assured that the false positives, those that happened to get in that didn't deserve to, are completely negligible in comparison to those that deserved to get in but didn't. And realistically, surviving at a top school is not very hard. Ivies tend to grade around a B~. If you suck and go to class once in a while, and show up for the exam, you're going to get at least a C. Flunking out is actually damn near impossible if you can, like, read English. Furthermore, if you find yourself lacking in some pre-requisite knowledge, a bunch of resources are always available to help you get to where you want to be... I know for a fact that my college has math/science/writing tutors at every residential unit. And besides, the admissions department knows that along with the IMO finalists and Intel winners, they'll be letting in a few less academically gifted minority students or athletes.

Even places like CalTech, which has a deserved reputation for being hard has fuck, don't count first year GPA so as to let students ease their way into a healthy and interesting courseload without forcing too much stress initially.

I'm not going to continue to further argue that "if you got in, you deserve it, and you should take advantage of it," but if the chance to go to your dream school suddenly becomes a reality, don't throw it away purely on account of modesty. But if you truly are concerned, I'll just tell you that with all the top schools, getting in is the hard part.
"I'm learning more and more that TL isn't the place to go for advice outside of anything you need in college. It's like you guys just make up your own fantasy world shit and post it as if you've done it." - Chill
geometryb
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
United States1249 Posts
September 04 2010 23:32 GMT
#68
do you have any information correlating salaries between graduates of top schools (us news and world report) and other schools?
KazeHydra
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Japan2788 Posts
September 04 2010 23:53 GMT
#69
On September 05 2010 06:21 love1another wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2010 05:12 KazeHydra wrote:
I'm going to say something that I notice a lot of high school students don't ask but should know and consider. It may be slightly off topic, but too many seniors don't think about this. I highly discourage applying/attending a college that you barely managed to get into. I'll explain.

It's very common for people to apply to top colleges with no real expectations because they understand their grades/scores/etc are not too great, but by some miracle they get in, all happy that they got into such a great school. In 2 or 3 years, they drop out, sometimes even in 1 year. Although it's great that you got accepted, it's really not a good decision to go to a school that you didn't think you had a decent chance for (unless you're just being paranoid). This is because, to be blunt, you probably can't actually handle it. Despite what parents may say (maybe this is just an Asian parent thing; being an Asian, I wouldn't know) going to the best college you can get into is not always the wisest choice.

Now, this is not always the case. Sometimes students slacked off in high school, get into a good college and then take school seriously and succeed. Good for them! But, please think carefully when it comes to the top schools, or at least the best schools that you apply for. Underestimating the rigor of college (particularly the "upper tier" ones) is not something to be taken lightly. If after contemplation, you think you can succeed in such a place, by all means go for it. I'm not here to prevent it; I just want to make people aware of it. Choosing your college is a huge decision; don't make a bad decision because of a college's prestige. I'm sorry to say I probably can't help with any specific questions regarding this, and I feel awkward leaving such questions to OP, but whenever I encounter "applying to college" topics, I almost always see this issue neglected, despite being a serious consideration in my opinion.

That's the end of my little rant. Good luck to all applicants and good job helping others, OP.


Well... given that the acceptance rate at all the top schools of which you speak are <10%, you can almost rest assured that the false positives, those that happened to get in that didn't deserve to, are completely negligible in comparison to those that deserved to get in but didn't. And realistically, surviving at a top school is not very hard. Ivies tend to grade around a B~. If you suck and go to class once in a while, and show up for the exam, you're going to get at least a C. Flunking out is actually damn near impossible if you can, like, read English. Furthermore, if you find yourself lacking in some pre-requisite knowledge, a bunch of resources are always available to help you get to where you want to be... I know for a fact that my college has math/science/writing tutors at every residential unit. And besides, the admissions department knows that along with the IMO finalists and Intel winners, they'll be letting in a few less academically gifted minority students or athletes.

Even places like CalTech, which has a deserved reputation for being hard has fuck, don't count first year GPA so as to let students ease their way into a healthy and interesting courseload without forcing too much stress initially.

