[Photos] Memories of College.

On January 10 2010 11:06 p4ge wrote:
yeah that's pretty interesting. those look like they are out in the open though, can't someone just wipe them off?

On January 10 2010 13:33 meeple wrote:
Thats your idea of a cute guy? He looks like he's just been in a bar fight... really cool pics though. I'd like to see that place

On January 10 2010 13:51 NeverGG wrote:


Actually I wasn't focusing on him at all when I was ninja photo taking, but the guy who is in the blurred area behind him. In that shot he just happened to wander past. I liked the composition though so I kept it.

Also Smix - that's what I was thinking too. Some of the tiles further up had photos set into them as well and it was really intriguing me as to where everyone who contributed something is now.

On January 10 2010 15:02 Piste wrote:
cool place and nice pics.. but why are they always so blurry from the edges?

On January 10 2010 15:08 konadora wrote:
Hey NeverGG, do you have a 1440x900 size for this one?

+ Show Spoiler +

I find this just too cute XD

On January 10 2010 12:30 alffla wrote:
aww so cute!! haha i can imagine when they're all old and go back or something. ;s

how many tiles do they have ? lo l o_ O wont they get used up?

On January 10 2010 15:38 NeverGG wrote:


I'm sorry, but I deleted all the raws after finishing editing them. I'll keep them for a little bit longer next time.

On January 10 2010 15:37 NeverGG wrote:


Um it's called bokeh.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh

I'm using a DSLR so my photos obviously don't turn out like a cheap digital camera. Also if you bothered to read the notes you'd see that I was photographing in very awkward conditions not using my external flash unit (because I didn't own it back then.) Please don't complain when I explained myself in the notes. ~_~ It puts me off taking more photos when people say things like that.

TLDR: Read the notes and don't bitch. I'm doing my best to learn and practice so obviously I'm not going to be some award winning photographer after only a couple of months using my new camera.

On January 10 2010 15:43 konadora wrote:

aww haha, thanks anyway

keep these photos coming, love them all :D

On January 10 2010 15:45 NeverGG wrote:


When we have time Susie and I are planning to take our cameras out into Seoul for a photo day. We both need to practice using Canon so hopefully we can experiment and come up with some fun shots

On January 10 2010 15:44 lilsusie wrote:


I don't think he was bitching about it.. just .. curious?

On January 10 2010 15:50 konadora wrote:

Sounds great, looking forward to it haha

When are you planning to do that?

On January 10 2010 16:18 lilsusie wrote:
Weather sucks a big one right now. sooooooooooooooo yuck. We'll do it when the weather clears up.

On January 10 2010 16:25 Rekrul wrote:
how can u be sick of taxis

On January 10 2010 16:24 konadora wrote:
I saw the news on KBSWorld that the snow was so bad that you couldn't drive cars around and the subway was totally packed lol.

Looked pretty though.

On January 10 2010 15:37 NeverGG wrote:


Um it's called bokeh.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh

I'm using a DSLR so my photos obviously don't turn out like a cheap digital camera. Also if you bothered to read the notes you'd see that I was photographing in very awkward conditions not using my external flash unit (because I didn't own it back then.) Please don't complain when I explained myself in the notes. ~_~ It puts me off taking more photos when people say things like that.

TLDR: Read the notes and don't bitch. I'm doing my best to learn and practice so obviously I'm not going to be some award winning photographer after only a couple of months using my new camera.

On January 10 2010 15:37 NeverGG wrote:


Um it's called bokeh.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh

I'm using a DSLR so my photos obviously don't turn out like a cheap digital camera. Also if you bothered to read the notes you'd see that I was photographing in very awkward conditions not using my external flash unit (because I didn't own it back then.) Please don't complain when I explained myself in the notes. ~_~ It puts me off taking more photos when people say things like that.

TLDR: Read the notes and don't bitch. I'm doing my best to learn and practice so obviously I'm not going to be some award winning photographer after only a couple of months using my new camera.

On January 11 2010 01:31 Piste wrote:

lol I'm not bitching. I like the pictures nevertheless and would like to use one as desktop picture but the blurriness is not something i like. cheap digital camera picture would be better in this case -.-
I was only asking the reason and not demanding sharper pictures Ms. Serious

On January 11 2010 20:32 MountainDewJunkie wrote:
Wish I had photographic talents... or even doodling talents...

On January 18 2010 16:19 phosphorylation wrote:
i am sure a semi-decent point and shoot on macro mode would have resulted in very similar quality photos for this subject -- at least in this resolution
hardly "shitty"

edit: ok except for that candid pic of guy.. looks like that requires a longer lens than usual

On January 19 2010 09:31 phosphorylation wrote:
obviously dslr is better than point and shoot
all i am saying that for this type of photos-- close range macro with not the most remarkable bokeh--point and shoot would do almost as well, at least without pixel peeping
i doubt this was in "almost complete darkness"
even with the fastest lenses, (around f1.4) on wide open, handheld shots would be impossible
tldr: for these types of pics (not your usual work) a point and shoot would do 90% as well for less than 10% of cost

On January 19 2010 20:05 NeverGG wrote:


Were you there with me at this location? No. So don't assume to tell me what the lighting conditions were like. Basically, it comes down to this - I don't want some piece of crap cheap digital camera and I *know* that one would not have been able to cope with this lighting. End of story, get out of my blog thank you very much.

On January 19 2010 20:28 meeple wrote:


lol... is it just me or have you been somewhat grumpier of late?

On January 11 2010 12:56 NeverGG wrote:


A cheap digital camera would have caused flare and over-exposure due to having to use flash. So no, it wouldn't have been better unless you wanted a shitty photo which wouldn't have even been large enough to make into a desktop.