EPTLiquipedia Feedback Thread - Page 45
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
shz
Germany2687 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
shz
Germany2687 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
shz
Germany2687 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [STX SouL vs EG-Liquid Round 2 Proleagu…] + During the STX SouL vs EG-Liquid match there was a regame between Dear and HerO due to there being a draw in the first match. When the VODs were posted on twitch, the original game and the regame were posted as separate VODs but there is only 1 spot for game 4 VOD on liquipedia. I wasn't sure how to add in another "game 4" or something so I only posted the VOD for the game that counted towards the final score. Here are the links for the 2 VODs Original game: http://www.twitch.tv/sc2proleague/c/1867476 Regame: http://www.twitch.tv/sc2proleague/c/1867502 http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012-2013_Proleague/Round_2 How would I go about editing the VOD in? On January 26 2013 18:08 salle wrote: I'd add it and let there be 6 vods, listed chronologically. and then mention it in the notes that are above the vod listing (already mentioning the re-game situation) Ok thanks :D | ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
| ||
|
DanishStarcraft
Denmark67 Posts
I've been trying to contact reviewers/staff in your IRC channel for almost 14 days now, and i haven't had my tournament Liquipedia page reviewed since the 13th of january. Is it possible anyone could take a look at it? http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/DanishStarcraft.com_2013_Winter | ||
|
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
On January 26 2013 21:31 DanishStarcraft wrote: Hello. I've been trying to contact reviewers/staff in your IRC channel for almost 14 days now, and i haven't had my tournament Liquipedia page reviewed since the 13th of january. Is it possible anyone could take a look at it? http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/DanishStarcraft.com_2013_Winter It's done (by conti) On IRC we're watching MKP vs Life, please give us a bit more than 5 minutes next time for IRC we take the relay part very literally. | ||
|
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
| ||
|
fookh
France3 Posts
I was browsing liquipedia when i found out a mistake : the photo of xMusica shown on his profile is not him. I wanted to clear this myself but i couldn't find how to. I'm not really used to the stuff used in the editing. So, here is the link : http://wiki.teamliquid.net/dota2/XMusiCa And you can find real picture of him here : http://www.eclypsia.com/uploads/media/user_avatar/0001/03/thumb_2708_user_avatar_normal.jpeg or http://play.gosugamers.net/uploads/images/albums/the-international-official/4789-1346313842.jpg thanks | ||
|
MChrome
Netherlands201 Posts
What about adding a short section about each player's playstyle to their articles? Some players have this kind of section (Qxc for example), others only have something mentioned in passing (MarineKing) but most have nothing at all - Maybe someone already started doing this at some point but it dropped it. I personally think it would add a lot of "value" to have a small section explaining the ingame personality of each player, their general style and their generally used builds, or even their influence on the scene (like with Mvp). It also helps newer players get a sense of "who" someone is, and will help people in finding more about a certain playstyle they're interested in (making playstyles in general something more standardized, grouping players by it on a new page perhaps?). | ||
|
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
On January 30 2013 21:40 ChromeBallz wrote: This might be a big project, or it might not be, but as a relative newbie i'm not sure i can (or am allowed to) do this myself: What about adding a short section about each player's playstyle to their articles? Some players have this kind of section (Qxc for example), others only have something mentioned in passing (MarineKing) but most have nothing at all - Maybe someone already started doing this at some point but it dropped it. I personally think it would add a lot of "value" to have a small section explaining the ingame personality of each player, their general style and their generally used builds, or even their influence on the scene (like with Mvp). It also helps newer players get a sense of "who" someone is, and will help people in finding more about a certain playstyle they're interested in (making playstyles in general something more standardized, grouping players by it on a new page perhaps?). You're allowed to add things no matter how big the project is, especially if it's very incremental like this would be. It would add a lot of value. and you're more than welcome to do it. Yes we did try to get this going but it was not something that took off, sadly. I know TotalBiscuit once mentioned that this sort of information about players (of all levels) would be among the best to have for casters. I believe it's interesting for everyone though. Playstyle is what sets the players apart from each other and it can be expanded upon to become a much bigger section of a page further down the line. And we tried to get this off the ground ages ago, using texts that had been written for the players participating in TSL 3. | ||
|
MChrome
Netherlands201 Posts
On January 30 2013 21:57 salle wrote: You're allowed to add things no matter how big the project is, especially if it's very incremental like this would be. It would add a lot of value. and you're more than welcome to do it. Yes we did try to get this going but it was not something that took off, sadly. I know TotalBiscuit once mentioned that this sort of information about players (of all levels) would be among the best to have for casters. I believe it's interesting for everyone though. Playstyle is what sets the players apart from each other and it can be expanded upon to become a much bigger section of a page further down the line. And we tried to get this off the ground ages ago, using texts that had been written for the players participating in TSL 3. I'd love to do this, but my knowledge is still at a "tadpole" level.  I can try doing it for some of the players i can kinda guess about, but i think i'd have to try and find people who are more knowledgable about this kind of thing. I might just try and read back over all the GSL previews and recaps, usually there's some snippets about players in there, though that will be quite some reading work...  | ||
|
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
On January 30 2013 22:06 ChromeBallz wrote: I'd love to do this, but my knowledge is still at a "tadpole" level. I can try doing it for some of the players i can kinda guess about, but i think i'd have to try and find people who are more knowledgable about this kind of thing. I might just try and read back over all the GSL previews and recaps, usually there's some snippets about players in there, though that will be quite some reading work... Well you can take notes whenever a high level commentator mentions a player's playstyle. | ||
|
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
| ||
|
MChrome
Netherlands201 Posts
| ||
|
fusefuse
Estonia4644 Posts
| ||
|
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
There's two main category of player pages, those with a chronological structure. and those who have coda a, code s and outside of korea structure. The former is the correct one. | ||
|
nachtkap
Germany197 Posts
-For on going tournaments collapsible/expandable elements that shows the matches coming up in the next 36h (36h because of timezones). I dont think it would clutter up the page either, since usually there arent that many games per day or at once. I think the most I've seen outside of something like dreamhack were 10 games on a single day. If I remember correctly ~75% of those were from tournament qualifiers. -Cosmetic item section for the heros. | ||
| ||