I'm not going to continue to further argue that "if you got in, you deserve it, and you should take advantage of it," but if the chance to go to your dream school suddenly becomes a reality, don't throw it away purely on account of modesty. But if you truly are concerned, I'll just tell you that with all the top schools, getting in is the hard part.


well, you're right that the majority of people that get in can at least survive. But I'm not referring to the "whew I managed to get in" type that can survive with a ~2.8 GPA, but rather the "how in the world did this happen?" To relate to starcraft, it would be like a bronze/silver person beating a diamond level player. Just because it happens once, doesn't mean he's diamond level. (this may be more extreme than intended) Furthermore, it's not flunking out that I'm addressing; the people that I said "drop out" choose to leave because either 1)they can't handle the academic pressure/expectations or 2)their grades are far from their expectations. Of course no one realistically expects a 4.0, but for some, they never thought they'd get a C in a class and become incredibly depressed/unmotivated/etc. This specifically applies to the top students at crap schools. It's not their fault; they've never encountered anything challenging before.

But maybe I sounded harsher than I intended. If I somehow made you lose confidence in your academic abilities, please do not listen to me! My goal was only to get people to consider difficulty of the school as a factor when deciding where to go. If it's a person's dream school, that's already a great reason to disregard my post as less than important. Absolutely don't refuse an acceptance solely because of modesty or because it "sounds hard." Do research, ask current attendees, and evaluate yourself as fairly and objectively as possible.

Anyways, I also don't want to continue my argument, especially since there is no absolute to this; it is always dependent on the individual. I also don't want to derail this thread; from what I've read, you've done an excellent job answering questions =)
"Because I know this promise that won’t disappear will turn even a cause of tears into strength. You taught me that if I can believe, there is nothing that cannot come true." - Nana Mizuki (Yakusoku) 17:36 ils kaze got me into nana 17:36 ils by his blog
Judicator
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States7270 Posts
September 04 2010 23:57 GMT
#70
On September 05 2010 03:42 imBLIND wrote:
My unweighted gpa is about a 3.8-3.9 right now, but my SAT is only a 1960. Do colleges overlook inconsistencies like these or do I have to work more to get a 2250+?

Also, if I plan on majoring in some form of engineering, chemical/nano specifically, would extracurriculars in music help me at all?


I would say SATs are probably the least valued criteria in college admissions provided your other areas are solid. My personal estimates rank them in this order:

1. GPA=>Class standing
2. Personal Statement
3. Teacher Recs
3. Extracurricular, especially if you have titles in those groups
5. Standardized testing scores

(Yes I know there are two 3s)

My reasoning for this is that everyone has testing scores and it really doesn't tell shit about you as a student or a person after you reach a certain score plateau. You're class standing indicates potential, if you are not tops in your school, then you already have proven that X amount of people are better than you in your particular situation. Personal statement is big and a lot of kids fuck this up because they can't write about their life worth a damn, aka making it actually personal.

As for your ECs, that's perfectly fine, ECs are suppose to show colleges of your interests and your dedication/involvement with those interests; they're not gonna hold it against someone if their personal interests differ from their academic pursuits.

Don't worry about your SATs unless you sucked it up badly on one particular subject, especially if your math is bad (I consider 750 bad in math, but I am Chinese...) and you want to be in engineering.

Obviously the admissions committee would weigh all the available information they have on you to make a decision, so what I am saying is a rough estimate based on my personal experience with college admissions and what I can gather from other people (since people keep sending me their PSs to read over).
Get it by your hands...
Coca Cola Classic
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
266 Posts
September 05 2010 00:10 GMT
#71
On September 05 2010 01:20 micronesia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2010 01:18 Catch]22 wrote:
How much does college cost in the US?

This obviously will vary a ton. A top school could cost you like 50,000 dollars a year tuition I bet. Can someone confirm this?

If you go to an in-state public university it will vary by state but be more on the order of magnitude of 8-10k tuition per year I think.

If you commute to a community college or something like that then it's probably significantly less.


I went to a state school in California and I paid 6k/year without a scholarship.

Attending Georgetown and is around 45k/yr
안녕하세요~~
theonemephisto
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States409 Posts
September 05 2010 00:16 GMT
#72
On September 05 2010 08:57 Judicator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2010 03:42 imBLIND wrote:
My unweighted gpa is about a 3.8-3.9 right now, but my SAT is only a 1960. Do colleges overlook inconsistencies like these or do I have to work more to get a 2250+?

Also, if I plan on majoring in some form of engineering, chemical/nano specifically, would extracurriculars in music help me at all?


I would say SATs are probably the least valued criteria in college admissions provided your other areas are solid. My personal estimates rank them in this order:

1. GPA=>Class standing
2. Personal Statement
3. Teacher Recs
3. Extracurricular, especially if you have titles in those groups
5. Standardized testing scores

(Yes I know there are two 3s)

My reasoning for this is that everyone has testing scores and it really doesn't tell shit about you as a student or a person after you reach a certain score plateau. You're class standing indicates potential, if you are not tops in your school, then you already have proven that X amount of people are better than you in your particular situation. Personal statement is big and a lot of kids fuck this up because they can't write about their life worth a damn, aka making it actually personal.

As for your ECs, that's perfectly fine, ECs are suppose to show colleges of your interests and your dedication/involvement with those interests; they're not gonna hold it against someone if their personal interests differ from their academic pursuits.

Don't worry about your SATs unless you sucked it up badly on one particular subject, especially if your math is bad (I consider 750 bad in math, but I am Chinese...) and you want to be in engineering.

Obviously the admissions committee would weigh all the available information they have on you to make a decision, so what I am saying is a rough estimate based on my personal experience with college admissions and what I can gather from other people (since people keep sending me their PSs to read over).

I can't say I really agree with this, though I wouldn't be the one to ask. I do think that after a certain plateau differences don't matter, but I think that plateau is around 2200-2300, a college might consider a 2250 and 2350 pretty equally, but IMO a 1960 will definitely have an impact on your admission chances.

In fact, depending on the school you go to and how much history the college has with that particular high school, a low SAT score relative to your GPA might just make them think the school is an easier school in general.
Cambium
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States16368 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-05 00:32:13
September 05 2010 00:31 GMT
#73
On September 05 2010 09:16 theonemephisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2010 08:57 Judicator wrote:
On September 05 2010 03:42 imBLIND wrote:
My unweighted gpa is about a 3.8-3.9 right now, but my SAT is only a 1960. Do colleges overlook inconsistencies like these or do I have to work more to get a 2250+?

Also, if I plan on majoring in some form of engineering, chemical/nano specifically, would extracurriculars in music help me at all?


I would say SATs are probably the least valued criteria in college admissions provided your other areas are solid. My personal estimates rank them in this order:

1. GPA=>Class standing
2. Personal Statement
3. Teacher Recs
3. Extracurricular, especially if you have titles in those groups
5. Standardized testing scores

(Yes I know there are two 3s)

My reasoning for this is that everyone has testing scores and it really doesn't tell shit about you as a student or a person after you reach a certain score plateau. You're class standing indicates potential, if you are not tops in your school, then you already have proven that X amount of people are better than you in your particular situation. Personal statement is big and a lot of kids fuck this up because they can't write about their life worth a damn, aka making it actually personal.

As for your ECs, that's perfectly fine, ECs are suppose to show colleges of your interests and your dedication/involvement with those interests; they're not gonna hold it against someone if their personal interests differ from their academic pursuits.

Don't worry about your SATs unless you sucked it up badly on one particular subject, especially if your math is bad (I consider 750 bad in math, but I am Chinese...) and you want to be in engineering.

Obviously the admissions committee would weigh all the available information they have on you to make a decision, so what I am saying is a rough estimate based on my personal experience with college admissions and what I can gather from other people (since people keep sending me their PSs to read over).

I can't say I really agree with this, though I wouldn't be the one to ask. I do think that after a certain plateau differences don't matter, but I think that plateau is around 2200-2300, a college might consider a 2250 and 2350 pretty equally, but IMO a 1960 will definitely have an impact on your admission chances.

In fact, depending on the school you go to and how much history the college has with that particular high school, a low SAT score relative to your GPA might just make them think the school is an easier school in general.


I think he meant it in the same way you described, at least that's the impression I received. Standardized tests are just idiot bars, once you pass them, they don't distinguish candidates much (although, I think getting perfect scores help).
When you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
love1another
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1844 Posts
September 05 2010 00:52 GMT
#74
On September 05 2010 08:57 Judicator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2010 03:42 imBLIND wrote:
My unweighted gpa is about a 3.8-3.9 right now, but my SAT is only a 1960. Do colleges overlook inconsistencies like these or do I have to work more to get a 2250+?

Also, if I plan on majoring in some form of engineering, chemical/nano specifically, would extracurriculars in music help me at all?


I would say SATs are probably the least valued criteria in college admissions provided your other areas are solid. My personal estimates rank them in this order:

1. GPA=>Class standing
2. Personal Statement
3. Teacher Recs
3. Extracurricular, especially if you have titles in those groups
5. Standardized testing scores

(Yes I know there are two 3s)

My reasoning for this is that everyone has testing scores and it really doesn't tell shit about you as a student or a person after you reach a certain score plateau. You're class standing indicates potential, if you are not tops in your school, then you already have proven that X amount of people are better than you in your particular situation. Personal statement is big and a lot of kids fuck this up because they can't write about their life worth a damn, aka making it actually personal.

As for your ECs, that's perfectly fine, ECs are suppose to show colleges of your interests and your dedication/involvement with those interests; they're not gonna hold it against someone if their personal interests differ from their academic pursuits.

Don't worry about your SATs unless you sucked it up badly on one particular subject, especially if your math is bad (I consider 750 bad in math, but I am Chinese...) and you want to be in engineering.

Obviously the admissions committee would weigh all the available information they have on you to make a decision, so what I am saying is a rough estimate based on my personal experience with college admissions and what I can gather from other people (since people keep sending me their PSs to read over).


Hey Judicator, where are you coming from? If you're asian/white and your SAT score is under 2k, admissions officers are not going to take your application seriously. Btw, what are your credentials regarding this matter?
"I'm learning more and more that TL isn't the place to go for advice outside of anything you need in college. It's like you guys just make up your own fantasy world shit and post it as if you've done it." - Chill
love1another
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1844 Posts
September 05 2010 00:52 GMT
#75
On September 05 2010 08:32 geometryb wrote:
do you have any information correlating salaries between graduates of top schools (us news and world report) and other schools?

No I do not have this information, but I've heard there is no correlation.
"I'm learning more and more that TL isn't the place to go for advice outside of anything you need in college. It's like you guys just make up your own fantasy world shit and post it as if you've done it." - Chill
love1another
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1844 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-05 01:01:31
September 05 2010 00:56 GMT
#76
On September 05 2010 09:31 Cambium wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2010 09:16 theonemephisto wrote:
On September 05 2010 08:57 Judicator wrote:
On September 05 2010 03:42 imBLIND wrote:
My unweighted gpa is about a 3.8-3.9 right now, but my SAT is only a 1960. Do colleges overlook inconsistencies like these or do I have to work more to get a 2250+?

Also, if I plan on majoring in some form of engineering, chemical/nano specifically, would extracurriculars in music help me at all?


I would say SATs are probably the least valued criteria in college admissions provided your other areas are solid. My personal estimates rank them in this order:

1. GPA=>Class standing
2. Personal Statement
3. Teacher Recs
3. Extracurricular, especially if you have titles in those groups
5. Standardized testing scores

(Yes I know there are two 3s)

My reasoning for this is that everyone has testing scores and it really doesn't tell shit about you as a student or a person after you reach a certain score plateau. You're class standing indicates potential, if you are not tops in your school, then you already have proven that X amount of people are better than you in your particular situation. Personal statement is big and a lot of kids fuck this up because they can't write about their life worth a damn, aka making it actually personal.

As for your ECs, that's perfectly fine, ECs are suppose to show colleges of your interests and your dedication/involvement with those interests; they're not gonna hold it against someone if their personal interests differ from their academic pursuits.

Don't worry about your SATs unless you sucked it up badly on one particular subject, especially if your math is bad (I consider 750 bad in math, but I am Chinese...) and you want to be in engineering.

Obviously the admissions committee would weigh all the available information they have on you to make a decision, so what I am saying is a rough estimate based on my personal experience with college admissions and what I can gather from other people (since people keep sending me their PSs to read over).

I can't say I really agree with this, though I wouldn't be the one to ask. I do think that after a certain plateau differences don't matter, but I think that plateau is around 2200-2300, a college might consider a 2250 and 2350 pretty equally, but IMO a 1960 will definitely have an impact on your admission chances.

In fact, depending on the school you go to and how much history the college has with that particular high school, a low SAT score relative to your GPA might just make them think the school is an easier school in general.


I think he meant it in the same way you described, at least that's the impression I received. Standardized tests are just idiot bars, once you pass them, they don't distinguish candidates much (although, I think getting perfect scores help).


This is true. They basically are idiot bars, but that bar varies a lot depending on your ethnicity, and that for whites/asians/desi/other majority/over-represented minority, the bar is a lot higher... in the 2250 range.

But I'm not entirely sure that perfect scores help. I mean more than one school rejected my 2400 . But I'm not kidding, retake your 1960. You can spend 10 hours studying, and like $40 to take it once more... get yourself at least a 2100. It's like the cheapest time investment you can put in to increase your chances of getting in by A LOT. That's like, what, one day of SC2?


On September 05 2010 09:16 theonemephisto wrote:
I can't say I really agree with this, though I wouldn't be the one to ask. I do think that after a certain plateau differences don't matter, but I think that plateau is around 2200-2300, a college might consider a 2250 and 2350 pretty equally, but IMO a 1960 will definitely have an impact on your admission chances.

In fact, depending on the school you go to and how much history the college has with that particular high school, a low SAT score relative to your GPA might just make them think the school is an easier school in general.


This. Most of what Judicator said is true, but seriously, don't just give up on the SAT because Judicator said "ehhh it's not important."
"I'm learning more and more that TL isn't the place to go for advice outside of anything you need in college. It's like you guys just make up your own fantasy world shit and post it as if you've done it." - Chill
OneOther
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States10774 Posts
September 05 2010 00:59 GMT
#77
On September 05 2010 08:57 Judicator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2010 03:42 imBLIND wrote:
My unweighted gpa is about a 3.8-3.9 right now, but my SAT is only a 1960. Do colleges overlook inconsistencies like these or do I have to work more to get a 2250+?

Also, if I plan on majoring in some form of engineering, chemical/nano specifically, would extracurriculars in music help me at all?


I would say SATs are probably the least valued criteria in college admissions provided your other areas are solid. My personal estimates rank them in this order:

1. GPA=>Class standing
2. Personal Statement
3. Teacher Recs
3. Extracurricular, especially if you have titles in those groups
5. Standardized testing scores

(Yes I know there are two 3s)

My reasoning for this is that everyone has testing scores and it really doesn't tell shit about you as a student or a person after you reach a certain score plateau. You're class standing indicates potential, if you are not tops in your school, then you already have proven that X amount of people are better than you in your particular situation. Personal statement is big and a lot of kids fuck this up because they can't write about their life worth a damn, aka making it actually personal.

As for your ECs, that's perfectly fine, ECs are suppose to show colleges of your interests and your dedication/involvement with those interests; they're not gonna hold it against someone if their personal interests differ from their academic pursuits.

Don't worry about your SATs unless you sucked it up badly on one particular subject, especially if your math is bad (I consider 750 bad in math, but I am Chinese...) and you want to be in engineering.

Obviously the admissions committee would weigh all the available information they have on you to make a decision, so what I am saying is a rough estimate based on my personal experience with college admissions and what I can gather from other people (since people keep sending me their PSs to read over).

This is wrong.

GPA and SAT scores are almost equally important for top schools. You can't even make the first cut at some schools if your GPA / SAT scores don't meet the minimum benchmarks - meaning they won't even look at your teacher recommendations.
love1another
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1844 Posts
September 05 2010 01:02 GMT
#78
Thanks OneOther. The consensus being, yeah.... retake your SAT.
"I'm learning more and more that TL isn't the place to go for advice outside of anything you need in college. It's like you guys just make up your own fantasy world shit and post it as if you've done it." - Chill
Judicator
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States7270 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-05 01:22:42
September 05 2010 01:16 GMT
#79
On September 05 2010 09:52 love1another wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2010 08:57 Judicator wrote:
On September 05 2010 03:42 imBLIND wrote:
My unweighted gpa is about a 3.8-3.9 right now, but my SAT is only a 1960. Do colleges overlook inconsistencies like these or do I have to work more to get a 2250+?

Also, if I plan on majoring in some form of engineering, chemical/nano specifically, would extracurriculars in music help me at all?


I would say SATs are probably the least valued criteria in college admissions provided your other areas are solid. My personal estimates rank them in this order:

1. GPA=>Class standing
2. Personal Statement
3. Teacher Recs
3. Extracurricular, especially if you have titles in those groups
5. Standardized testing scores

(Yes I know there are two 3s)

My reasoning for this is that everyone has testing scores and it really doesn't tell shit about you as a student or a person after you reach a certain score plateau. You're class standing indicates potential, if you are not tops in your school, then you already have proven that X amount of people are better than you in your particular situation. Personal statement is big and a lot of kids fuck this up because they can't write about their life worth a damn, aka making it actually personal.

As for your ECs, that's perfectly fine, ECs are suppose to show colleges of your interests and your dedication/involvement with those interests; they're not gonna hold it against someone if their personal interests differ from their academic pursuits.

Don't worry about your SATs unless you sucked it up badly on one particular subject, especially if your math is bad (I consider 750 bad in math, but I am Chinese...) and you want to be in engineering.

Obviously the admissions committee would weigh all the available information they have on you to make a decision, so what I am saying is a rough estimate based on my personal experience with college admissions and what I can gather from other people (since people keep sending me their PSs to read over).


Hey Judicator, where are you coming from? If you're asian/white and your SAT score is under 2k, admissions officers are not going to take your application seriously. Btw, what are your credentials regarding this matter?


Cornell University, applied to like 10 schools iirc.

Helped two others get into Cornell after I read over their PS and advised them on the process.
Helped an international student from China get into Florida-Gainsville after I walked him through the process for business grad school.

The reason I said SAT scores weren't important because I actually polled my floor freshmen year to get a rough idea where everyone stood academically since I thought my grades and scores were borderline to get into Cornell. Turned out the common denominator (assuming everyone was telling the truth) was that we were all at least top 5% of our classes, me being the lowest at 5%, everyone else being closer to 1-2% with 3 valedictorians. So I reasoned that my sub par ECs (I moved during sophomore year of HS so getting involved was more difficult), and "low" class ranking was supported by my PS, Teacher Recs (sort of weak iirc they weren't the teachers closest to me), and the fact that I had 14 APs under my belt so my schedules could be considered "highly competitive".

I also know that plenty of people with much better SATs than me (1510 on the old scale with 800 verbal, with a 780 on SAT2 Writing) didn't get into Cornell my year or the year immediately after me. My floor mates scored anywhere from 1200s to 1400s with nobody topping 1500 so in comparison I actually had the highest SAT score but they were all around better students (with some MUCH better) than me in every other aspect (with Teacher Recs as an unknown). Same for the year after according to Cornell's statistics for SAT scores.

I am not saying I am completely right, but I am just going by what I would tell and have told prospective students going through the admissions process. It's just my theory if you will.

And the notion that there are absolute benchmarks is entirely correct OneOther, except that some schools use a comprehensive lowest line rather than just a single category. IIRC the SAT averages for pretty much all of the schools I applied to (all top 20s in a major science/engineering field except my super back up) were all around 1300s on the old scale which would translate to about 2100 on the new test?

My point was that after you reach a certain score, the benefit to you for improving on the score is very little compared to "improvement" in the other criterion.
Get it by your hands...
love1another
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1844 Posts
September 05 2010 01:22 GMT
#80
On September 05 2010 10:16 Judicator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2010 09:52 love1another wrote:
On September 05 2010 08:57 Judicator wrote:
On September 05 2010 03:42 imBLIND wrote:
My unweighted gpa is about a 3.8-3.9 right now, but my SAT is only a 1960. Do colleges overlook inconsistencies like these or do I have to work more to get a 2250+?

Also, if I plan on majoring in some form of engineering, chemical/nano specifically, would extracurriculars in music help me at all?


I would say SATs are probably the least valued criteria in college admissions provided your other areas are solid. My personal estimates rank them in this order:

1. GPA=>Class standing
2. Personal Statement
3. Teacher Recs
3. Extracurricular, especially if you have titles in those groups
5. Standardized testing scores

(Yes I know there are two 3s)

My reasoning for this is that everyone has testing scores and it really doesn't tell shit about you as a student or a person after you reach a certain score plateau. You're class standing indicates potential, if you are not tops in your school, then you already have proven that X amount of people are better than you in your particular situation. Personal statement is big and a lot of kids fuck this up because they can't write about their life worth a damn, aka making it actually personal.

As for your ECs, that's perfectly fine, ECs are suppose to show colleges of your interests and your dedication/involvement with those interests; they're not gonna hold it against someone if their personal interests differ from their academic pursuits.

Don't worry about your SATs unless you sucked it up badly on one particular subject, especially if your math is bad (I consider 750 bad in math, but I am Chinese...) and you want to be in engineering.

Obviously the admissions committee would weigh all the available information they have on you to make a decision, so what I am saying is a rough estimate based on my personal experience with college admissions and what I can gather from other people (since people keep sending me their PSs to read over).


Hey Judicator, where are you coming from? If you're asian/white and your SAT score is under 2k, admissions officers are not going to take your application seriously. Btw, what are your credentials regarding this matter?


Cornell University, applied to like 10 schools iirc.

Helped two others get into Cornell after I read over their PS and advised them on the process.
Helped an international student from China get into Florida-Gainsville after I walked him through the process for business grad school.

The reason I said SAT scores weren't important because I actually polled my floor freshmen year to get a rough idea where everyone stood academically since I thought my grades and scores were borderline to get into Cornell. Turned out the common denominator (assuming everyone was telling the truth) was that we were all at least top 5% of our classes, me being the lowest at 5%, everyone else being closer to 1-2% with 3 valedictorians. So I reasoned that my sub par ECs (I moved during sophomore year of HS so getting involved was more difficult), and "low" class ranking was supported by my PS, Teacher Recs (sort of weak iirc they weren't the teachers closest to me), and the fact that I had 14 APs under my belt so my schedules could be considered "highly competitive".

I also know that plenty of people with much better SATs than me (1510 on the old scale with 800 verbal, with a 780 on SAT2 Writing) didn't get into Cornell my year or the year immediately after me. My floor mates scored anywhere from 1200s to 1400s with nobody topping 1500 so in comparison I actually had the highest SAT score but they were all around better students (with some MUCH better) than me in every other aspect (with Teacher Recs as an unknown). Same for the year after according to Cornell's statistics for SAT scores.

I am not saying I am completely right, but I am just going by what I would tell and have told prospective students going through the admissions process. It's just my theory if you will.

The last year the "Old SAT" was accepted was 2004. I believe your data is woefully out of date and probably suffers from the problem of a small sample size and an improper control for confounding variables.

Nobody from my high school with an SAT under 2200 gets into Ivy league schools unless they're stellar athletes. That being said all my friends who DID manage to get into Ivy league schools over the past few years from my high school had 2300+.

I think there's a very clear idiot-bar, and you'd be wise not to try to convince people that the SAT is unimportant.
"I'm learning more and more that TL isn't the place to go for advice outside of anything you need in college. It's like you guys just make up your own fantasy world shit and post it as if you've done it." - Chill
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 54m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 475
UpATreeSC 119
ProTech91
goblin 53
BRAT_OK 41
JuggernautJason34
MindelVK 19
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 24936
Calm 3208
Bisu 873
Larva 314
Shuttle 195
Mong 92
Soulkey 84
Hyuk 82
Dewaltoss 77
Killer 49
[ Show more ]
Aegong 26
Rock 23
ajuk12(nOOB) 20
soO 16
HiyA 11
Sacsri 10
NaDa 7
Beast 2
Dota 2
Fuzer 253
Pyrionflax92
LuMiX1
League of Legends
Reynor53
Counter-Strike
fl0m4215
flusha119
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu273
Other Games
Grubby1702
FrodaN880
Lowko322
IndyStarCraft 168
C9.Mang0108
markeloff50
Trikslyr48
fpsfer 1
trigger1
ZombieGrub0
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 24
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 8
• Reevou 1
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade895
Counter-Strike
• imaqtpie836
Other Games
• WagamamaTV349
• Shiphtur142
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 54m
The PondCast
14h 54m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
15h 54m
herO vs MaxPax
Clem vs Classic
Replay Cast
1d 4h
LiuLi Cup
1d 15h
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs herO
Cure vs Rogue
Classic vs HeRoMaRinE
Cosmonarchy
1d 20h
OyAji vs Sziky
Sziky vs WolFix
WolFix vs OyAji
BSL Team Wars
1d 23h
Team Hawk vs Team Dewalt
BSL Team Wars
1d 23h
Team Hawk vs Team Bonyth
SC Evo League
2 days
TaeJa vs Cure
Rogue vs threepoint
ByuN vs Creator
MaNa vs Classic
Maestros of the Game
2 days
ShoWTimE vs Cham
GuMiho vs Ryung
Zoun vs Spirit
Rogue vs MaNa
[ Show More ]
[BSL 2025] Weekly
2 days
SC Evo League
3 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
SHIN vs Creator
Astrea vs Lambo
Bunny vs SKillous
HeRoMaRinE vs TriGGeR
BSL Team Wars
3 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Sziky
BSL Team Wars
3 days
Team Dewalt vs Team Sziky
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLAN 3
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
Acropolis #4 - TS1
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
EC S1
Sisters' Call Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.